Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
D
Driven2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
Some general questions for the Vets and other BS's in the recovery process.

Assume your snooping tactics have been successful. Over many months you've learned all kinds of information about your WS's foggy activities, plans and actions. You are now in possession of all kinds of knowledge that could only have been obtained by covert means -- including the confirmed death of the A. The major events of the A have been blown wide open and most everything your WS did is out in the open, but not everything; not the things you learned via snooping. You are tentatively beginning the recovery process.

1) At what point in the process, if ever, do you reveal, discuss and deal with things that you could only have learned via snooping?

2) At what point, if ever, do you disclose your snooping methods?



Assume you've fought hard for your marriage, Plan A was successful and your reluctant FWS is now beginning to participate in the recovery. But to protect yourself and your children, you were fully, completely prepared to file for D and fight for custody.

1) When, if ever, do you reveal to your FWS that you were ready at a moment's notice to blow up the bridge and file for D (and perhaps go Plan B) if they had done X, Y, or Z?

2) What are the advantages or disadvantages of telling your FWS you weren't just thinking about a D as a result of their actions, you were in process of filing for D -- but didn't pull the trigger?


Your answers and stories related to these questions would be very helpful...


BH (Me): 50
WW (Her): 44
Married 22 years
DD15, DD10
D-Day) 3/18/11

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Driven2
1) At what point in the process, if ever, do you reveal, discuss and deal with things that you could only have learned via snooping?

These details should be revealed as they are found. If they were not, then you should tell her now.

Quote
2) At what point, if ever, do you disclose your snooping methods?

Never. When an affair has been found, your methods of snooping should not be revealed.

Originally Posted by Dr Harley
"There are two situations where I don't recommend radical honesty or the POJA: Abuse and infidelity. In the case of infidelity, if one spouse suspects the other, I have gone so far as to encourage hiring a private detective to help investigate, using spyware, keyloggers, putting a gps on the car, and all sorts of other snooping methods. If its found that the spouse is not guilty, I encourage revealing the snooping to the spouse. If found guilty, I encourage keeping spying techniques secret indefinitely. Your conclusions are correct. "


Quote
1) When, if ever, do you reveal to your FWS that you were ready at a moment's notice to blow up the bridge and file for D (and perhaps go Plan B) if they had done X, Y, or Z?

The wayward should be told up front that if the affair does not end and she does not commit to a program of recovery that divorce will be the outcome. The BS should be up front about that fact all along.

Quote
From the new book by Dr. Harley Effective Marriage Counseling pg 94:

"Granted, there are situations when demands may be necessary in marriage. During a spouse's affair, for example, I recommend that the betrayed spouse demand there be no contact with the lover. [b]If there is continued contact, separation or even divorce would be the logical consequence. While normally demands don't work, in this case there are no reasonable alternatives because thoughtful requests are even less likely to separate lovers."



"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Driven, in other words, don't be afraid to tell your spouse that divorce will be the outcome if she doesn't get on board. A waywards needs to know that you will not stay in a loveless, one-sided, abusive marriage.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
D
Driven2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Originally Posted by Driven2
[b]1) At what point in the process, if ever, do you reveal, discuss and deal with things that you could only have learned via snooping?

These details should be revealed as they are found. If they were not, then you should tell her now.

Yes, but doesn't Dr. Harley also recommend that once the affair is truly over, you never bring it up again? Wouldn't this cause major LB withdrawals and risk negative impact to the recovery process?



BH (Me): 50
WW (Her): 44
Married 22 years
DD15, DD10
D-Day) 3/18/11

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
He says that the affair should not be rehashed once all the details are known. All the details are not known. For example, she doesn't know the extent of your information and telling her how much you know would send the message that you have pretty good resources. And that is a good message to send a wayward! grin


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
D
Driven2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
He says that the affair should not be rehashed once all the details are known. All the details are not known. For example, she doesn't know the extent of your information and telling her how much you know would send the message that you have pretty good resources. And that is a good message to send a wayward! grin

And if the WS demands to know how you know X, Y and Z? You simply refuse to tell them?



BH (Me): 50
WW (Her): 44
Married 22 years
DD15, DD10
D-Day) 3/18/11

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Driven2
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
He says that the affair should not be rehashed once all the details are known. All the details are not known. For example, she doesn't know the extent of your information and telling her how much you know would send the message that you have pretty good resources. And that is a good message to send a wayward! grin

And if the WS demands to know how you know X, Y and Z? You simply refuse to tell them?

I politely told my husband that was my business and I would never reveal my sources.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 514
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 514
Driven2, first, I want to say that you are on the ball!! At this point, you need to tell her that you know more than she has revealed and that she has not been completely honest. She needs to be reminded that sparing feelings is not an excuse to be dishonest and hold back valuable information!

Secondly, I REALLY need your help and advice on snooping!!!!

Last edited by Littlebit3; 07/21/12 03:55 PM.

BS Me 47,WH 49
DS's x3 17, 10, 7
Multiple D-Days
No disclosure by WH. No EP's, no transparency, no guilt or remorse either.
Plan C DOES NOT WORK!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
never reveal your sources

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Driven2
[
And if the WS demands to know how you know X, Y and Z? You simply refuse to tell them?

Remind her also that demands are a lovebuster. smile


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,108
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,108
Originally Posted by Driven2
2) What are the advantages or disadvantages of telling your FWS you weren't just thinking about a D as a result of their actions, you were in process of filing for D -- but didn't pull the trigger?

All disadvantage IMO - If you didn't pull the trigger then you aren't "in" the process of filing for D. crazy So what is the point to telling a WS such a thing? Either you pull the trigger or you don't. The worst thing a BS can do is "talk" and then not follow through.


BW - me
exWH - serial cheater
2 awesome kids
Divorced 12/2011




Many a good man has failed because he had a wishbone where his backbone should have been.

We gain strength, and courage, and confidence by each experience in which we really stop to look fear in the face... we must do that which we think we cannot.
--------Eleanor Roosevelt
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
It's a good idea to be honest about it. There is no reason to not be honest about it. There are only advantages to informing the spouse that you were prepared to divorce her over her affair and/or refusal to work on the affair. That might give her second thoughts about a repeat.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,025
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Originally Posted by Driven2
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
He says that the affair should not be rehashed once all the details are known. All the details are not known. For example, she doesn't know the extent of your information and telling her how much you know would send the message that you have pretty good resources. And that is a good message to send a wayward! grin

And if the WS demands to know how you know X, Y and Z? You simply refuse to tell them?

I politely told my husband that was my business and I would never reveal my sources.


Because I was still actively monitoring the situation for awhile I didn't want my wife even having the thought that I may be still snooping on her so when I revealed such details I'd say something like...

"I don't remember...I think that information I overheard while you were talking to someone while in the tub and I had a my ear to a cup on the door eavesdropping."

Another explanation I spun was that I was able to retrieve a copy of all their texts from Verizon (which isn't possible but she didn't know that).

But I would follow up such broad explanation with "But we don't need to focus on HOW I got that information...but rather what that information is and why you lied/are lying to me"


1. Waywards are so overwrought emotionally that they won't remember which details they said or wrote to who, when and where. Between talking, texting and emailing their OM and their best friend(s) in the know and other affair supporters they won't be able to recall that there's only one place you could have gotten one specific nugget of information.

2. If the affair is truly 100% over...they won't care any longer if you snoop on them so even if their mind goes there...they'll shrug it off as "Whatever". It's a good test to see if there is still NEW lies going on.

3. Be careful of the wayward that wants to focus solely on what you know...how you know it and where this information is stored. They want the evidence destroyed (have 2 copies so you COULD destroy one if you want too without yet revealing you have a backup). If they are still lying about a lot of stuff they will be hesitant to go forward until they know all the details you know so they can figure out if they can continue lying about some details you don't know about. (that's why being general about knowing everything...giving some nuggets with the implication that the nuggets are just the tip of the iceberg you know....such that they just confess everything honestly...i.e. - they give up)

4. A little over a year into recovery I came clean about snooping. She was thankful for all I did to save her and our family and apologetic for putting me in the position of needing to snoop in the first place.

5. We both are free to snoop as much as we want now.


Mr. Wondering


p.s. - As far as telling my wife about seeing an attorney and being prepared to file....a few months into recovery I made her aware of that fact as well as the fact I didn't intend to remain/continue in a loveless marriage indefinitely. That simply staying married for our daughter wasn't enough for me. I had an out and I'd use it unless she got on board with a recovery PLAN.


Last edited by MrWondering; 07/22/12 10:54 AM.

FBH(me)-51 FWW-49 (MrsWondering)
DD19 DS 22 Dday-2005-Recovered

"agree to disagree" = Used when one wants to reject the objective reality of the situation and hopefully replace it with their own.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Quote
And if the WS demands to know how you know X, Y and Z? You simply refuse to tell them?
Why is she demanding to know? redflag

My H was so remorseful that he didn't care what I did. He actually busted me at one point; he found one of my VAR's. I'd tried it out and it didn't pick up enough clear sounds (cheap model - I had bought a better one and already had it planted in his car.) He asked what it was and I looked him squarely in the eye and told him that it was a voice-activated tape recorder, but that it wasn't a good one, so I couldn't use it. I told him that I would do whatever it took to make sure my marriage and my family was safe. And that NONE of it was his business. All he needed to do was be faithful and he had nothing to worry about.

I also told him that he was welcome to do anything he wanted to do to make sure I was faithful. He declined.


D-Day 2-10-2009
Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever!
Thank you Marriage Builders!

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
D
Driven2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
I politely told my husband that was my business and I would never reveal my sources.

Like it!


BH (Me): 50
WW (Her): 44
Married 22 years
DD15, DD10
D-Day) 3/18/11

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
D
Driven2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by MrWondering
Another explanation I spun was that I was able to retrieve a copy of all their texts from Verizon (which isn't possible but she didn't know that).

But I would follow up such broad explanation with "But we don't need to focus on HOW I got that information...but rather what that information is and why you lied/are lying to me"

Great idea on the explanation for knowledge related to text messages...

I can see the beauty of turning it around and keeping the focus on the WS and what they did.

Originally Posted by MrWondering
p.s. - As far as telling my wife about seeing an attorney and being prepared to file....a few months into recovery I made her aware of that fact as well as the fact I didn't intend to remain/continue in a loveless marriage indefinitely. That simply staying married for our daughter wasn't enough for me. I had an out and I'd use it unless she got on board with a recovery PLAN.

That is pretty much parallels my approach so far.


BH (Me): 50
WW (Her): 44
Married 22 years
DD15, DD10
D-Day) 3/18/11

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
D
Driven2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by maritalbliss
Why is she demanding to know? redflag

My H was so remorseful that he didn't care what I did.

She still believes she has a God given right to privacy, though her tenacity on this appears to be fading over time.

In this particular case, she would likely be pulling her hair out to figure out who betrayed her and how I found out. She broke no contact a year ago with the help of her POS friend. It was kept very secret between the two of them (FWS and her "friend").

Remorse? That's not something I've even remotely seen yet. Not sure I ever will.


BH (Me): 50
WW (Her): 44
Married 22 years
DD15, DD10
D-Day) 3/18/11

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,738
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,738
@Driven2: Found your thread!

The important thing to remember here is that YOUR experience is not HER experience. The chances are very good that if you recover, she's going to look back at her affair as the turning point in your marriage. While it may not make it a "good" thing, for her the "good" experiences were prior to D-Day, and then after D-Day all the "bad" (consequences!) happened at the start of recovery: exposure, tears, nights spent apart, arguments, etc.

Pushing her to try to change her mind about how she thinks of the events will not work, period. Lead with love, but set limits on what you are willing to accept.

There's one positive spin to this. The affair woke the two of you up to what you were doing to your marriage and provided the impetus to change. Losing a loved one, suffering a debilitating illness, or having a major unpleasant life event can also provide a similar stimulus to change. Not pleasant, not "good" in the typical sense, but if you make it work and fall back in love with one another, you might come to view the affair and its consequences as a terrible, destructive fire after which you built something new and beautiful together.

But you have to make your marriage be the "good" you both love together. Put in the effort, and you can make the feelings she experienced during the affair seem like the pale shadows of reality they are.


Doormat_No_More
(Formerly Barnboy)
Original thread lost in the forum purge of '09.
4 months after D-Day
1 year after D-Day
Two Years Later
Four Years Later

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 317 guests, and 92 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Raja Singh, Loyalfighter81, Everlasting Love, Harry Smith, Brutalll
71,958 Registered Users
Latest Posts
Lack of sex - anyway to fix it?
by Nightflyer90 - 03/23/25 08:14 PM
Happening again
by happyheart - 03/08/25 03:01 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics133,621
Posts2,323,490
Members71,958
Most Online3,185
Jan 27th, 2020
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 2025, Marriage Builders, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5