I don't get it, why did you "tsk, tsk, tsk" me? My response to Justaperson was tame compared to some I read regarding Justaperson's original post. What was wrong with my response as opposed to all the others posted? And I am fully aware that the original post was a smoke screen for othjer issues Justaperson had going on but her original post before it became "freindly" was extremelly cruel and offensive. I'm not sure why you took my post to Justaperson<BR>to task above all those other responses to her I thought this was a forum that allowed one to speak out when there was reason to.

(NOTE: This post was made my SeenTheLight. He used my computer again and did not check the UserName. We keep doing this to each other. lol)<P>cs:<P>It is good to address issues to which we disagree: that is a healthy and normal thing to do.<P>However, in the spirit of this site, to lash out helps no one (and I have done it on a few occasions myself). I do know how easy it is to emote before we intellectualize. In some cases, it is evident that the the poster is just attempting to stir up trouble, lashing out at those on MB.<P>In the case of JaP, her pain was readily apparent in her post. Now, I will be the first to agree, that if you want help, you generally don't start by lashing out and name-calling those from whom you need help.<P>But such, too, is the folly of humans. Sometimes pain drives us to say and do things that we would normally not do. In such a case, it is better to look at the motivation of the anger. In JaP's case it was fairly easy to see that she was suffering major pain/hurt ... after that, it was a matter of seeing whether she would return "to take whatever we said".<P>And no, I did not really single you out, I have mildly chastised a number of people (see the duplicate post in General Questions II).<P>Godspeed,<BR>STL<P>[This message has been edited by zorweb (edited July 03, 2001).]<p>[This message has been edited by zorweb (edited July 03, 2001).]