Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
H
Member
OP Offline
Member
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
Is A "Good Enough" Marriage Good Enough?


Feb. 28, 2008

(WebMD) Forty-one-year-old single mother and journalist Lori Gottlieb has written candidly of spurning "good enough" men in search of the perfect romantic mate. But in her provocative new essay for the Atlantic, Gottlieb advises singles - especially women - to consider settling when it comes to a love relationship, arguing it will likely lead to long-term happiness.

In her essay, Gottlieb likens a "good-enough marriage" to a small nonprofit business with a likeable mate who can problem-solve. Gottlieb spoke exclusively with WebMD about the reaction it has generated.

"I've gotten quite a response, and it's been all over the map," Gottlieb tells WebMD. "Married people are very supportive of the point I am trying to make. Some single women applaud me for saying out loud what many are thinking but not saying. But many single women think it is an affront. They think it is an unpalatable challenge to an empowering world view that you can have it all."

At the heart of the "good enough" argument is that too many of us have been brainwashed into a "fairy tales and fireworks" view of romance that lacks long-term stability. Gottlieb writes that marrying Mr. Good Enough is a viable option, especially if the goal is to land a reliable life partner and create a family.

"The point of the article is not to settle for any schmo off the street, but a good guy you like, enjoy the company of, and have realistic expectations of," she says.

"If you want to be with somebody and you're holding out, you may end up with nothing," Gottlieb says. "That's the crazy-making part - you're always comparing."

Defining The Good-Enough Marriage

London pediatrician Donald Winnicott coined the term "good-enough mother." A good-enough mother stands in contrast to a "perfect" mother. She provides a safe environment, connection and ultimately, independence, to facilitate the child's development. A good-enough mother meets some, but not all, of her child's needs.

Can the good-enough theory apply to romantic partners as well?

"Good enough, rather than the fairy-tale model, which is a big disappointment, is a reasonable way to picture married life," says Louanne Cole Weston, PhD, WebMD's sex and relationship expert.

Katharine Parks of Chillicothe, Ohio, married John at 19 and has been happily wed for 32 years. She says the terminology is right on target. "In American society, we are always going for much more than we actually need. We're expecting too much from a relationship. I think realizing this is 'as good as it gets' and that life isn't 'once-upon-a-time' is important to building a life together."

Scott Haltzman, MD, a clinical assistant professor at Brown University's department of psychiatry and human behavior, says the issue of settling for a certain person or behavior in a relationship is one of the principles of happiness - if you reframe it as "acceptance."

<QUOTE />"We live in a culture where we're being told through all forms of media, 'Don't accept anything but the best.' We all marry 'the wrong person.' I think the real challenge of marriage is to get out of the romantic, over-idealized phase and into the 'Now what?' phase. Making adjustments, modifying expectations, and settling is something that happens throughout the entire relationship, not just the day you stand in front of the altar," he tells WebMD. "We need to broaden our view of what acceptable means."

Pepper Schwartz, PhD, a relationship expert at perfectmatch.com and professor of sociology at the University of Washington, acknowledges that the term "good enough" carries a negative - and unnecessary - connotation.

"The implication of settling for good enough is that at some core level you will be dissatisfied," Schwartz tells WebMD. "It's a downer concept for sure. The whole feeling has infected society in a way that is shocking." She draws a sports analogy. "I'm a good skier, I have a lot of fun skiing, but I don't say I'm a 'good enough skier.' I wish we could just call it a 'good marriage.'"

Schwartz says that being in a state of constant aspiration is a form of "self-torture."

"If I had to settle for a new Oldsmobile when what I really want is a Porsche, I'll never be satisfied. In truth, the Oldsmobile is new, it's pretty, and it works. Why wouldn't I be satisfied with it?"

Haltzman notes in his book, "The Secrets of Happily Married Women: How to
Get More out of Your Relationship by Doing Less" (Jossey-Bass), that for centuries happiness was not a factor in good marriages. Rather, marriage was a practical matter that ensured social and financial security and provided for offspring. It's only over the last century that couples have expected marriage to bring them happiness. We're learning as we go.

David Rice of Alpharetta, Ga., agrees. Married for five years to Cynthia, he points to his parents' long marriage and the role model of World War II couples. "Think back to those soldiers, who just wanted to get home to a woman who came from a church-going family, could dance, and was happy to marry a nice guy. Prerequisites have changed."

He admits that his romantic journey didn't go as planned. "At the ripe old age of 44, I felt the time was right and I wanted to get married. I found somebody I could build something with, but regardless of the attraction, it wasn't puppy love. I actually treated it like a business decision, as cold or callous as that might sound. I didn't feel I had time to make a couple of mistakes. I felt I had to hit it out of the park."

A Pragmatic View Of Marriage

Experts and married couples both agree: It's a fantasy to think you'll achieve perfection in a relationship. Chemistry, while important, is not all-important, and the "soul mate" concept sets the bar unrealistically high.

"The good-enough marriage that de-emphasizes romantic love in favor of a pragmatic relationship is a very important topic that addresses the idealization of romance and the failures that inevitably occur due to unattainable expectations," says Michael D. Zentman, PhD, director of the postgraduate program in marriage and couple therapy at Adelphi University.

<PGBR>Belinda Rachman, an attorney in Carlsbad, Calif., has been married to Eliot for more than 20 years. "I made a rational choice that had nothing to do with romantic love and have been very happy. I had a written 'man plan.' As each successive relationship failed, I took a look at what I had to have in a man, what qualities I had to have and what was negotiable; I knew I didn't want to go on another emotional roller-coaster ride. When I look at the utter mess made by couples who have based a marriage on being in love with no thought to basic compatibility, I know I made the right choice."

Terri, an artist based in Roswell, Ga., who has been married for eight-and-a-half years, says the good-enough concept resonates with her.

"I did have a fantasy idea of what marriage was going to be. By the time I got married in my mid-30s, I had a lot of dating experience and the bubble burst. We had a child within the first year of marriage, and it got pretty practical pretty quickly," says Terri, who asked that her last name not be used. "The ever-shifting process of coming together, compromising, and the day-to-day of housekeeping and child rearing have taught me to accept Thomas for who he is. When that happened, I truly felt a sense of relief, a comfortable feeling of where I have landed. I'm much more relaxed."

Recognizing Mr. Or Ms. "Good Enough"

In Tyler Perry's films, the girl often gets the guy - but there's a caveat: He's not usually the guy she pictured herself with. In fact, it's usually a regular guy - the proverbial "diamond in the rough" - that she's overlooked.

As we mature and learn more about who we are, recognize our inadequacies and learn to accept those of our mate, we are better equipped to "screen in" candidates who are good enough, experts say.

Gottlieb believes many of us - herself included - have dismissed potential mates based on looks, habits, or their superficial "deal breakers." In her article, she writes about her own change of heart in terms of what romance and marriage is or isn't supposed to be.

Cynthia Rice underwent a similar change. "Earlier in my life, I had certain criteria in my mind, like 'I'm not going to choose someone without a certain stature in life or money," she says. "I consider [settling] reprioritizing. We all have a little more baggage. I realized David was really smart. We can have a conversation and connect even while we are grinding out the day."

"I made a practical choice in a mate," she tells WebMD. "It's not what we look like to our neighbors or to society. It's what we have here in our home."

Although everyone has different requirements of a potential spouse, experts offer five guidelines to help you determine the qualities needed for sharing "good enough" lifetime together.

Compatibility. "Similar styles in living, similar ways of operating, whether more rational or emotional, will help you avoid chronic disappointment," Weston says. Gottlieb speaks of lifestyles that can "meld."

Sexual Attraction. "You need adequate sexual attraction, some chemistry, but you each don't have to like 17 body parts," Weston says.

Similar Goals. You may have a laundry list of ideal qualities in a mate, but narrow down your list to three must-have traits, Schwartz suggests. "You only have so many 'slots' someone can fulfill, whether it's a shared love of travel, a similar outlook on money, or raising children." Schwartz cautions about seeking what she calls "incongruent characteristics" from a partner. "Some women marry industry lions and then are surprised when they bite," she says.

Respect. "If you admire someone, you are way ahead," says Schwartz.

Gut Check. Finally, Weston suggests trusting your gut for clues on whether someone is good enough for you. "Nine years before I married my husband, I was engaged to another man," she says. "I had funny little shooting pains and a twitch in that hand; I wasn't sleeping well. My body was giving me clues."

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774
i do not disagree with this article.

in my experience with men, they want what they can't have.
they want a sex symbol on their arm who never disagrees with them, who puts them on a pedestal, and who is agreeable. (this is my experience, not saying all men are like this)
to me, that is not realistic nor is it what most men are going to get!

as a woman, that is frustrating to me because i feel if i don't fit that bill, and the man i am with really wants that but know they can't have it, then they are just "settling" for me. i don't think anyone wants to think they are just being settled for. so, i want nothing to do with any man who really wants what i described above. i say good luck to finding that, especially if you are 35 and above and are looking for some 20 something.

i have changed a lot from when i was in my 20's for what i am looking for. in my 20 it was very surperficial what i was looking for. and that is when i got married, and that is partly why it didn't last. i think i am a bit more practical now, although i do have some non negotiables.

a man doesn't have to be drop dead gorgeous for me. if you are well kept, clean, smell good, care about your appearance, and healthy, that is good. i do NOT want to date or marry a smoker or someone who drinks a lot.
income is not hugely important or what kind of job you have, as long as you can help to support a family with it.
i want someone who goes to church because i will not marry someone again who doesn't. going to church as a family is very important to me. not me and my kids going while my partner stays home.
someone who obviously has similar interests and someone who is dedicated to me. DEDICATED TO ME. not looking elsewhere at the same time for something better to come along. that man is the man above i want to avoid.

falling head over heels in love or "lust" is no longer realistic to me. the last 2 times i did that (the only 2 times i did, my exh being one of them) it bit me in the [censored].
i do think this is something to be realistic about. not necessarily going on just a feeling but on all parts of the picture. actions speak louder than words.

so, i would have to say, i agree with a lot of that article.

mlhb

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,531
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,531
Very interesting article. It's also interesting that the characteristics of the "good enough" relationship are completely opposite to those of an affair. I like the 5 guidlines.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 213
Z
Member
Offline
Member
Z
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 213
This is actually very interesting. I have a friend with whom I have been discussing the fallout of my M with. She is married. She describes her M as just this, good enough. Her and her H are good friends and share alot of things that make them a good match, including finacial stability, matching ambitions and their own agreement that they need their owm space to be happy. Their R seems very unemotional compared to the M that I have been in. There doesn't seem to be alot of passion. It seems more like they are very good friends.

In turn, she talks about a previous relationship she was in that was very passionate and rocky. She said she felt much more emotional attachment to this previous relationship than to her current H. But in the end it was not good for her, because it was tooo emotional.

I have wondered often if I had expected too much from my M and if something more of a good enough R would be better for me, where I wouldn't be so emotionally involved with my partner. It leaves room for more contentment and less disappointment I think. It seems like it could turn out to be a much healthier R.


WW(me)-44
WH-49
Together 10 yrs
M 4 yrs
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 297
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 297
I couldn't agree more - my marriage was the passionate, emotional and high maintenance, aka "high drama" marriage - I never felt calm or comfortable for 12 years. I had those unrealistic expectations of "soul mate" and the "happily ever after" - and they all blew up in my face.

Now, I'm almost 3 years into the most comfortable "good enough" relationship I've ever had in my life. He's not the "typical" guy that I had been attracted to my entire life (which didn't work very well for me) - but I think it's the healthiest relationship for me ever. I have no unrealistic expectations for the first time in my life. I am comfortable with the relationship (and him) as he is - I have no desire to control him, change him, etc.....it's awesome.

No, my belly doesn't flip flop every time I see him, he doesn't write me mushy poetry, sweep me off my fee, etc. - but I will say that everytime I do see him - it makes me happy and my day better.....

Laura


Older But Definately Happier and Wiser
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 448
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 448
I think this article is right on. The smartest thing I've read in a while - very common sense.

I printed it out and will share it with my teenagers.

Em

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,578
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,578
A desire to have the best in always insatiable...THE BEST IN ANYTHING!

I think that there are those people--male and female-- who put off marriage and keep looking because they have this sort of weird way at looking at things. I think there is something intrinsically wrong with their thinking to begin with. A sort of twisted thinking!

There MILLIONS people out there who have no trouble dating and mating. They have no fear of commitment, no fear of intimacy, responsibility, failing or losing freedom or self identity. In fact their self-identity IS to be part of a greater unit.

Having a partner to share my life with was always important to me. When I found someone who wanted me as much as I wanted him, I thought--and still think--that I am the luckiest woman in the world. Is he perfect? In my eyes he is and will alway be--perfect for me! Often, in the evenings, we will be quietly reading and I'll look over and watch him from across the room and think that I won the lottery.


Me: 56
H: 61
DD: 13 and hormonal
DS: 20

Oldest son died 1994 @ age 8

Happily married 30+ years

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 522 guests, and 41 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bibbyryan860, Ian T, SadNewYorker, Jay Handlooms, GrenHeil
71,838 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5