On another thread you said:


I don't think that is accurate at all. I did get your main point, that there are FWW's that seem to be able to connect with Rain without the need to beat her up first and that the newly betrayed men should probably learn to hold their tongues before attempting to debate with an actively wayward wife.

But you may have missed my point, that I was posting because I thought I might have made a connection.

I also tried to make a point, but appear to have failed, that the debate over who should post and who should not post on any given person's thread, should not be hashed out on that thread no matter what kind of advice is or is not being given. Correction by addition sometimes gets the job done, but correction by confrontation nearly always leads to a debate that detracts from the thread itself, often ending up with the thread being locked, or worse, deleted all together.

I questioned if you were replying to me and you said you were not, but then you added to what you already said and seemed to be defending your position, so I challenged you along those lines, or at least it was my intent to do so.

But now you are further defending yourself by saying that I don't get it and that just isn't the case at all. I do get it. I'm just trying to understand why even after saying you weren't talking to me you made a point of addressing me specifically and each time adding to your reasoning instead of just letting it go or calling me out on a new thread, since Rain's thread is already so convoluted as to be almost undecipherable.

Now, so you understand why I began a new thread to call you out for this, I am attempting to avoid any further conflict on Rain's thread that is unrelated to her and her husband's situation. I don't need to debate this, but am willing to do so, not because I have anything at stake but because I think other people do have something at stake in the debate.

I'm going to be rather busy today and probably won't get back here till after work, but I will look here for your response if you care to make one when I get home.

I'm late and have to get going.

Mark

You geeting hung up with me supposedly starting a debate with you.

Please read the following slow and carefully.

Many a time here people reply to a thread without replying to a specific poster. They just click onto the reply box in the last post of a thread.

For the LAST TIME:

I clicked on to the reply box on your post because it was the last post on the thread at the time.

I was responding to the overall thread. I was not responding to your specific post.

The other times I responded to you was in response to you addressing my specific posts.

I never spoke about your thread. I did mention 3 MB posters.

I did not intend to attack them. Only to point out how one can be too caustic most of the time, how a BH can be to close to a D day to be objective enough to help a WW. How effective one can be when the post as melody, and now I add Mr and MRS wondering.

Too those that I have left out as being great here I apologize because at the momenent I do not remember other names at this time.

I do not want to see WW's and WH's or BH's and BW's pushed away from the help they can get here.

If you still feel that I was still attacking you, then I will not bother to respond to this thread. There is nothing more for me to say if I have not convinced you otherwise.