Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
SugarCane #2627370 05/19/12 09:19 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by SugarCane
Originally Posted by RidicSit
So your husband is making an effort to bind your family together, and include your daughter's partner- and it causes you too much grief to bear?

Can you elaborate on why? It's difficult to see where POJA factors in without knowing the motivation on both sides.

What would your husband tell us about this situation?
But it isn't up to this board to sort out who is right and who is being unreasonable. It isn't for us to adjudicate between the spouses. The reasons for this poster not wanting the partner in her home are not relevant to our advice. We are not here to tell her to accept someone into her home and family if WE feel that that the person should be accepted; it is her marriage and her feelings that count.

Our job is to teach her how to use POJA so that this and every other decision affecting the couple can be negotiated and solved BY THEM, without their coming to this board (or going anywhere else) each time they disagree about something.

POJA says that NO decision should be taken that hurts one of the spouse's feelings or interests. Other's people's feelings (the daughter and her partner) are not a priority here; this wife's feelings should be the priority to her husband.

If they cannot agree to allow the partner into the home, and cannot find another solution to meeting or acknowledging her, they should do nothing. This wife should NEVER concede to an action that she does not agree with.

Um. The statement "Homosexuality is a SIN" seems a bit at odds with this approach. Presumably, on your view, we are not here to validate her personal moral beliefs, either.


kerala #2627371 05/19/12 09:19 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by kerala
MaritalBliss - that is an exceptionally narrow way to look at it. It is asking the other person (the one who must deal with the lack of enthusiasm) to adopt a level of detachment (this is not about sexual orientation, it is about my spouse's happiness) that seems very difficult to achieve. But, I understand that is what MB would prescribe.

I don't think she is saying that though. She is saying that the main issue is the spouse's agreement/disagreement with the decision and the reasons WHY are secondary. It doesn't matter if we APPROVE of their reasoning, the spouses feelings must be respected. Of course we have to understand WHY our spouse feels that way in order to brainstorm, but our approval of his reasoning is not warranted.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


kerala #2627372 05/19/12 09:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by kerala
[

Um. The statement "Homosexuality is a SIN" seems a bit at odds with this approach. Presumably, on your view, we are not here to validate her personal moral beliefs, either.

Where did you see that we can't validate her personal moral beliefs? I most certainly CAN. That, however, doesn't mean that the main focus shouldn't be on finding enthusiastic agreement regardless of the issue.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


kerala #2627375 05/19/12 09:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Quote
MaritalBliss - that is an exceptionally narrow way to look at it. It is asking the other person (the one who must deal with the lack of enthusiasm) to adopt a level of detachment (this is not about sexual orientation, it is about my spouse's happiness) that seems very difficult to achieve. But, I understand that is what MB would prescribe.
The POJA does not ask either party to adopt a level of detachment. That is clear when it is practiced consistently throughout the marriage. If Lorraine and her husband were practicing the POJA throughout their marriage, this would be one more opportunity to negotiate an issue for the betterment of the marriage. Lorraine has been dealing with this issue for quite a while, now, because she and her husband do not practice the POJA.

Dr. Harley:
Quote
In marriage, your interests and your spouses interests should be considered simultaneously. One of you should not suffer for the benefit of the other, even willingly, because when either of you suffer, one is gaining at the other's expense. If you both care about each other, you will not let the other suffer so that you can have what you want. When you are willing to let the other sacrifice for you, you are momentarily lapsing into a state of selfishness that must somehow be corrected before damage is done. The Policy of Joint Agreement provides that correction.


D-Day 2-10-2009
Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever!
Thank you Marriage Builders!

lorraine555 #2627377 05/19/12 09:26 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 46
L
Member
OP Offline
Member
L
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 46
Jessitaylor
"You two need to agree that even though he has chosen a relationship with your daughter that includes her partner you do not chose the same for what ever reason you have.

All you wish is not to be forced to do so if you chose not to, arrangements will have to be made separately and not in your home while you are present, all encounters will be negotiated and approved a head of time to avoide any conflict you feel, you could fill your time elsewhere or he could go to their home.
It is workable through poja, accepting each others choices and respecting each
other.
You are both entitled to the relationship you chose with your daughter and you both deserve respect from each other how that will happen .
You will have to understand it will have a different meaning and experience for each of you.
Sit down and speak to your daughter and work out the logistics and respect each other, make sure everyone knows how the other feels, make sure you all know you want the best for each other and you love each other as mother, daughter and father and as a married couple.
Love and respect each other.
Open and honesty is the key factor and actions in a very loving manner.
Good luck"


My husband has the possibility of seeing our daughter and her partner at their place and he does so freely and I do not have any objection, all I want is not to be pressurized to see them together as it hurts me. And it really hurts me! He wants me to react as if my daughter was with a husband. And I can't! The pressure and the expectation are too much.

Last edited by lorraine555; 05/19/12 09:27 AM.
MelodyLane #2627378 05/19/12 09:26 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
Independent behavior, especially by a former wayward, is a lovebuster. H, in this case, is exhibiting all kinds of independent behavior - inviting people to the home and planning vacation trips without enthusiastic agreement. These are big lovebusters.

I agree with others. It is the lack of POJA and the H's independent behavior that is the problem. A post affair spouse who has not signed on to POJA is hugely negative. How can a marriage possibly recover after an affair without POJA?

AM


BW - 70
WH - 65
M - 35 years
D-day - 17 Apr 08
H broke contact 11/1/09
Back in love after the worst thing that every happened to us.
lorraine555 #2627379 05/19/12 09:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by lorraine555
It is true, I mentioned this 6 months ago because the subject comes up every now an then.
Kerala: There is nothing about this woman which I dislike. I have nothing against her as a person at all. But seeing her with my daughter is a trigger and depresses me. I just start crying writing about it because it makes me feel soooo sad. My daughter's homosexuality is a result of that nasty period. She also never asked me if she could bring her partner.
MelodyLane
I have already told my husband that I find it upsetting. My situation now is that I do my best to avoid conflict.

Lorraine, please consider signing up for the Marriage Builders program. You might not be able to resolve this specific problem immediately but you and your husband can learn the skills to resolve these problems in a way that does not hurt your marriage. This program will restore the romantic love to your marriage if you will just use it!


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


RidicSit #2627384 05/19/12 09:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by RidicSit
Melody- what are you saying?

That it's acceptable for her to treat the partner like this ? Because of sexual orientation?

Would we say it was okay if Lorraine wanted to ban all blue eyed friends of her daughter from her house and life?

Would we be telling her to POJA it?

Ridic, is it okay if people don't believe like you on this issue? And is there a rule that people have to have everybody in their house whether they like it or not?

Yes, it's acceptable for people to not allow someone in their home, for any reason.


If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app!

Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8.
Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010

If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
lorraine555 #2627385 05/19/12 09:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by lorraine555
Markos: There was no question mark and I did not say no because it would have lead to an argument and I can't take any more.

You can't speak up because your husband would become angry with you? Is that correct?


If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app!

Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8.
Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010

If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
armymama #2627386 05/19/12 09:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 46
L
Member
OP Offline
Member
L
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 46
I need to leave for a while. I want to thank you all for your thoughts.
I do not stand up at all for myself that's why I am in this situation.

RidicSit #2627387 05/19/12 09:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by RidicSit
I look forward to her explaining why the partner bothers her.

She does not have to answer to you, Ridic. You are not her judge, and I hope you will not increase her grief by continuing to post in this line.

I am notifying the moderators and hope they will be watching this closely. I don't think anyone has the right to come on here and browbeat someone for holding different personal opinions or tastes.


If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app!

Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8.
Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010

If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
lorraine555 #2627390 05/19/12 09:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Originally Posted by lorraine555
I need to leave for a while. I want to thank you all for your thoughts.
I do not stand up at all for myself that's why I am in this situation.
Lorraine, not 'standing up for yourself' is not the issue. There is a level of independent behavior and disrespect in your marriage that can be overcome. This is something you and your husband both need to work on, and it will only strengthen your marriage.

Please at least read this before you go: The Policy of Joint Agreement


D-Day 2-10-2009
Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever!
Thank you Marriage Builders!

markos #2627393 05/19/12 09:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 299
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 299
I admire & respect Lorraine for starting her thread.
I am very encouraged that she came back to seek expert advice from you MB vets! (You know who you are!!!) hurray
The adversarial posts by "some" can be used for good, in that Lorraine will be able to see the difference between those with hidden agendas and those of you (MB Veterans) hurray who sincerely want to help her by imparting Dr. H's "tools"! weightlifter
I believe Lorraine will find the courage and strength to stand up for herself, that she will learn to be more assertive in expressing her thoughts & feelings to her H & DD. clap
Thank you, Vets, for your faithfulness!!! hurray
And, Lorraine, believe me when I say that you are NOT alone!
rcoaster
Blessings ~



"Now is the time for all good MB Veterans to come to the aid of their MB Rookies!"
kerala #2627396 05/19/12 09:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
Originally Posted by kerala
Lorraine555 in your original post you said you said "He wants me to accept her even though he knows I find "it" very hurtful.". Can you please clarify what is the "it" that is hurtful?

It doesn't matter what "it" is that she finds very hurtful, what matters is that it does and her FWH is acting indepently regardless of the fact that he knows this hurts her. This should not be turned into a debate about homosexuality. This OP (or anybody else on this board) should not be attacked or grilled for having the belief that homosexuality is wrong. Good grief, she has enough on her plate as it is now.


Widowed 11/10/12 after 35 years of marriage
*********************
“In a sense now, I am homeless. For the home, the place of refuge, solitude, love-where my husband lived-no longer exists.” Joyce Carolyn Oates, A Widow's Story
princessmeggy #2627400 05/19/12 10:11 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
Lorraine,

I agree with Mel in that you and your husband could vastly benefit from the online program. It is structured and has accountability. For me, it also took some of the heat off me. In the beginning, I didn't have to be the one who pointed out things that were making me very unhappy. The coach did that. I don't know what things she said to my H, but they made a huge difference in his behavior and outlook. My H and I have independent behavior clearly in check. We POJA everything - what to do for recreation, where to go for lunch, when and how we will do household chores. It has made us partners in everything - how a marriage is supposed to be.

Would your husband be willing to do the online course?
AM


BW - 70
WH - 65
M - 35 years
D-day - 17 Apr 08
H broke contact 11/1/09
Back in love after the worst thing that every happened to us.
armymama #2627407 05/19/12 10:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
Originally Posted by RidicSit
Dr. Harley believes in reparative therapy?

I did not know that.

Thank you for telling me. This will be my last post here.

I am so disappointed I might cry. Wow.


Wow...how very intolerant of you. grumble


Since the OP is taking a break on this thread I hope no one minds me addressing this post.

It is my understanding, having talked with Dr. Harley, that he "believes" in reparative therapy only to the extent that he's had success doing it. Now he doesn't have websites devoted to repairing homosexuals. He's not storming the country trying to "fix" homosexuals, telling parents to send me your "gay" teens and homosexuals can rest easy that he won't attempt to fix the unwilling. Quite the opposite. Persons living the homosexual lifestyle have approached him, as a family and marital counselor, seeking help in their attempt to LEAVE the lifestyle. At first....he said he'd try and he suggested and "coached" these individuals using similar behavioral therapies that he applies to marriages herein. Feeling follow actions....behave like a heterosexual and eventually your feelings will follow.

I don't know how many "successes" he's had but he's had enough that he "believes" he can coach someone how to leave the lifestyle.

Now arguments could be made about whether such "successes" stuck or whether such individuals were truly homosexuals (born that way) in the first place or just heterosexuals that got caught up in the lifestyle. All the sensitivities of political correctness remain because I've yet to see him claim universal "correctability". From what I know...Dr. Harley's only claim on the subject of reparative therapy is "he's done it".

Flipping this argument around a bit...if you were a family and marriage counselor and you were approached professionally by a homosexual that was seeking out your advice/help on how to NOT be a homosexual anymore...and they were adamant that that is what THEY wanted....what would you do? Impose your tolerant views???? I submit a compassionate counselor would try to help to the best of their ability.

Mr. Wondering

p.s. - I don't speak for Dr. Harley so this may not be 100% accurate regarding his opinions/views on the subject


FBH(me)-51 FWW-49 (MrsWondering)
DD19 DS 22 Dday-2005-Recovered

"agree to disagree" = Used when one wants to reject the objective reality of the situation and hopefully replace it with their own.
MrWondering #2627419 05/19/12 11:13 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 289
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 289
I found this thread a pretty interesting read. Regardless of your views on homosexuality. I consider myself a pretty open minded individual and believe in everyones choices, but I can honestly say I'm not sure how I would feel about one of my sons if that were the case. But honestly thats really kind of irrelevant to her current predicament.

It sounds like the POJA would definitely be in play here. But I believe it should be very important to sit down and talk to each other about it. Maybe tell the H that he can have them over at a time when you conveniently have something else going on or somewhere to be. He should have some opportunity to see them and welcome them into the house (if you are can enthusiastically agree with that), but should agree to talk to you and see if there is a proper time that you are able to do that, and either not be there or whatever you can both agree upon. This is his daughter, the person who should be second in his life only to you. So open and honest communication about it and finding a middle ground you can both get on board with. I would say that if he had them both just pop by when you aren't ok with it, would be unacceptable.

The second issue I have noticed is that you blame the "bad times" for her lifestyle choices. This sounds like a very large resentment to carry around with you. Thats a heavy burden. I am not going to philosophize about the reasons she became homosexual. But it sounds like finding a healthy relationship with your H and learning to let go of old resentments might go far. I can't tell you to accept your daughters relationship or lifestyle but maybe it would be healthy to not blame it on everything that you guys went through.

Im fairly new to this whole program, and this forum, but thats just my two cents.
I wish you the best and pray for you.


Me: FWS/BS recovering alcoholic (2 yrs sober)
Married 9.5 years
2 kids ages 6,7
DDay: 17 June 2012 (worst fathers day ever)
Status: in plan A, exposure done, WW moved out
RidicSit #2627423 05/19/12 11:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by RidicSit
Would we say it was okay if Lorraine wanted to ban all blue eyed friends of her daughter from her house and life?

Would we be telling her to POJA it?

Yes! In Marriage Builders, it doesn't matter why someone is not enthusiastic. It's bad for the marriage to do something your spouse is not enthusiastic about, whether their reason is justified or not, rational or irrational, whether you understand it or not, whether it's fair or not. Even if they don't have a reason, if they are not enthusiastic about it, you should not do it!

POJA is darn near absolute, unless someone's life or health is at stake.


If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app!

Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8.
Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010

If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
markos #2627445 05/19/12 12:26 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,589
Markos' post is the golden nugget of the day.


BW - 70
WH - 65
M - 35 years
D-day - 17 Apr 08
H broke contact 11/1/09
Back in love after the worst thing that every happened to us.
armymama #2627484 05/19/12 03:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,232
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,232
it seems to me that the DD's (daughter) partner is not the issue, but a trigger (something that sets you back emotionally because of H's [husband's] adultery). the real issue is that the OP (original poster) is not in a recovered M (marriage). what she really needs is guidance on how to recover, of which POJA (policy of joint agreement) is a part.

OP, can you give us some background on your M so we can give you guidance towards recovery? right now you are both engaging in LB (lovebusting) behaviour, which is not conducive for your M. getting started in recovery will be a big help for you all around.

terms defined for OP as i don't think she is conversant yet in MB principles.

Last edited by Letty; 05/19/12 03:36 PM. Reason: clarity in punctuation

fBW 49
xWH 55
DD 22
DDay 6/07
D 8/15
Letting Go
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 597 guests, and 58 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bibbyryan860, Ian T, SadNewYorker, Jay Handlooms, GrenHeil
71,838 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5