|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,479 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,479 Likes: 6 |
By the way, did anyone recommend the book "I Promise You" for you? It's for engaged couples. Yes, BrainHurts did way back at the beginning. I checked out some reviews, and it looks like a winner. Thanks markos, BrainHurts, and anyone else that recommended it! The intent of poja is simple: avoid being the source of your spouse's unhappiness. The easiest way to avoid a situation like markos described is to not make agreements that you are unsure about, and to put off agreements if you sense any reluctance in your spouse.
It is tough to get the hang of.... I hope I'm not over-analyzing this thing to death, but I'd like to hear thoughts on the following scenario. Suppose one of a married couple is an introvert and the other is an extrovert. For the sake of example, let's say the H is the introvert and the W is the extrovert. At the end of the week, the H wants to come home from work, kick off his shoes and relax with a glass of wine and watch TV with his W; as an introvert, he needs some peace and quiet to recharge his batteries. The W wants to meet her H at a restaurant with some mutual friends for dinner; as an extrovert, she needs social interaction to recharge her batteries. From the W's point of view, her H is not enthusiastic about going out to dinner, so she should agree to stay home. From the H's point of view, his W is not enthusiastic about staying home, so he should agree to go out. If they don't both enthusiastically agree to either stay home or go out, I guess the default is to do nothing, which means they stay at home? Or maybe they try to negotiate the agreement, but it takes too long and the time for meeting for dinner passes, and they end up at home? In either case, the H got what he wanted but the W was not enthusiastic about it. How do they reach an enthusiastic agreement about what to do Friday evening after work? You're welcome my friend. You POJA the event before Friday night. You do an event both are enthusiastic about.
FWW/BW (me) WH 2nd M for both Blended Family with 7 kids between us Too much hurt and pain on both sides that my brain hurts just thinking about it all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,437
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,437 |
Social interaction isn't one of the intimate needs in marriage, so time with friends comes after the minimum 15 hours a week of undivided attention anyway. People in love don't fill their time with others, also. But to be specific, going out is more of a sacrifice for the H in your scenario, as it is an action compared to the non-action of not going out for the wife, so going out has more potential for resentment by the H than not going does for the W. Any enthusiastic agreement has the same base: what is it that each person wants to gain/enjoy from the activity? If the wife wants to gain the admiration of her friends, she probably isn't marriage material. If she wants to enjoy attention and good food, her husband can fill that need for her in ways that don't harm him: perhaps ordering in and putting on some music and dancing in the living room. If the husband needs someone to sit silently by while he vegges out on television, he isn't marriage material, either. But if his base need is to spend some time not requiring use of his brain, well, there are ways a wife can help with that.  Get to the base need before getting stuck on a particular way to meet it, and negotiating is easier.
Marriage is the triumph of imagination over intelligence. Second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience. (Oscar Wilde)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3 |
Agreeing with Brain and CWMI, especially this part: But to be specific, going out is more of a sacrifice for the H in your scenario, as it is an action compared to the non-action of not going out for the wife, so going out has more potential for resentment by the H than not going does for the W. Maybe it will help you to read up on Type 1 and Type 2 Resentments. If the husband is not enthusiastic about going out with friends, they don't go. But that doesn't mean sitting around watching TV likes he wants to do. It will always appear that one spouse benefits from the default position of POJA. It is up to that spouse to start negotiations on what they can do with each other that will make BOTH of them happy. Have you read up on the steps of negotiation?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,389
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,389 |
Walk.
A long stroll outside holding hands is a cheap, easy, and fun way to balance introvert and extrovert.
My H would be happy to sit in the house every night and relax. Me, a stay at home mom, I need to get out or I'll go nuts, my life exists within these walls with cheerios on top.
If we can't agree, we drop our boy off at grandpas and go for a nice lovely walk. It's the perfect compromise.
Last edited by alis; 06/07/12 05:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,171
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,171 |
The one thing we don't mention is that in the example of the introvert and extrovert, I would have hoped the behavior of each person was well evident while they were dating. Each has chosen to marry someone with different preferences than them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 360
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 360 |
Thanks everyone for your thoughts. You POJA the event before Friday night. I'm sure once this situation happens a time or two, the couple would POJA in advance. I was trying to create a scenario where they don't have much time to POJA. Say the W calls the H at work Friday afternoon and wants to go out that night. It seems that from the W's point of view, the husband can get his way by simply stalling for a few hours. I think Prisca's comment addresses this: It will always appear that one spouse benefits from the default position of POJA. It is up to that spouse to start negotiations on what they can do with each other that will make BOTH of them happy. That puts some responsibility on the H to come up with a mutually agreeable solution. That's good, and I think that answers my original question on POJA. Maybe it will help you to read up on Type 1 and Type 2 Resentments. Prisca, I tried several different search criteria on the MB website but couldn't find anything on Type 1 or 2 resentments. I finally tried a generic google search and came up with Following the Policy of Joint Agreement When You're VERY Incompatible in the Q&A Columns, in particular this: There are two kinds of resentment: (1) Resentment due to something one of you DID to the other that was hurtful, and (2) resentment due to something you DIDN'T do for yourself that you would have liked, but would have hurt your spouse. Your husband has the first kind of resentment because you had an affair three months into your marriage. What you did hurt him. You have the second kind of resentment because you now feel obligated to avoid seeing a friend who is a threat to your husband.
I think you would agree with me that the first kind of resentment is the worst, because your husband knows you deliberately hurt him. It's no wonder he's having trouble recovering from the experience. Your poor communication may be partly due to the fact that he is still trying to recover from the shock.
The second kind of resentment, the kind you are experiencing, may be uncomfortable, but life is full of instances where we need to control ourselves for the protection of others. In other words, I'm saying that whatever resentment you may feel about not being able to see your friend is nothing compared to the resentment you would feel if your husband had indulged in an affair. Just want to confirm this is what you're referring to by Type 1 and 2 resentments because in the quote, it sounds like the first type of resentment is something one person does to another to hurt them. In the scenario I was describing, neither spouse wants to hurt the other, they just have different ways of unwinding at the end of the week. The one thing we don't mention is that in the example of the introvert and extrovert, I would have hoped the behavior of each person was well evident while they were dating. Each has chosen to marry someone with different preferences than them. I've heard that opposites attract each other, and often, the things that attract a couple during dating become annoyances that repel them after marriage. I think there's an example of this in the Five Love Languages book: one person is the "chattering brook" and the other is the "dead sea." At first they get along great because the chattering brook has a need to talk and be heard, and the dead sea has the ability to be silent and listen. But after a while, the chattering brook gets annoyed with the lack of 2-way communication, and the dead sea gets annoyed with the constant chattering. Anyone have any experience that confirms or denies the "attracts/repels" phenomenon?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3 |
Just want to confirm this is what you're referring to by Type 1 and 2 resentments because in the quote, it sounds like the first type of resentment is something one person does to another to hurt them. In the scenario I was describing, neither spouse wants to hurt the other, they just have different ways of unwinding at the end of the week. Neither spouse has to WANT to hurt the other spouse in order to create Type 1 resentment. Type 1 resentment is created when one spouse forces the other to DO something against his will. In your scenario, if the couple stays home, the wife may feel Type 2 resentment -- she doesn't get to go out like she would like to. But if she were to force her husband to go out with her, he would experience Type 1 resentment -- being forced to DO something he is not enthusiastic about. Type 1 is worse than Type 2, therefore the default of POJA is DO NOTHING. It would hurt the husband worse to go out somewhere he doesn't want to go than it would hurt the wife to stay home and find something else to do with her husband.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,094
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,094 |
Anyone have any experience that confirms or denies the "attracts/repels" phenomenon? Sounds a little like infatuation to me. I wouldn't count on it for a long term marriage type of relationship. The discussion is not really relevant to MB principles, though. Dr. Harley would advocate an approach that would put this concept out to pasture. IOW, using the meeting each other's needs concept and eliminating LB's and using POJA and honoring UA....puts two people's tendencies and BEHAVIORS more in line with each other. I've been finding "I Promise You" quite helpful as it tends to relate principles I'm already familiar with to the actual engagmeent phase of marriage. opt
Last edited by optimism; 06/14/12 07:33 AM.
Me: 43 y.o. BFWH, D-day 11/11/09 (NC since 9/01) Divorce from WW final 9/16/10. Current Status: MB-based Marriage to Nature Girl 12/8/12 (first date on 12/11/10) Mine: S(16), D(11) NatureGirls: S(23), D(21) Another EA Story
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 360
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 360 |
Thanks Prisca & Optimism, appreciate your thoughts.
I just ordered I Promise You and am looking forward to reading it. I'm surprised that it's no longer available in the MB bookstore. Do you know if there's an updated book Dr. Harley wrote to replace it?
I also ordered Fall in Love, Stay in Love, and HNHN for Parents. I have the original HNHN and Love Busters, and I think all those will keep me occupied for a while.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,479 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,479 Likes: 6 |
Thanks Prisca & Optimism, appreciate your thoughts.
I just ordered I Promise You and am looking forward to reading it. I'm surprised that it's no longer available in the MB bookstore. Do you know if there's an updated book Dr. Harley wrote to replace it?
I also ordered Fall in Love, Stay in Love, and HNHN for Parents. I have the original HNHN and Love Busters, and I think all those will keep me occupied for a while. KL, You have such good questions. Have you thought about emailing Dr. H? Email your questions to Joyce Harley at mbradio@marriagebuilders.com
FWW/BW (me) WH 2nd M for both Blended Family with 7 kids between us Too much hurt and pain on both sides that my brain hurts just thinking about it all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3 |
Fall In Love, Stay In Love is my favorite! Glad you got that one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818 Likes: 7 |
I just ordered I Promise You and am looking forward to reading it. I'm surprised that it's no longer available in the MB bookstore. Do you know if there's an updated book Dr. Harley wrote to replace it? I hadn't heard that it wasn't available any more! We ordered ours from the mb bookstore in 2010. Sometimes he does retitle them, but I haven't heard of that for this book.
If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app! Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8. Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010 If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
0 members (),
462
guests, and
82
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,625
Posts2,323,525
Members72,046
|
Most Online6,102 Jul 3rd, 2025
|
|
|
|