Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 19 of 27 1 2 17 18 19 20 21 26 27
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
K
Member
Member
K Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
Quote
I agree with just turning WH over to Steve. I know that my wayward-o-meter is probably all out of whack. I would not trust my instincts with the WS. Let SH sniff out the bull and get a cliff notes report.


Jean - Hi! I missed your post earlier..Thanks for checking in. I'm going to have to sleep on this one. What a mess!!

Mel - Perhaps I should give WH the number to Harley's show & let him figure it out himself!! Just kidding with that....

I believe I"m off to bed....Have a good night!

Kim


D-Day May 14th, 2005
Married 16 Years
DS age 8
6 months Plan A
Plan B 10-11-05, H moved back in June 2007, Very False Recovery.
2nd Day-Day 7/7/08 Kicked WH Out.
Plan B for my sanity
"Enjoy the little things, for one day you may look back and realize they were the big things." Robert Brault
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Quote
Mel - you are one hard @$$.

Well, it won't hurt anything if you do counsel with SH, but I don't think he is ready. And I don't think SH will allow you to settle for crumbs either. But the reason I am a hard [email]a@@[/email] is because I can recognize a bullshi**er a mile off and this SMELLS to high heaven, Kim. I also have seen the UTTER HE11 that other BS's have gone through in false recoveries. The he11 of a false recovery, because a BS settled for FOOLS GOLD, is usually worse than D-Day.

You have been through ****** enough. If you are just patient and persistent, you will get what you NEED.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
K
Member
Member
K Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
Quote
Kim, why are you backing down here? He is throwing you crumbs again. He has agreed to nothing except possibly counseling with SH.



Alright, let's slow down then. You are right. I don't even know the letter exists except that he has told me so. Next step is to actually see the letter. So, that will be my text message for tomorrow.

"WH, I need to see the letter."

Kim

Last edited by kimberly234; 03/13/06 10:22 PM.

D-Day May 14th, 2005
Married 16 Years
DS age 8
6 months Plan A
Plan B 10-11-05, H moved back in June 2007, Very False Recovery.
2nd Day-Day 7/7/08 Kicked WH Out.
Plan B for my sanity
"Enjoy the little things, for one day you may look back and realize they were the big things." Robert Brault
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 833
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 833
I don't have anything to add... just wanted to check in and say hi, Kim!


(Formerly SadMommy05) BS, 29 (me) XH, 27 DD, 1 M, 2001 high school sweethearts OW, 36, divorcee, "we have a friendship people can't understand" WH left out of the blue 9/5/2005 I filed 11/1/2005 D finalized 6/20/06 XH and OW married 1/6/07. Ugh!
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
K
Member
Member
K Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
Quote
But the reason I am a hard [email]a@@[/email] is because I can recognize a bullshi**er a mile off and this SMELLS to high heaven, Kim. I also have seen the UTTER HE11 that other BS's have gone through in false recoveries.


Gotcha. And I meant that in a good way.

Hi SadMommy!!

Kim


D-Day May 14th, 2005
Married 16 Years
DS age 8
6 months Plan A
Plan B 10-11-05, H moved back in June 2007, Very False Recovery.
2nd Day-Day 7/7/08 Kicked WH Out.
Plan B for my sanity
"Enjoy the little things, for one day you may look back and realize they were the big things." Robert Brault
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
I know ya did. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
K
Member
Member
K Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,200
Mel -

did you see my thoughts about texting WH tomorrow - you suggested it earlier, about asking him for a copy of the letter?

Kim


D-Day May 14th, 2005
Married 16 Years
DS age 8
6 months Plan A
Plan B 10-11-05, H moved back in June 2007, Very False Recovery.
2nd Day-Day 7/7/08 Kicked WH Out.
Plan B for my sanity
"Enjoy the little things, for one day you may look back and realize they were the big things." Robert Brault
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Kim, why not just set up the appt with SH and text him the time? You have stated your conditions and he still disrespects them.

You told him nc until those conditions are met and you should stick to that. Have SH discuss this with him and get SH's feedback.

Your H just threw you another nothing crumb and expects you to just drop your conditions after you have clearly stated them. There is no reason to continually debate, discuss, and reiterate your conditions. He knows them. He wants to take the control back and is manipulating constant contact with you.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,823
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,823
Hi Kim-

Sorry I haven't posted in a while. I still maintain that he want's this to work, he just doesn't understand the reasoning.

Does he have e-mail???

Why don't you suggest that he e-mail you a copy of the letter, and then there'd be no danger of you sending it. Tell him that the NC letter would have to have his signature on it, and that he can call the Other Woman *OW* in the email instead of her name.

Would that work???

God Bless,

-Caren


Always Look For Grace Given, Even in the midst of Grace Denied.

BS-Me 39
WH-37
Together 15 years
Married 12 years
7 kids total, His: SD20, SS18, Twin SS's 16.
Mine: DD22, DD15
Ours: DD12
Affair began Fall 04, Separated Fall 04,2 Failed Plan B attempts, False recovery of sorts Spring 05.......Still pluggin' away.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 17,837
O
Member
Member
O Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 17,837
Quote
Quote
Kim, why are you backing down here? He is throwing you crumbs again. He has agreed to nothing except possibly counseling with SH.



Alright, let's slow down then. You are right. I don't even know the letter exists except that he has told me so. Next step is to actually see the letter. So, that will be my text message for tomorrow.

"WH, I need to see the letter."

Kim

U r still talkin' to a fog head so howz about a bito' babble.

Instead of "WH, I need to see the letter."

Try: WH, would like to see the letter so I can make a decision.

<img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> That'll give him some umph incentive....he has no idea which way your decsion w/b and you need to keep him guessing. Work his gray cells. LOL!!! <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />

L.

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
Quote
Kim, why not just set up the appt with SH and text him the time? You have stated your conditions and he still disrespects them.

You told him nc until those conditions are met and you should stick to that. Have SH discuss this with him and get SH's feedback.


I agree 100% with this plan as suggested by ML...


I made it happen..a joyful life..filled with peace, contentment, happiness and fabulocity.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Mimi, take a gander at this note exchange below and you will see why I am so leery. She clearly told him NOT TO CONTACT HER unless these conditions were met and he responds that he won't honor that. He doesn't honor any of her conditions and still believes that he has the leverage to set the conditions of his return. Example, he refuses to give her the nc letter "but would like to have counseling first." Meaning that he is hopeful that a counselor will side with him and not make him send the letter. He wants Kim to ask Dr Harley if his method is ok, he doesn't care what Kim requires and doesn't grasp that this is a non negotiable point. And he refuses to allow the OWH to see it. because he is still trying to keep this all a big secret. No doubt to make his continued pursuit of OW easier.

I do think that SH will be able to flush out his BS, but I don't think this is ANY indication that he is prepared to come back because he is not willing to meet her conditions. I think it's important that she stick to what she said and not speak to him until those conditions are met, lest she ruin her credibiity with him. He has been using these negotiations to draw her out of Plan B and endlessly debate her conditions. That has to stop, IMO.

KIM [note sent last weekend]:

WH -

Your choices have put me in a position where there is no trust. Trust has everything to do with a M and finances. Successfully merging your finances in marriage requires honesty, communication, flexibility and trust. I would never consider entering into any financial agreement with you until trust is restored in our marriage after a successful reconciliation. A sincere commitment to our marriage and repairing the damage is required for reconciliation.


Here are the steps that need to happen in order for us to move forward:
1 - I need to see a copy of the letter you have written to OW. If I agree with what you have written, then it needs to be mailed together with a copy sent to OWH.
2 - Counseling with Steve Harley.
3 - A committment to the Marriage Builders four rules of Protection.

When you can tell me you are ready for this, let me know. I am not interested in negotiating. Please don't contact me again until you can.


WH [note sent yesterday]

: "I don't know how we can communicate if you won't speak to me. I have written the letter to OW/you but I would like to have the counseling session first. The letter cannot be mailed and end up in the wrong hands. I will not be responsbile for any ammunition ending up in OWH's hands. As long as the message is delivered to OW - and it is approved by you. Why don't you ask Steve or Dr. Harley if this would work. Otherwise, I don't have a problem meeting your requirments. OW did what you asked her to do - now I am doing what you are asking. I want to be a functioning family again. Love, WH."


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,197
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,197
When was the last time Kim spoke to OWH's?


Me-41 BS (FWS)
DH-41 WS (FBS)
2DD's- 10 and 12
Married 15 years
Separated for 2 years after my A
Reconciled for 1 year before his A
D-day for his A 8/23/05
WH moved out 9/16/05
Divorce final 1/23/07
Affair ended or month or so later
My Story
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
I believe she emailed him back in late December, early January. It probably would be a good idea to inform him of these latest developments and ask him if anything else is going on.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
If she has already spoken to the OMW once, that is enough

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
oops, sorry, OWH

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Quote
If she has already spoken to the OMW once, that is enough

No, its not. They should stay in constant contact until the affair is ended. And often afterwards to compare notes and ENSURE the affair is over.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
I guess we have to agree to disagree

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
sfjaj, the purpose of contacting the OP's spouse is to kill the affair and make sure it stays dead; however many calls that may take. There is no "one call" standard.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 476
I am speaking from the perspective of a FWW; there comes a point where the BS efforts look desperate to the WS,and that most definitely pushes the other away. Initial exposure to kill the A, but further efforts do nothing to appeal to the WS.

Page 19 of 27 1 2 17 18 19 20 21 26 27

Moderated by  Fordude 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 300 guests, and 92 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
louischan, elongrimer, finnbentley, implementsheep, rafaelakutch
72,046 Registered Users
Latest Posts
Three Times A Charm
by still seeking - 08/09/25 01:31 PM
How important is it to get the whole story?
by still seeking - 07/24/25 01:29 AM
Annulment reconsideration help
by abrrba - 07/21/25 03:05 PM
Help: I Don't Like Being Around My Wife
by abrrba - 07/21/25 03:01 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics133,625
Posts2,323,525
Members72,047
Most Online6,102
Jul 3rd, 2025
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 2025, Marriage Builders, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0