There are all kinds of potential extenuating circumstances that we just don't know.
I agree and we seem to have gotten a different perspective as to what is going on with his marriage. He does have another post that sheds more light on his situation.
The question is whether your spouse should have control over your recreation without providing any kind of alternative. It would be one thing if she was saying, "Honey, I'd really like it if you'd spent time with me." But she's not saying that. She's not engaging him in any alternative way, from what I'm seeing. She's just being controlling.
This would be one of the things we disagree on. I don’t think she is being controlling. I think she really has a fear that he is addicted to video games. We also don't know if she suggested things that he turned down.There is no way to tell for sure because we don’t have her side, just his.
She needs to know that you can't just take away something that fulfills a need and not replace it. If she wants him to stay away from video games, she needs to give him something worth staying away from them for. I don't know what that is, but it's not setting arbitrary rules and then never being around and not wanting to do anything when she is around.
I also disagree with this statement. It is not his wife’s responsibility to entertain her husband 24/7. He has stated that when they are together they do things. He is speaking about when he is alone. My take on this is he isn’t open to other forms of entertainment so even if she did suggest something else I don’t think he would be open for it. He wants to play video games period.
There is an old saying; people who are constantly bored are boring people. I think there is some truth to that. Put another way, if you are happy with who you are then you can have fun doing anything by yourself without anyone or anything to “entertain” you.