Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 9 10
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
[color:"red"]available on the MB bookstore[/color]


Defending Traditional Marriage:
It Starts with You


Why does traditional marriage need to be defended?

Traditional marriage is a permanent and sexually exclusive relationship of extraordinary care between one man and one woman.

But marriage, as defined this way, has been under attack for more than seventy-five years, and if you're married--or planning to be--that's not good news. In fact, those attacking traditional marriage have been winning. Why? And what can be done about it?

Willard F. Harley, Jr., Ph.D. believes you can not only protect your own family from falling prey to these legal and cultural attacks but also help reverse the trend that characterizes today's marriage-unfriendly culture.

Historically, traditional marriage has provided two primary advantages over any other relationships: safety and stability. If either of these advantages is undermined, the success of an entire society is threatened. With heated sanctity-of-marriage debates swirling around us, whose responsibility is it to defend what's left of traditional marriage?

According to Dr. Harley, "It starts with you."

Order your copy today!


(2005, Paperback - 256 pages)

Retail $12.99 - Your Price $9.74 (Save 25%)
Defending Traditional Marriage (Paperback)
In Stock - Available Now!

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!


Faith

me: FWW/BS 52 H: FWH/BS 49
DS 30
DD 21
DS 15
OCDS 8
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069
Reporting for duty! <salutes>


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 799
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 799
Pep,

Thanks for the new resource. I do admire your posts and great advice (not to mention, your sense of humor).


AKA VowsRSacred/ VRS Me 44 WH 46 dd Mar 7 06 Dday 2 Jan 19 07 EA and PA DD 19 DS 10 DS 7 DD 4
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
since this is HARLEY'S site

we might as well promote the HARLEY values

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
"Traditional marriage is a permanent and sexually exclusive relationship of extraordinary care between one man and one woman."

permanent.... it takes a BUYER and another BUYER

sexually exclusive .... go wild sexually ~at home~ with your beloved

extraordinary care .... never be the cause of your spouse's unhappiness

one man and one woman .... no farm animals

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
So, those who have gone down the road of swinging are doomed to ******? Should there be a "Swingers DO NOT ENTER, we don't your kind here" message at the top of this website?

Maybe they truly do want guidance and the tools to stop the vicious cycle. What makes helping them different from helping a couple who both have strayed and want to change? Or a couple where the WS has had more than one affair?

Who are we to say that someone's M is doomed or not? We are just a bunch of people with a common thread on a message board... although some seem be self proclaimed "experts" on all things marriage related.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
If someone does not value TRADITIONAL marriage, as outlined by the Harley's ... this program will be minimally helpful because it will not make sense to them

I am simply pro TRADITIONAL marriage

and peace be with those with other/different values ... their journey is not so kind

and their ability to absorb the Harley methods is very very limited

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
familycomesfirst

when you argue an exaggerated version of my position ... that is called strawman fallacy ... no one pays attention

when you argue about "me" and attack "me" instead of my position... that is ad hominem fallacy .... and no one pays attention

if you stick to discussing the actual words I've stated in my position (or Harley's words which I've quoted) it would elevate the nature of this discourse and many would pay attention

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,179
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,179
I feel no need to try and defend the swinger lifestyle.

I am not a swinger.


A smooth sea never made a skilled mariner.
~ English proverb



Neak's Story
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699
Quote
If someone does not value TRADITIONAL marriage, as outlined by the Harley's ... this program will be minimally helpful because it will not make sense to them

I am simply pro TRADITIONAL marriage

and peace be with those with other/different values ... their journey is not so kind

and their ability to absorb the Harley methods is very very limited

I definitely agree that there would be a disconnect between Harley's methods and a marriage that includes consensual polyamory.

But do you really think there are limitations to applying MB principles in a same-sex marriage? It seems to me they would apply just as well in a marriage of two men (or of two women) as in a marriage of one man and one woman.

But maybe I'm forgetting something . . .?

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Just quoting Harley's position , kiddo

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,808
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,808
The Book is called HIS Needs HER Needs - seems to say one man- one woman.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816
2
Member
Offline
Member
2
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816
Quote
consensual polyamory

= polygamy.

Just say no.

-ol' 2long

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816
2
Member
Offline
Member
2
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,816
Quote
But do you really think there are limitations to applying MB principles in a same-sex marriage? It seems to me they would apply just as well in a marriage of two men (or of two women) as in a marriage of one man and one woman.

Ac2ally, I would tend 2 agree, though I'm not personally of the "gay persuasion." At least it's a committed, one-on-one relationship. Or it could be, I suppose. But it's certainly not "traditional marriage."

-ol' 2long

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
You know what, I'm not defending the swingers lifestyle, I have NO DESIRE to be a swinger. What I am defending is a person's right to come here seeking advice and guidance without being immediately labeled as a troll. If someone was a swinger and wants out, they can't find help here?

I just don't see the difference, maybe I'm too kind. But if it feels good for you to bash them for their faults, well this is America after all.

This dead horse has been beaten enough.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Quote
But if it feels good for you to bash them for their faults, well this is America after all.


ad hominem

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
position discussion

Quote
If someone was a swinger and wants out, they can't find help here?


unless they convert completely, and buy into the one-man-one-woman-permanently-excluding-all-others standard on which Harley wrote his concepts ... it is a wrong fit

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 699
Pep,

I know you are quoting Harley's position. I presumed your remarks that I quoted above were in response to familyfirst's remark on "swinging." So I was just asking you to whether the remarks applied to another non-traditional marriage.

But now that I re-read the thread, I can see that it's not certain you were responding to directly to familyfirst and the swinging issue.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Quote
I can see that it's not certain you were responding to directly to familyfirst and the swinging issue.


I am suggesting we all go out and purchase Harley's book

DEFENDING TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE

and return for a rousing lively informed discussion ! <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

I have not read this book

I plan to

it was recommended to me by another MBer (who has not finished it)

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 9 10

Moderated by  Fordude 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 61 guests, and 129 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Debby Woman, Comfortable Shoe, Sourdine, Abela Laye, Ardent Center
71,847 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5