|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
A new text from my wife to the OM:
"you have been ironclad about not communicating with me in any way. As my letter stated, i appreciate the'no communication' I should have been more respectful of your request to not communicate and i shouldn't have left that letter. Safe travels" Yup, orchestrated. Perhaps. And that was my first thought when I saw it. On the other hand, Im keeping an open mind here. Maybe it was orchestrated, but maybe those were texts that were recycled for some reason. It doesn't really matter, though, does it? What matters is my Plan A.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
A new text from my wife to the OM:
"you have been ironclad about not communicating with me in any way. As my letter stated, i appreciate the'no communication' I should have been more respectful of your request to not communicate and i shouldn't have left that letter. Safe travels" Yup, orchestrated. Perhaps. And that was my first thought when I saw it. On the other hand, Im keeping an open mind here. Maybe it was orchestrated, but maybe those were texts that were recycled for some reason. It doesn't really matter, though, does it? What matters is my Plan A. Of course it matters! If orchestrated that means they know you know and are trying to throw you off their path while they communicate some other way.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 789 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 789 Likes: 4 |
Contact between your wife and OM minimizes succes of your plan A.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Could she have a secret phone hidden somewhere?
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 789 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 789 Likes: 4 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
A new text from my wife to the OM:
"you have been ironclad about not communicating with me in any way. As my letter stated, i appreciate the'no communication' I should have been more respectful of your request to not communicate and i shouldn't have left that letter. Safe travels" Yup, orchestrated. Perhaps. And that was my first thought when I saw it. On the other hand, Im keeping an open mind here. Maybe it was orchestrated, but maybe those were texts that were recycled for some reason. It doesn't really matter, though, does it? What matters is my Plan A. Of course it matters! If orchestrated that means they know you know and are trying to throw you off their path while they communicate some other way. She has known for months that I had access to and was reading her emails and texts. So this likely wasn't an exercise to test anything, but who knows. I can see it both ways. But your other point is important, ie, communicating via some other means.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
Contact between your wife and OM minimizes succes of your plan A. Yes, I agree.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
Could she have a secret phone hidden somewhere? She could. I haven't in her car in a long time and have left her purse and school bag alone. I have access to those things whenever I want at night, so Ill start looking.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
[
She has known for months that I had access to and was reading her emails and texts. So this likely wasn't an exercise to test anything, but who knows. I can see it both ways.
But your other point is important, ie, communicating via some other means. But you only had access to her texts by getting on her phone. She has locked that down now. She knows you can't get on her phone and read them. How are you accessing her emails?
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
OR she could have been texting this knowing you would read it and believe they have really ended contact. I don't know. But my alarms are going off because of the way they felt the need to talk about how they have been in "ironclad" non communication. If true, they would have no need to tell each other.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
Ooohhh, this is getting interesting...
My wife has contacted our cell carrier and I'm seeing her side of the chat dialogue:
"the other line on my account has accessed all my contacts and is texting people in a wayvthat it looks like it is from my phone. 1. is that posssible 2. can it be changed"
"is there a way to text that is not from my phone that uses my phone number?"
"I am currently going through a divorce and will need to seperate our sprint lines, what is the best way for me to do this? Would going to the store be quickest and easiest"
"im not a tech savy person and need to reset all my passwords, can a service rep at a store help me with this?"
She really does think that I am sending texts to the OM and making it look like it was her number sending them.
She also seems to think that the way I am allegedly doing this is because I have her passwords.
Yikes.
My real concern now is that should she take her phone to. Sprint store, some know-nothing will simply factory reset her phone and my spyware gets removed as a result.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
[
She has known for months that I had access to and was reading her emails and texts. So this likely wasn't an exercise to test anything, but who knows. I can see it both ways.
But your other point is important, ie, communicating via some other means. But you only had access to her texts by getting on her phone. She has locked that down now. She knows you can't get on her phone and read them. How are you accessing her emails? Spyware and using a laptop that she logged into and which saved her email password.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
OR she could have been texting this knowing you would read it and believe they have really ended contact. I don't know. But my alarms are going off because of the way they felt the need to talk about how they have been in "ironclad" non communication. If true, they would have no need to tell each other. I'm hearing the same bells. It's weird that he would tell someone that he's been in no communication that he's been good at not being in communication. I wonder if this is her attempt to fabricate a reason to remove my line from our shared sprint account.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
Quirky how she describes her current situation to others, ie, going through a divorce even though no attorney retained, no filing, etc.
Also, tonight will be weird. She will be expecting that my check would be deposited into our joint checking, but it went into my sole acct. I wonder if she will say anything.
Further, after a problem with our shared banking institution, my transfer of savings should happen tomorrow or Monday.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
My wife's response to the revised text that Melody had above:
"I think that sounds like a very challenging conversation and I am not confident in our communication skills for it to be successful. Thus would be a good conversation to have with a family therapist. I do have a phone appt set to get the boys enrolled with a personal counselor to help them with the coming divorce." You could reply with something like: "Thank you for being willing to consider discussing the boy's behavior in the future. Until we are able to arrange a more complete discussion, I was thinking about requiring the boys to be responsible for [chore 1, chore 2] each week in order to earn their phone for the following week. If they do not do the chore, they would not have their phone for the following week. I hope this will engage them in doing the chores we need and reduce their arguing over it. Does this action sound OK to you? Also, I wanted to have a better response ready for disrespect next time it occurs to me. Instead of trying to argue with them, I'd like to try taking privileges away so there is no point in my having an escalating argument. The sequence of privilege loss I was thinking of was [a], and [c]. I will back you up for these same consequences if they disrespect you. Does that sound OK to you? Are these consequences OK or would you prefer other consequences?
I feel that having a preset sequence of consequences will help me set boundaries with them in a more productive way. I want very much to be able to respond to them firmly, but in love and avoid the escalations of the past. Is it OK with you if we give this a try after school today? If so, would you like to be there as we lay this out, or do you prefer I do it alone?"
Dr. D: When you need to enforce one of these boundaries, [b]set down the law and WALK AWAY like you own the place, expecting it to be done. DO NOT stay around to argue about it. If the boys chase after you, calmly let them know that if they have one more sentence they will lose [b]. If they persist, DO take [b] away. Use some reality discipline - let their choices make their consequences. Never reason or argue with a disrespectful kid. You don't need to have anger because YOU own the upper hand and control of [a], [b] and [c]. I really appreciate this message. Ironically, last week she and I worked on a chore list to earn screen time. Neither boy has a phone, though each has a tablet and access to tv, laptop, Xbox. So we came up with a plan and expectations of chores to earn screen time. And we are already enforcing it. Although, my wife is giving additional time with and without doing extra chores. Our youngest boy last night fussed about and refused to do dishes and garbage. We took away screens for today and, as we agreed with them last week, noted that unfinished chores would result in continuing the no screen time until the chore(s) were done. Ultimately he completed the chore,but man it was a lot of work. And that's my problem. I just won't let it go when he's sassin, back talking, refusing to do something he's been asked. I need to just give the instruction and if not complied with with then remind of the consequence and walk away. If it's done, great, if not, then enforce the consequence, no more cajoling, no more yelling, no threats, no additional consequences. So, a revision to your suggested response: Thank you for being willing to consider discussing the boy's behavior in the future. Until then, I very much want to respond to the boys firmly, but with love and not anger to avoid the escalations we have seen in the past. With that in mind, I would appreciate your support when I impose a consequence, such as when I take away screen time. I will support you as well. For me this would mean that when you impose a consequence, I will tell one or both that I agree with you and will reinforce to them the importance of following directions and behaving respectfully to both of us. But I think we need to discuss the sequence of consequences. Last night, Boy 2 was not persuaded to do his chores by taking away screens for today. I'd like to talk about whether in these situations we want to impose additional consequences or that we simply walk away from the argument and let the consequences be as they are. I'd also like to discuss what additional consequences, beyond taking away screen time, we want to consider for more serious behavior issues. For example, when one or both boys are physically hurting one another, cursing, or being extremely disrespectful to each other or us, taking away screen time may be insufficient. I think we both have effective strategies and I value your input, so it's important to me that we are on the same page and present to the boys a united front when it comes to their behavior.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 560
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 560 |
OR she could have been texting this knowing you would read it and believe they have really ended contact. I don't know. But my alarms are going off because of the way they felt the need to talk about how they have been in "ironclad" non communication. If true, they would have no need to tell each other. I'm hearing the same bells. It's weird that he would tell someone that he's been in no communication that he's been good at not being in communication. I wonder if this is her attempt to fabricate a reason to remove my line from our shared sprint account. I'm not so sure that this cell carrier chat is legitimate or another attempt to flush you out. Tread with caution. Heed those warning bells, and do NOT divulge your snooping methods! If the phone ends up getting reset, you still have other methods available, both electronic and a private investigator.
BH (me) 50, WxW 47 Married 1994 D-day, plan A, & exposure Jan 2017 Divorced Nov 2017
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
Quirky how she describes her current situation to others, ie, going through a divorce even though no attorney retained, no filing, etc. We see it quite a bit with wayward spouses. They talk alot about divorce when they are in the fog but don't always act. You did good here focusing on her ACTIONS and not her talk. Very often they never file and it all blows over. Or they will file and then change their minds.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
OR she could have been texting this knowing you would read it and believe they have really ended contact. I don't know. But my alarms are going off because of the way they felt the need to talk about how they have been in "ironclad" non communication. If true, they would have no need to tell each other. I'm hearing the same bells. It's weird that he would tell someone that he's been in no communication that he's been good at not being in communication. I wonder if this is her attempt to fabricate a reason to remove my line from our shared sprint account. I'm not so sure that this cell carrier chat is legitimate or another attempt to flush you out. Tread with caution. Heed those warning bells, and do NOT divulge your snooping methods! If the phone ends up getting reset, you still have other methods available, both electronic and a private investigator. Hmm, interesting. What I posted was from a keylogger. From that same keylogger I saw she was entering a username password combo. From the browsing tab I saw she was going to our cell providers website. And from her texts I saw she received a one time passcode from our cell provider. So I think it's legit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 863
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 863 |
Thank you for being willing to consider discussing the boy's behavior in the future.
Until then, I'll try very hard to respond to the boys firmly, but with love and not anger to avoid the escalations we have seen in the past. Until we can talk, would you be agreeable to the both of taking a united stand when either imposes a consequence, such as taking away screen time? When either of us impose a consequence, we can say "your father and I" or "your mother and I" and then we can both stand behind it.
Would you be OK with imposing additional consequences for more serious behavior issues? For example, when one or both boys are physically hurting one another, cursing, or being extremely disrespectful to each other or us, taking away screen time may be insufficient. I was thinking we could provide an escalating series of consequences, such as (a) (b) and (c). Does that escalation sound good to you?
I value your input, and it's important to me that we are on the same page and present to the boys a united front when it comes to their behavior. Dr D, using the phrase "I would appreciate it if...." can come off as a demand. I reworded so you are asking for mutual agreement instead of asking her to comply with your position. Also, walking away is your friend. Don't get your emotions involved. An angry man is a fool. Don't be a fool. Be pragmatic and behave in a way that is attractive to your wife. Focus on your goal of winning your wife back, not on your frustration. Be the man she will want. Walk away EXPECTING them to comply. If they follow after you then impose an additional consequence and walk away again. While you are practicing walking away, you might just walk away to the bathroom. They can't follow you there. Or you could walk away to the garage and when they follow you say "While you're here, I need you to give me a hand at ..... (something they won't enjoy doing)."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 511 |
Lol - wonder if this explains what we saw yesterday? https://www.theverge.com/platform/a...-received-overnight-valentines-day-delayNow, the really troubling thing, if this is related to what we saw yesterday, is that the article refers to messages sent on Valentine's Day. According to my wife, they slowly developed feelings for each other that culminated in late Spring.
|
|
|
Moderated by Ariel, BerlinMB, Denali, Fordude, IrishGreen, MBeliever, MBsurvivor, MBSync, McLovin, Mizar, PhoenixMB, Toujours
0 members (),
213
guests, and
51
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Children
by BrainHurts - 10/19/24 03:02 PM
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,615
Posts2,323,460
Members71,895
|
Most Online3,185 Jan 27th, 2020
|
|
|
|