|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,437
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,437 |
Cemar, when I came to this board I was batted about pretty well. Most things were MY problem, the solutions all laid with ME, I was the one wreaking havoc on my marriage...
So I went to Steve. My H and I counseled with SH for six months. Some people here were ticked that SH told my H what he needed to do differently, and even recommended that my H get evaluated for a behavioral disorder. After all, it had been determined that everything was my fault, my H was perfect and I needed to do all the changing.
I had plenty to work on myself. But MB does NOT work when implemented alone. I recommend that you be RH with your wife, evaluate her response, then call in an expert. IOW, quit yer bellyaching and DO SOMETHING.
Marriage is the triumph of imagination over intelligence. Second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience. (Oscar Wilde)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 76
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 76 |
CWMI:
So what is the compromise position? Oral sex is the highest form of intimacy possible. There are NO SUBSTITUTES for it. If we have oral sex, she loses. If we don't have it, I lose. There is NO MIDDLE GROUND as far as I can see. Ugh, I said I give up but this is nuts here. Cemar... OS for a lot of women is so impersonal it makes us feel like hookers. I'm getting the feeling that you actually have no idea what intimacy is. That's exactly why I call nights when SF is OS porn star nights. Because I don't feel like a wife, I feel like porn star. His pleasure is super gratifying for me, but I don't feel intimate with him. Again, I ask, are you having an affair? A lot of your answers, to me, seem like you're trying justify *something*.
Me: BW WH 41 (practicing alcoholic) Married 20 yrs DS20, DD15, DD9 Too many D-Days to account for, more FRs than I care to admit NC since 03/11, broken 04/11 NC again 07/11 broken 12/11 Plan D full steam ahead, made WH leave WH now living with his "soul mate" (we call her donkeychui) 1/13/2012 D filed 01/25/2012 D final 05/15/2012
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,836
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,836 |
Mrs. Hold and I don't have anywhere near as much sex as I wish we did. But you know what? I get nothing from receiving oral sex. Nothing. I never ask for it. If she offers, usually I say no thank you. If it seems she very much wants to do it (maybe 3 or 4 times in our 18 year marriage), I let her start and then quickly ask if I can return the favor. I LOVE giving her oral sex. Not that she allows me to do it very often. Early in our marriage, yes. The past few years hardly ever.
Even as a guy in a sexually starved marriage, I don't get why cemar is so fixated on oral sex. Seems to me it is definitely about control and dominance and submission, and not about physical sensation.
When you can see it coming, duck!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357 |
Good grief...oral sex is the highest form of intimacy possible? Who says, Dr. Cemar?
Can you back up your opinion with proof from someone qualified to make this statement?
I doubt it but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. Psst! Hey, MarriedForever - don't hold your breath waiting for an answer or you'll pass out. Cemar does not respond to these sorts of questions.
D-Day 2-10-2009 Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever! Thank you Marriage Builders!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 571 |
Cemar is certainly within his rights to find that OS is the highest form of intimacy for HIM. Seems a waste of time to try and convince him otherwise. But that's as far as it goes. He refuses to understand that not everyone feels that way. Or he does, and just gets a kick of continually making people rise to his bait.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357 |
Or he does, and just gets a kick of continually making people rise to his bait.
D-Day 2-10-2009 Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever! Thank you Marriage Builders!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,490
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,490 |
Originally Posted By: Dr Harley Uh, where do I begin. I can't tell you how many couples I've counseled where one spouse did just what you suggested -- sacrifice their own enjoyment for the pleasure of their spouse. The reason I'm counseling them, of course, is that the one doing the sacrificing eventually can't take giving without receiving anymore, and wants a divorce. One recent cases that comes to mind is a pastor's wife. He gave your message to his wife throughout their marriage. They have reconciled, but only because he finally understands the concept of mutual care. Unless both he and his wife enjoy their sexual experience, she comes to hate it. Now they make love almost every day, not out of sacrifice, but out of mutual enthusiastic agreement. By the way, they've given up OS.
It's dangerous stuff you're recommending. It ruins marriages.
Best wishes, Dr. Harley cemar, have you seen this quote by Dr. H?
Me,BW - 42; FWH-46 4 kids D-Day #s1 and 2~May 2006 D-Day #3~Feb.27, 2007 (we'd been in a FR) Plan B~ March 3 ~ April 6, 2007 In Recovery and things are improving every day. MB rocks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 218
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 218 |
kerala:
We all have different definitions of intimacy. One way that I look at intimacy is "to make onself vulnerable to another". OS definitely about the man making himself vulnerable to his wife. She has COMPLETE control of the sitution. He is vulnerable to her. So from my perspective, it is a very intimate moment for me. In my case, my wife does not like to perform OS onme, so the message she is sending me is loud and clear, I am not important to her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803 |
kerala:
We all have different definitions of intimacy. One way that I look at intimacy is "to make onself vulnerable to another". OS definitely about the man making himself vulnerable to his wife. She has COMPLETE control of the sitution. He is vulnerable to her. So from my perspective, it is a very intimate moment for me. In my case, my wife does not like to perform OS onme, so the message she is sending me is loud and clear, I am not important to her. You're contradicting yourself again. You state: "We all have different definitions of intimacy." Then, you go on the claim that: "In my case, my wife does not like to perform OS on me, so the message she is sending is loud and clear, I am not important to her." Why would that have to be her message? Has it ever occurred to you that your wife simply has a different definition of intimacy than you do, and that for her, OS is not intimacy? You yourself admit that not everyone will have the same definition of intimacy, so why is it so difficult to realize that your wife's idea of intimacy may simply be different from yours?
Me: BS/FWW: 48 BS/WH: 50 DS: 30, 27, 25 DD: 28 OC: 10 BH and I are raising my OC together.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,704
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,704 |
I believe Cemar won't be happy unless he gets OS from his wife. And she has to want to do it or he won't be happy. He doesn't want her to just give him OS but sants her to desire doing this.
She's apparently not going to be happy doing this.
So he either divorces or learns to be happy without it.
I know that I like both giving and receiving and would miss OS if it went off the table. But I've thought of OS as the pre-eventor an intermission event rather than a way to finish the game.
Husband (me) 39 Wife 36 Daughter 21 Daughter 19 Son 14 Daughter 10 Son 8 (autistic)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 218
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 218 |
CWMI:
So what is the compromise position? Oral sex is the highest form of intimacy possible. There are NO SUBSTITUTES for it. If we have oral sex, she loses. If we don't have it, I lose. There is NO MIDDLE GROUND as far as I can see. Good grief...oral sex is the highest form of intimacy possible? Who says, Dr. Cemar? Can you back up your opinion with proof from someone qualified to make this statement? I doubt it but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. Anyone ever read the books by Barbara De Angelis, PH.D.? Here is what SHE says about OS: (qouted directly from her website) However, we know that men are into it, and ladies, you need to understand why they love receiving oral sex so much. A man�s penis is not only the most sensitive part of his body, but the most vulnerable. It represents his maleness, his sense of power, his identity. Men don�t love oral sex just because it feels so good--they love it because it makes them feel so accepted, so received. It isthe only sexual act during which he can be totally passive, and you become the aggressor. You give, and he receives, experiencing a more feminine, receptive mode. When I teach women about how to give oral sex to their partners (See Secrets About Men Every Woman Should Know, Chapter Five), I remind them that the key is to imagine their partner is only about six inches tall, the size of the average penis. Instead of thinking "I�m loving his [censored]!", imagine loving a miniature version of your mate, as if all he was could be contained within the size and shape of a penis. Suddenly, you�re not giving him a blow job--you�re loving and adoring an expression of your sweetheart.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803 |
Here's what I discovered about Barbara De Angelis and her so-called PH.D:
"De Angelis received a master's degree in psychology from Sierra University in Los Angeles,[3] and a Ph.D. in psychology from Columbia Pacific University.[4] She was awarded her degree from this now-defunct unaccredited institution after completing a correspondence course."
I hardly think earning a doctorate from a now-defunct, unaccredited "college" through a correspondence course makes her a legitimate authority on anything.
Me: BS/FWW: 48 BS/WH: 50 DS: 30, 27, 25 DD: 28 OC: 10 BH and I are raising my OC together.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357 |
http://www.rickross.com/reference/gray/gray3.html"It seems that well-known relationship gurus "Dr." John Gray and "Dr." Barbara De Angelis have bogus credentials reports Men News Daily.
Apparently the two both obtained their touted "doctorates" from a "diploma mill" shut down two years ago by the California state attorney general's office.
Gray and De Angelis received doctorates from Columbia Pacific University, which California officials described as a "diploma mill" that issued "totally worthless degrees."
Nevertheless these lauded experts have been a hot ticket on the lecture circuit (Gray is $30,000-$50,000 and De Angelis starts at $15,000) and they hold forth on such popular TV shows as Oprah, Good Morning America, and Larry King Live.
Gray and De Angelis routinely pass themselves off with the attached title of "Ph.D."
Gray's bestseller Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus has sold 15 million copies worldwide and developed quite a cult following for the author.
De Angelis has written more than a dozen books, produced a video series, infomercial and was featured on CNN as a "relationship expert."
Some might think that John Gray is trained in psychology and/or counseling, but instead he has degrees in Eastern Philosophy and they are hardly Ivy League. Gray reportedly picked up both his Bachelor's and Master's from the Maharishi European Research University in Switzerland.
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is the founder of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement. And Gray was once one of his celibate monks, before becoming a guru of sorts himself.
Well, maybe it takes a guru to make a guru.
De Angelis has more in common with Gray than a "worthless" Ph.D., the two were once married.
De Angelis was Gray's first wife, though he was her third husband. Barbara then went on to marry twice more, while John is still on his second marriage.
Another TM devotee magician Doug Henning was Barbara's second hubby. Maybe she met Gray while attending a seminar at Maharishi U? Wouldn't that be guru-romantic?
De Angelis did double duty as Henning's assistant in his magic act. Perhaps she is now playing the role of a "doctor" for her second act.
"Secrets for Making Love Work," is the title of a De Angelis produced video series. But will Barbara learn the secret herself the fifth time around?
And do these two phony "doctors" really posses the personal histories and/or credentials to commend them as "relationship experts"?
The popular radio "Sex Doctor" and perhaps the gold standard for a relationship guru might be Dr. Ruth Westheimer.
At least "Dr. Ruth" really is a doctor (Ph.D.) and though twice divorced, her third marriage has held together for more than four decades.
In fact both of Westheimer's children have an accredited Ph.D., which is more than you can say for either "doctors" John Gray or Barbara DeAngelis." Careful who you quote, cemar.
D-Day 2-10-2009 Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever! Thank you Marriage Builders!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,549 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,549 Likes: 10 |
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357 |
I hardly think earning a doctorate from a now-defunct, unaccredited "college" through a correspondence course makes her a legitimate authority on anything.  Looks like we were on the same track at the same time, writer! So, really, cemar, you are quoting the opinions and writings of a...woman. Well, there are millions of women, and they've got a million thoughts. Better to concentrate on the woman whose thoughts should be most important to you. Your WIFE. BTW, if you're looking for accreditation, might I remind you that Dr. Harley, whose work we've been patiently yet fruitlessly bringing up to you, does have a Ph.D from a real university.
Last edited by maritalbliss; 04/04/11 11:40 AM. Reason: clarity
D-Day 2-10-2009 Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever! Thank you Marriage Builders!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,549 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,549 Likes: 10 |
In my case, my wife does not like to perform OS onme, so the message she is sending me is loud and clear, I am not important to her. cemar, you may be right. She does not care for you. So what now?
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 76
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 76 |
De Angelis was Gray's first wife, though he was her third husband. Barbara then went on to marry twice more, while John is still on his second marriage. Hold on, ignoring the fact that she doesn't even have a real education.... she's been married FIVE times?
Me: BW WH 41 (practicing alcoholic) Married 20 yrs DS20, DD15, DD9 Too many D-Days to account for, more FRs than I care to admit NC since 03/11, broken 04/11 NC again 07/11 broken 12/11 Plan D full steam ahead, made WH leave WH now living with his "soul mate" (we call her donkeychui) 1/13/2012 D filed 01/25/2012 D final 05/15/2012
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,490
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,490 |
Here's what I discovered about Barbara De Angelis and her so-called PH.D:
"De Angelis received a master's degree in psychology from Sierra University in Los Angeles,[3] and a Ph.D. in psychology from Columbia Pacific University.[4] She was awarded her degree from this now-defunct unaccredited institution after completing a correspondence course."
I hardly think earning a doctorate from a now-defunct, unaccredited "college" through a correspondence course makes her a legitimate authority on anything. I asked if this "opinion" came from someone qualified and I have my answer. And yes, this "relationship expert" has been married 5 times. 
Me,BW - 42; FWH-46 4 kids D-Day #s1 and 2~May 2006 D-Day #3~Feb.27, 2007 (we'd been in a FR) Plan B~ March 3 ~ April 6, 2007 In Recovery and things are improving every day. MB rocks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 218
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 218 |
Ok, obviously my definition of one form of intimacy is the product of my demented male mind. So maybe someone should enlighten me to what intimacy is.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,704
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,704 |
As long as you've been on here and you've never read any of Dr. Harleys articles?
Husband (me) 39 Wife 36 Daughter 21 Daughter 19 Son 14 Daughter 10 Son 8 (autistic)
|
|
|
0 members (),
327
guests, and
96
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,625
Posts2,323,525
Members72,045
|
Most Online6,102 Jul 3rd, 2025
|
|
|
|