|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
"An enabler has their self image wrapped up with being IN CHARGE of their spouse's outcome, all the while pretending they are a victim of circumstances."
Very succinct.
committed Yeah - all those years trying to manage the outcome for my alcoholic husband taught me a thing or three ((( hugs ))) to committed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,956
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,956 |
"Yeah - all those years trying to manage the outcome for my alcoholic husband taught me a thing or three"
This site benefits from you sharing your story, along with all your trials and tribulations.
I have noticed that more and more people are posting with 'marriage' problems that are really cloaked under 'substance' problems.
A few well versed questions to them brings out information concerning alcohol, drugs, or a combination thereof.
Or...is it simply my imagination?
Thanks for the (((hugs))). Same to you....as my Daddy used to say when we told him that we loved him. Kinda like that "Ditto" thing from the movie "Ghost".
committed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
I hope other posters join in and add their thoughts/feelings to this conversation. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,584
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,584 |
People have to know their true feelings and use that to make life decisions that they can live with. Seems simple, but for most of us it's actually very difficult to know what our true feelings are. Human beings are very good at avoiding thoughts and insights that might take them into an uncomfortable place a few steps down the line. Working out our real feelings is a skill that has to be learned, I think. TA
"Integrity is telling myself the truth. And honesty is telling the truth to other people." - Spencer Johnson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
This is an awesome thread about principles that have changed my marriage. Namely the principle of radical honesty and its importance to POJA. I can see in my last marriage how I complained OFTEN in a way that killed the love in my marriage with chronic lovebusters. I had the right idea, but the wrong delivery.
In this marriage I initially went to the opposite extreme where I sucked up my grievances, which resulted in resentments. I have since learned - from around here - what a huge mistake that was. I can see how that tactic was eroding the love I had for my H and causing me to avoid him.
I have since learned how to present complaints in a non-busting manner and my H is very receptive to this. He does his best to make changes. I am not good at recieving complaints, though, and get mad at him sometimes. I am thinking on this....
Great thread, Pep. I hope everyone here GETS this concept, because it really does define the difference between Dr. Harley and other marriage counselors. Dr. Harley knows how to save marriages. This is why MC have an 84% failure rate.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
Seems simple, but for most of us it's actually very difficult to know what our true feelings are. TA This might be one of the reasons for high marriages failure when couples under agfe 25 marry. Having said that, getting back to the original Harley article .... Do you think that it is not so complicated to say "You do this (whatever-it-is) and I don't like it. It makes me feel terrible when you do this (whatever-it-is). I really do not think it takes all that much insight to declaie what feels bad to a person. Heck, as soon as kids can talk they start doing just exactly that !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
still no edit feature - spelling Nazi's everywhere are having heart attacks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621 |
I believe there are times when empathy does mean one should "carry it all" ... at least for awhile. And times when it is just dumb to "carry it all".
Example: Spouse has cancer and cannot do more than breathe because of effects of chemo. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
Iffy example: Spouse has health problems due to self-inflicted obesity. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
Extreme opposite example: Spouse is lazy and will not work. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
Dopey example: Spouse is a poor marriage partner because they suffered horrible childhood abuse and have no ability to meet the needs of anyone else. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
What I really see as the core issue is this:
An enabler has their self image wrapped up with being IN CHARGE of their spouse's outcome, all the while pretending they are a victim of circumstances.
EMPATHY does not try to manage the outcome nor make up a pretend reality. These are some interesting examples. I want to think a bit before I reply in earnest. But I do want to reply. Mostly on what it means to be an enabler. And when one should carry something, anything, at all.
"Never forget that your pain means nothing to a WS." ~Mulan
"An ethical man knows it is wrong to cheat on his wife. A moral man will not actually do it." ~ Ducky
WS: They are who they are.
When an eel lunges out And it bites off your snout Thats a moray ~DS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
I believe there are times when empathy does mean one should "carry it all" ... at least for awhile. And times when it is just dumb to "carry it all".
Example: Spouse has cancer and cannot do more than breathe because of effects of chemo. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
Iffy example: Spouse has health problems due to self-inflicted obesity. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
Extreme opposite example: Spouse is lazy and will not work. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
Dopey example: Spouse is a poor marriage partner because they suffered horrible childhood abuse and have no ability to meet the needs of anyone else. Should the healthy spouse "carry it all"?
What I really see as the core issue is this:
An enabler has their self image wrapped up with being IN CHARGE of their spouse's outcome, all the while pretending they are a victim of circumstances.
EMPATHY does not try to manage the outcome nor make up a pretend reality. These are some interesting examples. I want to think a bit before I reply in earnest. But I do want to reply. Mostly on what it means to be an enabler. And when one should carry something, anything, at all. While you are gnashing your brain on that - please consider thinking about this as well (I'm still not sure where I am going with this one) I'd like to add, many of us give ourselves "brownie points" for suffering in the name of love. Many of us equate personal sacrifice of our needs as loving. (another pervasive social message we are given) How does a religious Christian apply the suffering of Christ into their marriage? By elevating "suffering" to the epitome of love. I don't really know how to address this right now. I will think on it some more.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621 |
Thought the First:
Duhh
Err
Ummm
Dang. It was here a second ago…
Oh, yeah, right …
Dr H has a great deal of heartburn with the concept of Unconditional Love. Yet love as a verb is what UL and meeting ENs no matter what is all about.
Is that the same as sacrifice at some level?
UL does indeed have at its core not being an enabler. Knowing when to step back. You are supposed to UL yourself too.
What is the difference between UL as anti-MB and meeting ENs even when you don’t want to?
‘scuse me while I wipe up some drool…
"Never forget that your pain means nothing to a WS." ~Mulan
"An ethical man knows it is wrong to cheat on his wife. A moral man will not actually do it." ~ Ducky
WS: They are who they are.
When an eel lunges out And it bites off your snout Thats a moray ~DS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,688
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,688 |
The part that my H does not get is the LB. He thinks "solving problems" is the key to facilitating marriage recovery. <This is not only his idea, but what we learned at MC.> This is a good thought, but does not make me feel like I love him any more.
I sent him this article, I hope he reads it and something sinks in. I like DrH's view on love building- any two people can problem solve, that does not a marriage make.
Me; W 46 Him; H 46
2 girls DD19 DD16 Dated/Married total 28 years. ..I am learning and working on myself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268 |
My wife continues to say "It's not my job to make you happy" or "My sole purpose in life is not to conform to what you want me to be" or "Nothing I do can heal you. That's between you and God."
It is difficult to find books, material or counselors (outside of Marriage Builders)who disagree with her.
Me - 45 Her - 47 Married - 23 yrs 4 chillun: D18,D14,S12,D9 Separated since March, 2010 Divorce proceeding
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,584
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,584 |
Do you think that it is not so complicated to say "You do this (whatever-it-is) and I don't like it. It makes me feel terrible when you do this (whatever-it-is).
I really do not think it takes all that much insight to declaie what feels bad to a person. Heck, as soon as kids can talk they start doing just exactly that ! Hmmm. A kid says "My friend won't play with me after school. She's stuck up and I don't like her." What she really means is that the friend has a new puppy and she's jealous of the attention the pet is getting. A wife says "My husband is a big show-off at parties and I feel embarrassed. I think he drinks too much in those situations." Might be true, but might also be that she's jealous of her husband's social easiness and popularity. Feeling bad doesn't automatically imply that the other is at fault. A lot of self-honesty is needed, don't you think?
"Integrity is telling myself the truth. And honesty is telling the truth to other people." - Spencer Johnson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
Feeling bad doesn't automatically imply that the other is at fault. A lot of self-honesty is needed, don't you think? Are you saying that you disagree with the quoted article? Or, you disagree with parts of it that require honesty and self awareness of married adults? I'm unclear what point you are making. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 546
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 546 |
The same sort of advice is given in Getting the Love You Want by Hendrix (Holt Rinehart, & Winston, 1988). While the book title seems to address the issue of romantic love in marriage, the author's strategy for couples is to learn to accept each other's marital failures, rather than doing anything to overcome them. I guarantee you, if you follow this strategy, you will NOT get the love you want. I have read this book 3 times and do not agree at at with what Dr. Harley has said here. I actually find Dr. Hendrix's stuff to be very much in line with Marriage Builders. Why do you have to fill out an EN questionaire instead of them all being the same? This is what I feel Dr. Hendrix seeks to explain. A huge downside is that it does not deal near as well as MB in infadelity. As with most things I find good and bad with every theory. In summary, I like both ways of thinking equally and do not really feel they conflict very much at all.
BH-me 32 WW-27 Married 5 yrs. together for 8 D2 D7 D-Day:11/10 EA for a week went PA and WW immediately left home leaving everything behind.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621 |
I'd like to add, many of us give ourselves "brownie points" for suffering in the name of love. Many of us equate personal sacrifice of our needs as loving. (another pervasive social message we are given) How does a religious Christian apply the suffering of Christ into their marriage? By elevating "suffering" to the epitome of love. I don't really know how to address this right now. I will think on it some more. I’m still masticating on this one, but I have an initial observation to spit out: Applying Christian mores to marriage is a bit broad. There are quite a few differences across the spectrum of Christian denominations in how marriage is viewed. On the left some view it as fairly secular – marriage is a just a particular kind of contract. Others on the other end view it as a holy sacrament that binds for life and is not to be tampered with nor interpreted in any alternative way whatsoever. I think we all suffer to one degree or another at the hands of our spouse. Have you suffered at all for your H? During recovery perhaps? How about while he was treating you rotten during his active adultery, but you didn’t yet know what was going on? All kinds of people sufferer all the time at the hands of all kinds of other people. What is so different about spouses? Other than you perhaps least expect it - until that first adultery anyway.
"Never forget that your pain means nothing to a WS." ~Mulan
"An ethical man knows it is wrong to cheat on his wife. A moral man will not actually do it." ~ Ducky
WS: They are who they are.
When an eel lunges out And it bites off your snout Thats a moray ~DS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
In summary, I like both ways of thinking equally and do not really feel they conflict very much at all. Thanks rusty ! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
Applying Christian mores to marriage is a bit broad. As Ronald Reagan said to Jimmy Carter ... "There you go again" ....  I am asking these questions because it is important to me and my personal interior work. I am not trying to make a point or convince anyone of anything. I am asking YOU, as a practicing Christian for whom I have a lot of respect, how you reconcile this idea of suffering as the epitome of love into YOUR life. Not as a debate exercise, but as a matter of personal living. "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son" There are quite a few differences across the spectrum of Christian denominations in how marriage is viewed. I don't want "the spectrum", I want your point of view - either fixed or still a work in progress. On the left some view it as fairly secular – marriage is a just a particular kind of contract. Others on the other end view it as a holy sacrament that binds for life and is not to be tampered with nor interpreted in any alternative way whatsoever. This is veering too far from my question .... FOCUS man, focus! I think we all suffer to one degree or another at the hands of our spouse. Have you suffered at all for your H? During recovery perhaps? How about while he was treating you rotten during his active adultery, but you didn’t yet know what was going on? Does love = suffering for you as a Christian? All kinds of people sufferer all the time at the hands of all kinds of other people. [sarcasm] Really ? I never knew that ! >slaps forehead< [/sarcasm] What is so different about spouses? Other than you perhaps least expect it - until that first adultery anyway. Stop wandering around and answer my question, please.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621 |
Just call me the Squirminator.
I am not purposely scurrying away from the light of plain answers. I am exploring the parameters of the question.
But if you need an instant answer, it is: maybe.
----- OK, here. As a practicing Catholic, my answer to your meaning of marriage question is: I, myself, to my own detriment and long-suffering, am pretty far to the right end of the spectrum. Christian marriage is a lifetime sacrament between a man, a woman and God. Sometimes a divorce is a wise choice for protection of children or self. But the sacrament does not “go away” with a civil divorce.
I have strenuously argued changing this point of view with God quite a bit and for a long time now. So much so we are on first names basis. But He won’t give in.
So, perhaps, maybe, it boils down to: Where do I belong, where do I want to be, on this spectrum?
Sinner (all taker) ------------------------------------------ Saint (but not necessarily all giver)
A question for you: How are the questions I grapple with going to help your marriage?
"Never forget that your pain means nothing to a WS." ~Mulan
"An ethical man knows it is wrong to cheat on his wife. A moral man will not actually do it." ~ Ducky
WS: They are who they are.
When an eel lunges out And it bites off your snout Thats a moray ~DS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996 |
A question for you: How are the questions I grapple with going to help your marriage? donno yet  This is how I work my stuff out. When I read something that interests me I like to post about it (like the Harley article). I ask others to give their opinions, then I cherry pick what works for me.
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
0 members (),
443
guests, and
57
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,623
Posts2,323,501
Members71,975
|
Most Online3,224 May 9th, 2025
|
|
|
|