Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044
Quote
Then, move down the line as neccessary to find a balance in the system.

what does this mean?

I agree that corporations should not be able to avoid taxes by those methods. But seriously, what do you mean by the above statement?


Quote
It's time to re-redistribute that money back to the people it was taken from in the first place.

you do realize this is socialism RIGHT? What money was taken from you W2S? I earned what I worked for. Nobody took my money. I spent it as I so choose. If something was too expensive, I moved on...it was a choice.

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Anyone who thinks any corporation pays taxes is sadly mistaken.
The consumer pays the taxes for them.
Raise the corporate taxes, the cost gets passed onto the consumer.
Economics and Business Management 101.

It's all a feel good campaign to buy votes from the masses that think they're suppressed financially.
Rather than products of their own poor financial and social decisions.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by Krazy71
Originally Posted by Pepperband
Quote
It's time to re-redistribute that money back to the people it was taken from in the first place.

Huh?

Whom might that be? And how is that decision to be made?

The MIDDLE CLASS.

Define "middle class".


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
Do I want to see people get more handouts...no, but at the same time, I think our best chance of getting out of the hole this country is in is to elevate the middle class.

But you won't do that by punishing the overachievers. Wealth redistribution ploys [government greed and avarice] never work. When you punish someone they either stop doing the activity that brought on the punishment or they make themselves unavailable for punishment. Anyone who has ever read a history book knows that communism was a huge failure.

Punishing corporations and businesses and wealthy ppl only encourages them to make themselves unavailable to be FLEECED by greedy politicians.

Wealth redistribution is nothing more than FLAGRANT GREED on the part of politicians who want to confiscate the wealth of those who earned it to buy votes. There is nothing "compassionate" about confiscating the wealth of free citizens for your own charitable goals. That is evil.

No government has ever taxed its way to prosperity, so this is a failed notion from the start. The greatest increases in government revenue came from TAX CUTS across the board, not from increasing taxes.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Quote
I think our best chance of getting out of the hole this country is in is to elevate the middle class.

Elevate to what?

Isn't it a classic American ideal to be given the opportunity to raise ourselves up by the merits of our OWN efforts?

Last edited by Pepperband; 10/20/08 11:03 AM.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 614
W
Member
OP Offline
Member
W
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by medc
Quote
Then, move down the line as neccessary to find a balance in the system.

what does this mean?

I agree that corporations should not be able to avoid taxes by those methods. But seriously, what do you mean by the above statement?

It means what it says, we start with corporations and move down the line. If it means balancing taxes to a point which keeps the economy expanding, then that's what we have to do.

Want2Stay


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 614
W
Member
OP Offline
Member
W
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by Pepperband
Quote
I think our best chance of getting out of the hole this country is in is to elevate the middle class.

Elevate to what?

Isn't it a classic American ideal to be given the opportunity to raise ourselves up by the merits of our OWN efforts?

Pep,

Agreed Pep, but that is not possible with stagnant wages that do not even keep pace with inflation let alone rising health care costs.

Want2Stay


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,531
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,531
Originally Posted by medc
seriously, who gives a flying turd about what other faceless people around the world think about this. They will not be paying our taxes or living in our cities.
I could give two [censored] what some European liberal..or Middle Eastern terrorist wannabe thinks.

You better care. If the faceless people around the world, especially in China, call in all your debts, your proverbial flying turd will hit the fan and the American empire will come crashing down.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
It means what it says, we start with corporations and move down the line. If it means balancing taxes to a point which keeps the economy expanding, then that's what we have to do.

Want2Stay

I say we start with GOVERNMENT GREED and hold them accountable. Leave our private citizens alone and get the government pigs away from the trough. Corporations contribute to the economy in a good way, corrupt politicians suck it dry. We need to remove the pigs from the trough and stop the government GREED. That is how the economy will be recovered. Communism failed.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
It means what it says, we start with corporations and move down the line. If it means balancing taxes to a point which keeps the economy expanding, then that's what we have to do.

Want2Stay

I say we start with GOVERNMENT GREED and hold them accountable. Leave our private citizens alone and get the government pigs away from the trough. Corporations contribute to the economy in a good way, corrupt politicians suck it dry. We need to remove the pigs from the trough and stop the government GREED. That is how the economy will be recovered. Communism failed.

Closing loopholes in the tax code and actually forcing corporations to pay their taxes would help trmendously. Right now most of them pay a smaller percentage than I do.


Divorced
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
I say we start with GOVERNMENT GREED and hold them accountable.


You got your talking points wrong, Mel. The theme of the day is "WALL STREET Greed". Didn't McCain pound that into your head enough?


Quote
Corporations contribute to the economy in a good way

Yeah, which is why AIG spent $400K of taxpayer money for an offsite to celebrate their bailout. I guess that did contribute to the economy of the resort... :RollieEyes:

AGG


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
Pep,

Agreed Pep, but that is not possible with stagnant wages that do not even keep pace with inflation let alone rising health care costs.

Want2Stay

So, what exactly are you advocating? Are you saying that "someone else" should pay for middle class health care?

Who?

I know something about health care and the reason for rising costs of health care ... tort reform - tort reform - tort reform !

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Krazy71
Closing loopholes in the tax code and actually forcing corporations to pay their taxes would help trmendously. Right now most of them pay a smaller percentage than I do.

I think the greater threat here is GOVERNMENT pigs at the trough who have great greed for other peoples money. They need to be limited first. We see the the horrendous damage caused by greedy pig democrats in this mortgage meltdown. Limits need to be placed on them FIRST because they are clearly the greater threat. They need to put on trial and brought to justice the same as Ken Lay of Enron.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
Originally Posted by AGoodGuy
Yeah, which is why AIG spent $400K of taxpayer money for an offsite to celebrate their bailout. I guess that did contribute to the economy of the resort... :RollieEyes:

AGG

Don't forget that those guys only went to the resort because they were given the chance to earn a living by that philanthropic entity, AIG.


Divorced
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 558
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 558
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
Originally Posted by medc
Quote
Then, move down the line as neccessary to find a balance in the system.

what does this mean?

I agree that corporations should not be able to avoid taxes by those methods. But seriously, what do you mean by the above statement?

It means what it says, we start with corporations and move down the line. If it means balancing taxes to a point which keeps the economy expanding, then that's what we have to do.

Want2Stay

What is wrong with everyone being taxed the same regardless of income or social status, etc.

What about 10%(or whatever) tax across the board, that way we ALL pay our fair share? This should apply to EVERYONE!

Do you really think that by over-taxing those over $250k and corporations, etc that it will solve the problem?



Me46
FWH42
Married 19 yrs
EA 4/07 - 4/08
(Confirmed by polygraph that it had not gone PA)
Dday1 4/13/08
Dday2 8/8/08
S26
S16
D10
Trying to Recover
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
Originally Posted by JoJo422
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
Originally Posted by medc
Quote
Then, move down the line as neccessary to find a balance in the system.

what does this mean?

I agree that corporations should not be able to avoid taxes by those methods. But seriously, what do you mean by the above statement?

It means what it says, we start with corporations and move down the line. If it means balancing taxes to a point which keeps the economy expanding, then that's what we have to do.

Want2Stay

What is wrong with everyone being taxed the same regardless of income or social status, etc.

What about 10%(or whatever) tax across the board, that way we ALL pay our fair share? This should apply to EVERYONE!

Do you really think that by over-taxing those over $250k and corporations, etc that it will solve the problem?

I think some sort of flat tax is a good idea, but it won't happen.

Corporations use CPAs and loopholes to get out of paying anywhere near the McCain-advertised corporate tax rate of 35%.

With a flat tax, no more loopholes for anyone.


Divorced
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Again, corporations do not pay taxes.
Any taxes.
Their customers pay the taxes for them.
Why does anyone want to punish the consumer any more?

Business management 101.

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,108
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,108
Originally Posted by JoJo422
Originally Posted by Want2Stay
Originally Posted by medc
Quote
Then, move down the line as neccessary to find a balance in the system.

what does this mean?

I agree that corporations should not be able to avoid taxes by those methods. But seriously, what do you mean by the above statement?

It means what it says, we start with corporations and move down the line. If it means balancing taxes to a point which keeps the economy expanding, then that's what we have to do.

Want2Stay

What is wrong with everyone being taxed the same regardless of income or social status, etc.

What about 10%(or whatever) tax across the board, that way we ALL pay our fair share? This should apply to EVERYONE!

Do you really think that by over-taxing those over $250k and corporations, etc that it will solve the problem?

I agree, but that will never happen until there is a serious tax revolt in this country. The greedy government is never going to give up the $$$$.

How did this thread go from Colin Powell to taxes? stickout


BW - me
exWH - serial cheater
2 awesome kids
Divorced 12/2011




Many a good man has failed because he had a wishbone where his backbone should have been.

We gain strength, and courage, and confidence by each experience in which we really stop to look fear in the face... we must do that which we think we cannot.
--------Eleanor Roosevelt
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
We see the the horrendous damage caused by greedy pig democrats in this mortgage meltdown.

Of course, the Republicans had nothing to do with the current crisis... Keep telling yourself that...

AGG


Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
Originally Posted by Krazy71
Originally Posted by AGoodGuy
Yeah, which is why AIG spent $400K of taxpayer money for an offsite to celebrate their bailout. I guess that did contribute to the economy of the resort... :RollieEyes:

AGG

Don't forget that those guys only went to the resort because they were given the chance to earn a living by that philanthropic entity, AIG.

Of course wink . They went there to stimulate the economy!

AGG


Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 148 guests, and 73 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Ardent Center, Lost@1969, Jmoor9090, Confused1980, Bibbyryan860
71,843 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5