Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 59 of 160 1 2 57 58 59 60 61 159 160
sdguy038 #1783238 10/17/07 04:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,155
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,155
First, get your meds checked. Although that seems like a crap shoot most of the time....and keep in mind that meds won't address everything. You'll just have to make it through.

Second.....I SOO hear you on the "this is all so stupid" front. My words exactly as I sat crying in my co-worker's office yesterday.

Fighting over OUR children that we brought into this world together in love.

Fighting over where they will be and when and for how long.

Fighting over what's best for them....with someone who is perfectly willing to destroy the security of their intact family and all the advantages that brings to children.

It's not just stupid, it's absurd. And sickening (thus the Ensure and Xanax dinner).

And I have the same issues IRL. And it's true. We ARE better off without the-person-that-is-now. Do not forget that.

At the same time, we recognize that our CHILDREN are NOT better off...even with the-person-who-is-now. THEY still deserve to security and advantages of an intact family.

And we crave that for them. We want so desperately to be able to give them that gift....and cannot believe that their other parent has no interest in giving them that most precious of all gifts, too.

Therein lies the rub.

Arrrgh....TJing again.

We are on the exact same place in the roller coaster again. I am so sick of this ride.

LilSis #1783239 10/17/07 05:16 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,900
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,900
Oh boy.. do I feel that pain acutely.

Especially in the midst of my own temporary custody battle.. and that's just to decide what happens while we work on getting unmarried.. which I don't want to do in the first place!

Yes.. it's frustrating, it's absurd, and it's -wrong-. But it is what IS.. not what SHOULD BE.

I was actually fairly peaceful today before reading this post, and it reminded me why I am really so distraught over the whole thing. It doesn't make sense to any rational human being. It won't, and you already know that.

Sometimes we aren't dealt the hand we want, but God wants us to play it out until the end. Win or lose, we've got the hand we have for a reason. We simply have to make the best of it.


As far as the kids go, I look at it this way. Consistency is key for -anything- having to do with the children. If the court sees you waffling it will look far worse on you than if you are focused on providing as much stability, consistency, and spending as much time as you possibly can with your kids. Now in and of itself the 'full weekends' are probably going to be seen as pretty trivial to the court. If she wants to litigate for full weekends, let her. If she gets them, fine.. but she's going to have to pay for it.. but the court is probably going to look at it this way: Am I going to see this woman in here every time she wants to have an extra day here and there with the kids? Am I going to have to -constantly- change this agreement that she now cannot agree to?

I find it just as likely that a good judge will tell her: This is what you agreed to, this is what the court ordered. This is how it is.

See Guy Smiley.. SHE is resisting what IS in favor of what she thinks SHOULD BE.. now... we all know where that leads.


Me - 32
DS - 5
DD - 13
DSD - 9
D final 12-8-08
Jamesus #1783240 10/17/07 07:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,828
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,828
I hear ya!!

Quote
Why am I still doing this? I'm just about out of people in RL to talk to--all of my regulars (including my IC to some extent) just want to shake me and say "IT'S OVER. ACCEPT IT and GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE." and "You're so much better off without her."


Oh yea,,,,am in the same place on this, too! That's why it's so great to have MB all all here.

Remember, you are doing this because you are living YOUR truth and defending what is Right. Doing what is Right is often the opposite of doing what is Easy! Hang in there and confirm in your mind that your motives are in alignment.

Check your meds, run around the block, punch the bag,,,,,but don't let this OVERWHELM you! You know how to work through this kind of phase. You can do it!


BS (me)
ExWS -Drac
DD 9
DSS 15
D Day 11/06
Divorced 10/01/07

"You Can't Fix Stupid" - My Mom
Bugsmom #1783241 10/17/07 10:50 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Quote
Arrrgh....TJing again.

No, not a TJ, Sis. Eloquently describing the thoughts that are in my head. Absurd is the right word.

Thanks, James and Bugs.

I still haven't decided how to respond.

sdguy038 #1783242 10/17/07 11:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
Quote
(Which one am I again, Fox, the pot or the kettle?)


Six of one, 1/2 dozen of the other. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

FWIW, I'd stick with the plan as you have it now if it is working for you and the kids. If she wants more, let her litigate for it.

She doesn't have to like it.....this certainly isn't what YOU chose. She could have been with them 100% of the time.

Take it from someone who knows.....if you are kind and try to work with her on these things, she'll just push for more and expect you to give in. Then a precedent is set. If you did it once, why couldn't you do it again, and again, and again.

Negotating trades opens the door for more communication...and reasons for her to get to you.

Maybe just a simple "no thank you. The schedule we have is working"

But then again....I'm just the pot (or the kettle).

Fox

sdguy038 #1783243 10/17/07 11:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Quote
I still haven't decided how to respond.

Just to clarify, I'm NOT considering giving in because she is demanding it. What I'm mulling is

Agree to the trade because

--I could use the weekend to travel and see my friends and family--I was already thinking about taking this trip.
--Being agreeable now makes her more likely to be agreeable in a final settlement (which is also in the air right now)
--Fighting over stuff like this is against my nature

Refuse the trade because

--She will use the time to take the kids on a trip with the OM
--She was manipulative and then demanding in how she approached it. It's offensive to me, and I don't want to give in to those kinds of tactics.
--Giving in on this feels like accepting and even condoning her adultery.

sdguy038 #1783244 10/17/07 11:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
Quote
Being agreeable now makes her more likely to be agreeable in a final settlement


A REASONABLE person might think that way. Will she? I'm not sure I'd count on this.

Quote
--Fighting over stuff like this is against my nature


Sorry....can't relate to this one. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" /> Actually, I guess, I can relate. Fighting over stuff like this stuff with H is foreign to me and not something I like to do. Fighting over stuff like this against the ALIEN is in my nature. Protection of my children from outsiders, including WH, is a must.

"Fighting" about it shows the children that it is NOT ok and you do not agree with what goes on with OM. If Dad's agreeable, why wouldn't the kids learn that this is all ok?

Quote
Refuse the trade because

--She will use the time to take the kids on a trip with the OM
--She was manipulative and then demanding in how she approached it. It's offensive to me, and I don't want to give in to those kinds of tactics.
--Giving in on this feels like accepting and even condoning her adultery.


I'm on board with these. Why are these reasons not good enough?

Fox

Last edited by wildhorses74; 10/17/07 11:19 AM.
wildhorses74 #1783245 10/17/07 11:31 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
Quote
Being agreeable now makes her more likely to be agreeable in a final settlement (which is also in the air right now)


I wouldn't assume anything about the future here, guy. Don't slip back and allow assumptions to mar your thinking. If you give her the weekend, she will just keep pushing, because to her it is a TRADE, not a favor, and she will OWE you nothing.

I would never assume that you being nice is going to win you anything in the end. Go for what you want and stick to it, even if you want to go and see your friends, it may be in the childrens' best interest for you to stay home this time.

Why are you afraid of your anger? If you were saying anything hideous above, we would call you on it. Why would you expose your kids to OM any more than you have to? It's sound thinking, guy.


Me-BS-38
Married 1997; son, 8yo
Divorced April 2009
silentlucidity #1783246 10/17/07 12:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
Priority 1: Protect the kids for as long as you can.

Priority 2: Protect yourself.

Priority 318,672: Be agreeable and therefore enable her affair.

Quote
Refuse the trade because

--She will use the time to take the kids on a trip with the OM [color:"red"]Yep[/color]
--She was manipulative and then demanding in how she approached it. It's offensive to me, and I don't want to give in to those kinds of tactics.OM [color:"red"]Yep[/color]

--Giving in on this feels like accepting and even condoning her adultery.OM [color:"red"]Yep[/color]


Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
sdguy038 #1783247 10/17/07 12:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,862
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,862
SD,

You don't have to reply right away.

Just sit on it a while.

Let her wait for an answer.

~ Marsh

Marshmallow #1783248 10/17/07 12:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
Quote
SD,

You don't have to reply right away.

Just sit on it a while.

Let her wait for an answer.

~ Marsh

[color:"red"]Yep[/color]


Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
Marshmallow #1783249 10/17/07 12:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
Why not reply,

"Well since you put it that way, why don't we just leave the schedule as the court ruled. Maybe later we can get to a place where we can discuss the children with their best interest in mind."

Hmmm?


Widowed 11/10/12 after 35 years of marriage
*********************
“In a sense now, I am homeless. For the home, the place of refuge, solitude, love-where my husband lived-no longer exists.” Joyce Carolyn Oates, A Widow's Story
princessmeggy #1783250 10/17/07 12:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,900
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,900
I think PM has struck oil with this answer.


Me - 32
DS - 5
DD - 13
DSD - 9
D final 12-8-08
Jamesus #1783251 10/17/07 01:03 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
I like princessmeggy's thought on this, too. It makes sense. [color:"red"] YEP [/color]


Me-BS-38
Married 1997; son, 8yo
Divorced April 2009
silentlucidity #1783252 10/17/07 01:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
[color:"red"]Yep Yep[/color]


Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
chrisner #1783253 10/17/07 01:17 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
Hmmmm.....I HATE to be the one to disagree BUT....

should she really be asked a question "why don't we". She may have plenty of reasons why she doesn't want to do that. Why open the door for more discussion? Is it up for negotiation or does sdguy have the say?

He can still be kind...."since you put it that way, I'd like to keep the arrangement....etc"

Don't give her an opportunity to slip in those cracks and argue her point. Her point doesn't matter....yours and the children's points do matter.

Fox

wildhorses74 #1783254 10/17/07 01:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
Wild, you make a great point. No sense in opening that door, even a crack.


Widowed 11/10/12 after 35 years of marriage
*********************
“In a sense now, I am homeless. For the home, the place of refuge, solitude, love-where my husband lived-no longer exists.” Joyce Carolyn Oates, A Widow's Story
wildhorses74 #1783255 10/17/07 01:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Thanks, everyone, for all the input.

I had been thinking about responses like what you suggested, PM, but I was wondering whether it might be too much interaction (there are subtexts in it). At least, I think that's what I would have told the Kettle (I mean Fox) if I had seen her write it.

How about this?

"Since you put it that way, I think I choose to keep the court-appointed schedule this time and not trade Sundays."

sdguy038 #1783256 10/17/07 01:46 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
Don't "think", Pot, be firm.

"Since you put it that way, I choose to keep the court-appointed schedule this time and not trade Sundays"

Don't show weakness....she's a piranha and will smell blood.

Be kind...but be firm.

Kettle (Fox)

wildhorses74 #1783257 10/17/07 02:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Okay.

What does it say about these situations that we would be better off if the WS had died? I'm not sure that my kids wouldn't be better off if the SCQ had died.

I feel lousy. On the bright side, I can feel the pounds coming off.

Page 59 of 160 1 2 57 58 59 60 61 159 160

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 213 guests, and 51 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Gastelumattorney, Demonolatry, Jose E. Martin, Frank Pro, annonymous
71,895 Registered Users
Latest Posts
Really Struggling
by BrainHurts - 11/15/24 03:48 PM
20 appointments and $1000’s later…
by IrishGreen - 10/30/24 06:20 PM
Happening again
by jah - 10/29/24 10:00 AM
I grounded my wife - am I proceeding correctly?
by Mature - 10/27/24 02:05 PM
Children
by BrainHurts - 10/19/24 03:02 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics133,615
Posts2,323,460
Members71,895
Most Online3,185
Jan 27th, 2020
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 2024, Marriage Builders, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5