|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 208
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 208 |
Do you guys really expect my 8 year old daughter, and 10 and 13 year old daughters, not to love their mom? Of course they do - she still takes care of them, even though she is involved with this terrible behavior also.
I can't completely stop her but at least I can try to make engaging in this behavior difficult and more risky.
Anyway, I'm getting ready for bed, and I will consider what you've said, as well as the opinions of others too. Besides my deacon, I'm also going to talk to my Christian friend and boss at work about it. And do some soul searching. I may discuss further with my older children.
DDay - July 25, 2013 DDay #2 - January 27, 2014 DDay #3 - June 29, 2014 BS - Me, 39 WW - Her, 36 5 kids Married 17 yrs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589 |
Pius,
Do they know or not?
What do you mean about making it less risky? Mel's right. You are signed up for an open marriage and just want to know how you can be less miserable in it.
AM
BW - 70 WH - 65 M - 35 years D-day - 17 Apr 08 H broke contact 11/1/09 Back in love after the worst thing that every happened to us.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,476 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,476 Likes: 5 |
Thanks Melody, I'll be listening to this shortly. I know the full show was previously posted, but in case posters only have time to listen to your segment, here it is. Radio Clip of Pius's Segment
FWW/BW (me) WH 2nd M for both Blended Family with 7 kids between us Too much hurt and pain on both sides that my brain hurts just thinking about it all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,476 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,476 Likes: 5 |
Do you guys really expect my 8 year old daughter, and 10 and 13 year old daughters, not to love their mom? Of course they do - she still takes care of them, even though she is involved with this terrible behavior also.
I can't completely stop her but at least I can try to make engaging in this behavior difficult and more risky.
Anyway, I'm getting ready for bed, and I will consider what you've said, as well as the opinions of others too. Besides my deacon, I'm also going to talk to my Christian friend and boss at work about it. And do some soul searching. I may discuss further with my older children. I went back through your whole thread and you stated you only told your 2 oldest DD. Have you told your DD8? Have you told them about ALL her affairs? And that the last 2 were with married men? Have you told the BW of OM3 yet? Have you exposed to your WW's parents and siblings? Your parents? Have you been tested for STD/I? Has your WW? Please read. Exposing to Children
FWW/BW (me) WH 2nd M for both Blended Family with 7 kids between us Too much hurt and pain on both sides that my brain hurts just thinking about it all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 208
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 208 |
In answers to a few questions, I have told my four oldest children. They also know about the original affair.
There have been two OM, not three. Latest episode was reestablishing contact with POSOM #2. POSOM #2 is married. I have tried but failed to contact POSOM #2's BW. I've sent an email and a facebook message which haven't been answered.
WW has been tested. I have not.
Also, in the latest episode, I found text messages but no actual proof of physical contact between them, which is what I would need to prove adultery in court. The last positive proof I have of physical contact was back in December. The law in my state says that if you have SF with spouse after you know about your spouse's adultery then you can't use it - presumably that means you have reconciled or something. So I would need proof of another more recent incident.
I have not told WW's parents and siblings yet, though I made it clear this would happen if there was a future incident. WW destroyed the evidence for this incident but if there is a next time I'll make sure I save it.
I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. Childen instinctively love their mothers, especially when the mothers care for them and such. They understand that it was a big mistake but that is not enough to make them stop loving her. Heck I still love my WW very much as well, and I have a full understanding of what happened.
DDay - July 25, 2013 DDay #2 - January 27, 2014 DDay #3 - June 29, 2014 BS - Me, 39 WW - Her, 36 5 kids Married 17 yrs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 810
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 810 |
ILatest episode was reestablishing contact with POSOM #2. POSOM #2 is married. I have tried but failed to contact POSOM #2's BW. I've sent an email and a facebook message which haven't been answered. Why not call her and speak with her directly? Even if this last time were "only" text messages, she deserves to know. The last positive proof I have of physical contact was back in December. The law in my state says that if you have SF with spouse after you know about your spouse's adultery then you can't use it - presumably that means you have reconciled or something. So I would need proof of another more recent incident. But you don't need further proof in order to totally expose though. Your parents need to know. Your wife's parents and siblings, and close friends need to know. The OM2's wife needs to know as well as his parents and any relatives that you can search out on Facebook. Heck I still love my WW very much as well, and I have a full understanding of what happened. Good that you still feel love for your wife! I am very much hoping that the love that you feel will help you to be strong enough to PROTECT her. With her habits as they are, it is only a matter of time before she contracts an STD, or meets up with the wrong person with the wrong intent and gets raped or worse. Protect her (and your children!) by exposing far and wide. Protect her by shutting off your home internet. Protect her by DEMANDING that she have no further contact with any POSOM and come back to the marriage. And if she won't do that�then I hope that you love her enough to SEPARATE from her so that she can have at least a shot at seeing firsthand what the consequences will be for her behavior. I'm sorry to point this out, but IF a thorough exposure works and IF your wife would happen to re-commit to your marriage, then the two of you will have to work out some over-the-top extraordinary precautions in order to have a shot at dealing with her instinct to troll for men. ARE you really committed to doing that? Be honest with yourself, because if you aren't really willing to do whatever it takes, then do you REALLY love your wife as much as you think that you do?
DDays - six months of them THANK YOU God and Marriage Builders. We never knew that it could be this good!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,476 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,476 Likes: 5 |
What are you doing to contact OM'S BW?
FWW/BW (me) WH 2nd M for both Blended Family with 7 kids between us Too much hurt and pain on both sides that my brain hurts just thinking about it all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. Childen instinctively love their mothers, especially when the mothers care for them and such. They understand that it was a big mistake but that is not enough to make them stop loving her. Heck I still love my WW very much as well, and I have a full understanding of what happened. I am astounded you would mischaracterize our posts in such a way. No one said they should stop "loving" her, but most children have enough moral training to know that adultery is wrong and to be upset about it. What have your children been taught about their mother's adultery? And back to the battered wife's syndrome. Your position greatly reflects what we see from battered wives: Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding, is a psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with them. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.[1][2] The FBI's Hostage Barricade Database System shows that roughly 8% of victims show evidence of Stockholm syndrome.[3]
Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."[4] One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual's response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself. When a victim believes the same values as the aggressor, they cease to be a threat.[5]
Battered-person syndrome is an example of activating the capture-bonding psychological mechanism, as are military basic training and fraternity bonding by hazing.[dubious � discuss].[6][7][8] here
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
I have not told WW's parents and siblings yet, though I made it clear this would happen if there was a future incident. WW destroyed the evidence for this incident but if there is a next time I'll make sure I save it. Exposure is not a "punishment" but a therapeutic measure that will help your wife. You deny her that therapy if you only promise to give her the medicine in the future. She needs the medicine NOW. There is no reason not to expose her affairs now. Everyone should know so they can hold her accountable and provide support for your family. Keeping her affairs a secret only serves to enable her. Your wife has admitted the affairs, so you have plenty of evidence now.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,650
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11,650 |
In answers to a few questions, I have told my four oldest children. They also know about the original affair.
There have been two OM, not three. Latest episode was reestablishing contact with POSOM #2. POSOM #2 is married. I have tried but failed to contact POSOM #2's BW. I've sent an email and a facebook message which haven't been answered.
WW has been tested. I have not.
Also, in the latest episode, I found text messages but no actual proof of physical contact between them, which is what I would need to prove adultery in court. The last positive proof I have of physical contact was back in December. The law in my state says that if you have SF with spouse after you know about your spouse's adultery then you can't use it - presumably that means you have reconciled or something. So I would need proof of another more recent incident.
I have not told WW's parents and siblings yet, though I made it clear this would happen if there was a future incident. WW destroyed the evidence for this incident but if there is a next time I'll make sure I save it.
I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. Childen instinctively love their mothers, especially when the mothers care for them and such. They understand that it was a big mistake but that is not enough to make them stop loving her. Heck I still love my WW very much as well, and I have a full understanding of what happened. Of course they will still love her. Exposure is all about love.
What would you do if you were not afraid?
"Fear is the little death. Fear is the mind-killer" Frank Herbert.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 571 |
I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. Childen instinctively love their mothers, especially when the mothers care for them and such. They understand that it was a big mistake but that is not enough to make them stop loving her. Heck I still love my WW very much as well, and I have a full understanding of what happened. I am astounded you would [b]mischaracterize[/b] our posts in such a way. No one said they should stop "loving" her, but most children have enough moral training to know that adultery is wrong and to be upset about it. What have your children been taught about their mother's adultery? If you asked my kids now I guarantee they'd want me to keep trying. I'd bet you any amount of money. The kids love me, but they adore their mom also. They don't want to be separated from either one of us. As for enabling, if I got divorced she would have an easier time trolling for sex anyway. It just wouldn't be my problem then. I am confused. Your children know what your wife is doing and adore her? AM What mischaracterization? As part of his general resistance to taking any dramatic steps, Pius said his kids do not want him to get divorced. He essentially got challenged that he must not have exposed sufficiently, or they would not feel that way. And puzzlement at his use of the word "adore" to describe their feelings. I don't find his kids' feelings odd in the least. And how some people report reacting to a similar experience in their own childhood is, frankly, irrelevant. The plural of anecdote is not "data". Now, one could argue that Pius is wrong to take his kids' feelings into account in this manner, because the nature of their maternal attachment distorts their wishes. That is not the convo that happened.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
[
What mischaracterization?
As part of his general resistance to taking any dramatic steps, Pius said his kids do not want him to get divorced. He essentially got challenged that he must not have exposed sufficiently, or they would not feel that way. And puzzlement at his use of the word "adore" to describe their feelings. You make a lot of assumptions in your post. The mischaracterization is this comment: I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. But you can see that is exactly what I am addressing in my post when I said this: I am astounded you would mischaracterize our posts in such a way. No one said they should stop "loving" her No one said his children "would stop loving their mom because of this." It was never suggested. And I do find his children's reactions odd. Children typically are very upset about an affair. But I am not surprised that his kids don't want them to get divorced; I am surprised his kids are not upset and taking issue with their mother. Especially female children: We�ve been married just over 15 years, and we have five children. The oldest is a son, age 14. We also have four daughters, ages 12, 9, 6 and 1 Since he thinks exposure is bad and since he has been resistant to any exposure throughout this ordeal, I don't believe he exposed the full truth to his children.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
And I do not doubt that some of his children are resistant to divorce. It is not relevant to the issue. He is the adult here after all. He is supposed to be doing what is in his best interest and the children's best interest.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589 |
[
What mischaracterization?
As part of his general resistance to taking any dramatic steps, Pius said his kids do not want him to get divorced. He essentially got challenged that he must not have exposed sufficiently, or they would not feel that way. And puzzlement at his use of the word "adore" to describe their feelings. You make a lot of assumptions in your post. The mischaracterization is this comment: I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. But you can see that is exactly what I am addressing in my post when I said this: I am astounded you would mischaracterize our posts in such a way. No one said they should stop "loving" her No one said his children "would stop loving their mom because of this." It was never suggested. And I do find his children's reactions odd. Children typically are very upset about an affair. But I am not surprised that his kids don't want them to get divorced; I am surprised his kids are not upset and taking issue with their mother. Especially female children: We�ve been married just over 15 years, and we have five children. The oldest is a son, age 14. We also have four daughters, ages 12, 9, 6 and 1 Since he thinks exposure is bad and since he has been resistant to any exposure throughout this ordeal, I don't believe he exposed the full truth to his children. Agreed. I find the reaction to be odd and that is why I asked the question about exactly what the children know. We know that some of them have been told that Mom made a mistake and needs to be obeyed. We don't know much else. BTW, I consider it a mistake when I out the trash out on Tuesday and it is collected on Thursday. Trolling for men on a married people hook-up site is not a mistake. It is a calculated selfish act with no regard for spouse or children. AM
BW - 70 WH - 65 M - 35 years D-day - 17 Apr 08 H broke contact 11/1/09 Back in love after the worst thing that every happened to us.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,433
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,433 |
BTW, I consider it a mistake when I out the trash out on Tuesday and it is collected on Thursday. Trolling for men on a married people hook-up site is not a mistake. It is a calculated selfish act with no regard for spouse or children. Your homeowners' association has a different opinion. In "Surviving an Affair", the APs Greg and Sue meet through their HOA. The HOA doesn't care who you shack up with, but if you take out the trash two days early, they will have something to say about that!
me-65 wife-61 married for 40 years DS - 38, autistic, lives at home DD - 37, married and on her own DS - 32, still living with us
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449 |
[
What mischaracterization?
As part of his general resistance to taking any dramatic steps, Pius said his kids do not want him to get divorced. He essentially got challenged that he must not have exposed sufficiently, or they would not feel that way. And puzzlement at his use of the word "adore" to describe their feelings. You make a lot of assumptions in your post. The mischaracterization is this comment: I'm still just astounded some of you guys think my fairly young children would stop loving their mom because of this. But you can see that is exactly what I am addressing in my post when I said this: I am astounded you would mischaracterize our posts in such a way. No one said they should stop "loving" her No one said his children "would stop loving their mom because of this." It was never suggested. And I do find his children's reactions odd. Children typically are very upset about an affair. But I am not surprised that his kids don't want them to get divorced; I am surprised his kids are not upset and taking issue with their mother. Especially female children: We�ve been married just over 15 years, and we have five children. The oldest is a son, age 14. We also have four daughters, ages 12, 9, 6 and 1 Since he thinks exposure is bad and since he has been resistant to any exposure throughout this ordeal, I don't believe he exposed the full truth to his children. Agree. The posts speak for themselves - he was questioned on his word "adore" and then he changed the word from "adore" to "love" while acting shocked someone would take issue with his kids feelings towards his WW. Anyone who has exposed to their children I think will testify that "adore" is not a word they would use to describe their children's feelings towards the WS.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449 |
There have been two OM, not three. Latest episode was reestablishing contact with POSOM #2. POSOM #2 is married. I have tried but failed to contact POSOM #2's BW. I've sent an email and a facebook message which haven't been answered. Why did you not come back and post about this update? Why not ask us what else could be done to get in touch with the OM BW? Very fishy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589 |
BTW, I consider it a mistake when I out the trash out on Tuesday and it is collected on Thursday. Trolling for men on a married people hook-up site is not a mistake. It is a calculated selfish act with no regard for spouse or children. Your homeowners' association has a different opinion. In "Surviving an Affair", the APs Greg and Sue meet through their HOA. The HOA doesn't care who you shack up with, but if you take out the trash two days early, they will have something to say about that! Yes, these are our cultural priorities.
BW - 70 WH - 65 M - 35 years D-day - 17 Apr 08 H broke contact 11/1/09 Back in love after the worst thing that every happened to us.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449 |
I'm sorry to point this out, but IF a thorough exposure works and IF your wife would happen to re-commit to your marriage, then the two of you will have to work out some over-the-top extraordinary precautions in order to have a shot at dealing with her instinct to troll for men. ARE you really committed to doing that?
Be honest with yourself, because if you aren't really willing to do whatever it takes, then do you REALLY love your wife as much as you think that you do? BS, did you listen to the radio clip posted in which Dr Harley answer Pius' email? He does not have any hope for this marriage. It was very interesting to me because I have spoken to Dr Harley about my own serial cheating WH and he had some hope for our M if we were to remove all opportunity for an affair. He described my ex as an addict, someone who got himself into trouble around women even if he wasn't intending to have an affair. He made it a point to say that this is not an serial cheating "addiction" situation. That Pius' WW exhibits extreme THOUGHTLESSNESS and SELFISHNESS that is not compatible with M....she goes out trolling for men that she doesn't even know to have sex regardless of the impact on Pius and her children....and that Pius would be better off divorcing and protecting himself and making sure that his children basically don't end up like this.
Last edited by SusieQ; 07/14/14 11:39 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449 |
If you asked my kids now I guarantee they'd want me to keep trying. I'd bet you any amount of money. The kids love me, but they adore their mom also. They don't want to be separated from either one of us. As for enabling, if I got divorced she would have an easier time trolling for sex anyway. It just wouldn't be my problem then. My children were devastated about the divorce as well. But now in the end they are not only fine w it but they are thriving. And yes, my ex did go right on to OW4 after our separation....his life seems to have a lot of turmoil and chaos that some might argue I could have prevented them from being exposed to if I stayed married to him. But this is the thing....through discussion with my kids I have seen the many lessons they have learned through this process. With me, good boundaries, honesty, they see that I am healthy and happier alone and a better mother than I was when I was buried in a bad marriage. With him, they have seen where poor decision making and selfishness gets you.
Last edited by SusieQ; 07/14/14 11:50 AM.
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
0 members (),
265
guests, and
37
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,621
Posts2,323,487
Members71,942
|
Most Online3,185 Jan 27th, 2020
|
|
|
|