Where it wishes to do the work of God, it becomes not divine, but demonic.

I, Susan Kahrs of California (Burson, to be precise), am of the personal opinion that your post basically provided substantial documentation for my earlier post a day or so ago, and I thank you for it.

Come on...George Bush versus Al Gore. George Bush had NO EXPERIENCE whatsoever especially in comparison to Gore, yet, now, McCain v Obama...experience matters.

This whole "Hitler" thing.... It's fear based marketing since Obama is different (skin color) it is an blantant attempt to play on this fear of something a little different. Instead of blantant racial remarks they are trying to stir the underlying racism in all of us...the fear of our differences. Sneeches come to mind.

Come on...George Bush versus Al Gore. George Bush had NO EXPERIENCE whatsoever especially in comparison to Gore, yet, now, McCain v Obama...experience matters.

There is not a doubt in my mind that this country would be better off today if Gore had won the election in 2000 and anyone that fails to acknowledge that today in hindsight is a _______ (insert insult here).

IMO, LAST NIGHT, John McCain came off as being more CHARISMATIC than OBAMA...

BTW, John McCain stated that his greatest moral failure was the "FAILURE of his FIRST MARRIAGE"...an error of OMISSION????

What is the difference between a WHITE person voting for a WHITE candidate STRICKLY because they are white, or a black person voting for a BLACK candidate simply because they are black? ANSWER: NONE.

Medc: "lilly-white"...OK. MEDC...you DID vote for Bush, right and you don't regret that vote....

in more than just "my opinion" but in fact...

no sense in me debating you until your political opinions mature.

Yes, I can say that there is no difference. I do not condone any type of murder...but to me, there is no difference. Just as there are non violent solutions to the problems facing mothers that seek abortion, there are also non-violent solutions to the abortion issue.

But morally, I see no difference except that in the case of the doctor, they are NOT an innocent....the baby is.

But, the IDEA that dems behave in a more CHristian manner is just silly.

Killing someone else in order to protect innocents is NOT murder

The Golden Rule Defense

The most penetrating Scripture with which to conclude our examination of the duty to defend the unborn is the Second Great Commandment. Christ committed the unborn into your care when He commanded you to love your neighbor as yourself, and applied this teaching in the story of the Good Samaritan. This story teaches that the command to love your neighbor as yourself extends to all your fellow men, especially those in need.

If your limbs were about to be torn from your body, would you defend yourself? If you couldn't, would you want someone else to? The Golden Rule teaches us to put ourselves in the place of others, so as to experience their feelings, and then to act in their behalf. If you were scheduled to be aborted, who would you rather have between you and the abortionist: someone who would intervene with the means necessary to save your life, or someone who, for whatever reason, would not take the action necessary to protect you? If you would want someone to defend you with the immediate means necessary, Christ's teachings require that you do the same for the unborn (according to your abilities and calling in life).

Don't deceive yourself; these children are your responsibility. Christ committed them into your care in the Second Great Commandment. Open your heart to them, spread your blanket over them, and own them as your own. Most of these children have been rejected by their parents; won't you adopt them as your own? Surely there is room in your heart for them.

Will you suffer when they suffer? Will you recoil as they do from the instruments used to dismember them? Rather than standing by as they are put to death, shouldn't we fight and kick for their lives as they do for their own?

Jesus said: “Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends” (John 15:13). If we truly love our unborn neighbors, shouldn't we at least be willing to assert the duty to defend them?

On July 29, 1994, Dr. Ronald E. Graeser, the County Medical Examiner in Fremont, Michigan heard, with the rest of the nation, of my shooting Dr. Britton and his two escorts in Pensacola. Later that day, and in the days that followed, many Christians scrambled to save their reputations and ministries by denouncing the shootings. But Dr. Graeser risked his reputation, and possibly his livelihood, by signing a statement justifying what I had done. Dr. Graeser was not independently wealthy; he had college-aged children and a public position as a medical examiner. Some might say he threw it all away by justifying my actions.

News cameramen soon appeared at his doorstep, and thousands of television viewers saw Dr. Graeser uphold the duty to defend the unborn. This eventually resulted in his finding a new and better job, and joy unspeakable. We don't know how his stand affected everyone, but we do know how it affected one expectant mother who was planning to abort. She changed her mind. Dr. Graeser lost it all, and in doing so, he found it.

No one else was in a position to do as he did. Neither is anyone else in a position to do as you can. But everyone with a reputation, job, or family has been given that life that he might lose it.

Will you lose your life for Christ's little ones? If so, on that day, you will hear Him say, “Come, you who are blessed of My Father. . . Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.” Not everyone should take up arms, but if you believe that abortion is lethal force, you should uphold the force needed to stop it

I think the world would be a much better place if every single doctor out there chose to not do abortions...I would hope because of their morals...but if it is fear that stops them...so be it.