|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 687
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 687 |
Nevermind..... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> <small>[ June 22, 2004, 10:14 AM: Message edited by: Blessed TIME ]</small>
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 6,937
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 6,937 |
Julie,
If you have a question for Archuletan (or any of the moderators), I'd suggest that you email it directly to the email address linked at the front page.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 295
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 295 |
Blessed Time, I did not see your question, but I will take a guess.
There is no problem with one poster starting a topic to address another.
However, if the discussion proves to be about another poster, or to continue a subject that has been locked, that thread may be locked as well.
Or, if the topic initiator requests a lock because the subject has gone astray or deteriorated into name-calling, we may indeed lock the thread.
The moderators received mod alerts or emails on the locked threads and the one I placed a message on.
If you do have a question, the report post feature allows you to add a comment or question about a specific post. Or, you can email a particular mod, using the links at the top of the page.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 687
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 687 |
I didn't realize we could post on blocked threads? (Suzet's from Plumb Bob) But I will just post here instead. (Had to come back and edit as I had PLUMP Bob; sorry Bob!) <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />
Arch...the question I was going to ask you yesterday, was why are you repremending Suzet, when it was MelodyLane that just kept going on and on and on and on, trying to get her point across? (And putting down Suzet's thoughts,in the process.)
And then if Suzet defended her beliefs, she is the one told by the c0-moderator that she was doing something wrong. YOU GOT THE WRONG LADY, ARCH!
It seemed to me, that the thread that should have been stopped, was the one MelodyLane (and her offensive ATTITUDE) posted, called 'Suzet'. (Although it seems to have died a natural death.)
This thread WAS continuing a topic of a blocked thread as you described above!
JMHO Julie <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> <small>[ June 23, 2004, 07:04 AM: Message edited by: Blessed TIME ]</small>
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,813
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,813 |
Blessed Time, I hope you don’t mind if I chime in here, because after the recent incidents I’m almost afraid to post anything and not sure what to do and how to react anymore. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="images/icons/frown.gif" /> Maybe I will even receive a post from the moderator telling me it’s unacceptable to post to this thread... I just want to inform you that BOTH the threads with the “judging” topic was locked… However, this thread (Plumb Bob addressed to me) is still open. If you interested you can read what the moderator (Archuletan) posted there yesterday. I have also send a message to the moderator on that thread this morning. Please read it. Maybe I’m wrong, but it appears I was bad mouthed in the e-mails from the specific poster to the moderator. Maybe I'm wrong by posting this post, but I can't just keep quite about this whole thing because this is really dissapointing. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="images/icons/frown.gif" />
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 687
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 687 |
I am glad you posted here, Suzet.
I felt you NEVER said anything wrong in your messages.
It was NOT you that was being the offensive troublemaker!
Sincerely, Julie <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/smile.gif" />
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,089
guests, and
85
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,624
Posts2,323,520
Members72,026
|
Most Online6,102 Jul 3rd, 2025
|
|
|
|