|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025 |
an update on the Kentucky case...
It appears the OM has FINALLY taken all the blogs and websites down and is no longer harassing his ALLEGED bio-son's family.
Mr. W
FBH(me)-51 FWW-49 (MrsWondering) DD19 DS 22 Dday-2005-Recovered
"agree to disagree" = Used when one wants to reject the objective reality of the situation and hopefully replace it with their own.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094 |
""""""""""""""""It's not like bio-dad/sperm donors in these situations are ever going to get every other weekend and Wednesday evenings.""""""""""""
that is what om got in our case along with alternating certain holidays
me-59 ww-55 married 1979 - together since 1974 6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30 my oldest son 37 d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001 oc born 12/20/01 now 8 grandchildren
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9 |
Please remind us, pops,
Was her age a factor in this arrangement? Was you daughter still a baby when this went to court?
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9 |
want,
I said I would bump the thread, but I've just looked at it as it is a messy argument. I don't think that the arguments on the thread will necessarily be useful to you.
From what I can see, this was a case decided in Kentucky in around April 2008. The judge threw out a call by OM to have a DNA test.
Your lawyer should be able to look up the case and see whether its outcome would be useful to your case.
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266 |
Pops, in your case you were okay with joint custody though, right?
My BH's question is: Does a BH have no rights? He is the victim, so how can any court order a paternity test against the BH's wishes? Or does he have no rights, and only the OM has rights? If that's the case, it seems like any Joe Shmoe could contest paternity and potentially ruin a family just because he feels like it...
Me: WW BH DD(4) DS(2) DD(1)
"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." (Jeremiah 29:11)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
""""""""""""""""It's not like bio-dad/sperm donors in these situations are ever going to get every other weekend and Wednesday evenings.""""""""""""
that is what om got in our case along with alternating certain holidays This went the way it did for pops beause pops didn't just open the door for the the OM, pops torn down the whole wall and gave the OM access to the OC and to intrude in his families life. Because pops placed more importance on money then NC.
Last edited by TheRoad; 12/06/10 10:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
Pops, in your case you were okay with joint custody though, right?
My BH's question is: Does a BH have no rights? He is the victim, so how can any court order a paternity test against the BH's wishes? Or does he have no rights, and only the OM has rights? If that's the case, it seems like any Joe Shmoe could contest paternity and potentially ruin a family just because he feels like it... The law of presumption, based on that the BH is the dad because no one could prove paternity. The courts logic was that what is best for the family as a whole guided their decision. That the parents were better off to stay together with the COM and OC as one family unit. Now science has made proving paternity possible it has forced the law makers and courts to change how things are being done. Basically the BH has two years to question paternity an disown the OC and not be stuck for CS. I don't know the time frame OM have to contest paternity, but I would think it be no more then what a BH has. Yes the BH is a "victim" he didn't do anything. But half the blame has to go to the WW. And the OM can try to blame everything on the WW and paint himself as the victim as well. OM can claim the WW was the agressor. OM can claim WW said she was infertile, had her tubes tied, she said she was on the pill, had an IUD. OM can claim WW said she was separated and filed for a D. OM can claim WW was going to marry OM and wanted a family with him soon as divorce was final. OM can claim WW said she wasn't married. OM can claim as many things as he is smart enough to claim. Now depending on a bunch of individual circumstances along with proof the OM is the bio dad courts can start protecting bio dad rights. Say when an unmarried couple dating split and she's pregnant she can't deny access to the bio dad. This single girl can't claim she never had sex with her boyfriend, well she can but DNA will prove she's lying. Just as with a WW can't claim there was no affair, no sex with the OM when DNA says different.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48 |
want,
I said I would bump the thread, but I've just looked at it as it is a messy argument. I don't think that the arguments on the thread will necessarily be useful to you.
From what I can see, this was a case decided in Kentucky in around April 2008. The judge threw out a call by OM to have a DNA test.
Your lawyer should be able to look up the case and see whether its outcome would be useful to your case. I agree & thought the same thing after refreshing myself on that thread.
Want, I have no idea what the presumption of paternity is in your state but your H has a good argument in my opinion. I think your lawyer really needs to take a look at what went on & what the arguments were in that Kentucky case. It could give him some ideas on argument. Sounds like he needs it if he thinks this situation is unprecedented. It's becoming more & more common as the days & years go by. Our society has become so....brazen.
Google Julie N. Ricketts vs. James Rhoades or Kentucky Supreme Court Ricketts vs. Rhoades. You'll find YouTubes of all parts of the oral arguments.
Here's a link to the Times article on it (I think this is it as I didn't have time to read it all): Time article
This may take you & your H doing your homework too. Good luck.
4eva
4eva
BW-47 WH-46 Married 21 yrs. D-19 S-15 OC-14/born 9/99 NC Dday #1 10/30/04 Dday #2 7/2/12 Skank ho #2 (40ish, childless, single & desperate; the world is becoming over-run with them...just like cheaters)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266 |
Thanks for the info, 4eva! We're definitely doing our homework, but it doesn't seem like enough...
Me: WW BH DD(4) DS(2) DD(1)
"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." (Jeremiah 29:11)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
http://letmeseemyson.blogspot.com/If I remember there were lots of pictures and some videos of OM, WW, and OC together in motel room and park. Along with a lot of text. http://forum.marriagebuilders.com/ubbt/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2057955&page=1There are at least 29 pages of posts. I not going to read them now but if I remember the OM had a DNA test done on his own before WW decided to end the affair and go NC with the OM for her and the OC. Being her BH and FIL were lawyers, has always made me feel if this pushed her to recover instead of divorce. Two lawyers working overtime, to hound her for CS, no visitation, loss of marital home, loss of an affluent life style married to an attorney, total financial ruin. The damage to her COM because their family fell apart.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094 |
the baby was just that a baby, about 8 months or so when the court stuff started. by the time the court order was finalized om had his 1st visit just before she turned 2.
yes i am ok with our custody order
in Ca there are 2 clasifications when it comes to custody. one is legal and the other is custodial
we have primary custodial and joint legal.
custodial means the oc lives with us and om can have court appointed visitations
legal means he can have the b-cert changed and add his name if he wants. right now there is no one listed and he hasn't changed it in 7 years
also in Ca your h has no say in the court procedings. only what fh and discussed and decided together with her attorney. not sure what your state laws are.
when fh went to the court mediator it was the mediator her and om only
i would not recommend my choices to anyone. it was a long bumpy road and not for the faint of heart.
in your situation i would recommend that you stay the MB course if at all possible.
keep in close contact with your attorney. if he isn't giving you the answers you want interview others. and force om to press the legal issue
no matter what some may think there was much much more than money that went into the choices we made. if they were here 10 years ago they would know that
Last edited by pops; 12/08/10 03:26 AM.
me-59 ww-55 married 1979 - together since 1974 6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30 my oldest son 37 d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001 oc born 12/20/01 now 8 grandchildren
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9 |
Thanks for you reply, pops. I think OP will find this helpful.
I don't like the way you have been accused of putting money first. I don't think financial gain was the motive. I've read and understood (I think) your concerns for your daughter's future. Also, I don't think that parents who have not read Harley would know how do do this - any more than I knew about exposure, Plan A, Plan B, changing jobs and NC letters when I first faced my H's affair.
I think, though, you are right to caution about following your path. Your right to CS gave OM his right to access, and this has affected the whole family.
New posters need to consider the positives and negatives of CS. It comes at a price.
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539 |
I don't like the way you have been accused of putting money first. I agree. Pops did the best HE knew how at the time. Thank you for posting that you would not recommend your solution. It IS a rough road and I know you and FH have struggled over it. You are a good guy, pops.
Faith
me: FWW/BS 52 H: FWH/BS 49 DS 30 DD 21 DS 15 OCDS 8
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,383
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,383 |
When I told OM I was P and wanted to stay with my BH, I said point blank, "You come after the child for any parental rights and/or visitation, I will come after you for CS." He was such a cheapskate, and probably didn't want family and friends to know of the A, (though he was single), that was enough to scare him away, as it seems to be with most OMs. People in affairs, are usually just in it for a 'free good time', not to be strapped with a kid. I'm sure he moved on to the next married woman, and never looked back.
I sometimes feel badly I said that to him in that way... like blackmail or whatever, but IF he really WANTED to know the OC, nothing I said would've stopped him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803 |
When I told OM I was P and wanted to stay with my BH, I said point blank, "You come after the child for any parental rights and/or visitation, I will come after you for CS." He was such a cheapskate, and probably didn't want family and friends to know of the A, (though he was single), that was enough to scare him away, as it seems to be with most OMs. People in affairs, are usually just in it for a 'free good time', not to be strapped with a kid. I'm sure he moved on to the next married woman, and never looked back.
I sometimes feel badly I said that to him in that way... like blackmail or whatever, but IF he really WANTED to know the OC, nothing I said would've stopped him. This worked for me too. The OM in my case definitely didn't want his ex-wife or his two teenage daughters to know about the OC, so I had a lot of leverage.
Me: BS/FWW: 48 BS/WH: 50 DS: 30, 27, 25 DD: 28 OC: 10 BH and I are raising my OC together.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
When I told OM I was P and wanted to stay with my BH, I said point blank, "You come after the child for any parental rights and/or visitation, I will come after you for CS." He was such a cheapskate, and probably didn't want family and friends to know of the A, (though he was single), that was enough to scare him away, as it seems to be with most OMs. People in affairs, are usually just in it for a 'free good time', not to be strapped with a kid. I'm sure he moved on to the next married woman, and never looked back.
I sometimes feel badly I said that to him in that way... like blackmail or whatever, but IF he really WANTED to know the OC, nothing I said would've stopped him. When you dumped the OM did BH know you had a PA and were pregnant?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266 |
In my case OM is relentless. Nothing seems to deter him. I'm at my wits' end!
Me: WW BH DD(4) DS(2) DD(1)
"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." (Jeremiah 29:11)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
In my case OM is relentless. Nothing seems to deter him. I'm at my wits' end! Have you change cell and email. Block OM on FB, better yet get rid of FB. Restraining order? Don't remember do you still work or live near OM?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,535 Likes: 9 |
In my case OM is relentless. Nothing seems to deter him. I'm at my wits' end! I think you're talking about his court case, aren't you? Your'e saying that you cannot get him to drop this. You're not saying that he keeps phoning or trying to contact you? Your thread is becoming muddled because so many separate discussions have spun off from it. We should try to stick to advising you about your situation here, and not discussing other people's.
BW Married 1989 His PA 2003-2006 2 kids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266 |
Right, the NC is working. We only "talk" through lawyers right now, which my BH handles. OM is only relentless about pursuing rights to the OC. My BH and I are terrified that he'll get joint custody. I only wish that the threat of CS would work to keep him away.
The one good thing is that my M has somehow gotten better after all of this. My BH and I are getting through this fire stronger than ever. Praise God something good could come out of all of the pain!
Me: WW BH DD(4) DS(2) DD(1)
"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." (Jeremiah 29:11)
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
1 members (1 invisible),
335
guests, and
55
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|