|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786 |
My ideal candidate would be a 26 year old foreign beauty queen with no emotional issues, no alcohol/ drug/ mental health issues, etc.....but obviously I know thats not possible. I'm logging off after this ... but this screams to me I have no idea how to properly care for a woman, and it's all about me, and please don't be any trouble for me woman! This is a serious question ... are you sure you are not really a freeloader? I derive that from your posts, your dating profile, and your feedback today. I'd run from you if I read you online! At this point in my life; Yes, I am a freeloader. However, I would like to have a romantic marriage where the POJA and other MB rules are followed because I know that would be the best possible outcome in life. I'm just saying that I truthfully dont want any baggage from a woman, but I understand that I'm not 20 anymore and so thats not possible I wanted to comment on this, and apologize it has taken me a couple days to get back. There are two kinds of freeloaders, and they are polar opposite of each other. I think sometimes this mindset gets confused, but in BRF it makes sense. The term freeloader that Dr. Harley discusses is not something that changes. They go through life only wanting their needs met, and will put no effort into the relationship of meeting the other persons needs. It is their character, and likely a long life of bad habit building. The term Freeloader Dr. Harley discusses in BRF is a way of life. They jump from partner to partner when more is asked from them. The likelihood of getting them to change is slim. They consist of Selfishness and IB ... because its all about them. There is also the "freeloader" who starts off dating. This person goes into the first couple of dates with their Taker in charge. They don't focus on meeting the other persons needs, instead they scope out how the person will properly meet their needs. They understand the relationship will not stay here long because it must move to renter stage in order to have a chance at building romantic love. This type of freeloader should have a "buyer" like character. In terms of MB even though they go into dating as a "freeloader" they do not consist of the same character traits unless they are truly a freeloader. Most in the dating world will move to "renter" quickly, and stay there. Can you see the difference? Sometimes your feedback concerning what you want in a woman tells me you may fall into the first category "freeloader". It may not be something that is permanent and my thought it is likely due to some healing needed on your part. Your Taker is really on fire, and it is my experience while dating having the taker start out strong is good, but you should be able to transition towards the middle with Taker/Giver in Equilibrium. This can put you into renter within the first couple of months dating. After this POJA can start to enter the dating relationship, and then you can be a buyer while dating. A woman will want to express her taker in the relationship relatively soon, i.e. by getting her IC and affection needs met. My question for you can you handle this? Can you date a woman and simply talk to her, her needs, her wants, her desires, her life, her failures, her kids, her hair, her clothes, her job, etc.?
Last edited by HomeSweetHome; 12/20/13 12:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818 Likes: 7 |
The term freeloader that Dr. Harley discusses is not something that changes I don't think that's the way Dr. Harley presents it. His whole book Buyers, Renters, Freeloaders is designed to help people move from Freeloader+Renter culture to Buyer culture. This is made a little more clear in Defending Traditional Marriage - originally Dr. Harley found that he could not reach Renters and Freeloaders by trying to talk to them like a Buyer. He was a Buyer and could not communicate with them because he thought like a Buyer. To reach them he had to learn to think like Freeloaders and Renters. In doing so, he learned how to persuade them to try the Buyers agreement. Doing so transforms them into Buyers. Defending Traditional Marriage is an interesting counterpoint/companion book to Buyers, Renters, and Freeloaders.
If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app! Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8. Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010 If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818 Likes: 7 |
A woman will want to express her taker in the relationship relatively soon As will a man's. Dr. Harley's whole approach is to integrate your Giver and your Taker and make sure that you use your intellect to ensure that both are satisfied. The Takers are a good thing! They just shouldn't be allowed to get their way at the expense of another person.
If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app! Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8. Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010 If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,362 Likes: 3 |
The term freeloader that Dr. Harley discusses is not something that changes. Are you aware that Dr. Harley acknowledges himself that he was once a freeloader? He doesn't make a distinction between two different types of freeloaders, and I don't think we need to start doing that either. The only distinction I can think of that Dr. Harley makes is: Freeloading while dating = good Freeloading while married = bad Jedi's on the right track. He's a freeloader, but he has a willingness to be more eventually. This is a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239 |
My ideal candidate would be a 26 year old foreign beauty queen I would put that thought out of your head.... I would be careful who you say this to (women) because I personally find this offensive. Why not just say someone I have chemistry//attraction with? ugs. I need to clarify that I was joking when I said this. Because obviously there is no young beauty queen with no baggage. That was a joke like All Bundy would say. I would like to date an attractive woman like Susie that is sane and not a drug addict or some other major issues.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239 |
Yes Home sweet home, I would be prepared to meet woman's top emotional needs. But I would really just like to go on lots of dates, and that's kind of what Harley encouraged me to do...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239 |
Thats what I'm going to do. I watched a John Wayne movie tonight, The Undefeated. The Indian loved this white woman. And John Wayne told him, I taught you how to survive when snow comes, how to fight and how to deal with men....but women, nobody knows whats on a woman's mind! As a woman, this offends me. If you want to know what's on a woman's mind, just ask. I don't get the sense that you like women enough yet to start dating. Respect is pretty crucial to building any relationship - especially a romantic one. You've been deeply hurt, so I don't blame you. You may want to spend some time healing. Otherwise, the good women (likely the ones you'll be attracted to) will pick up on the disrespect and dismiss you. You may get hurt over and over, and not know why. No fun. I feel that I've had plenty of time to heal. Almost 2 years. I'm ready to date. I respect women. I try to conduct myself as a gentleman
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803 |
But I would really just like to go on lots of dates, and that's kind of what Harley encouraged me to do... In that case, just date, widely and diversely. It doesn't matter if every date you have fits your description of the perfect potential spouse, since it doesn't sound like you're looking for someone to settle down with immediately anyway. You may find yourself on dates with women who ultimately don't turn out to be a good match for you, but who cares? You haven't lost anything by having the experience of meeting them, other than maybe a couple of hours of your time, and you don't have to ask them out again. Dating a wide variety of women will give you a much clearer picture of what qualities you do and do not like in a potential companion. It will also provide you with a much wider pool of candidates to choose from when you do reach the point where you want a relationship that goes beyond casual dating.
Me: BS/FWW: 48 BS/WH: 50 DS: 30, 27, 25 DD: 28 OC: 10 BH and I are raising my OC together.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,574 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,574 Likes: 1 |
Just sayin, I have a ex BiL who married a beautiful young lady from the Phillipines, and it was great while it lasted....
Me 40, OD 18 and YD 13 Married 15 years, Divorced 10/2010
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786 |
The term freeloader that Dr. Harley discusses is not something that changes. Are you aware that Dr. Harley acknowledges himself that he was once a freeloader? He doesn't make a distinction between two different types of freeloaders, and I don't think we need to start doing that either. The only distinction I can think of that Dr. Harley makes is: Freeloading while dating = good Freeloading while married = bad Jedi's on the right track. He's a freeloader, but he has a willingness to be more eventually. This is a good thing. So if a freeloader in marriage is bad, then what were they before marriage good? We can try and spin it however we want, but the fact is a freeloader in marriage was a freeloader in dating (and/or possibly a slight renter with very bad habits). One doesn't just wake up one day in marriage and turn into a freeloader. It is most likely learned behavior, and likely fully present while in the dating relationship. You read on here all the time ... we usually tell those dating freeloaders to run for the hills, and do not consider marriage. I took from BFR a difference in freeloaders. I also discussed this with Dr. Harley who told me one can also be a buyer in dating. Most assume buyer is only marriage. I agree in dating we start as freeloaders ... but most move to renters early on to demonstrate a willingness to meet the needs of the others and while lovebanks are being filled ... and some move to buyers in dating which demonstrates the proper use of POJA. I have dated a lot of men, and many have been freeloaders. They have no desire to change (set in their ways). They have little desire to meet my needs, and feel entitled to me meeting their needs. They often come with IB, and I think they are quite selfish. When I start to press to get my needs met, they usually move on and the relationship is a no go. I usually find this out by date #3 or after several months of havng a friendship. Sometimes the freeloaders are difficult to spot, but over time their inability to demonstrate proper care usually rears its ugly head. Yes I could marry one of them and get a freeloader in marriage, but I choose not to ... I choose run from them. I cannot see how one is a freeloader in marrige without showing great signs of this before marriage. We see these relationships on this forum extensively and in all cases they poster is usually advised to run for the hills. Several of us women on Jedi's thread have discussed our concern with his feedback. I posed the question is he a freeloader? I don't know if he is, so I'd hope the feedback would allow him to honestly look at himself. He may not be a freeloader ... he could be a renter with just bad habits. I don't know ... but several of us have seen red flags and have provided the necessary feedback to grow. My 2cents!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
[. You read on here all the time ... we usually tell those dating freeloaders to run for the hills, and do not consider marriage. No, we don't. Because dating is a freeloader proposition in the first place. The freeloader doesn't own the house and is not going to make improvements, as such. The only time being a freeloader is a problem is if he STAYS that way in marriage. But you can't say "don't marry a freeloader" because people who date ARE freeloaders. Dr Harley was a freeloader; my H was a freeloader. They are now buyers.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
This describe daters perfectly because they are just there to interview the candidate: Freeloader is unwilling to put much effort into the care of his or her partner in a romantic relationship. He or she does only what comes naturally and expects only what comes naturally. It's like a person who tries to live in a house without paying rent or doing anything to improve it unless the person is in the mood to do so. This describes married people: [hopefully!] Buyer is willing to demonstrate an extraordinary sense of care by making permanent changes in his or her own behavior and lifestyle to make the romantic relationship mutually fulfilling. Solutions to problems are long-term solutions and must work well for both partners because the romantic relationship is viewed as exclusive and permanent. It's like a person who buys a house for life with a willingness to make repairs that accommodate changing needs, painting the walls, installing new carper, replacing the roof, and even doing some remodeling so that it can be comfortable and useful.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786 |
Freeloader is unwilling to put much effort into the care of his or her partner in a romantic relationship. He or she does only what comes naturally and expects only what comes naturally. It's like a person who tries to live in a house without paying rent or doing anything to improve it unless the person is in the mood to do so. So you want me to date "this" and expect that "this" is going to be what? I certainly don't want to marry that...! My definition of dating is the entire "time" up until marriage. Are we all on the same page here? Maybe my use of date is confusing people....when one dates they continue dating ... I am dating this person who is my boyfriend or girlfriend. I am going on a date with a guy I have been seeing for a couple months ... I am dating this man for four months. My definition of dating is building a romantic love ... it is my understanding a freeloader shouldn't be part of this "dating" or "courtship" except on the first couple dates, but after that they should go to renter. How is this freeloader person you are telling me to date going to show me they can properly care for me while dating? How am I as a dater going to be reassured that "this" freeloader you describe above is going to be good marriage material if I am expected to date that? So date the freeloader ... did you just recommend that? Step 1) Date Step 2) Engage Step 3) Marriage
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786 |
[. You read on here all the time ... we usually tell those dating freeloaders to run for the hills, and do not consider marriage. No, we don't. Because dating is a freeloader proposition in the first place. The freeloader doesn't own the house and is not going to make improvements, as such. The only time being a freeloader is a problem is if he STAYS that way in marriage. But you can't say "don't marry a freeloader" because people who date ARE freeloaders. Dr Harley was a freeloader; my H was a freeloader. They are now buyers. And again as a dater ... how am I going to know this person can properly care for me when they are expected to not put any effort into it? When does POJA get tested? After marriage? How am I going to be reassured this "freeloader" is going to be a buyer in marriage? Where's the test?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
yep! Dating is just a job interview for marriage, which is a freeloader position. They do what comes naturally. One doesn't become a BUYER until they are married. While dating, one can express that they will become a buyer when married, but a person who is dating is still a freeloader until they have bought the house.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
And just consider this point: a person is not a buyer until he is married. You can't be considered a buyer if you are not even married, because you haven't made a legal commitment. Sort of like test driving a car: you haven't bought it until you have signed the papers.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,786 |
yep! Dating is just a job interview for marriage, which is a freeloader position. They do what comes naturally. One doesn't become a BUYER until they are married. While dating, one can express that they will become a buyer when married, but a person who is dating is still a freeloader until they have bought the house. I'll have BrainHurts pull my Harley radio interview, where he discusses I should be a buyer in dating and how that's good. I cannot recommend anyone to date a freeloader without any substance to prove they can not only meet needs, but successfully establish a POJA relationship. I feel it is dangerous to recommend anyone date a freeloader and then marry them blindly without any action to back up their ability to meet needs. I have read a lot and I do not know of anyone on this forum who has ever recommended marrying someone who doesn't have the habit of showing proper care, which not only includeds EN meeting but also the ability to resolve conflict. It is my understanding by reading BFR and talking to Dr. Harley one should demonstrate action of good marriage building habits before you marry them. I am a dater and I run from freeloaders because I don't want to take a chance on blind trust that that freeloader will be a buyer in marriage. I'd have zero ability to verify a freeloader. Marrying a freeloader sounds like a gamble this betrayed wife certainly doesn't want to sign up for, and certainly something I would never recommend to anyone who has felt the wrath of adultery.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Something else to think about. When you test drive a car, you buy it on faith. You check it out, kick the tires and test drive it in the hopes that it will be a reliable car in the future. But you don't know for sure. You have make a judgment based on the information available to you at the time.
Same with a house. You have it inspected, appraised, check it's history. But you can't live there.
It is in that way that dating is a freeloader proposition. The goal of dating is to find someone who will be a BUYER in the future.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,239 |
I dont understand why I should be a "buyer" if I'm not married and just starting to date
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
[ I feel it is dangerous to recommend anyone date a freeloader and then marry them blindly without any action to back up their ability to meet needs.
I have read a lot and I do not know of anyone on this forum who has ever recommended marrying someone who doesn't have the habit of showing proper care, which not only includeds EN meeting but also the ability to resolve conflict. BUT, they are still a freeloader until they are married. They are not a buyer, by definition, until they are married. Once again, daters are freeloaders. Dr Harley says all the time he was freeloader when they were dating. He is now a buyer. What you have to do is make sure your dating candidate will be a BUYER once married. The goal of dating is to eliminate - not freeloaders - but those will REMAIN freeloaders after married.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
3 members (Blackhawk, 2 invisible),
168
guests, and
103
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Children
by BrainHurts - 10/19/24 03:02 PM
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,616
Posts2,323,460
Members71,895
|
Most Online3,185 Jan 27th, 2020
|
|
|
|