I believe the first couple on tv to share a bed were Herman and Lilly on the Munsters <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

Take care,
Why

WIB,

I was shocked when I came on the BB this morning and saw your post to me. I went back and read my post looking to see if it in fact took an attack stance against you. I couldn't see it.

But if it was received as such, let me apologize.

I can clarify that the reason I brought up the points regarding CS is to show that OW/BS/MM should all be able to look at the laws and see they are not just.

I knew you had in the past commented on Catnip and other's ridiculous amounts being paid, so I knew you could possibly be in a position to agree with me.

I was looking for your validation to those points to show others here that "paying" isn't the issue ... the "issue" is how they determine what get's paid.

What i was hoping for was that you'd agree with me and we could set an example of OW/BS AGREEING on CS issues.

That was the post's intent and I am sorry if it was received any other way.

Please accept my apology for not being more clear in my original post.
Z.

Zebra,
I took the following quote as an attack.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">There are posters like WIB that will never get what we are trying to say about the unfairness of CS laws.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Since I had made no mention what so ever about any CS laws in any of my posts I did think it was uncalled for.
If I am mistaken then I also apologize. I did not take any offense to your post about the arguments for changes in the laws. They are all very valid. I have no argument with any of them which is why I felt your comment was indeed an attack.

<small>[ July 25, 2002, 10:55 AM: Message edited by: want it back ]</small>