|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
Why wouldn't I? I thought the principle hear was complete honesty and openness. \ No, it is not when it comes to adultery. My understanding is that after everything is disclosed, zero contact is established. Then you move on to work the 10 principles which both of us have been studying. One of which is The Policy Of Radical Honesty. Is this not true? I have made a committment to her for complete honesty and openness. I think hiding this thread would violate that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
...Then the unthinkable happened. The woman she was staying with met me and another friend who had been supporting me. She told me my wife was having sex with her 18 year old son. I was destroyed, it was unbelievable. My wife had always been the most honest person I had ever known. Her standards of right and wrong higher than anyone�s. The mom said I know they are having sex right now because her son called her and asked how long she was going to be. We went to the house and burst into the room and caught them in the act.... I went back and studied the opening statement, and there were a few notable things there. 1. The mother of the teenager came to pdc, within a few weeks of the sexual encounters. This to me must mean the affair had started recently. Of course it could have been some tawdry thing like the mother got mad or jealous at pdcs wife and/or her own son and exposed them out of spite, but it is more likely she was upset by thier new blatent sexual exploits. So that makes it just started 2. PDC had stated his WW was one of the most honest people he knew, and held high standards. I assume this was amoung all the people and community for some years, and even with the boys Mom. This would explain why she. the Mom, came to pdc upset, because of the shock of it. Again sounds like it just started. But PDC, you seem to miss the point my friend, she was not honest with you with the extent of sexual needs, and passion, and trapping she had felt in prior years. She might have had fantasys of men and pushed them aside for quite some time prior. Because she stubbornly held on to her morals and integrity, and somehow, somewhere, something clicked and she gave up on those things. Probably peri-menopause helped depress her to a point of breaking. Along with the feelings anyone would have when left alone with a set of standards that seemed to not be bringing any rewards anymore emotionally. Because you yourself stated the poor state both of your communication was in for some time, you must realize that this is possible, and the main reason you are here, because you guys need help. Understanding the things that breed affairs, and how they develop over time, sometimes a long time, is part of the wisdom found in the posters here. I believe you that she had not had an active affair going with the boy before, but I don't believe she hadn't entertained the fantasy at times, for some time. Happens to many people, in the right/wrong circumstances, and that is what we all need to protect in our marriages, the enviroment in which it exists and breeds love and intimacy, or cold indifferance. None of us got married thinking passion would not stay, in fact most of us were said or thought it would never ever leave, or we would not have got together in the first place. As you have allready said, issues had piled up between you, and now you are reaping the consequences like many do, when we push them to the side. They rear their ugly head and don't go away because thats how relationship works. You have to maintain them to a standard together, with devoted time and communication, constantly. No body can live without love, and in desparation so many reach out for anything, even someone like the kid you gracously did not put in the hospital. So in your wife there must have been some form of dishonesty that had developed with maybe influence from outside sources, menopause, skechy friends, a marraige that had lost its intimacy, too much work and not enough play/pressure of being a Mom. Maybe even being the strong and reliable dedicated wife who many people leaned on with all thier problems who wondered why she bothered to behave that way when she was unhappy. How many times did others let her down? How many people did she counsel in thier problems that drew her strength? How did this happen to her? Where did her independance and whatever stubborness you both must have had between you for some time betray both of you? Strong minded people with good moral standards can break down if left alone with no support in bad circumatnces. With the world and tragic circumstances surrounding them and lies are the norm, with so many grabbing as much as they can and using others, people can become desparate and afraid. I think this happened over time with your wife, and your smart enough to have come here knowing why. It was in your opening statement. So lets just say that it has been brewing for some time, the possibility of passion. intimacy, excitment within your wifes mind, probably she was holding out for her marriage to bring that, but gave up. In those times alone and needing the closeness you guys lost at some point. She was at least, you must admit, not honest with how she felt about what she was missing, and that is the breeding place of affairs, secrecy, and in her ability to keep a secret it backfired as she kept it from you how much lonliness she really felt, didn't beleive you cared. probably anyone did really, and was not honest about that either. There is nobody who has an affair who is totally honest. Nobody wrecks thier life and goes that low without destroying themselves in the process. Nobody with a 23 year marriage who hurts it like that is even honest with themselves. Why would it be so far fetched to beleive that she belived she would/could not be dishonest with others? She believed the lie that an affair was the right thing to do. Do you think its possible she hid other things before? Thats what is at the crux of what other posters are asking. I know we are all trying to get to the bottom of this, and many things are bound to be hidden whithin your wifes mind that had been entertained at some point before she had the thing with the kid. They were there, even if she didn't accually sleep with anyone before, but the desparation has been brewing for some time, thats the point. These things in a marriage of 23 years don't happen overnight or without reason. I hope we can all help to figure them out. I hope the issue of whether she was seeing the dumb kid prior or not can be dropped too. Suffice it to say thier was an imagined lover in her mind somewhere before she had one. That understood we can go about helping you be that lover again, and recover your preciuos marriage. Constant - Your insight is uncanny. I think you summed up almost exactly how things happened. I'm hoping to bring something beautiful out of these ashes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 373
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 373 |
Wow Constant! You have such amazing perception.
It is difficult for me to comment because unlike your wife, I didn't leave...acutally I wasn't even going to for OM....but I "left" in my mind at least a year before.
I had the fantasy OM...sometimes an old boyfriend, sometimes a work collegue, sometimes a guy in line at the minimart...whatever. I had good boundaries (or so I thought) and avoided any "wrong" contact except in my head.
Like this 18 year old boy, my OM was so impossible that I let the boundaries slide. I was stupid and naive. He was so far away and couldn't really want me that much so it was never going to be an issue right? WRONG.
After reading here, I've learned so much about vunerability. I am so much more protective of my marriage and myself.
I hope it works that way for your wife. I would imagine she will have more difficulty than I because of the taboo of such a young boy. You are a good man if you can recover but you will be a good man even if you can't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
My understanding is that after everything is disclosed, zero contact is established. Then you move on to work the 10 principles which both of us have been studying. One of which is The Policy Of Radical Honesty. Is this not true? I have made a committment to her for complete honesty and openness. I think hiding this thread would violate that. Yes and no. Yes, you should be radically honest..to a DEGREE. When it comes to protecting you, ie: snooping, etc, your tactics should always be kept secret. On this thread, for example, many posters - including me - questioned her honesty about the beginnings of her affair. If you feel like that will help your marriage for her to read it, that is up to you. Here is what Harley says about radical honesty and POJA when there has been adultery: There are two situations where I don't recommend radical honesty or the POJA: Abuse and infidelity. In the case of infidelity, if one spouse suspects the other, I have gone so far as to encourage hiring a private detective to help investigate, using spyware, keyloggers, putting a gps on the car, and all sorts of other snooping methods. If its found that the spouse is not guilty, I encourage revealing the snooping to the spouse. If found guilty, I encourage keeping spying techniques secret indefinitely.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,549 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,549 Likes: 10 |
I went back and studied the opening statement, and there were a few notable things there.
1. The mother of the teenager came to pdc, within a few weeks of the sexual encounters. This to me must mean the affair had started recently. Of course it could have been some tawdry thing like the mother got mad or jealous at pdcs wife and/or her own son and exposed them out of spite, but it is more likely she was upset by thier new blatent sexual exploits. So that makes it just started It doesn't make it any such thing. We don't know that the mother went to pdc's wife within a few weeks of the sexual encounters. SHE WAS TOLD that the sexual encounters were only a few weeks old. It does not mean that the affair had started recently; only that the mother had only just found out. 2. PDC had stated his WW was one of the most honest people he knew, and held high standards. I assume this was amoung all the people and community for some years, and even with the boys Mom. This would explain why she. the Mom, came to pdc upset, because of the shock of it.
Again sounds like it just started. pdc has said elsewhere that his wife didn't really know the boy's mother. You are ignoring other things that he wrote, in order to side with him. Many WSs are described as being among the most honest people the BS knows. Most WSs are not dishonest, deceitful people before the affair starts, but they certainly become so once they decide to embark on the affair. Many lie about when the affair started and how far it progressed. How many BSs have we seen here put through trickle truth - that there is no affair; that there have only been a few texts that the BS has misunderstood; that okay, it has progressed to "feelings"; okay, since you have evidence, there was a PA, but only once; then finally, there has been a PA over several weeks or months? This happens ALL THE TIME here, CP. The wife's prior honesty did not stop her having an affair with someone not much more than a child, so how is it relevant? It is hard to believe that this woman left her own home and young children to stay in the home of another woman with three children (hardly a situation in which to find "space"), one of whom was in jail, and only then started her affair. It is much more likely that lies are being told about the start date of this affair, because the boy was underage when it began. Some of us can see an issue that you, CP, and pdc, are determined to reject. That's fine, but I, for one, do not buy the explanation of the wife's moving out and the start of the affair.
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
pdc, do you have the Marriage Builders materials yet? Which books do you have and where are you in the program?
How can we help you in your recovery?
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
[1. The mother of the teenager came to pdc, within a few weeks of the sexual encounters. This to me must mean the affair had started recently. Of course it could have been some tawdry thing like the mother got mad or jealous at pdcs wife and/or her own son and exposed them out of spite, but it is more likely she was upset by thier new blatent sexual exploits. So that makes it just started I really want to move on, but I had to address this comment, CP. The fact that the mother came to pdc within a few weeks of the sexual encounters does not mean the affair started recently. It only means that she just found out recently. There is a big difference. If there was an affair previously, it would have obviously been more well hidden if his WW did not live with the mother. When the WW moved in with them it was just easier to catch. I remain unconvinced that the affair started after she moved out, but I will move on from this issue and try to help pdc with a plan of recovery.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
My understanding is that after everything is disclosed, zero contact is established. Then you move on to work the 10 principles which both of us have been studying. One of which is The Policy Of Radical Honesty. Is this not true? I have made a committment to her for complete honesty and openness. I think hiding this thread would violate that. Yes and no. Yes, you should be radically honest..to a DEGREE. When it comes to protecting you, ie: snooping, etc, your tactics should always be kept secret. On this thread, for example, many posters - including me - questioned her honesty about the beginnings of her affair. If you feel like that will help your marriage for her to read it, that is up to you. Here is what Harley says about radical honesty and POJA when there has been adultery: There are two situations where I don't recommend radical honesty or the POJA: Abuse and infidelity. In the case of infidelity, if one spouse suspects the other, I have gone so far as to encourage hiring a private detective to help investigate, using spyware, keyloggers, putting a gps on the car, and all sorts of other snooping methods. If its found that the spouse is not guilty, I encourage revealing the snooping to the spouse. If found guilty, I encourage keeping spying techniques secret indefinitely. He is talking about before the affair is discovered. There has been total disclosure and there is no need for anything but radical honesty.
Last edited by pdc; 12/14/10 10:03 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
He is talking about before the affair is discovered. There has been total disclosure and there is no need for anything but radical honesty. This thread consists of several posters who QUESTION whether there has been total disclosure or not. If there has not been total disclosure, showing her this thread would not be wise. Dr Harley is talking about "INFIDELTY" in general and gives an example; he is not saying that is the ONLY instance. And again, radical honesty does not apply to infidelity BEFORE OR AFTER infidelity. You shouldn't, of course, be radically honest about your snooping techniques. But like I said, it is up to you.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
I don't want a marriage based on snooping.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
I don't want a marriage based on snooping. Do you want a marriage that is safe? Blind trust is not very wise, especially since you already have experience with infidelity. Snooping could keep your marriage safe from a repeat affair. It is too much trust that leads to affairs. It is not a lack of trust that harms marriages, but a lack of boundaries. Snooping helps you ensure her fidelity. I am a firm believer in letting each spouse do as much snooping around as they want. Nothing should be kept secret in marriage, and no questions should be left unanswered. If a spouse objects to such scrutiny, what might he or she be hiding?
<snip>
Look what happened to poor Kathy Lee Gifford. She stated publicly and wrote in one of her books that she trusted her husband completely, that he would never cheat on her. But she should not have trusted her husband. If she would have taken the steps she is now taking to help him avoid another affair, the first would never have taken place, and she would have avoided all its pain and embarrassment. I don't trust my wife completely and she doesn't trust me, and that's why neither of us have ever had an affair. Lack of trust does not make spouses paranoid and miserable, it makes their marriages safe. here AND One topic is loss of trust. How can a spouse ever trust an unfaithful partner again? My answer is that the spouse should never have been trusted in the first place. I shouldn't be trusted by my wife, and I shouldn't trust her. The fact is that we are all wired for infidelity, and under certain conditions, we'll all do it. The way to protect your marriage from something that has been common to man (and women) for thousands of years is to recognize the threat, and do something to prevent it from happening. Basing a marriage on the Policy of Radical Honesty and the Policy of Joint Agreement goes a long way toward preventing an affair. Being each other's favorite leisure-time companions, and not being away from each other overnight are also important safety measures. Meeting each other's most important emotional needs, avoiding Love Busters and building an integrated lifestyle, free of secret second lives, are all ways to affair-proof your marriage. With these measures in place, we end up trusting our spouses because an affair becomes almost impossible to achieve. here
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449 |
How are you sure there has been no contact if you are opposed to snooping??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449 |
He is in jail for probably 6 months. My wife has agreed to 0 contact for life, although this distresses her. Between her going to the hospital and him going to jail, there was no closure This is the post that has me concerned for you that your wife is still foggy and if she is, she will NOT like this thread and some of the other advice given on this site. Has she looked at the MB principles such as PORH, transparency, 15+hrs of UA time? Does she agree with them? Willing to implement? I would say that would be a good standard to sharing this site with a WS...not just confidence that NC is in place...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
I don't want a marriage based on snooping. Denial is not a river in Egypt. It's the land where you are living. This affair started before WW moved out. WW's do not leave unless they have an OM willing to provide them with a place to live. Your refusal to dig deeper is your fear taking control. Your afraid of finding out the whole truth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357 |
I don't want a marriage based on snooping. Total trust hasn't worked very well, now, has it.
D-Day 2-10-2009 Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever! Thank you Marriage Builders!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
I have incontrovertable proof of the inception of this affair. I'm not going to present it here, but it just is. Some of you proclaim fact without anything other than statistics. I do appreciate the concern.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
pdc, do you have the Marriage Builders materials yet? Which books do you have and where are you in the program?
How can we help you in your recovery? On the way is: HIS NEEDS HER NEEDS BASIC CONCEPTS FOR MARRIAGE DISC 5 STEPS TO ROMANTIC LOVE HIS NEEDS HER NEEDS LESSON ASSIGNMENT + FALL IN LOVE CD + MARRIAGE BUILDERS INFIDELITY DVD Surviving an affair and fall in love stay in love. I have printed the 10 principles from the website and are familiar with them all. We have done the EN questionaire We have done the recreational questionaire.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 1 |
He is in jail for probably 6 months. My wife has agreed to 0 contact for life, although this distresses her. Between her going to the hospital and him going to jail, there was no closure This is the post that has me concerned for you that your wife is still foggy and if she is, she will NOT like this thread and some of the other advice given on this site. Has she looked at the MB principles such as PORH, transparency, 15+hrs of UA time? Does she agree with them? Willing to implement? I would say that would be a good standard to sharing this site with a WS...not just confidence that NC is in place... Agreed. The only "closure" she can look forward to is you divorcing her if she continues this wretched path in any form. Closure is bullchit.
"An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field." - Niels Bohr
"Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for non-smart reasons." - Michael Shermer
"Fair speech may hide a foul heart." - Samwise Gamgee LOTR
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,235
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,235 |
Get your wife some help, ****edit****
Last edited by JustUss; 12/14/10 02:36 PM. Reason: attack
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 121 |
.
Last edited by pdc; 12/15/10 07:09 AM.
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
0 members (),
378
guests, and
102
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,625
Posts2,323,525
Members72,044
|
Most Online6,102 Jul 3rd, 2025
|
|
|
|