|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
[color:"red"]available on the MB bookstore[/color]
Defending Traditional Marriage: It Starts with You
Why does traditional marriage need to be defended?
Traditional marriage is a permanent and sexually exclusive relationship of extraordinary care between one man and one woman.
But marriage, as defined this way, has been under attack for more than seventy-five years, and if you're married--or planning to be--that's not good news. In fact, those attacking traditional marriage have been winning. Why? And what can be done about it?
Willard F. Harley, Jr., Ph.D. believes you can not only protect your own family from falling prey to these legal and cultural attacks but also help reverse the trend that characterizes today's marriage-unfriendly culture.
Historically, traditional marriage has provided two primary advantages over any other relationships: safety and stability. If either of these advantages is undermined, the success of an entire society is threatened. With heated sanctity-of-marriage debates swirling around us, whose responsibility is it to defend what's left of traditional marriage?
According to Dr. Harley, "It starts with you."
Order your copy today!
(2005, Paperback - 256 pages)
Retail $12.99 - Your Price $9.74 (Save 25%) Defending Traditional Marriage (Paperback) In Stock - Available Now!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539 |
Faith
me: FWW/BS 52 H: FWH/BS 49 DS 30 DD 21 DS 15 OCDS 8
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069 |
Reporting for duty! <salutes>
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 799
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 799 |
Pep,
Thanks for the new resource. I do admire your posts and great advice (not to mention, your sense of humor).
AKA
VowsRSacred/ VRS
Me 44 WH 46
dd Mar 7 06
Dday 2 Jan 19 07 EA and PA
DD 19
DS 10
DS 7
DD 4
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
since this is HARLEY'S site
we might as well promote the HARLEY values
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
"Traditional marriage is a permanent and sexually exclusive relationship of extraordinary care between one man and one woman."
permanent.... it takes a BUYER and another BUYER
sexually exclusive .... go wild sexually ~at home~ with your beloved
extraordinary care .... never be the cause of your spouse's unhappiness
one man and one woman .... no farm animals
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735 |
So, those who have gone down the road of swinging are doomed to ******? Should there be a "Swingers DO NOT ENTER, we don't your kind here" message at the top of this website?
Maybe they truly do want guidance and the tools to stop the vicious cycle. What makes helping them different from helping a couple who both have strayed and want to change? Or a couple where the WS has had more than one affair?
Who are we to say that someone's M is doomed or not? We are just a bunch of people with a common thread on a message board... although some seem be self proclaimed "experts" on all things marriage related.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
If someone does not value TRADITIONAL marriage, as outlined by the Harley's ... this program will be minimally helpful because it will not make sense to them
I am simply pro TRADITIONAL marriage
and peace be with those with other/different values ... their journey is not so kind
and their ability to absorb the Harley methods is very very limited
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
familycomesfirst
when you argue an exaggerated version of my position ... that is called strawman fallacy ... no one pays attention
when you argue about "me" and attack "me" instead of my position... that is ad hominem fallacy .... and no one pays attention
if you stick to discussing the actual words I've stated in my position (or Harley's words which I've quoted) it would elevate the nature of this discourse and many would pay attention
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,179
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,179 |
I feel no need to try and defend the swinger lifestyle.
I am not a swinger.
A smooth sea never made a skilled mariner. ~ English proverb Neak's Story
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699 |
If someone does not value TRADITIONAL marriage, as outlined by the Harley's ... this program will be minimally helpful because it will not make sense to them
I am simply pro TRADITIONAL marriage
and peace be with those with other/different values ... their journey is not so kind
and their ability to absorb the Harley methods is very very limited I definitely agree that there would be a disconnect between Harley's methods and a marriage that includes consensual polyamory. But do you really think there are limitations to applying MB principles in a same-sex marriage? It seems to me they would apply just as well in a marriage of two men (or of two women) as in a marriage of one man and one woman. But maybe I'm forgetting something . . .?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
Just quoting Harley's position , kiddo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,808
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,808 |
The Book is called HIS Needs HER Needs - seems to say one man- one woman.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816 |
= polygamy. Just say no. -ol' 2long
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816 |
But do you really think there are limitations to applying MB principles in a same-sex marriage? It seems to me they would apply just as well in a marriage of two men (or of two women) as in a marriage of one man and one woman. Ac2ally, I would tend 2 agree, though I'm not personally of the "gay persuasion." At least it's a committed, one-on-one relationship. Or it could be, I suppose. But it's certainly not "traditional marriage." -ol' 2long
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735 |
You know what, I'm not defending the swingers lifestyle, I have NO DESIRE to be a swinger. What I am defending is a person's right to come here seeking advice and guidance without being immediately labeled as a troll. If someone was a swinger and wants out, they can't find help here?
I just don't see the difference, maybe I'm too kind. But if it feels good for you to bash them for their faults, well this is America after all.
This dead horse has been beaten enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
But if it feels good for you to bash them for their faults, well this is America after all. ad hominem
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
position discussion If someone was a swinger and wants out, they can't find help here? unless they convert completely, and buy into the one-man-one-woman-permanently-excluding-all-others standard on which Harley wrote his concepts ... it is a wrong fit
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699 |
Pep,
I know you are quoting Harley's position. I presumed your remarks that I quoted above were in response to familyfirst's remark on "swinging." So I was just asking you to whether the remarks applied to another non-traditional marriage.
But now that I re-read the thread, I can see that it's not certain you were responding to directly to familyfirst and the swinging issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
I can see that it's not certain you were responding to directly to familyfirst and the swinging issue. I am suggesting we all go out and purchase Harley's book DEFENDING TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE and return for a rousing lively informed discussion ! <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I have not read this book I plan to it was recommended to me by another MBer (who has not finished it)
|
|
|
0 members (),
61
guests, and
129
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|