|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
Fred, I would make sure you give her all of her stuff. There is no reason not to other than punishing her. Plan B is not about punishment. It is not a boundary at all because giving her her possessions does not harm you in any way. ML, I'm confused. In my Plan B letter I stated that the next time she came to the house she should bring a moving van. If I fold and give her what she's asking for, aren't I exposing myself as weak and able to be manipulated? Isn't that what she's trying to do? I thought one of the purposes of Plan B was to make the A difficult by exposing to the WS and OP the false reality of the A.
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Fred, wouldn't you agree that she has a right to her stuff? Why would you want to withhold that from her? The method she uses to get it should be her decision as long as it does not involve her coming in the house. I can't think of a single good reason to withhold her possessions from her unless the goal is to just make her mad for no reason. It doesn't help you in any way to make things unneccessarily difficult for her. Plan B is never about not allowing a WS to have their stuff.
On the other hand, it would be gracious of you to make sure she gets the things she needs.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Fred, Plan B is not supposed to be about punishment. It is supposed to be about self protection. It does not harm you in any way to box up her possessions and take them somewhere for her.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
Fred, wouldn't you agree that she has a right to her stuff? Why would you want to withhold that from her? The method she uses to get it should be her decision as long as it does not involve her coming in the house. I can't think of a single good reason to withhold her possessions from her unless the goal is to just make her mad for no reason. It doesn't help you in any way to make things unneccessarily difficult for her. Plan B is never about not allowing a WS to have their stuff.
On the other hand, it would be gracious of you to make sure she gets the things she needs. ML, according to our Separation Agreement, she has six months in which to retrieve her things. I have no desire to withhold anything from her, but I wrote in my Plan B letter The next time you appear at this house it should be with a moving van. I do not care to be inconvenienced by your need to make multiple trips. So, while I think giving her the things she's requested is the "loving" thing to do, I also wonder if it isn't a violation of the boundaries I set for myself, and sends her the message that she can manipulate me? Also, since the NC rule forbids my contacting her, I would have to ask my attorney to contact her. I suppose I could ask a mutual friend to relay the message to her, but I've tried to keep them from getting mixed up in this. We're having the first snow of the season today. I doubt anyone is going anywhere to fetch a few "comfort items" anyway...
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Fred, I understand you don't want to be inconvenienced by multiple requests, so maybe you could have a friend ask her to make arrangements to get it all, but in the meantime, you are willing to box up the requested items THIS ONE TIME because you do want to be accommodating.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
Fred, I understand you don't want to be inconvenienced by multiple requests, so maybe you could have a friend ask her to make arrangements to get it all, but in the meantime, you are willing to box up the requested items THIS ONE TIME because you do want to be accommodating. Thanks, ML. This seems like the right solution. I will ask that she make a list of things she wants -- this one time only -- and will accommodate her by boxing it up and leaving it outside for her to pick up. No LB there, and no break of NC. Gosh, I love this place. And I love you folks (who are obviously more level-headed than I).
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Thanks for listening, Fred. I do understand that you don't want to be hit with never ending requests for this and that. That makes perfect sense.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 639 |
While this thread is active again, I have a question for the veterans:
I've read suggestions given to others to call/contact the OM. No one suggested that to me, but I did send him a copy of the Plan B letter with the P.S. to him, per SAA.
Is it appropriate to contact the OM during Plan B? Or is dark DARK? (I suspect the latter, but I would like the more experienced hands to comment). Fred, Echoing the other vets here, I would not bother contacting the OM. He doesn't give a rat's behind about your feelings, your marriage, or "what's right" (quite obviously!) or he wouldn't be screwing around with a married woman. Contacting him will only hurt you and make you look needy and "still in pursuit" to your WW (you can bet OM will tell her about your contact with him). Don't bother--noting productive can come of it. Sorry....I know you want to vent at that evil individual, just don't waste your energy.
xWW: Secret LTA w/ thrice married OM at her workplace; EA/PA starts ~ 2005-6 Files & completes D - 2007, OM/OMW#3 D - 2007, Affairage - immediately thereafter Disappears in 2006 w/o even a goodbye to anyone, Never a paragraph of real truth ever spoken Me/xBH: M "for life", Suspicions (denied) & desperate Plan A latter-half '06 1st D-day 1/07, full truth D-day 7/08 (all via 3rd parties) NC w/ xWW 8/08-date, better off w/o unrepentant vileness, betrayal, & rampant deceit in my life anymore
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
Yes, I thought that might be the case.
Once again, I'm having a bit of a tough day. It's snowing outside, which limits the things I can do and places I can go. I decided to move her things from the closet in our master bedroom to one of the empty rooms.
Coming across a number of articles of clothing, I remember her and how she looked wearing them. I know this is to be expected, but it's still a bit wracking on the ol' emotional system.
Then I went to Facebook to see if my daughter was online and saw that WW was. I logged off in a hurry.
I can't escape the reminders. I keep telling myself that I'll get through this, but I look at all the things she left behind to go fulfill her fantasy, and I'm saddened all over again.
I thought of going to a movie, but I don't want the fuss of driving on unplowed streets and having to wipe the snow off my car.
So, I'll just keep moving things and coming here during breaks...
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 639 |
Fred,
Regarding the lawyer stuff, I would ignore it. Ignoring her is far more effective than rebutting her arguements/requests logically (I found this out the hard way myself). Even the stuff you "agree with"--just comply as you would have anyway without ever acknowledging that you are doing so or are affected by the contact she made with your attorney.
She asked you to stop writing exposure letters, identify all parties to whom you have done so, apologize for them, and to cease "having her followed" or making her feel financial repercussions. I agree that you shouldn't act vindictively, illegally, or "in pursuit" of her but...
Did you notice how many of her "request items" had something to do with affair-exposure??? Waywards, esp. WWs IMHO, absolutely LOATHE being exposed for their trampy and despicable behavior! I am always amazed how often these people will (privately) claim to be "proud", "so happy", or "have found their true soulmate" regarding their affair, but will react vengefully, accusatorily, and belligerently toward anyone who tells the truth and holds up a mirror for all the world to see!
Hmmmm....I thought your affair was so "special" and "inspirational"? Nonsense! People who truly are honored by and proud of their relationship DON'T try to squelch or "gag-order" its revelation!
Do what you should (as you stated) but don't offer her anything and certainly don't apologize for TELLING THE TRUTH. If she doesn't like the truth, then she shouldn't be living as she is...
xWW: Secret LTA w/ thrice married OM at her workplace; EA/PA starts ~ 2005-6 Files & completes D - 2007, OM/OMW#3 D - 2007, Affairage - immediately thereafter Disappears in 2006 w/o even a goodbye to anyone, Never a paragraph of real truth ever spoken Me/xBH: M "for life", Suspicions (denied) & desperate Plan A latter-half '06 1st D-day 1/07, full truth D-day 7/08 (all via 3rd parties) NC w/ xWW 8/08-date, better off w/o unrepentant vileness, betrayal, & rampant deceit in my life anymore
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 639
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 639 |
My attorney just replied to me, saying that she was obligated to respond to WW in some way, "even if that response is simply that you have received her messages and wish not to reply at this time."
She then went on making some recommendations in order to "deescalate the tension between the parties and to deny her allegations of wrongdoing."
I told her that if she was obligated to respond, that she should give WW my message. Fred, I think your lawyer is blowing smoke to churn fees! Why would your atty be "obligated" to respond to your WW? There is no legal obligation that I am aware of! Your WW's requests are NOT court-mandated nor do they even come from another atty... I would have your lawyer simply say (once and for all): "WW, Fred has sent you a Plan B letter (another copy to you enclosed) and there is a separation agreement in place. There is nothing else to add. My client has done nothing illegal nor will he. Please refer to the documents above for any personal questions you may have from now on."
xWW: Secret LTA w/ thrice married OM at her workplace; EA/PA starts ~ 2005-6 Files & completes D - 2007, OM/OMW#3 D - 2007, Affairage - immediately thereafter Disappears in 2006 w/o even a goodbye to anyone, Never a paragraph of real truth ever spoken Me/xBH: M "for life", Suspicions (denied) & desperate Plan A latter-half '06 1st D-day 1/07, full truth D-day 7/08 (all via 3rd parties) NC w/ xWW 8/08-date, better off w/o unrepentant vileness, betrayal, & rampant deceit in my life anymore
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
Even if one could throw snowballs in Hades, there's no way I'm writing any such tripe. I'm staying silent on all of her silly "demands" (obviously they know the OMW got a letter -- I wonder how) and no doubt they've been trying to "spin" it. Whether or not others believe them or not is beyond my control.
It surprises me that some of "our" friends continue to treat her as if nothing were amiss. I know that they too, are free to behave as they wish, but it seems that some people will ignore bad behavior simply to "be nice."
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
It surprises me that some of "our" friends continue to treat her as if nothing were amiss. I know that they too, are free to behave as they wish, but it seems that some people will ignore bad behavior simply to "be nice." They are not friends. They are the kind of "friends" who dumped most of us alcoholics when we stopped drinking. Remember those "friends?"  Good riddance!
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
It surprises me that some of "our" friends continue to treat her as if nothing were amiss. I know that they too, are free to behave as they wish, but it seems that some people will ignore bad behavior simply to "be nice." They are not friends. They are the kind of "friends" who dumped most of us alcoholics when we stopped drinking. Remember those "friends?"  Good riddance! Yeah, I know. It's sad that these are A.A. "friends." One of them is someone I've known since Day One. Tells me to my face that he's behind me 100%. Then goes and leads a meeting for her. I know A.A. is about singleness of purpose. Still... Time for the Serenity Prayer...
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,775
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,775 |
Yep, I had "friends" like that, as well, Fred. These spineless people are no lnger my friends. SDCW is right. It makes no sense that your lawyer is claiming an obligation to respond. Thus is not a discovery demand or any othe court mandated disclosure. Your L is free to ignore the letter, as are you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,888 |
And ignore we shall. It wasn't a letter, but a call to my attorney, anyway. And my attorney emailed me late yesterday saying she didn't get my WW's telephone number.
So, no response has been issued. I told my attorney the only response I was willing to make to WW was that details for picking up her belongings were in my (Plan B) letter to her.
I am reconsidering (see earlier posts), and may accommodate my WW to the tune of ONE BOX of items that she provide in a list. I will box the stuff up and leave it outside the house for WW to pick up.
Preach the Gospel every day. When necessary, use words. St. Francis of Assissi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,775
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,775 |
Stick a rotten mackeral carcass in the bottom of the box, Fred.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Stick a rotten mackeral carcass in the bottom of the box, Fred. 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH WW SHOES? ARE YOU GOING TO WEAR THEM?  It's a box of stuff. Be the bigger man here. Drop them off at her parents house. Are you that broke? Then mail, UPS, etc, that crap to WW.  WW want to play games. If you sent all her stuff then she can't play the I want my stuff game. Every way you can stop her from playing a game you take power away from her. Take the power.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 508 |
Ditto. You are the reasonable one. No point in appearing vindictive.
Me: BH Her: FWW Kids:DSD 12, DS 7, DD, 7
EA/PA: September 2007 - November 2007 Status: In Recovery
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
0 members (),
626
guests, and
35
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,621
Posts2,323,489
Members71,946
|
Most Online3,185 Jan 27th, 2020
|
|
|
|