T/J from A baby has just been made - 02/07/07 09:08 PM
FTS,
I thought it best to create a new thread. I suspect others are going to post and did not want to interfere with Deeply Torn's thread.
I am sorry you too have found yourself in this situation.
Reasonable.
Well I am glad he decided to try and work things out.
I will not comment on the trigger part, I will take your word for it.
I don't have much to say about how OW feels about her "dream child", I do have comments about the stealing comment.
Your H, like me created an expense. Children MUST be taken care of an not be finacilly abandond. I know first hand that CS can be setup in a way that is UNFAIR. There are many example here, but some level of support must be given.
Don't take this as a defence of OW, but an acknowledgement of H's part in this mess. He, like I, have blame to bare. Unfortanly, the liability also spreads to the W and COM's.
I will disagree that OW alone is responsible for OC. For him it is just as much his as it is OW's child and he shares responsibility in that.
I agree.
Nothing wrong with telling the truth. I to will have to answer for what I have done.
However, Your H IS responsible for the outcome of OC just like he is any of the other children.
To walk away from that responsibility makes him a "deadbeat" like any other father that walks away.
There are circumstanses that make it impossable, but attempt should be made.
This however would not apply if OW is married and her H is willing to work things out. Diferent set of rules.
Yes it is devastating to all partys.
Children are children no matter how they got here. The shame of the parents acts should not be transferd to the child. I know it is hard to accept (and maybe you never will), But the OC is the child of your H and the brother or sister to your children that you had with your H.
I do not belive that a W should be forced to have contact with OW or OC if that is her chioce. She is ENTITLED to that choice. At the same time, it is ALSO unreasnable to expect (DEMAND) that a father walk out on his child finacialy and emotionaly.
Some will say that the M comes first, I belive that to applies when both parties are in agreement about continuing the M. But it is not wrong for a man to feel for his children. ALL OF THEM!
In a case where thier is disagrance, then with the expeirance I have went thru, I would sugest a cooling off period
so that focus can be given to the M. If after 6 months to a year or focusing on the M, the H still wants contact and the W will not, then I would question wether the M should continue.
At that point, a decision could be made with a clear mind.
I can name ten off the top of my head. Many post on this very board.
I don't disagree with you entirerly on this. The OC is innocent, but the "primary concern" part you have a point.
Basic needs of OC should be met, then focus on the M.
TH
I thought it best to create a new thread. I suspect others are going to post and did not want to interfere with Deeply Torn's thread.
Quote
deeply torn,
I am brand new to this forum, I don't have any good advice for you. I can tell you that your world has tilted and it will be a long time before it ever feels right, no matter what you do. I was informed that my spouse might have a son. I thought, 17 yrs old? No, 4 months. OW was 40 her 62 yr old sugar daddy wouldn't let her have a baby. Well she found someone she could conive into getting her preg. She used fertility monitoring for birth control. Refused to abort, refused to adopt. When WS didn't get kicked out by me she sued for support.
I am brand new to this forum, I don't have any good advice for you. I can tell you that your world has tilted and it will be a long time before it ever feels right, no matter what you do. I was informed that my spouse might have a son. I thought, 17 yrs old? No, 4 months. OW was 40 her 62 yr old sugar daddy wouldn't let her have a baby. Well she found someone she could conive into getting her preg. She used fertility monitoring for birth control. Refused to abort, refused to adopt. When WS didn't get kicked out by me she sued for support.
I am sorry you too have found yourself in this situation.
Quote
WH loves kids, everyone. He is great father to mine and ours (1 each). The rule is no contact with OW, EVER!!
Reasonable.
Quote
He chose me, mine, and ours. Every support check is a trigger. Every health insurance payment is a trigger. He must choose. It is a lose, lose situation for everyone except the OW.
Well I am glad he decided to try and work things out.
I will not comment on the trigger part, I will take your word for it.
Quote
She is now single raising her dream child, staying home and playing mommy, while stealing from my children. SHE is responsible for the life that OC will grow up in. SHE planned it, SHE chose it.
I don't have much to say about how OW feels about her "dream child", I do have comments about the stealing comment.
Your H, like me created an expense. Children MUST be taken care of an not be finacilly abandond. I know first hand that CS can be setup in a way that is UNFAIR. There are many example here, but some level of support must be given.
Don't take this as a defence of OW, but an acknowledgement of H's part in this mess. He, like I, have blame to bare. Unfortanly, the liability also spreads to the W and COM's.
I will disagree that OW alone is responsible for OC. For him it is just as much his as it is OW's child and he shares responsibility in that.
Quote
I am responsible for me, my children and the future of my marriage.
I agree.
Quote
My FWS is responsible for my children, our marriage not for the outcome of her or the OC. If the OC ever shows up. the truth will be shared.
Nothing wrong with telling the truth. I to will have to answer for what I have done.
However, Your H IS responsible for the outcome of OC just like he is any of the other children.
To walk away from that responsibility makes him a "deadbeat" like any other father that walks away.
There are circumstanses that make it impossable, but attempt should be made.
This however would not apply if OW is married and her H is willing to work things out. Diferent set of rules.
Quote
This is devastating to all involved, especially the innocents, you and your children. The OC cannot be compared to children of previous relationships/marriages.
Yes it is devastating to all partys.
Children are children no matter how they got here. The shame of the parents acts should not be transferd to the child. I know it is hard to accept (and maybe you never will), But the OC is the child of your H and the brother or sister to your children that you had with your H.
Quote
Your husband took them on knowing of them before being involved with you. An OC occurring after your marriage exists, should not exist and it is unreasonable for your WS to ever believe that you could tolerate it in your lives.
I do not belive that a W should be forced to have contact with OW or OC if that is her chioce. She is ENTITLED to that choice. At the same time, it is ALSO unreasnable to expect (DEMAND) that a father walk out on his child finacialy and emotionaly.
Some will say that the M comes first, I belive that to applies when both parties are in agreement about continuing the M. But it is not wrong for a man to feel for his children. ALL OF THEM!
In a case where thier is disagrance, then with the expeirance I have went thru, I would sugest a cooling off period
so that focus can be given to the M. If after 6 months to a year or focusing on the M, the H still wants contact and the W will not, then I would question wether the M should continue.
At that point, a decision could be made with a clear mind.
Quote
If there is such a saint I don't know where they exist.
I can name ten off the top of my head. Many post on this very board.
Quote
The ideas of couselors that the OC is innocent and needs to be a primary concern is wrong!!!!!!!!
I don't disagree with you entirerly on this. The OC is innocent, but the "primary concern" part you have a point.
Basic needs of OC should be met, then focus on the M.
TH