Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 146 of 160 1 2 144 145 146 147 148 159 160
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
sigh

Well, I hate to admit it. But that was probably better than the original.

The fewer words - the scarier it will be for her.


Fox

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
I could have done it in a couple letters.

Foxtrot Yankee


Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
Originally Posted by Foxy lady
The fewer words - the scarier it will be for her

I find myself doing a lot of editing in my emails. If I use the words--because, or but, or anything that would indicate I'm going to follow that up with an explanation of WHY I choose to do something--I roll my eyes and then hit delete... delete... delete.

I don't have to explain myself. Neither do you, Guy. You just have to lay out the facts, say what you are willing to do to remedy the issue and drop it. The reason you don't want to go to SCQ's house could be that you have a fobia of driving more than 15 miles away from home in that specific direction; it doesn't matter; what matters is the solution...

Last edited by silentlucidity; 01/09/09 03:24 PM. Reason: because I left off the T in BUT...eyeroll....delete...delete...delete

Me-BS-38
Married 1997; son, 8yo
Divorced April 2009
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
Originally Posted by Chrisner
Foxtrot Yankee

I do so love those sweet letters...


Me-BS-38
Married 1997; son, 8yo
Divorced April 2009
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
rotflmao

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
Quote
By allowing WW to locate the residence of the kids to outside the district. All some one has to do is tip off the district about your kids residence and they will be thrown out of the old school and forced to attend schools were OM lives.

In Texas (or at least in the community I live in) you can pay a transfer fee and have your kid attend any school you want. I don't know if it's that way where SD lives.


Widowed 11/10/12 after 35 years of marriage
*********************
“In a sense now, I am homeless. For the home, the place of refuge, solitude, love-where my husband lived-no longer exists.” Joyce Carolyn Oates, A Widow's Story
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Quote
Quote:By allowing WW to locate the residence of the kids to outside the district. All some one has to do is tip off the district about your kids residence and they will be thrown out of the old school and forced to attend schools were OM lives.

In Texas (or at least in the community I live in) you can pay a transfer fee and have your kid attend any school you want. I don't know if it's that way where SD lives.
She hasn't changed the residence of the kids. They reside with me. She has maintained my address as their residence all along. I haven't checked with the school or anything, but if she has done anything to jeopardize their status at the school (I kind of doubt this), I'll go back to my lawyer and seek however much custody I need to keep them at their school.

She's not making this easy.

SCQ: Yes threats, if you get triggered you may hurt me.

On my days with the kids they are to remain at school or at Therese's and I will pick them up. They are not to go to your house.

[color:#000000]and shortly after


The solution is to reduce the situations where either of us have to go to the others house. That is to eliminate the Sunday exchanges.[/color]

SDG: Hey, relax. It's what would happen to anyone. When one gets triggered like that, it's how we tend to respond. Look at what you've done in this email exchange. You got triggered by some of the things that I've said, and you have tried to hurt me. First by making a demand about the forms and titles, threatening with court costs, and now with something out of the blue about the kids coming to my house on your days (does that include when their grandparents are here? Who is that hurting?)

You're trying to hurt me because you don't like what I've said. It's what people do. I'm telling you that asking me to come to POSOM's house and bringing him to my house will hurt me, so I'm trying to figure out how to avoid those situations.

Eliminating the Sunday exchange doesn't solve the problem. Do you really think that we can go forward only having exchanges through daycare and school? What about holidays? Sick days? We need another drop off plan.

I have made it clear that I am not coming to POSOM's house, so unless you're willing to do all the exchanges at our house, we'll need someplace neutral. Which is what I've been trying to suggest.



Last edited by sdguy038; 01/09/09 05:18 PM.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
Anthrax, I’m thinking anthrax.


Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
She reminds me of the Queen of Hearts in Alice. "Off with their heads! Off with their heads!"

"A threat!! Look everyone I have been threatened!!!!"


Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
Quote
She reminds me of the Queen of Hearts in Alice. "Off with their heads! Off with their heads!"

"A threat!! Look everyone I have been threatened!!!!"

rotflmao


I like how you keep calling it "our" house.

It's a very very very fine house.

grin

Fox

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,423
Originally Posted by SCQ at her finest
On my days with the kids they are to remain at school or at Therese's and I will pick them up. They are not to go to your house.

You can imagine what happened when I read this.

My first reaction (after the spine stiffens): oh, they are, are they? naughty

Fox





Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,965
Quote
SCQ: Yes threats, if you get triggered you may hurt me.

Is she really implying physical violence?

Keep your Lawyers number handy. That line worries me SD. Be careful what you put in writing.

Last edited by chrisner; 01/09/09 06:06 PM.

Testosterone boys! Testosterone! It ain’t just for nose, ear and back hair anymore!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Well, I would like to think that I'm protected by the context of the rest of the discussion, but who knows. She's really pissed off, and when she gets that way she says stuff she doesn't mean.

I held up the mirror.

Quote
I like how you keep calling it "our" house.
By our house, I mean me and the kids. My house is "their home." The other place is POSOM's house. They understand the distinction. The SCQ doesn't seem to have picked up on the subtlety yet.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Quote
Is she really implying physical violence?

Keep your Lawyers number handy. That line worries me SD. Be careful what you put in writing.
Good point. That's just the kind of disgusting tactic POSOM used to get custody of his children. I should be more careful.

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,871
It's good that your responded by telling SCQ to relax. Now there is email record that you do not intend on physically hurting anyone.

The last part of your last email was solid. STick to stuff like that. Don't be vague. Be concise and now that you have discussed WHY you will not go to her house, move on and don't get dragged back into discussions over the same subject. Just keep pushing a solution.


Me-BS-38
Married 1997; son, 8yo
Divorced April 2009
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Follow up.

SDG: Wait, you don't think I'm talking about physical violence, do you? I'm talking about hurt feelings and things being said that people might regret.

I think you're really angry right now. Sometimes when you get angry, you say things that you don't mean, and I don't want to escalate this any more.

I'm not trying to hurt you. I'm not trying to win anything from you. It's not about getting what I want.

You already won. Don't you see that? We're divorced. You got to move in with POSOM. You get to live as a big, happy family. That's what you wanted. I lost. I lost my family.

Your seeming insistence that I come to POSOM's house or accept him at mine seems cruel to me. Is it really necessary given what I've told you about how I feel? Neutral child exchange points are very common. I don't see why you need one, but if it makes you feel better, then fine.

I don't want to argue about this via email any more, but I would still prefer to avoid mediation. It really shouldn't be necessary, but I'll set it up if you want or still think I'm being unreasonable.


Okay, this is now officially using up too much of my life force. Sigh.

If that doesn't get her to back down, nothing will. Destroying her in front of a mediator, while satisying, sounds more like a hassle.

Last edited by sdguy038; 01/09/09 06:36 PM.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,862
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,862
Quote
The kids won't be comfortable with it. DS9 is already well aware and sensitive to the fact that you will not talk on the phone or be in the same space as me. (BTW if you plan to go to his performance and plan to avoid me, go on Thursday. I don't know if I will go on Weds or Fri).

It REALLY bothers her that you ignore her. That you can't put her adultery behind you. That you can't just be friends.

The fact that she sees that your son notices how you treat her, BUGS the crap out of her. She knows that as he grows older, he will judge the rightness and wrongness of what happened. She knows that in the end, she will LOOSE her son's respect.

Unless you embrace the sitch.

Drop the kids off at her new home.

Start talking to her.

That's why she'd rather you go to your son's performance on a night she won't be there. That way your son won't see the way you ignore her.

When you told her you wouldn't be dropping the kids off at POSOM's house, it added to what she fears the most.

She may have "won" the end of the M, but she will loose her children's respect.

If she keeps up this "You threatened me" crap, tell her you'd be ok exchanging the kids at a police station...anywhere other than POSOM's house.






Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,819
Thanks, Marsh. I value your opinion.

I have to admit that this exchange has been wearing on me. It didn't for the first 80% of the emails, but the last couple have drained me.

Tonight, however, I went out with my neighbors for game night. A bar no one really knew anything about. Pool, shuffleboard, and darts. It was awesome.

I had a babysitter over to stay with the kids. We have a babysitter right of refusal, so I sent the SCQ an email telling her about tonight, asking her whether she wanted to exercise her right of refusal. She told me (basically) I didn't tell her soon enough.

She can go [censored] herself.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,390
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,390
Originally Posted by sdguy038
She can go [censored] herself.

That's my boy, SD. grin


BS - me 56
XWH - 57

12/25/06 - Dday - WH promised NC. Plan A in effect. Thought we were in recovery.

6-3-07 - Dday#2 Found out NC never took place and A never ended. Found MB NC promised again, but WH would not write NC letter.

9/07 - Dday #3. Still lying and sneaking around. Plan B implemented
WH wants nothing to do with me

Divorced as of 12/09 after 36 years
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,150
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,150
:crosseyedcrazy: I SO know what you mean!!!!

Page 146 of 160 1 2 144 145 146 147 148 159 160

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
3 members (anchorwatch, bb1471, 1 invisible), 654 guests, and 61 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bibbyryan860, Ian T, SadNewYorker, Jay Handlooms, GrenHeil
71,838 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5