Tiny,<p>I think SP hit the nail on the head, and also by revealing that stuff it forces him to face how NOT a hero he is, and THAT is the probably the core of it. SNL said that about his disclosure--that at first it was about not wanting to hurt his W, but when he got really honest with himself, he knew it was really more about his not wanting to deal with being the CAUSE of her pain. It was really about him, and isn't all of this about the WS to the WS? At least from the beginning until insight and empathy come along?<p>I personally envy you that he at least offers to help with all that other stuff. I'd probably fall over in a dead faint if that happened here. [img]images/icons/shocked.gif" border="0[/img] <p>And I agree with SP about the details. Try this context: When it comes to such a major betrayal as an A, there's no such thing as, well at least he didn't betray me this way or that way. Kind of like if you're pregnant, you're pregnant--there's no such thing as being a little bit pregnant. If you're betrayed, you're betrayed--the details don't make it any less or more of a betrayal because it already is what it is.<p>It really is a gross error in judgment for a WS to think that hiding the details in any way diminishes the impact because it has the opposite effect. That article, "Shattered Vows" (by Shirley Glass, available at
www.findarticles.com )that was mentioned on another thread had a great description of the importance of it:<p> <blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>There is almost always a wall of secrecy around the affair; the primary partner does not know what's happening on the other side of that wall. In the affair, there is often a window into the marriage, like a one-way mirror.<p>To reconstruct the marriage, you have to reverse the walls and windows--put up a wall with the affair partner and put up a window inside the marriage. Answering a spouse's questions about what happened in the affair is a way to reverse the process. It's a matter of who's on the inside and who's on the outside. Sometimes people will open windows but not put up walls. Sometimes they will put up walls but don't open the windows. Unless you do both, you cannot rebuild safety and trust in the marriage. <hr></blockquote><p>Isn't that a great analogy? And if I recall correctly, your M has not gotten that wall between your H and the OW, and you're not getting that one-way mirror window on the A and the OW, so it's no wonder you don't feel safe in your M. Maybe you can ask him if he WANTS you to feel safe in your M.<p>I'm planning to do another 180: Since I've given my H this comfort zone for 2 months of never mentioning the A or our M, I'm going to 180 that and start asking my questions (I have a whole notebook full of them!) regardless of his response. Don't know what will happen, but I'm tired of being mired in this alone, and I need to get out of my comfort zone of avoiding confrontation.<p>If I actually get brave enough to do it, I'll let you know if it makes me feel any better. I don't plan on trying to convince him of why he needs to tell me everything and all that that I tried in the past. My plan is to just ask a question every once in a while or actually state out loud something I'm feeling in response to a trigger.<p>It would be great if he actually cooperated, but my primary goal is to train myself to do it regardless of his response. I want to become more differentiated and be able to "hold onto myself in close proximity to my partner", which is what I'm currently reading about in that book
Passionate Marriage. Also, how to nurture and soothe myself when he fails to do it.