Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 415
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 415
Quote
Quote
Almost all of their materials deal with marriage building in which it may be assumed that there once was chemistry (or there never would have been a marriage in the first place), and that the potential must therefore still exist.

This is not a valid assumption. Many, many people get married without it. I did.
But, there had to be something there for you to have even approached or continued dating your exW, no? Just maybe not at the level that you want it to be now, which I totally get....


DW--BW....separated/divorced since 2003
Re-married 7/09!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,262
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,262
Quote
They said that we can fall with anybody who meets our ENs, but that is a far cry from just "anybody".


But this still implies that ANYBODY who chooses to meet our needs will be someone we'll fall in love with.

I still don't think I buy this entirely.

The Harley's do guarantee that married couples can fall in love.

Maybe they can engineer some affectionate times and even in love feelings for a while. I even experienced this to some extent with my STBXW.

Don't get me wrong. I loved my wife. True love. But it was an uphill struggle to maintain that relationship from the git-go. It was work...drudgery.

I think we both got to the point where the payoff just wasn't there anymore for either of us.

We NEVER had the kind of relationship where we "clicked" or we got butterflies from seeing each other come into a room.

I hear couples in their eighties talk about having this...even after sixty years of marriage, so don't tell me it fades. It might rise and fall, but it's always there.

If you override your feelings of "chemistry" to choose a sensible mate, I think you'll regret it.

A quiet, passionless, reliable companionship might be enough for some, but I won't settle for that. I want the butterflies AND all of the rest. They are inseparable for me.

They could be PERFECT, but if I don't have the chemistry, it's over.

But, if the chemistry is there, I can tolerate a lot of imperfection elsewhere.

As such, I probably will overlook a few caterpillars. But then again, if they are still caterpillars, I'm not interested in them anyway. I'm not interested in marrying a "project".

Low

Last edited by LowOrbit; 05/03/06 04:20 PM.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,262
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,262
Quote
But, there had to be something there for you to have even approached or continued dating your exW, no?


Nope...nada. My STBXW met through an arranged meeting, were doted on by family, and convinced ourselves the getting married was the next logical step.

We both knew this. We were married a long time before we let ourselves consider that maybe there should be more to this.

You see, as a young man, I didn't trust my heart and made every decision with my head. If it didn't make sense, it didn't get done. I drove beige Corollas while friends drove Camaros...I envied them so. Knowing my choice made more sense was little consolation.

I never let myself enjoy living.

Nowadays, I live differently.

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
Quote
But this still implies that ANYBODY who chooses to meet our needs will be someone we'll fall in love with.

Not at all. It means that anybody who is ABLE to meet our ENs will be someone we can fall in love with if we so choose.

Many people may CHOOSE to meet your EN's, but very few will be ABLE to do so (unless you are very non-picky <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> ).

The other part of it is that you must be open to having your ENs met. So if you are married, and you meet someone who can conceivably meet your ENs, you won't fall in love with them and won't let them meet your ENs.

But yes, if you are open to falling in love with someone and someone comes along who can fully meet your ENs, then I think you will fall in love with them.

AGG


Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,345
Quote
The Harley's do guarantee that married couples can fall in love.

Well, I agree with you that this cannot be guaranteed.

Quote
If you override your feelings of "chemistry" to choose a sensible mate, I think you'll regret it.

A quiet, passionless, reliable companionship might be enough for some, but I won't settle for that. I want the butterflies AND all of the rest. They are inseparable for me.

I agree that having chemistry, or that feeling of being drawn to your spouse, is an important start, or opening balance. But I still feel that when you say you won't settle for less, you are setting yourself up for disappointment. Chemistry can be a fleeting thing, and if you place too much emphasis on the hormones, you may end up feeling empty. You need to have that connection, that "being on the same wavelength" feeling - but that comes from awesome compatibility, not from hormones.

AGG


Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,887
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,887
Quote
Quote
But this still implies that ANYBODY who chooses to meet our needs will be someone we'll fall in love with.

Not at all. It means that anybody who is ABLE to meet our ENs will be someone we can fall in love with if we so choose.

Many people may CHOOSE to meet your EN's, but very few will be ABLE to do so (unless you are very non-picky <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> ).

The other part of it is that you must be open to having your ENs met. So if you are married, and you meet someone who can conceivably meet your ENs, you won't fall in love with them and won't let them meet your ENs.

But yes, if you are open to falling in love with someone and someone comes along who can fully meet your ENs, then I think you will fall in love with them.

AGG
Nice and succinctly put!

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,887
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,887
Quote
You touched upon the basis of a book I just started reading, Getting The Love You Want by Harville Hendrix. He theorizes that we tend to end up w/ people, subconsciously, who are alot like our parents (the good and the bad) in order to for us to try to heal our childhood wounds, so that we can once again, be "whole".....

VERY interesting read so far.

Have you read it?

DW
Yep. I read that book about eight years ago, I think, and it's one of the factors in my thinking. Combine that with Malcolm Gladwell's Blink, and the implications are...scary. Throw in Neil Strauss's The Game if you really want to feel disturbed. (I only made it halfway through, it made me feel so icky.)

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 415
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 415
Blink... <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> got a bit overwhelmed just reading the synopsis! Sounds so confusing yet it piqued my interest. Don't think I'm ready for that one yet <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />

The Game sounds just plain sad <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/eek.gif" alt="" />


DW--BW....separated/divorced since 2003
Re-married 7/09!
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774
low orbit, i agree with your line of thinking. i totally believe in complete compatibility, that butterfly feeling, all of it,and i believe you can have it after many years together. i see lots of couples who have it, who are as in love now as when they first married and still act like they are newlyweds. yes, it can happen and that is exactly what i want. i hope i am well on my way to getting that....
mlhb


God first, family second, and all else will fall into place.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 556 guests, and 130 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
finnbentley, implementsheep, rafaelakutch, DGTian120, MigelGrossy
72,044 Registered Users
Latest Posts
Three Times A Charm
by still seeking - 08/09/25 01:31 PM
How important is it to get the whole story?
by still seeking - 07/24/25 01:29 AM
Annulment reconsideration help
by abrrba - 07/21/25 03:05 PM
Help: I Don't Like Being Around My Wife
by abrrba - 07/21/25 03:01 PM
Following Ex-Wifes Nursing Schedule?
by Roger Beach - 07/16/25 04:21 AM
My wife wants a separation
by Roger Beach - 07/16/25 04:20 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics133,625
Posts2,323,525
Members72,045
Most Online6,102
Jul 3rd, 2025
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 2025, Marriage Builders, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0