Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#1738953 08/29/06 11:25 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
late exposure

measurably superior to

no exposure

when discussing

protection of future contact

therefore

facilitating the safety

of all concerned!

Pep

Last edited by Pepperband; 08/29/06 06:01 PM.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
recovery efforts that omit

exposure to the other betrayed spouse

permits unnecessary vulnerability

and a known risk for future betrayals

as exampled by several "recovered" marriages here

where the other BS was not informed of the affair

and even a few years later ... NC is breached

and the BS suffers another betrayal

because the OP's spouse was not vigilant on his/her end

because he/she was deliberately left vulnerable

what a shame <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

and

what a sham <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/mad.gif" alt="" />

Pep

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
and

the vulnerability of a less than 100% exposed affair

continues

even

"years down the road"

it's an inconscionable position

for a FWS to recommend

less than 100% protection

for their other victim

the OP's spouse

inconscionable

<img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 258
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 258
PEP,

You are all knowing and wise!!

Don't ever leave these boards!

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Quote
You are all knowing and wise!!

I don't know about THAT!

however, I am experienced
and I have common sense
and
I have observed both

what works
and what

does not

Pep

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,035
H
Member
Offline
Member
H
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,035
Pep is a pro and he is bilingual! He speaks English and Foganian...


BH = Me 38; WW = 35; DS = 5, DD = 3, DD = 14 mo.
Feb 2006 = EA/PA started
May 19 & Aug. 15, 2006 = D-Days
Nov. 3, 2006 = Divorce Papers - (EA/PA ongoing)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Pep >self-exposure< is a girl!

<img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Last edited by Pepperband; 08/29/06 01:25 PM.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
Exposure to OP's Spouse, even late exposure

Finally and hopefully for all time

destroys the fantasy on both ends

For without FULL exposure

The secretive, lustful, and faux passionate illusion of the affair, to SOME extent, admitted to or not, very likely remains

The unexposed spouse necessarily remains stuck in the fantasy...

The "what if" remains open ended on their end

The exposed wayward spouse unwittingly remains tempted by the illusion, even if it's only held by OP, perhaps indefinitely

It could always rear it's ugly head in the form of contact from a still deluded OP.

Regardless, the wayward remains vulnerable to the fact (whether true or not) that the illusion may STILL exists

If not, perhaps just comforted, at some level, that the fantasy may still exists.

In quiet reflection there may always be:

"If my spouse died, perhaps OP will still be there for me"

"I wonder if OP thinks about me"

"I wonder if OP still loves me"

"I wonder what would have happened if we had just run off together"

The fantasy/illusion is where the HIGH of infidelity and the actual reward of the addiction IS...OP is just the CRACKPIPE/BONG. IMO, without the fantasy, OP is NOT nearly as tempting. They can rigthfully then become...just another crackhead after exposure.

Mr. Wondering


FBH(me)-51 FWW-49 (MrsWondering)
DD19 DS 22 Dday-2005-Recovered

"agree to disagree" = Used when one wants to reject the objective reality of the situation and hopefully replace it with their own.
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 928
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 928
Pep... now that you've exposed yourself (hopefully not wearing one of Mel's thongs)... is your masculine side going berserk?

I can just imagine all the fog talk... "It's not PMS, you're just annoying me." "My pants shrunk...again." "I'll be ready in a minute." And so on...


BH (Me) - 38
WW - 36
Married - 16 years
2 children - 10,12
DD1 - 05/30/05 - EA suspected, W wanted space
DD2 - 07/01/05 - EA/PA discovered & confronted WW
DD3 - 07/21/05 - Further contact discovered and now ended.
11/07/05 - exposed to OMW...
07/01/07 - separated to give "space". recovery was not progressing.
09/04/07 - DDAY all over... new OM.

Patience with God is Faith.
Patience with myself is Hope.
Patience with others is Love.
FAITH REQUIRES ACTION!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,435
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,435
Quote
Pep >self-exposure< is a girl!
<img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

No no.. now don't get NEKKID again !
You'll catch a cold from all that exposure <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> !


[color:"purple"]When we lose sight of the well being of others, it is like losing sight in one eye. (the Dalai Lama)[/color]
The Neutral Zone Theory
Doing the right thing vs being a good boy/girl
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
exposure works to protect marriages ...

to advocate non-exposure is to advocate an avoidable risk

just nonsense!

Pep

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Thank you Pep and Mr W. Excellent posts.


Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW)
D-Day August 2005
Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23
Empty Nesters.
Fully Recovered.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
why would a FWW respect her husband when he refuses to protect her from further contact by the OM?

she wouldn't

which is why the OM feels entitled to try again and contact FWW ... years later .... because he senses the FWW's disrespect for her BH

wimpy BH are targets for further contact from OM

"wimpy" is not attractive to most women ... agree or disagree?

Pep

Last edited by Pepperband; 08/30/06 09:49 AM.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,800
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,800
non-exposure only benefits the AFFAIR!!!!!


Quote
wimpy BH are targets for further contact from OM

"wimpy" is not attractive to most women ... agree or disagree?


My H used the Crowbar method to secure our future from OM. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> Wimpy, not a bit, kind of hostile, but it did scare the crap out of OM and I'm guessing he will NEVER try and contact me regardless of how his end of the world is going. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> Still paying for the damage, sad reminder, but OM is out of the picture. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />

I agree it is a wimpy approach to not expose, and wimpy is not attractive.

I confessed my A because I needed my H's help with ending it. I was weak, and the OM was persistant, I couldn't do it alone. I needed him to help me.

KY


The queen, for her part, is the unifying force of the community; if she is removed from the hive, the workers very quickly sense her absence. After a few hours, or even less, they show unmistakable signs of queenlessness. - Man and Insects
kyellow4 #1738967 08/30/06 12:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 73
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 73
Have exposed to WW family, my family, WW friends. Is there a need for last exposure to WW work, OM work, OM family (if possible)? NC has not occured, minimal contact at work. I know OM still calling, it has been a month since she said she doesn't want to talk to him. I still believe that there is contact based on phone messages. WW is coming around a little, fog seems to be clearing at times. Is there a need for this added exposure or will it drive her further from me?????

Thanks


M: 3 times in the past. 2 ended because of her having affairs, last ended because of her verbal and physical abuse. Last marriage ended in 2018.
K:1 son (Adult and out of home) and 1 daughter (in-home 50/50)


DavyJones #1738968 08/30/06 04:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 977
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 977
DavyJones,

Yep, I would expose to everyone that may be able to help end the affair, (and your W will need to leave the job. Minimal contact is too much!).

And yes, it may drive her further from you at first ('cause she'll be ticked off that you put her secret out there in the light) but if you want to begin to heal (which you CANNOT as long as there is ANY contact)... exposure is the best weapon.



new_beginningII #1738969 08/30/06 05:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,959
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,959
My biggest regret over my W's last two A's... I DIDN"T EXPOSE TO HER FAMILY!.

I was always viewed by them as a black sheep in their midst, but after discovering the A's, I should have exposed her to her very religous family members, to have garnered their support in getting her to end the A, and to have allowed them to perceive me in a better light, having been able to forgive her and welcome her back into the marriage.

Exposure is as critical to helping end the A, as NC is to ensuring Recovery has a chance.

JMHO
SD


BH - me 53, ONS 1979
FWW - 51, 2 EA's, 1 PA
Last D-Day, Sep. 30, 2003
Last Contact/recovery began 2-26-04

***You can do anything with time and money...but remember...money won't buy you time!***
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 73
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 73
Ok, I found out tonight there is still contact for sure. Some initiated by her. Should I confront her with this, expose and continue with plan A? Please help, at a critical point here.

Thanks to all


M: 3 times in the past. 2 ended because of her having affairs, last ended because of her verbal and physical abuse. Last marriage ended in 2018.
K:1 son (Adult and out of home) and 1 daughter (in-home 50/50)


DavyJones #1738971 08/30/06 08:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
Quote
recovery efforts that omit

exposure to the other betrayed spouse

permits unnecessary vulnerability

and a known risk for future betrayals


Pep, I have a feeling you're talking about me (and others) here. You do realise that my H exposed fully to the OM's W about 6 months after D-day (when the A had been over nearly a year) don't you?

It stopped any risk of contact again. The first meeting of recent contact was purely accidental but, yes indeed, was an A waiting to happen again. By the time Mel exposed to my H, there was NC back in place anyway.

My H tried to phone the OM's W a few times but couldn't get through.

KiwiJ #1738972 08/30/06 08:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
And I object VERY strongly to my wonderful H being called a wimp.

He is a strong, sensitive and wonderful man and could show most men a thing or two about being a real man.

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  Fordude 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 259 guests, and 57 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bibbyryan860, Ian T, SadNewYorker, Jay Handlooms, GrenHeil
71,839 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5