Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 46 of 68 1 2 44 45 46 47 48 67 68
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
She got one of the posts removed.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,842
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,842
It seems like it would be hard to prove cyberstalking. It usually has to be a pattern of behavior. Do you have records to show that you did most of it at the same time?

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
What does that mean? Oh yeah. I did most of the exposure in January.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,842
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,842
I'm not sure what the laws are in your area but generally stalking is defined as a pattern of behavior. So once or twice wouldn't meet the definition. But it depends on the case law in your state. if you posted several places but did it all at once, it might not count as a pattern. You could ask your attorney.

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
I think we're getting ahead of ourselves. All PW got was a silly C&D letter that wasn't even sent registered.


Remarried 7/16
Thanks MB!
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
I think PW should get a lawyer to send OW a C&D letter telling her to stop the affair... smile I mean, as long as we're sending meaningless C&D letters with nothing to back them up.


Remarried 7/16
Thanks MB!
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
Originally Posted by nmwb77
I think we're getting ahead of ourselves. All PW got was a silly C&D letter that wasn't even sent registered.

Exactly.

As warped as it might be, your H might have given her the address to somehow pull you back in and get some sort of connection, even if it's fighting. It's not necessarily that he's on 'her side', although it shows a gapping lack of judgement.

I'd say ignore it, leave the truth out there, and request 'no more harassment' if you get another letter. She hasn't thought this through at all - there is no way she is going to want a fully public lawsuit detailing her skanky behavior.

Plan B it and let those two deal with the nasty public consequences of their nasty marriage destroying behavior.

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
Originally Posted by nmwb77
I think PW should get a lawyer to send OW a C&D letter telling her to stop the affair... smile I mean, as long as we're sending meaningless C&D letters with nothing to back them up.

That made me laugh - haha!

I think no response is better. It's a position of power.

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
I posted in a bunch of places. Once in October and then a bunch in January. So, I am not sure if that is a pattern.

Honestly, if she wants things taken down, it makes the most sense to just use those post removal services because then you can't post the name again. Doing it this way is just costly.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
I am actually more worried about that than a meaningless libel lawsuit. I am not sure how hard/easy it is to prove.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by PigletWiglet
I am actually more worried about that than a meaningless libel lawsuit. I am not sure how hard/easy it is to prove.

The cyberstalking nonsense? If you did not threaten her, then there's no case. I see nothing in those posts that comes across as threatening.


Remarried 7/16
Thanks MB!
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
Originally Posted by PigletWiglet
I am actually more worried about that than a meaningless libel lawsuit. I am not sure how hard/easy it is to prove.

In any event it will cost her money and time. I really think she just wants you to stop posting the truth. You haven't posted anything since January, and don't plan on doing any more right? So she has what she wants. If she pursues this, she is the one keeping it alive. Even her lawyer has to see that.

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
Google california cyberstalking laws. The first hit gives the things that have to be proven. Just like in a defamation case the statement has to be false, in a cyberstalking case there has to be a credible threat.


Remarried 7/16
Thanks MB!
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
I credibly moved 500 miles away from her, so she'd have to deal with that.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
Lawyer told me to stop posting and let if go.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by PigletWiglet
Lawyer told me to stop posting and let if go.

Well, you already had, right? Relax. Everything's going to be fine. Focus on something else. (I know, easier said than done.)


Remarried 7/16
Thanks MB!
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
Yeah, but that post from shes a homewrecker showed up the day I got the letter. Lol. I must have written if 3-4 weeks ago.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
P
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 991
Thanks! I know it will be fine. I'm not going to google her name any longer. I don't care what's up/what's down--nothing. She is going to be banished from my life from now on.


Me: 38, have been divorced for 4 years
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by PigletWiglet
Thanks! I know it will be fine. I'm not going to google her name any longer. I don't care what's up/what's down--nothing. She is going to be banished from my life from now on.

Good. smile Now to take my own advice. laugh


Remarried 7/16
Thanks MB!
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 316
Originally Posted by PigletWiglet
Thanks! I know it will be fine. I'm not going to google her name any longer. I don't care what's up/what's down--nothing. She is going to be banished from my life from now on.

Great!! You have too bright a future stay in the mud of that stuff.

Page 46 of 68 1 2 44 45 46 47 48 67 68

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,254 guests, and 50 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Mike69, petercgeelan, Zorya, Reyna98, Nofoguy
71,829 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5