20+ hours of UA time + Meeting of ancillary EN's + avoiding LB's = rock-solid SF.
I'd readily admit that we are not spending 20+ hours of UA time together. However, it seems like we tried to get involved in common activities, but when I expressed more than passing interest (e.g. hiking), she would start making excuses for no longer participating (e.g. "it's too strenuous for her" - this from a person who has no problem spending 6+ hours mall-shopping, leaving her poor H with aching knees trying to keep up). She spends most of her spare time now playing FB games, and most of the time she engages me, it's usually because she wants something from me, not because she wants to spend time with me.
She also has no interest in MB stuff, except to point out where I'm failing the MB approach.
Each side of the coin has their own individual reasons, but actively refusing to engage in one of the 4 intimate EN's is a huge misstep in marital recovery.
My FWW isn't *actively* refusing to engage in SF. She's a lot more subtle than that. She's told me that "whenever I want to, just let her know and she's willing to take part". However, if I make any overture to her that appears slightly sexual in nature, I usually get a negative comment in response, e.g. "not the best time", "not the best place", "let's wait until later", etc. She's become an expert in turning me off. to the point now that I'm hardly ever turned on at the thought of engaging in sex with her.
However, knowing that she pursued the OM for SF whenever I was not around and was apparently willing to do it anywhere of course makes matters worse.
At this point, I've stopped trying, and basically let things happen when they happen, which is very rarely these days. After a while, it becomes exhausting, irritating and very unappealing, having to dodge an emotional mindfield every time the subject of sex comes up.
Well, brother, I could trade war stories on you with this type of stuff (ie, what our FWW's did for the OM that they wouldn't do for us)... but, I don't really care what she did for him. Really. I don't. As far as I'm concerned, he's a scummy dirtbag that was blessed with a name that sounds like an 8 year old talking about a passing Mustang. He ain't me, never could be.
I prefer to think of things in what I actually bring to the table, and what that s**tball could never hope to.
What you are explaining, MiM, is our marriage Pre-A. I dealt with the absolute minimum from NGB for approximately 8 years. I then entered withdrawal for 2, and then she had an A.
Now, because of her choice, I will never again accept that type of treatment from my wife. Period.
I flatly refuse to ever again be the only one holding this marriage up.
HOWEVER, this doesn't free me from the tenants provided here; I will provide Radical Honesty, and specifically emotional honesty, on a regular basis on my emotional state within the marriage. Brainstorming, PoJA, and action are acceptable - blameshifting and inaction are not.
I supplement this with something I picked up in the Men's thread, I am holding on to my N.U.T.s. Non-negotiable, unalterable terms; I will not live in a loveless, sexless marriage.
All that being said; if SF is lacking now, it is
my fault. I cannot say that I am particularly turned off, but I'm definitely not... craving(?) as much as I used to. To the point that 2 weeks can pass before my drive kicks in for me to initiate - and that
only happens if there are continuous life circumstances that get in the way.
I would say that the "F" is really in SF. To the point, NGB is usually the one requesting, not me.
However, for her this creates an issue because she feels that I have a lack of desire. Being totally honest, it's probably true. I just don't use that as an excuse to withhold, and once engaged, I certainly don't dwell on any resentments.
Aaaaaaaaaaanyway... enough brain puke.