|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
My W talks to other men pretty much every day. Her boss is a man and she works around other men, so of course she has to talk to them. I have no problem with conversation that is strictly professional and mostly unavoidable.
I work with other women also, conversation with them is unavoidable, and frankly it would be ridiculous for me to never talk to them.
You can be pleasant and friendly and still keep your conversations with the opposite sex business-like. But then this is at total odds with this: I'm not aware of anywhere that Dr. Harley makes the distinction between conversation and CONVERSATION. It is understood that conversation in itself is an INTIMATE emotional need. You don't have to be talking about INTIMATE subjects - personal dreams, disappointments, marriage problems, sex - to have this need met by someone of the opposite sex. We could be talking about politics, gardening, sports, whatever, and the mere fact that someone will listen to us and be interested in what we have to say can be intoxicating. Completely inconsistent.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245 |
You know, they always say that we worry most - and ACCUSE most - that which we ourselves are afraid of. Maybe all this is ottert's way of dealing with fears of his own.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
Everyone has repeatedly told Ottert his wife's emails were inappropriate but for some reason he thinks he has to keep flogging this horse.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268 |
Hey, tst, I'M RELAXED!!! WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???!!! HUH??!! YOU WANNA ARGUE WITH ME??!! Seriously, I'm cool.  I just like debating and discussing this stuff. I thought that's what forums are for. Why does everybody think I'm arguing or uptight? I don't know what it is, but all I did was make a point about the story linked in the OP's first post, and WHAMMO, SugarCane comes in and tells me "Don't go there, ottert!" and the SWAT unit sweeps in on me. What? I'm just participating in the discussion. I'm allowed to do that, right? Hey, even though it's getting near my bedtime, I think I'm gonna take your advice and go have a beer. G'night.
Me - 45 Her - 47 Married - 23 yrs 4 chillun: D18,D14,S12,D9 Separated since March, 2010 Divorce proceeding
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268 |
You know, they always say that we worry most - and ACCUSE most - that which we ourselves are afraid of. Maybe all this is ottert's way of dealing with fears of his own. That's exactly what Dr. Harley says - he knows he's hard-wired for an affair and that's why he uses Extraordinary Precautions. In fact he said that early in his marriage he realized that his biggest weakness was women, so he knew he had to avoid being in a position to be tempted. I'd say I'm in good company.
Me - 45 Her - 47 Married - 23 yrs 4 chillun: D18,D14,S12,D9 Separated since March, 2010 Divorce proceeding
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245 |
Yeah, not exactly what I meant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268 |
Cat, I wrote this My W talks to other men pretty much every day. Her boss is a man and she works around other men, so of course she has to talk to them. I have no problem with conversation that is strictly professional and mostly unavoidable.
I work with other women also, conversation with them is unavoidable, and frankly it would be ridiculous for me to never talk to them.
You can be pleasant and friendly and still keep your conversations with the opposite sex business-like.
None of this is what I'm talking about. How do you get this? So...if your wife works in an office, she's not allowed to say to John, "Hey John, we need some more toner for the printer" now? How many straw men are you going to try to build tonight? I've counted three or four so far. I seriously need that beer now.
Last edited by ottert; 01/09/10 12:48 AM.
Me - 45 Her - 47 Married - 23 yrs 4 chillun: D18,D14,S12,D9 Separated since March, 2010 Divorce proceeding
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543 |
... opposite-sex conversation, in which neither party has any adulterous intent, can so easily progress from casual, every day topics to an affair before you know what's happened to you. Yes, of course, there is a risk of that happening. My W talks to other men pretty much every day. Her boss is a man and she works around other men, so of course she has to talk to them. I have no problem with conversation that is strictly professional and mostly unavoidable. Even professional conversations can be pleasurable and it is possible to begin to admire someone because of their professional capabilities. We could be talking about politics, gardening, sports, whatever, and the mere fact that someone will listen to us and be interested in what we have to say can be intoxicating. Each and every one of us likes to be listened to and most of us enjoy interaction with other people. The entire premise of HNHN is to meet your spouse's ENs so there will be less danger of someone else meeting them, so infidelity won't happen. YES!This is a big issue for you Ottert because you clearly do not feel safe in your M - YET. I drive in my car almost every day. I need to drive to get to where I need to go and I enjoy the freedom driving gives me. I cannot imagine not being able to drive. It would put limits on me that I would find very isolating, and if BB was the one insisting I couldn't drive, that I would surely feel resentful. Statistically, it is the most dangerous form of transport, so when I get in the car I accept the risk that comes with that decision. However, when I drive I take precautions to keep me safe. I service and maintain my car regularly to keep it in good condition, I follow the rules of the road, I never drink and drive, I wear my seatbelt, and I keep to the speed limit. I therefore minimise the risk that I will become another accident statistic. BB understands all I do to keep safe and is therefore happy for me to tootle around and even take our 3 children out in the car with me. Conversation seems to be to be somewhat similar. It is unrealistic to expect a spouse never to engage in conversation with a member of the opposite sex but yes, there is a risk that the conversation will be enjoyable and will ultimately lead to one being another A statistic. However, if you build a M in which both participants agree that precautions are necessary to keep you safe, and you maintain a M in which the need for conversation is consistently met and met the way your spouse likes it to be met, then you reduce the risk of your spouse having this need met elsewhere. I think Dr Harley says you can even Affair proof your M. I guess you feel this way because your W has not yet acted to prevent herself from being in a similar situation that led to her inappropriate behaviour. But realistically, how can she? How can she guarantee that she will not engage in any conversations that she may find pleasant. That's virtually impossible. But it's not impossible to put EP's in place and it's not impossible for you to meet your wife's need for conversation so well that she feels absolutely no desire to discuss anything interesting with anyone other than you. I am of course not referring to secret emails which are clearly a big NO-NO, and are a clear betrayal of trust. What has your wife done to demonstate to you that her EPs' around conversation are strong? What plan do you have for total transparency in each of your dealings with the opposite sex? If EP's are tight, you are happily meeting each other's top needs, avoiding LB'ers and spending good quality UA time togther, you will feel safer and the risks will be massively reduced, if not eradicated. JMVHO. Sorry, I seem to have rambled a bit. I know what I'm trying to say even if no-one else will.
Me - BW FWH - BB -(PA Jul 08 - Aug 08) D-Day - 8 Aug 2008 Recovering nicely
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543 |
I wanted to add that it's also important to identify and protect your weaknesses.
Conversation isn't high on BB's list of EN's but admiration is.
In the aftermath of BB's A, we talked about the reasons he had done it for what felt like ages. We identified his specific weaknesses and put in extra EP's to protect those.
Conversation per se will not deposit units into BB's LB� but if someone starts singing his praises telling him how wonderful he is, how clever he is, how attractive he is and the deposits begin.
Now he appreciates this weakness, he can protect himself and remove himself from any situation in which he feels there is a danger of someone of the opposite sex saying anything remotely like this.
Incidentally, for me, if someone I hardly knew started saying things like that to me, it would be a huge turn off and withdrawals would be made from any LB� they had with me. I just dislike "false/fake" people" who try to ingratiate themselves.
However, if someone starts to share their problems with me, then Bingo. Big deposits.
Weird.
We both, however now understand where our weaknesses or vulnerabilities are and can protect them.
Me - BW FWH - BB -(PA Jul 08 - Aug 08) D-Day - 8 Aug 2008 Recovering nicely
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543 |
Sorry, that would be my FWH who posts here as BillyBassett.
Me - BW FWH - BB -(PA Jul 08 - Aug 08) D-Day - 8 Aug 2008 Recovering nicely
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245 |
How do you get this?
Originally Posted By: catpersonSo...if your wife works in an office, she's not allowed to say to John, "Hey John, we need some more toner for the printer" now? I based it on this: I'm not aware of anywhere that Dr. Harley makes the distinction between conversation and CONVERSATION. It is understood that conversation in itself is an INTIMATE emotional need. You don't have to be talking about INTIMATE subjects - personal dreams, disappointments, marriage problems, sex - to have this need met by someone of the opposite sex. We could be talking about politics, gardening, sports, whatever, and the mere fact that someone will listen to us and be interested in what we have to say can be intoxicating.
Read the example of Jill in Ch. 6 of HNHN. Most of the conversations she has with her neighbor Tom, who she eventually has an affair with, occurred while the two couples were TOGETHER! They weren't even alone, their spouses were apparently in the room with them, and there is no mention that their conversation topics were INTIMATE.
And she didn't have to invite him in for hot cocoa for Tom to fall in love with her. He was in love with her "almost from the first time we met." All because they liked talking to each other.
On your second point, I could not disagree more. The explicit reason Dr. Harley gives for guarding against having any of our four most intimate ENs met by anyone of the opposite sex is for the express purpose of AVOIDING INFIDELITY IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Your statement that "all that jazz about extraordinary precautions" is geared toward those who have suffered infidelity is way off the mark. Dr. Harley has famously never committed infidelity and he credits his use of these very same extraordinary precautions.
The entire premise of HNHN is to meet your spouse's ENs so there will be less danger of someone else meeting them, so infidelity won't happen.
As you say, those hurt by infidelity will be more sensitive to preventing it from happening again. But I think we can all agree it's better to avoid it in the first place. IMO, your wife DOESN'T feel 100% fulfilled by you, so you WILL have to be hyper-vigilant. So for you, yeah, you'll have to guard her like a prized pig (no harm intended) for your own peace of mind for the rest of your marriage; and she'll resent you for it for the rest of your marriage, no matter what she tells you to your face. For others, who are regularly fulfilling each other's ENs and not LBing, forbidding conversations altogether is a great way to LB yourself into divorce.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,416
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,416 |
Yesterday as I was walking through the cafeteria, I ran into the PE teacher. His wife is expecting, so I asked him how she was feeling. I asked him if he was excited about having a daughter (they already have a boy). He asked how music was going. It was very short, but it had nothing to do with faculty meetings, lesson plans, or when he needed to put up risers for the next program. And there was nothing - nothing - inappropriate about it.
Last night a colleague/classmate of H's and one of my friends called H to ask about a class she was being asked to take. The chatted for a few minutes, during which time he gave her some advice that could have easily been given my her female advisor, but since they were on the phone anyway they talked about it. And there was nothing - nothing - inappropriate about it.
My daughter is 13. She is at an age when se will be facing lots of temptation and questioning a lot of things. I could homeschool her, keep her in the house unless a chaperone her everywhere she goes. I could try to remove all outward circumstances in which she might make the wrong choice. And it might work. But the bottom line issue is what is INSIDE of her. And even if it worked, the minute she left for college, she would probably just explode. And to be honest, I really wouldn't blame her. What girl wants to live like that????
I just wanted to get my 2 cents in before this thread locks, because EVERY time we go down this road, the thread gets locked because it disintegrates into TOS violations. You would think it would sink in after awhile. If going 75 MPH gets you pulled over, take responsibility for your driving and stop going 75!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245 |
My daughter is 13. She is at an age when se will be facing lots of temptation and questioning a lot of things. I could homeschool her, keep her in the house unless a chaperone her everywhere she goes. I could try to remove all outward circumstances in which she might make the wrong choice. And it might work. But the bottom line issue is what is INSIDE of her. And even if it worked, the minute she left for college, she would probably just explode. And to be honest, I really wouldn't blame her. What girl wants to live like that???? My D19's best friend has wicked strict parents and expected perfect scores from her (they're Korean); if she drove to our house for a sleepover party (1/2 mile away) and didn't call the very minute she got here, they would come over and tell her to get back in the car and go home. All she cared about in high school was to pick a college as far away from her parents as possible. Her freshman year, she partied like crazy; she talks about how much she likes to drink now. This year, she is now back home, getting ready to start in junior college; she had to take a medical discharge, unable to finish the semester, for having a mental breakdown - trying to be the perfect student for her parents, and also trying to get what SHE wants out of life. You're right; it has to come from inside.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 268 |
IMO, your wife DOESN'T feel 100% fulfilled by you, so you WILL have to be hyper-vigilant. So for you, yeah, you'll have to guard her like a prized pig (no harm intended) for your own peace of mind for the rest of your marriage; and she'll resent you for it for the rest of your marriage, no matter what she tells you to your face. For others, who are regularly fulfilling each other's ENs and not LBing, forbidding conversations altogether is a great way to LB yourself into divorce. First, show me where I said I am "forbidding conversations altogether." Another of your straw men, cat. Second, you telling someone that their spouse isn't 100% fulfilled is a case of the pot calling the kettle black if I ever saw one.
Me - 45 Her - 47 Married - 23 yrs 4 chillun: D18,D14,S12,D9 Separated since March, 2010 Divorce proceeding
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245 |
Yep, back to tearing down anyone who questions you. Real mature.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 543 |
Me - BW FWH - BB -(PA Jul 08 - Aug 08) D-Day - 8 Aug 2008 Recovering nicely
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
Yep, back to tearing down anyone who questions you. Real mature. Oterts posts to this thread are his passive agressive attempts to send a message to his wife.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11,245 |
Yep, back to tearing down anyone who questions you. Real mature. Oterts posts to this thread are his passive agressive attempts to send a message to his wife. Hmm. I suggested, way back when, that ottert was passive aggressive and I got reamed big time. Thanks for validating my opinion, though, bk. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
LOL Cat - well I agree with you!
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
0 members (),
236
guests, and
72
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,621
Posts2,323,490
Members71,959
|
Most Online3,185 Jan 27th, 2020
|
|
|
|