News Story
A Victoria couple, who have been married since 2000, will be in Supreme Court tomorrow on appeal against a Victoria Judge who granted a Calgary pilot access to his biological 3 year old autistic son, whom he had originally denied being the father of, then relinquished his rights to the couple, then later helped his own father and mother abduct the child while confining and threatening the biological mother afterwards. The biological father, an Air Canada Jazz Pilot, and his parents deny the accusation. The Victoria couple is adamant about the events and are pursuing an appeal in hopes to have the Provincial Trial Judges findings dismissed.
The Provincial Court granted access to the biological father preferring his claim that the biological mother became pregnant on purpose, despite a 16-year documented infertility history, and choose to end contact with the biological father because he was in a new romantic relationship, even though the couple are married and have since had a second child. The court further discrediting the biological mother by stating that the mother made up the abuse story to save her marriage and granting the defendant’s claim of sanction and security of access due the child’s right to know his biological father. The Victoria couple view that the Judge’s biasness towards the mother has skewed the courts decision and that biology is not a trump card to be waved by any person trying to use the judicial system to vindicate criminal actions. In this case, the Victoria couple has stated and are insistent that there should be no contact or communication with the biological father, or his parents at all.
The couple wish to launch a movement toward a more clear meaning for an act that separates and limits the role of physical biology toward an adults right over a child from that of the role of the actual parenting and the social- biological responsibilities of an adult toward the right a child.
In other words, this is going to the top.
