Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 452
E
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 452
I was reading the article, and my blood was boiling.
Usually, I am pretty good in "understanding" people's sorrow but today it was a bit much.


BS (me) 46
STBX WH 53
Married 2000
DS, 11; DS, 10
1st A: LT D-Day - 02/14/06
2nd A: D-Day - 12/21/11
Plan B since 1/17/12
Divorcing
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 24
M
Junior Member
Junior Member
M Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 24

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 613
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 613
Anyway we can get a brief synopsis. One has to register to read it and probably end up getting endless advertisment.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 846
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 846
Here is a copy of it and I didn't have to register for it. There have been lots of stories told about the fireman that divorced their wives to marry the widows that were assigned to console. I always wonder if the million dollars they all got in settlements had anything to do with it. My heart breaks for all the spouses dumped when they needed their spouses the most.

All of it does say a thing or two about human nature. It is not a pretty picture.



Modern Love
Dust to Dust: An Affair Post 9/11
By NIKKI STERN
ALTHOUGH I’ll never know for certain, my husband, Jim, was probably at his desk on the 94th floor of 1 World Trade Center when the plane came crashing into his life, briefly, and into mine, permanently. On that day and for so many days after, I felt suspended in time. My past was gone and I couldn’t imagine a future.

First I surrendered to the grief. I stopped eating. Then I tried drinking but found that booze doesn’t mix with acid reflux. I considered drugs but hadn’t a clue as to what to take. I even considered suicide but was either too weak or too strong — I’m not sure which.

Finally I realized I needed to face the event and its aftermath head-on, and the best way to do that was to become involved in victims’ advocacy efforts, where my career experience in public affairs came in handy: I could more or less navigate the bureaucracy that had confounded so many other 9/11 families and could create a role for myself while helping others heal. But I couldn’t be that kind of sensible professional when it came to my own healing. Thus I allowed myself to arrive at the conclusion that, although grief-stricken, I must try to love again — and soon.

No matter that everything stood in my way: my vulnerability, my demographic (middle-age widow in the suburbs) and especially the still-fresh memory of my husband and what had been our exceptionally strong marriage. I couldn’t get my head around being alone and I certainly couldn’t accept being a widow. The status change shocked me about as much as the loss of my love. I was supposed to be part of a couple, damn it. I became convinced that if I could just love again, I could heal.

“Too soon,” my friends warned. “It’ll take years.”

“I don’t have years,” I countered. I needed to test drive my heart to see whether it had been destroyed. Love unexpectedly presented itself halfway through the first year. He was also awash in grief, having lost a family member in the attacks. We seemed to share a sensibility as well as a tragedy. We had no end of things to talk about, from 9/11 to interests we shared to, inevitably, matters of the heart: longstanding strains in his marriage, my difficulties with family members.

Keeping the issues separate was increasingly difficult, and I often felt as if we were communicating in code.

He remembered me on my first lonely Valentine’s Day with an e-mail message that said, “I know this day will be difficult but I didn’t want you to be without a Valentine.” On my birthday, he sent one of those silly e-cards. Our e-mail messages were becoming more personal — we discussed our losses, our lives, our hopes and our fears. “I’m worried that I might not ever fall in love again,” I wrote him.

“Of course you will,” he assured me. “It will just be different.”

Oh yes, there were red lights, red flags, warning signals galore. But I had no one to tell me to be guarded, careful, smart or safe. It wouldn’t have made any difference.

Literature and movies are full of “love amid the ruins” stories. The events of 9/11 entangled many of us in a kind of emotional lost and found. Families grew closer or seemed to disintegrate. Firefighters left their wives to be with the widows they counseled. Rescue workers fell in with the volunteers who offered them comfort between their shifts. In a time of jumbled lives, shattered hearts and altered expectations, people were thrown together and torn apart. Some of those relationships were temporary, some became permanent, and the jury is still out on others.

He and I both saw our affair coming a ways off, I think; we also recognized its inevitable end well before we were able to let it go. I attempted in various ways to shield myself from being hurt. I gave us sardonic nicknames: VW for “vulnerable widow” and UM for “unavailable man.” I pretended I was comfortable with a temporary involvement. I imagined I was merely insulating memories and emotions too painful to face with newer, more positive ones. I told myself to live in the moment. I told myself I wasn’t in love.

At the same time, I managed to tie myself up in knots by simultaneously thinking of a future together and anticipating our final breakup. I had to remind myself that even if I lost him, it wouldn’t be that kind of loss.

Our times together were what the romance novels refer to as “stolen moments.” I would show up at work with a little overnight bag and an air of frenzied expectation, prompting a concerned friend to ask me if I knew what I was doing.

“Reinventing myself?” I suggested hopefully.

To which she replied, not unkindly, “As a mistress?” I tried to ignore her. This was simply my “new normal.” I was experiencing a grand passion as outsized as the grief I was still processing. It was glorious, painful and extraordinarily insular. I felt desirable, desired and alive.

BUT it was tumultuous, a roller coaster ride. We broke up five times in three and a half years, dramatic bust-ups followed by passionate reconciliations. That we stayed together even that long was something of a minor miracle. Even as I was seeking to build a new life, he was determined to preserve his exactly as it had been — or as closely as possible. I was looking for a life preserver and he was trying not to rock the boat. So typical, I remember thinking. Just like a guy.

It was all typical, of course. The extraordinary circumstances and heightened emotions that marked 9/11 couldn’t change the fact that this was in many ways an “ordinary” affair. At the end of the day, he was simply another man who had strayed, and I was another lonely woman who had resolutely closed my eyes to the shortcomings of this kind of relationship because I was so certain it was better than no relationship.

Which was true until it wasn’t. Gradually, even as I allowed my courage to flag at the approach of another 9/11 anniversary or the death of my parents or the major surgery I faced, even as I gave myself permission not to break it off, I grew more resolute about accepting the inevitable.

The ending presented itself as a sort of slow fade. No more drama, thank God, but our rendezvous were less frequent and tinged not with anticipation but with sorrow. The fact that the days were becoming shorter seemed entirely appropriate.

AFTER Christmas, he tried to call me after returning from a family trip. After four days of not picking up, I took a deep breath and answered. Dutifully, I asked about his vacation, even though I didn’t want to hear about it. “It was great,” he replied and proceeded to talk about his activities, where they had gone and what they had done. I know those are the conversations friends have, but I wasn’t feeling friendly, just lonely and abandoned. How typical.

When he asked what I’d been doing, I said, “Making a New Year’s resolution.”

“I hope it’s not about me,” he said. There was a silence, after which he added, “Oh.” I didn’t need to respond and I couldn’t have if I’d wanted to. We’d already had that discussion. I was on shaky ground but determined not to go back on my promise to myself. We finished our conversation and that was that.

Well, almost. Although we no longer talk on the phone, we are still in touch by e-mail, usually with 9/11 news or stale office jokes or the occasional update, in which he’ll tell me what he’s been doing and I’ll make up something to sound busier than I am. It’s hard, I admit. He is by turns intimate and distant, which I now realize was true throughout our affair.

“Block his e-mail,” my friends suggest. But honestly, at this point, I can’t. I guess I still need to hear from him, to know that he’s O.K. — and alive.

“Do you think you were really in love with him?” a close friend asked me recently. “Or was it the crazy emotionalism of 9/11 that kept the relationship going?”

I’ve asked myself that more than once. Love is always a combination of need, desire, compatibility and convenience that converge at any given moment. He didn’t provide the stability or security I had lost and missed from my marriage, and the comfort he offered was fleeting at best. But he was part of my healing and he helped plug the hole in my heart, however temporarily. Maybe I did love him. It was, exactly as he had once suggested, just different.

Anyway, I’m in love again. Her name is Molly. She is smallish, all white except for silky red and black ears, an apricot patch down her back leg and soft brown eyes. I’m not in danger of confusing puppy love with the real thing, but there is something to be said for unconditional affection. My life is tranquil, but sometimes I miss the roller coaster ride.

For me — and, I suspect, for so many others — love after 9/11 has been like love after any loss: painful, foolhardy, obsessive, instructive, destructive, redemptive, wondrous, weird, unavoidable and necessary.

It’s also remarkably like first love, which, in a sense, it is. When it’s going great, it takes you away to a whole other place, one where you can eat, drink, make love, laugh, sing, dream and open your heart without fear, just as you did when you were young and hopeful, your world was a safe if predictable place, and the worst thing you had to fear was that he might not call.

Nikki Stern is a communications consultant living in Princeton, N.J.


Me/BS 48
Married 16 yrs/together 23; 1 child
Dday 4/05; WH "needed space" and left 5/05
WH Filed D papers 6/05 - Divorce final 12/05
WH moved in with OW 11/05; moved out OW 1/06
12/06 His 3rd and strongest attempt at reconcilliation (I believe OW still in picture)
2/07 Affair over, begging me to take him back - it's too late.
WH has tried numerous times to reconcile.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,788
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,788
What a head case. Bleech!

All I can say is both of them caused double the grief...the absolute fog in her writing is nauseous.

Stuff of romance novels? Bleech...hurl! VOMIT!

She almost broke up a family. She knew he was an UM..as she put it...

I suspect that if her H had been alive...he would have been sickened at her behavior. How horrid a way to dishonor the memory of her H...by boinking a married father and family guy.

Love amid the ruins? How about Love...uh excuse me...Lust wrecking more lives...that's more like it Ms. Nikki !

I am sickened to know this was even published...that this stuuupid and fogged out woman can prey upon the vulernability of those TRULY AFFECTED BY 9/11 to write her story.

But then again...we see a window yet again into the life of an OW...it was an "ALL ABOUT ME" time in her life...she wanted comfort..she wanted sf...she wanted ...she wanted...she needed....it was all about her.

somehow I think her grief for her dead H was not that deep.

And like most OW..they describe their destruction they create as romantic...as stuff of novels...nevermind the families they willingly destroy. It's all ok! It felt good...it was fun when it lasted...IT MET THEIR EN'S...

I have had it up to my neck with these OW...wanting sympathy and help.

As for me? I know she has to someday deal with her conscience and actions...and the proverbial karma train is rolling her way yet again....sorry for her original loss...but she did NOT HAVE TO CHEAPEN THE MEMORY OF HER H BY SCREWING A MARRIED MAN!

Sadly...in the end...THERE IS NO REST FOR THE WICKED.


me:37 BS; s:7; xh:38; OW:26;eloped w/OW 1 wk after D: 12/29/03. OC born 3/17/04. Happy! Blessed to be the mother of a wonderful son..great profession..Life's good!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,435
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,435
I noticed she never mentions the BW; it's all about HER.
The only thing I'd like to insert here is the MSN *puke* icon.

A while ago I noticed the headlines on some women's magazine in the supermarket. It went something like "Our baby looks just you", being a WW calling her OM in hospital. They did an article on 5 WW having a child that was OM's instead of their BH.. without BH knowing about it.
I WAS the MSN *puke* icon when I saw that. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />


[color:"purple"]When we lose sight of the well being of others, it is like losing sight in one eye. (the Dalai Lama)[/color]
The Neutral Zone Theory
Doing the right thing vs being a good boy/girl

Moderated by  Fordude 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 692 guests, and 89 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
DGTian120, MigelGrossy, Jerry Watson, Toothsome, IO Games
72,041 Registered Users
Latest Posts
Three Times A Charm
by still seeking - 08/09/25 01:31 PM
How important is it to get the whole story?
by still seeking - 07/24/25 01:29 AM
Annulment reconsideration help
by abrrba - 07/21/25 03:05 PM
Help: I Don't Like Being Around My Wife
by abrrba - 07/21/25 03:01 PM
Following Ex-Wifes Nursing Schedule?
by Roger Beach - 07/16/25 04:21 AM
My wife wants a separation
by Roger Beach - 07/16/25 04:20 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics133,625
Posts2,323,525
Members72,042
Most Online6,102
Jul 3rd, 2025
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 2025, Marriage Builders, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0