I am the OW...what I do not get is why I should be sued for this law and not the husband also....why is the women the only wrong one??? I didn't know my man was married for quite along time into the realtionship....he was truly unhappy....and went seeking someone else...when he left he made sure she was taken care of financially...he never wanted her to go without anything.....Now she is suing me...for taking everything away from her....Why do all you wives feel that we can TAKE away someone...isn't it that they are just not happy ....and seeking something else....I am really interested in knowing how this l;aw really works and what the specifics of it are....Please do not feel I am not sympathetic to each and every ones cause....I had been maried before this and my husband left for another too...but not for one minute did I think it was soley her fault....it was my husband and myself at fault....anyone have any feed bak?

First of all, you are not who you say you are. Second, if you were you wouldn't have just stumbled onto this small site about pregnancy in infedelity. Maybe your buddy from SOUTH Carolina mmlilgirl can help you...Good bye...

blueOO:<BR>I am sorry you have so much hostility towards me. I don't know this person,however I am interested in the honest answers to her questions. Why do you assume we know each other? Is it just because we are not BW's? Please don't get ticked off I am just curious as to why you have so much hostility towards me, I don't know you personally and have none towards you.

Blue, <P>Why do you react so easily on postings even not intended for you? Are you guilty of something? Do you think, all these women who post to get some clarifications on their situations are all your OW's? On other issues/topics, you basically have shown your discriminatory tendencies which I believe is illegal. You can be sued for that. Why can't you leave your OW alone and deal with your H rather. Maybe he actually did all those favors to the OW because he has feelings for her. I see the obvious but you're denying to see them.

Hey blue,<P> I'm sorry I replied, thought she was legit.<P> God bless you,<P>------------------<BR>Gregg

Glynton, These are all the same person again. She/it/he whatever is targeting me now. I was pissed off yesterday, pms I guess and getting off of my meds, but I will ignore now. My h knows a lot about computers and will help me trace this person. What a pathetic shame!<BR>

Hey blue,<P> We've got your back!! Hang in there!!<P><BR> God bless you,<P>------------------<BR>Gregg

Blue:<BR>I am not the same person as anyone else. I am a person who has something to share and was looking for a little support myself. I guess you have to have been here a long time to have anyone support or care about you. This doesn't seem like a support group to me. I am sorry that I bothered you, I was not targeting you in anything I said I just responded to what I read.

She has a right to sue him under the laws of divorce for his cancellation of the marital contract. After all, it is a contract, not just a religious union.<P>However, the alienation of affection law, the one you claim you are being sued for, is NOT because you stole a PERSON, but because you accepted affection from him (affection not legally yours) which meant he was not giving affection to her (more than likely). You helped and/or enticed him to alienate his affections for her. <P>Being that he can be sued under the guise of divorce, you too can be sued under the guise you helped break up their contract. <P>In addition, if he bought you gifts etc and she has the ability to file divorce under Adultery (in some states there is still such a thing), she can sue him for half the money she claims he spent on you. After all, it was half her money too. <P>Now tell me, if you had say.. a business contract with a person, one which you based your future financial and emotional well-being on, and someone came along and swayed your "contract partner" into giving someone else the business and not you, wouldn't you be pissy too? Most humans would when it comes to business matters. So why does the word marriage instead of contract (which it really is) make any difference? When you look at the nitty-gritty, it doesn't. <P>After all, it's only money and you got "da man", right? If he loves you and you love him, the money shouldn't matter. Right?<P><p>[This message has been edited by Couple_of_Reasons (edited May 12, 2001).]