Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
I just wanted to know how many BWs get along w/ their ow and vice versa? And if you do get along w/ your OW what are some ways you have found an equilibrium? I really would like to have a better relationship w/ ow and wanted to know how others are dealing w/ it. Thanks in advance for your help.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
cas, I don't know to many except one or two, but I can say this....all the adults HAVE to be just that......adults. I wish I could give you some advise on this. I can't remember what issues (except the affair) that you two have (xow and you).

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
Thanks NTMO. All i know for sure is tghat in the beginning we didn't exactly get along. I tried and I'm sure she did too but it just didn't work. she'd say something and I'd take it the wrong way and just go off. I even wrote her a really nasty letter just because I was hurt and wanted her to feel the pain she had help inflict. After my nasty letter we really didn't speak to each other at all.. In short we just both became digusted w/ one another. Recently she has been calling for my H about Oc and we've talked and it doesn't seem too bad. I fell like we're able to actually communicate a little now. I'm actually grateful. I know we probably wont be best friends but I kind of would like us to be able to be friends or at least find a way that we can work together and not step on each others toes. I've told my H how I feel and he actually said that she had expressed similar intrest but her and I have never discussed it. I was just wondering how others who have made it work are making it happen. Sometimes the whole ow/ oc thing gets so overwhelming that I want to end the marriage because I don't think I can deal. But I really want it to work. I want it all to work out for everyone.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
Good question cali. I've extended an olive branch to OW but no response. Not really sure how to proceed. It just seems that for the sake of OC, she would rather speak to me. H doesn't always seem to relay info correctly or he edits stuff that doesn't seem important to him.

ent

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 88
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 88
I am friends with my OW (Jami).
When I first found out about the affair and my stepson I was devestated. (the A had been over for 2 yrs at this point). I listened to everything my H had to say but that just wasnt enough for me. I finally forced him to give me her phone #. (they live 800 miles from us). At first she was afraid to talk to me, but she finally did. She answered every question that I had. She held nothing back. She apologized to me.
We talked on the phone several times over the next couple of weeks. She sent me pictures of Tylor. The kids started talking on the phone.
About 3 weeks after I found out. I decided I wanted to meet her in person, So i loaded my H and the kids in the van and drove up to meet her.
After we got to her house and the kids all got aqauinted(SP), they went outside to play. I then told Jami and my H exactly how devestated I was. I wanted them to hear the exact same words that the other did. I wanted everything out in the open. No more lies or sneaking around. After this we took Tylor to the hotel with us for the weekend. A couple of hours later, I left my H with all 5 kids and met Jami at a coffee shop near by. We talked for 3 or 4 hours. The next day I went to her house alone and we talked again.
For the first 6 months or so after D-day all comunication went thru me. After awhile it didnt/doesnt bother me if they talk. I know that their relationship is over.
I think for me it was her willingness and openess to talk to me. To answer all my questons.
Her and Tylor came and spent a month here. She stayed 3 or 4 days with me and the kids. (my H was still in the navy and wasnt home). I felt she needed to be here at the beginning for Tylor.
I didnt want to push myself on him and wanted him to be comfortable with me. She then went and stayed a couple of weeks with my sister and then a couple of weeks with my MIL, while Tylor stayed with us. We spoke on the phone and saw each other a couple of times a week.
We were able to build a friendship. My kids think she is neat. We talk on the phone every couple of weeks. We e-mail each other all the time. Hopefully we will get to get Tylor this summer and maybe see her for a day or two.
We made a choice for everyone involved to be friends. It takes time. I believe it can happen if everyone is willing to do the work.

<small>[ February 27, 2005, 11:00 AM: Message edited by: Tylorsstepmom ]</small>

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
I really needed to hear a success story. Thanks tylors step mom. I was wondering since friendship is honestly something I would like to establish w/ ow how do you think I should go about it? If you like you can email me at **edit**. I appreciate it.

Last edited by MBLovebanker; 05/28/11 10:25 PM. Reason: removing email address
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 88
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 88
I just e-mailed you!!!!

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by calismile:
<strong> Thanks NTMO. All i know for sure is tghat in the beginning we didn't exactly get along. I tried and I'm sure she did too but it just didn't work. she'd say something and I'd take it the wrong way and just go off. I even wrote her a really nasty letter just because I was hurt and wanted her to feel the pain she had help inflict. After my nasty letter we really didn't speak to each other at all.. In short we just both became digusted w/ one another. Recently she has been calling for my H about Oc and we've talked and it doesn't seem too bad. I fell like we're able to actually communicate a little now. I'm actually grateful. I know we probably wont be best friends but I kind of would like us to be able to be friends or at least find a way that we can work together and not step on each others toes. I've told my H how I feel and he actually said that she had expressed similar intrest but her and I have never discussed it. I was just wondering how others who have made it work are making it happen. Sometimes the whole ow/ oc thing gets so overwhelming that I want to end the marriage because I don't think I can deal. But I really want it to work. I want it all to work out for everyone. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Cali, your honesty is inspriational. Really it is. You know what I feel. I feel that what you did was normal. We all react differently in these situations. When someone acts, then reaction happens. No matter the situation. It's human. I think maybe the time has helped. I also think and hope that it works out. Hopefully xow has enough maturtity to put her childs needs first. Also as you said you were a part of the nastyness and not saying she did not have it coming, but that always put people on the defensve. But time heals wounds and it sounds like she wants to put her child's needs first. Don't give up on your marriage. It's getting better <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/smile.gif" /> Things take time.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 80
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 80
Wow now this is a thread I can relate to. I did not meet XOW til 2 years after A. She lives in the USA and we live in Australia. H met her almost 3 yearts ago in Poland. Her brother helped me through all of this and I became close to him. We were invited to his wedding in poland last year. She also came over for it. Not only did I have to spend the night of the wedding in her company she and her boyfriend also ended up staying in the same house as my family. Then unbeleivebly we were seated at same table at wedding and also we had organised to go away with the bride and groom for a holiday she also came with her boyfriend..... I was not very happy to say the least lol. But for some very strange reason we were both very drawn to each other and really enjoyed each others company. If she and my H had not had an A she could have been one of my closests friends. Anyway to this day we still speak to each other about once a week and my 15 year old son is flying over to Florida to spend 4 weeks holiday with her. Sometimes I am sure people think I have two heads because I genuenly enjoy her company. If anything it actually made my marriage even stronger H and XOWs family were so happy and proud and see the two of us get alone. My H very rarely has any contact with her only occaionaly when I am on the phone to her and he is at home he will get on to say hello nothing is hidden and all our feelings have been totally laid out there. XOW is certainly sorry for all the pain she caused.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by Iamshellshocked:
<strong> Wow now this is a thread I can relate to. I did not meet XOW til 2 years after A. She lives in the USA and we live in Australia. H met her almost 3 yearts ago in Poland. Her brother helped me through all of this and I became close to him. We were invited to his wedding in poland last year. She also came over for it. Not only did I have to spend the night of the wedding in her company she and her boyfriend also ended up staying in the same house as my family. Then unbeleivebly we were seated at same table at wedding and also we had organised to go away with the bride and groom for a holiday she also came with her boyfriend..... I was not very happy to say the least lol. But for some very strange reason we were both very drawn to each other and really enjoyed each others company. If she and my H had not had an A she could have been one of my closests friends. Anyway to this day we still speak to each other about once a week and my 15 year old son is flying over to Florida to spend 4 weeks holiday with her. Sometimes I am sure people think I have two heads because I genuenly enjoy her company. If anything it actually made my marriage even stronger H and XOWs family were so happy and proud and see the two of us get alone. My H very rarely has any contact with her only occaionaly when I am on the phone to her and he is at home he will get on to say hello nothing is hidden and all our feelings have been totally laid out there. XOW is certainly sorry for all the pain she caused. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Wow that is a cool story. Do you guys get to see oc much? How old is oc? So her brother helped you through it? I'm assuming you guys knew him?

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 80
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 80
Needtomoveon
Wow that is a cool story. Do you guys get to see oc much? How old is oc? So her brother helped you through it? I'm assuming you guys knew him?

Sorry I guess I confussed you here OW does not have a child with my H "thank god" I am more on the recovery board but read most of the boards and this was the first time I had seen a story about people likeing the OW and I couldnt help myself replying.
My H went to Poland to work he met XOW Brother in an internet cafe and somehow became very tangled with this family. I never met him until I went to his wedding but we commmunicated alot by email and phone. His sister at that time spoke very little english so a few times I would get him to pass a message on.... and he was also there to support my H through all the turmoil he went through. It is really strange how our families have interwined. But I too am wondering if there are many other people in my situation who became friends with XOW or do I really have 2 heads lol

Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
Cali,
I'll never call xow my "friend" again b/c she pretended to be my friend throughout the A!!

However, we act "friend-ly" since visitation began last year. Since XOW and I haven't talked about A or *us* in years, I can't really say what's she's thinking. Like to think we try to be very civilized for OC's sake, and xow can see we care for OC.

It's truly worth speaking to your xow and laying out the truth for her: that you care about OC and want to get along for his sake. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/smile.gif" /> Hopefully she'll respond in kind. If not, then it was never going to work anyway! What have you got to lose?


Iamshellshocked, that's a fascinating story! Welcome to the board! (I love Aussie) Why, though, are you sending your son to stay w/xow?! YUCK.


Best wishes to all,
J
6+yr recovery and glad I stayed

<small>[ February 28, 2005, 03:45 AM: Message edited by: Jenny ]</small>

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
Wow, these stories are inspiring. I think the most imporatnt thing for being some sort of "friends" with the OW is that she is truly repentive and that she doesn't "want" your H anymore. That is not the case with many OW from what I hear on this board. I also noticed that in these situations where thw BW and OW became friends is that the H pretty much stays out of it. I think this helps the BW feel no threat.

In my situation I believe the first is true. Right now, the OW and I have no contact, although we did talk about 2 months after I found out about the A. I initiated it. She didn't want to talk to me yet, I think she was scared. But when we did talk she apologized and that was VERY important to me in being able to get past her part in it.

I hope that one day most contact will come through me and that we can get along. I don't see how we would ever be "friends", but I think I could "like" her and be able to speak to her about things without feeling anger and resentment. I think that will come with time on both our parts. I think she doesn't care who she talks to about things (me or H) I just think right now she doesn't know if I want any C with her, and right now, I'm not sure myself. I know that when the baby comes it will probably happen more often than not. My H has a way of leaving out the details of things that Mom's think is important. So I know when it comes to visitation and "what we did", "how the baby was", she's gonna get better insight from me than him :-).

Hare's to hoping for the strength, courage and insight to being able to carry that off. Wow, I have such respect for the BW who can get past it and be friendly with their FOW. That says a lot about a person and how strong we really are. I'm sorry because I don't feel the same about a FOW. It would be in her best interest to get along w/BW and she has no pain to get over that she herself didn't cause. If only all FOW could see this, they might step down in the "defensive" department and look at the bigger picture.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
colddayinjuly: I hear what your saying. And your right to a point. I agree that ow has 50% blame no if's and or butts. I also think it takes all 3 (sometimes 4) adults to make it work. I also agree that woman have more of a sense of what is going on than men do with details of the baby. I think all MEN LEAVE out details. It's to all benifit that if contact works that all the adults are just that adults and PUT ALL THE KIDS interest first. bc and oc alike.

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
Yep, is that not what I said? I guess I just realize that the BW has the bulk of **** to put aside. Too bad more FOW can't realize this and just take a step back and realize it's not all about them !

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 503
O
Member
Offline
Member
O
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 503
Calismile,

BS and I get along fairly well. We’ve had our ups and downs, but with effort, we stabilize and keep going. Absent the affair, BS is someone I would have called a friend. I like her. She’s a nice lady. I understand that because of who I am and what I represent, we will never be best buds, but we are kind to each other. We both got a raw deal and made the best of it. We put aside our differences and do what was best for my son and their daughter. That’s our litmus test, “is this best for the kids?” There have been many times when I had to bite my tongue, suck it up and let her vent. I’m sure she’s done the same with me. Where was xMM in all this? He was out-gunned. Being flanked by two very strong women, he didn’t have many options if he wanted to keep his marriage AND have contact with his son. Actually, I think it was a relief for him to let us take the reins and “work it out”.

I always say, if you want it done right, let a woman do it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
OB1, Dont you think that goes against the "BS is not the parent thing?" Most OW feel the BS should have no say in what, when, and where happens if it is to do w/ OC?
So my question is to you and some of the others that "get along" w/ the BS. Do you like dealing w/the BS on parenting issues or not? And do you think this is why C is working because you and the BS communicate and not just you and WS? Just wondering?
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> Sunny D

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,344
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,344
I wish I could get along with her.

Unfortunately, that is impossible.

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 503
O
Member
Offline
Member
O
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 503
Sunny,

It very well may. But, being honest, I could care less (about "BS is not the parent"). I’m not trying to fill a roll or further alienate us from each other by strictly defining who or what she is. I may be billed as a STOW by some, but I KNOW that I am more than that. By the same token "she" is more than the "BS". My concern is in doing what is fair and what is right. BS has always respected me as Jonas’ mother. She has never tried to call the shots or make demands of me, with regard to my son. We talk, discuss and we learn from each other. I remain open-minded and so does she. This woman is my son’s father’s WIFE. She WILL play an integral part in my son’s life, by virtue of who she is and her connection to him. I would be stupid and negligent to disregard her or try to exclude her from my child’s life. She is his step-mom…..the operative word being M-O-M. She’s a mom, period. She has a good heart and that’s what I choose to focus on.

You remind me a lot of “my” BS, Sunny. You do what is best for baby A. I know it’s a tough road to walk, yet you do it….and you do it with grace.

<small>[ February 28, 2005, 01:06 PM: Message edited by: ohbratti1 ]</small>

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
I would much rathe deal with a woman when it comes to children as they are more intuned. I think a man should take responsiblity of there kids, but lets face it woman are just more in tunned.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 741
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 741
Currently we are living a very quiet life dealing with OW … But that may change in the near future… We have to go to court over child support.

She and I communicate, though very limited from her side… mostly a mirror of what I tell her about Lil Bit, and complete fabrications…
Mr Lee has a much harder time dealing with OW.
I wouldn’t call us friends. I would call us partners in raising Lil Bit. She is mostly the silent partner.. LOL

I find it funny that 2 ½ year ago, I was told I was only a Part Time Parent... and now I am FULL TIME!!
I am Mommy and OW is Momma. Lil Bit chose what she would call us. We did not force her to call either of us Mommy/Momma… She has gone through spells of calling each of us by our first names… but has reverted to calling us Mommy and Momma.
I don’t know if OW is bothered by it… but I do know OW’s Mother is frustrated by it.
Lil Bit has told me that her Gma has told her that I am Stacia.. not Mommy. But Lil Bit keeps calling me Mommy.

I have even built a website which I share pictures and stories about Lil Bit’s daily life with OW and her family. They have yet to post or share pictures and stories, but I keep the site active so they can.

I may be doing most of the communicating and trying… but at least I am trying.

Stacia

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 503
O
Member
Offline
Member
O
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 503
Stacia!!

(TJ in progress)

How goes it Mama Bear? Every now and again I think of you and your king size heart. The one thing that I find myself wondering about most is Lil Bit's older brother. Whatever happened with him? How is life (and xOW) treating him? I so much hope for a happy ending for that kid.

OB1

<small>[ February 28, 2005, 01:36 PM: Message edited by: ohbratti1 ]</small>

Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
Agreed: makes more sense for BS and xow to work visitation issues---if possible---so long as there's poja between married spouses.

1)decreases contact between H and xow, increasing trust within marriage.

2)moms are, generally, more detailed AND more communicative. WHO tracks family activities, phone #s, medical things, kid favorites, paperwork, holiday gifts, etc. etc.?? ME!!!

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
I think in order for the C to work and work smoothly for everyone. Its an everyone thing. We all have a part in raising these great children no matter where/who/why they are here. They are here because God choose for them to be here. I am trying my best to do what is right for Baby A. I think everyone here knows that and I am a firm beleiver of C working. But it takes work, hard work, to get there. You don't stop because things get difficult at times. You get over the bumps and get to what matters most. My M is my first concern and then the children. We have worked hard on repairing what both of us have broken. OW has done her best in interfering. And I think w/ most of C going though H, well we all know that most men don't get this right! LOL <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> But with her actions lately its been more of a way for her to have C w/ him, than anything. So its been alittle hard to get along w/ her knowing that or feeling that. And it will be H responsibilty to hande it, right or should I call and say something? What do you think?
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> Sunny D

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
I was able to be very civil w/ OW & some moments 'felt' friendly but I would never want to be 'friends' w/ OW & IRL, I don't think we would have been. Besides having sex w/ my H,(oh & being a mother <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> ) we have nothing in common.

OW is not the type of person I would ever normally be friends w/.

But the bottom line IS: OW did NOT want OC to have C w/ us & would stop @ nothing until her goal was achieved. And that is exactly what happened.

IF an OW or FOW really wants her child to have a father in thier life....then I think eventually, things will @ least be civil between the parties & they will all get a long for the children's sakes. If that is the REAL goal then the focus MUST be on the child & not the A or your personal feelings.

Our OW could NOT get past her own personal 'feelings'....."uh, get your own dang therapist! sheesh!" kwim?

Do I think it's possible? yes, do I think it's likely? no.


xoxox
kt

<small>[ February 28, 2005, 04:29 PM: Message edited by: ktbunch ]</small>

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
KT, which is truely sad as your kids have to go through what they went through. Some people are truely selfish and when they use there kids well that is as low as you can go. Who would not want there child to have a father? Really? Hopefully in time the younger ones will forget? the majority of it? I hope so for there sake.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by sunnydale:
<strong> I think in order for the C to work and work smoothly for everyone. Its an everyone thing. We all have a part in raising these great children no matter where/who/why they are here. They are here because God choose for them to be here. I am trying my best to do what is right for Baby A. I think everyone here knows that and I am a firm beleiver of C working. But it takes work, hard work, to get there. You don't stop because things get difficult at times. You get over the bumps and get to what matters most. My M is my first concern and then the children. We have worked hard on repairing what both of us have broken. OW has done her best in interfering. And I think w/ most of C going though H, well we all know that most men don't get this right! LOL <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> But with her actions lately its been more of a way for her to have C w/ him, than anything. So its been alittle hard to get along w/ her knowing that or feeling that. And it will be H responsibilty to hande it, right or should I call and say something? What do you think?
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> Sunny D </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Your a smart lady Sunny, what DO you think? What do you FEEL you should do?

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
Really Mary? Cash out every penny I could get on my CC / savings / IRA's everything. Pack my bags (by myself) and move to Jamaca and open a hut bar on the beach! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" /> But can't do that now can I. <img border="0" alt="[Teary]" title="" src="graemlins/teary.gif" /> With the year I've been having! LOL !
Its really tempting. KWIM! And w/ help from others informing her of the situations in my life, well I think it has opened the door for the games she is now playing. But who knows. I've tried to remain possitive about everything, but right now I'm not getting there. Me and H are doing much better and I think I need to work on the C w. her and handling things because lately I just hadn't wanted to. Too much "other" stuff in my life. The last conversation (by phone) we had turned into me being "short" "not nice" w/her (these are her words). So I told H the only C would be by email or in writing so no one can say I said something or did something I didn't do. KWIM. But I'm not giving up, not yet, like most of you have incouraged me by reminding me that I am different and I am better than that! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> Sunny D

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by needtomoveon:
<strong> KT, which is truely sad as your kids have to go through what they went through. Some people are truely selfish and when they use there kids well that is as low as you can go. Who would not want there child to have a father? Really? Hopefully in time the younger ones will forget? the majority of it? I hope so for there sake. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Forget what? OC?----LOL--not likely....we haven't seen or heard from OC in almost 7 mos & the 4.5 yo just yesterday drew a 'family' picture w/ : me, DH, himself, ds, dd AND oc.

But I probably help 'keep the dream alive' by continuing to send mail to OC regularly & the ktbunch always has tons of drawings to include. LOL <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />

Forget OW antics?---oh yah, no problem there...except for the oldest, of course. The other 2 don't have any recollection of that I believe.


sorry for the tj.

xoxoxo
kt

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by sunnydale:
<strong> Really Mary? Cash out every penny I could get on my CC / savings / IRA's everything. Pack my bags (by myself) and move to Jamaca and open a hut bar on the beach! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" /> But can't do that now can I. <img border="0" alt="[Teary]" title="" src="graemlins/teary.gif" /> With the year I've been having! LOL !
Its really tempting. KWIM! And w/ help from others informing her of the situations in my life, well I think it has opened the door for the games she is now playing. But who knows. I've tried to remain possitive about everything, but right now I'm not getting there. Me and H are doing much better and I think I need to work on the C w. her and handling things because lately I just hadn't wanted to. Too much "other" stuff in my life. The last conversation (by phone) we had turned into me being "short" "not nice" w/her (these are her words). So I told H the only C would be by email or in writing so no one can say I said something or did something I didn't do. KWIM. But I'm not giving up, not yet, like most of you have incouraged me by reminding me that I am different and I am better than that! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> Sunny D </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> Yeah Jamica sounds pretty good about now!!! LOL. You are so funny! See you know what to do...you have already figured it out. YOU are one smart cookie girlfriend. I have a feeling it will come back to bite HER in the butt. does She realize how lucky she is? You my friend have had more going on than most and have kept your composure and faith up. KUDOS to you! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/smile.gif" />

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 908
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by ktbunch:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by needtomoveon:
<strong> KT, which is truely sad as your kids have to go through what they went through. Some people are truely selfish and when they use there kids well that is as low as you can go. Who would not want there child to have a father? Really? Hopefully in time the younger ones will forget? the majority of it? I hope so for there sake. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Forget what? OC?----LOL--not likely....we haven't seen or heard from OC in almost 7 mos & the 4.5 yo just yesterday drew a 'family' picture w/ : me, DH, himself, ds, dd AND oc.

But I probably help 'keep the dream alive' by continuing to send mail to OC regularly & the ktbunch always has tons of drawings to include. LOL <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />

Forget OW antics?---oh yah, no problem there...except for the oldest, of course. The other 2 don't have any recollection of that I believe.


sorry for the tj.

xoxoxo
kt </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">KT, I meant no offensive by it. And with my one's memory I should have known better uh? It's so sad. Do you hear back from her? If I was in that situation that would be a way to share with each other with the pictures back and forth. My kids do that for my parents. Well my parents don't draw back they write back...but you know what I mean.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
none taken, of course. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

I even included a SASE in the last letter so that OW wouldn't have to do ANYTHING but drop it in the mail from OC---but nope, NOTHING!!!!!!

A bit discouraging! <img border="0" alt="[Teary]" title="" src="graemlins/teary.gif" />
But whatever! NOT MY PROBLEM!

Some days...I'm SO tired of being MATURE! kwim?

kt

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
Well, I sent her an email to see how Baby A was doing and some insurance stuff. We'll see if I get a response.(I wuz NICE!) I think we would be better at communicating if H stayed our of it too. I mean on issues he knows nothing about anyway. LOL <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> I figured I should stick around in the south for awhile yet b-4 I take up the dreadloc hair do! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" /> My D said I wouldn't look good w/ that hair style anyway. Thanks !
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> Sunny D

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,412
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,412
I'm struck by the assumption on this thread that only if the people involved act like "adults" is meaningful relationships with the OW possible. It implies that it's childish to choose not to.

There are some very capable, mature, loving ADULTS on this forum who may NEVER want to have a relationship with an OW. They act in adult ways towards the OW, as well as their own family. They leave the other woman alone, and ask for nothing more than the same from them.

So if you ask me...the first prerequisite for having a good relationship is to "desire" one, to make a decision to creat one...it's not being "an adult". Even adults, who act like adults, and don't exhibit childish behavior may STILL decide not to have a relationship. Even adults who act childishly often DO have relationships. Presenting this argument...that it is an "adult thing" is very disrespectful I believe.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 778
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 778
Starfish, I agree 100%

I have always found that most people, on here, think "acting like an adult" meant...."doing whatever ow/oc needed/wanted"

I consider myself quite adult. I am reliable, dependable, and a solid citizen of my community. My choosing to not have anything to do with ow/oc does not make me a child. I makes me an adult who made a choice and stuck by it.

I have found that attitude to be one of the most dangerous ones that I have read here. It forces so much of ones beliefs and wishes onto another, no matter what the cost.

While I am well known to be pro-no contact, I have never, not once, called anyone a fool for choosing contact. I have always stood by any wife and encouraged her to do what is best for HER and HER family. Yet there are those who feel that anything less then contact with the oc is wrong.

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
Starfish and Lynn,

I didn't really think that what we/they meant was that only childish people do NC.

I think you are right that all parties have to want it first and foremost. Like in KT's situation, it just seems like the OW wanted C w/H, not necessarily to share her child with the other family. I think that's the part about the OW you have to figure out. If she is just wanting to use her child as a pawn, well that's not very ADULT is it?? I guess that's the one I was most concerned about acting ADULT. As far as my part in acting ADULT, I guess I would just have to think that I couldn't attack the OW because of my own emotions/insecurities. That would be something I would have to work out with my H as far as how C is handled and agreed upon by both of us. So YES, many adult people choose NC and that's fine with me, but in order for C to work, people have to put their most mature foot forward and work it out like ADULTS, not children reacting to every situation like it's all about them. Cause you know when you're a child it IS all about YOU :-).

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,412
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,412
cold,

I appreciate your effort to explain what is meant here by "adult", but this is a recurring theme on this board. As Lynn mentions, it comes up again and again....this use of the phrase to describe what's wrong with the relationships between OW and BW. "Act like an adult" is thrown around like a mantra to many who decide that NC is their choice, or BW who get angry about anything.

Adults OFTEN act angry, childish, foolish etc. People who are intelligent and mature often argue, worry, fret and rage. But acting LIKE an adult doesn't mean that a relationship with specific person is more likely to happen. It depends on both people. It depends on each of their desire to be co-operative. It depends on what kind of personalities they have...is one very religious? is one very controlling? is one really manipulative?. Even if you act like an adult...you can't control how the other side will act. I know people where acting like an adult actually HAMPERS your ability to be friends with them because they prefer NOT to act like adults.

The phrase is disrespectful because when you tell people they need to act like adults....what you're REALLY saying is "stop acting like a child". Acting like an adult in this situation assures NOTHING. It is THE WILLLINGNESS by both parties that creates a relationship between them. Within that relationship....they are bound to both act childishly and in adult ways...because people are complex and this situation is complex.

So if folks here truly want to bridge this gap....it will be far better served by not continuing to throw around the "adult" argument and give them some specific things to try....IF that is their desire.

This "adults must act like adults" is not just rude...it's wrong...it assures nothing. Rather than saying "act LIKE and adult" talk about what that MEANS in THIS context...co-operation, getting to know each other, concentrating on the children...whatever REAL strategies can be shared. In fairness, some did that...but the "adult" mantra is overdone.

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
I know people where acting like an adult actually HAMPERS your ability to be friends with them because they prefer NOT to act like adults.

I see what you mean about the word "ADULT", I guess you said it right there. People prefer not to be cooperative, not to think of the children first, not to act with their heads vs. their hearts.

I would never think someone who chose NC was not acting like an adult. That is an adult decision made with their own adult reasoning, but I see what your saying about using the term as a generality that everyone perceives the same way.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by star*fish:
<strong> cold,

recurring theme on this board. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">There are MANY recurring themes on this board. Add this particular one to another "sterotype". If it's not you, then just ignore.

ent

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> If it's not you, then just ignore.

</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Unless it is blatently anti-marriage and/or pro-affair. Then do not ignore... report.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
Well Pepper....

I can't seem to recall lately anyone being "pro-affair".

It's not like there are OW's crawling out of the woodwork saying, "I slept with your H!!" Most of the OWs who post here aren't slapping anyone around with their affair.

ent

p.s. If I missed the post....let me know...love to read it!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/smile.gif" />

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Let's both agree to be pro marriage. And to use this forum to support marriage. How about that?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
Thought I was doing that Pepper. Just "representing" another side of marriage. One who has contact AND to show it CAN work.

ent

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Good for you BECAUSE MARRIAGE IS THE TOPIC

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 164
What was the topic? Ohhhhh....

MARRIAGE....

Couldn't help myself!! lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />

ent

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,536
WoW...very good point starfish. I get it completely. Wish I would of thought of that & I'm kinda surprised/diappointed in myself that I didn't pick up on that sooner.

Interesting food for thought. JUST strengthens my resolve & arguement FOR OUR specific choices.

And kinda explains what I couldn't.

Because I've honestly had those moments of civil & normal actual conversation w/ OC mom & then there were those 'other' non-civil & extremely frustrating times. I would be so perplexed by the dynamics of it all & upset that 'acting like an adult' just did NOT seem to be the 'answer'.

xoxoxo
kt

<small>[ March 01, 2005, 09:53 PM: Message edited by: ktbunch ]</small>

Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
Great point Starfish!

LynnG, I totally disagree that "act like an adult" usually translates as do whatever the xow/oc want, on this board. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />

Expressing sound mental health, appropriate boundaries, principles/morals, and--with limits--putting others before ourselves IS mature behavior. Whether that means contact or nc depends on the parties involved.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 778
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 778
"...what is best for the children....."

And the merry-go-round comes full circle again!

What is best for the children.... when I hear that, the children that I put first, are my own. Just as it is for anybody. So, we are at another bulleye in this situation. What is best for MY children may not be what was best for oc.

I believe that it was best for MY children to not have to pay for their fathers sin. That the oc would not be part of our lives. It was THEIR best interests that were taken into consideration. I did not want them dragged into the whole "who is that boy at your house" scenario. To much to ask, and I chose not to disrupt my childrens lives with a revolving door family. We heard of children who grew increasingly angry at the oc, embarrassed at having to explain the situation, being the butt of jokes, for something they did not cause. Sorry, childhood is hard enough without having to suffer for your fathers sin.

So, here we are again. I feel that the children of the marriage are asked to pay a heavy price for the sins of the father when the oc is brought into the home. Based on experience and discussions with others, we made that decision. Our children deserved to have a childhood free of the drama and stigma of oc. So, was that best for the oc? Well maybe, maybe not. But based on experience of others, it was decided that we would not disrupt our childrens lives that way. Naturally, the ow was upset with this choice. She felt that the oc should "..know his family..." So. Who was wrong? Actually neither. It was parents looking out for the best interests of their children.

EVERYONE loses here. The oc does not know his bio dad. The bio kids have to know about the betrayal of the family, etc. EVERY CHILD GETS A KICK IN THE PANTS dont they? There is no nice, neat and tidy way to clean this mess up is there?

"..what is best for the children..." is not a cure all for every child in this situation. Words are cheap, easy and useless.

Personally, I know that speaking with my older daughter....she is glad that we didn't allow her to be embarrassed by having oc around. She finds it all to Springerish and would be ashamed of having our family skeltons aired in public. She is quite old enough today, to understand the whole situation.

So "...what is best for the children.." sounds awesome on paper.....but reality is what it is.

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 411
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 411
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> What is best for MY children may not be what was best for oc.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">I agree with this. When H was going through hell last year to get visits with his son then having him live with us, then supervised visits, it took a toll on our children. They were depressed and acting out. That is when H decieded to stop having contact with Oc and put his full attention to our kids. I was upset with him at first thinking that his Oc is being let down by one parent, that H should be there no matter what. But then Xow made sure that H was never really a part of his life.


</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> So "...what is best for the children.." sounds awesome on paper.....but reality is what it is. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Unfortunatly I found that out the hard way.

I would like to congrat all the people who can make contact work. But for some it just doesn't.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 741
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 741
I agree Jenny...

When dealing with OW, we (personally) do not bend to her whims.
The things we have done, have been in Lil Bit's best interest. We are concerned about raising her the right way, not bowing to OW's will.

On the subject of "acting like an adult" I do not feel that is a bad phrase... though I agree w/star*fish....
I feel that "acting like an adult" means that we make hard choices... for C or NC.
"Acting like an adult" when dealing with OW means that you are able to keep your composure, be respectful and command respect from her as well.

Doing what is in the best interest for the marriage, for the children of the marriage and what is best for the OC is the exact order in which decisions should be made.

When you are doing what is best for the marriage, how can you not be acting maturely?
When you are protecting the children of your marriage, how can you not be acting maturely?

If the marriage and the children of the marriage are able to deal with contact, and you do everything you can to insure that the OC is protected and loved,
How can you not be acting maturely and responsibly?

Each person defines things differently... and we should not be judgemental about who is or is not 'acting like an adult.'

JMHO
Stacia

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 778
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 778
And isn't it sad all around?

This isn't some Lifetime movie, where all is resovled and everyone suddenly is free from hurt and love blooms and all is one big happy family.

This is reality, in all its ugly and crude truths.

This is not a "family". This is, by necessity, a legal arrangement, with courts and judges and all that entails. I think that as soon as one moves beyond wishing, and gets real, it will be easier to move on.....no matter what is chosen. There is nothing warm, and nuturing about this situation.

I think for BW/MM and OW (and her husband) to all get along, it has to be done legally, with everyone knowing exactly what is going on, etc. All matter of fact, signed and stamped by the law.

Then I think having a resonable relationship "for the child", would depend upon the behavior of the ow. The relationship and it's ability to succeed really soley lies on her shoulders. How she handles sharing her child with another. How she handles knowing that her child is part of another family, that she is not part of.

I don't think that would be easy for anyone to come to terms with. So if the ow is able to hand over her baby to it's father and his family, without manipulation and games things could go smoothly. It is rarely the wife who causes problems with contact...if she has agreed to it. It seems like the ow have an (understandably) hard time handing the child over to another. But who wouldn't?

Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 2,430
Applaud Stacia!

(edited)

<small>[ March 02, 2005, 11:11 AM: Message edited by: Jenny ]</small>

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by Stacia_Lee:

Doing what is in the best interest for the marriage, for the children of the marriage and what is best for the OC is the exact order in which decisions should be made.

When you are doing what is best for the marriage, how can you not be acting maturely?
When you are protecting the children of your marriage, how can you not be acting maturely?

If the marriage and the children of the marriage are able to deal with contact, and you do everything you can to insure that the OC is protected and loved,
How can you not be acting maturely and responsibly?


</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Bronze this ... it's priceless!

Brava!

Pep

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
I wish this was a lfetime movie LynnG. Then I'd know for sure that there is a rainbow at the end of the journey! As far as the whole adult issue is concerned. I agree that being an adult is having the ability to make the hard decisions. I also agree that in situations like ours it is at times very difficult to be adult like in our behavior because we're acting out of hurt and pain. Then again when I think in this context the same goes for ow so I guess I should get pissed off hen she wiggs out then huh? lol. I'll get it all one of these days!

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Wow, this is an amazingly bizarre thread and I was so grateful to get to starfish's post that finally injected some sanity here. The implication that it is "adult" to friend a terrorist whose goal is the destruction of your marriage and your children's family is bizarre. You don't "get along" with a terrorist, you protect yourself from her. [lest you end up with your head cut off! nothing "adult" or virtuous about exposing yourself to foolish risks. crazy] Having any contact with an OW will only prevent the recovery of the marriage by keeping the BS and the WS perpetually triggered. No marriage can afford that.

It is, however, an "adult" responsibility to protect your marriage and your children's family from an OW. Dr Harley advocates no contact between the married couple and the OW and, ideally, no contact with the OC.

It is scary to read some of these old threads and see how far from actual Marriage Builders concepts - and simple basic sanity - this forum once veered. It disturbs me because marriages that involve an OC need to be MORE stringent about recovery concepts, not less. For them it is a matter of survival after such a compounded trauma.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
It is scary to read some of these old threads and see how far from actual Marriage Builders concepts - and simple basic sanity - this forum once veered. It disturbs me because marriages that involve an OC need to be MORE stringent about recovery concepts, not less. For them it is a matter of survival after such a compounded trauma.

You are so correct!
This forum used to frequently be invaded by OW/baby mama from another forum.
It was a constant up hill battle to stop them from hijacking the REAL purpose of this forum, which is MARRIAGE BUILDING under horrible circumstances.

Even today, there are current MB old-timers who post that "children come first", meaning the OC, of course.

I still feel protective of this forum and the hurting MBers who need actual MB advice under the circumstances of having an OC.

I miss LynnG.
She was strong and fearless, like you Mel.
She took arsenic tipped bullets and still came out fighting.
I've bookmarked several of her threads for quick future reference.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
You are strong and fearless for doing the heavy lifting on this forum for so many years, Pepperband. I don't know how your blood pressure withstood it!!


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
4
Member
Offline
Member
4
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Wow, this is an amazingly bizarre thread and I was so grateful to get to starfish's post that finally injected some sanity here. The implication that it is "adult" to friend a terrorist whose goal is the destruction of your marriage and your children's family is bizarre. You don't "get along" with a terrorist, you protect yourself from her. [lest you end up with your head cut off! nothing "adult" or virtuous about exposing yourself to foolish risks. crazy] Having any contact with an OW will only prevent the recovery of the marriage by keeping the BS and the WS perpetually triggered. No marriage can afford that.

It is, however, an "adult" responsibility to protect your marriage and your children's family from an OW. Dr Harley advocates no contact between the married couple and the OW and, ideally, no contact with the OC.

It is scary to read some of these old threads and see how far from actual Marriage Builders concepts - and simple basic sanity - this forum once veered. It disturbs me because marriages that involve an OC need to be MORE stringent about recovery concepts, not less. For them it is a matter of survival after such a compounded trauma.

Now THAT'S hilarious! and oh, so true.

Mmmmm...I couldn't agree more with your statement. Thank you for being such a staunch supporter Mel.

Originally Posted by Pepperband
You are so correct!
This forum used to frequently be invaded by OW/baby mama from another forum.
It was a constant up hill battle to stop them from hijacking the REAL purpose of this forum, which is MARRIAGE BUILDING under horrible circumstances.

MrRollieEyes I remember her well. I think she was the FIRST person (or one of the first) to respond to me on my first post here. Pissed me off when she tried to "diplomatically" convince me I'd be stealing from the OC by protecting our assets mad .

Originally Posted by Pepperband
Even today, there are current MB old-timers who post that "children come first", meaning the OC, of course.

This floors me also.

Originally Posted by Pepperband
I still feel protective of this forum and the hurting MBers who need actual MB advice under the circumstances of having an OC.


I want to also thank you for YOUR staunch support as well. I always look forward to reading your profound wisdom Pep. There aren't a lot of people in this society who can see past "a child" if they haven't been directly affected by this mess. So, I thank you...for being able to see beyond that & UNDERSTAND hug .

Originally Posted by Pepperband
I miss LynnG.
She was strong and fearless, like you Mel.
She took arsenic tipped bullets and still came out fighting.
I've bookmarked several of her threads for quick future reference.

I miss her also. But we have you & Mel now. To me, that is even more important because you guys don't have a dog in this fight like Lynn did so no one can charge you with being biased because your dog could lose.

I was also just as strong & fearless...until I allowed some posters to make me doubt myself & what I KNEW was RIGHT for me, my marriage & my children. LynnG set my head STRAIGHT. The OC's well-being is NOT in my jurisdiction of responsibility & my H's ends at paying his COURT ORDERED child support.

There are folks here, in this position, who couldn't STAND her philosophy, principles & vocal approach. Heck, they even go against some of Dr. Harley's so I suppose that's not surprising huh.

4eva


4eva

BW-47
WH-46
Married 21 yrs.
D-19
S-15
OC-14/born 9/99
NC
Dday #1 10/30/04
Dday #2 7/2/12 Skank ho #2 (40ish, childless, single & desperate; the world is becoming over-run with them...just like cheaters)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Shucks.
Thanks gals.
hug

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
if all the back patting is over may i ask who this more than 6 yo old thread was bumped for and why



me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
if all the back patting is over may i ask who this more than 6 yo old thread was bumped for and why

I saw someone reading this monstrosity in who's online yesterday and read it myself. I am sure you are as sickened as I am by reading it, no? I wonder how many marriages were lost on this forum over the years because of the bizarre, anti-marriage views that were promoted here? It is heartbreaking to read this kind of anti-marriage crap on a board that is furnished by Dr Harley.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
smile

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 690
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 690
Never read this one. My life hadn't been destroyed yet back then. I am glad that you both bump up the other old threads with the "Good Advice". to help the newbies and assist the not so newbies who can't find the old threads to help the newbies.


Me BS
D Day 4-2-2005
OC born 12-2004
DS 21, DS 12
Married 1993

May the love hidden deep inside your heart find the love waiting in your dreams. May the laughter that you find in your tomorrow wipe away the pain you find in your yesterdays.

Recovering....it's a long road, even with a dedicated FWH
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by pops
if all the back patting is over

I like "back patting" when it follows the action of inserting Harley MB concepts into the conversation......
Thank you very much. grin

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
actually it didn't sicken me. i was actually saddened

while i am in NO WAY advocating being "friends" with the op (i will never be friends with the om) i do agree with some of the discussion that you may have to be civil at times

what i read was a thread not by ow, but by 12 women trying to figure out how to make the best of this crappy situation they found themselves in

2 things saddened me

1 - that the thread was interuped by someone taking offense at the term "act like an adult". there was never any inclination or hint that the term had anything to do with people who chose nc. the meaning in the conversation was kept in the context of the thread only

2 - by the harsh line in the sand attitude by the conversation after it was bumped

as an example i will use our situation.

we cannot afford someone to act as a intermediary for pick-up's and drop-off's twice a week and the court will not order one

we also have no family members or friends that will take on the same chore for 18 years

so we are left to do the best we can of and handle those times by ourselves

also while i am 99% of the time the go between there are times when i am out of town for work and my w takes one of the other kids with her

for the best interest of our COM and the oc we have learned to be civil during these exchanges and not throw bricks at each other and there is civil comunication about certain issues, school, health, etc

from what i have read here latey is a very "our way or the highway" attitude and that also is depressing. and i am only talking about this paticular forum

with the uncountable scenerios for people getting thru this situation i only hope that they are not chased away or discouraged by those hard lines





me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
2 - by the harsh line in the sand attitude by the conversation after it was bumped

And I view this bizarre hyper-focus on "harshness" as a distraction from sane direction on this board. This insane focus on the tone of some posters has been used Ad nauseam as a means to shut those down who were advocating true marital recovery and sane self protective measures.

That won't work with me, though. I don't care what you say about my "tone." I would point out that the lack of tone has not served you well.

I just want to remind you that is DR HARLEY'S board, pops, and he very much takes a "hard line" in the sand when it comes to marital recovery. Not using a hard line in your own case has not helped your OWN marriage. Using your situation as an example does not impress me because you and I both know that your marriage NEVER RECOVERED and that your wife and her OM are still in contact. You might use your situation as a worse case example, but you sure cannot use it as an example of success. And that is what this board is FOR. It is for MARITAL RECOVERY.

It is a crying shame to consider all the marriages that were lost here because Dr Harley's views were swept under the rug.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
for the best interest of our COM and the oc we have learned to be civil during these exchanges and not throw bricks at each other and there is civil comunication about certain issues, school, health, etc

First off, no one ever advocated "throwing bricks" at anyone. However, it is ridiculous to assert that you are operating in the best interest of your COM when you have all but destroyed your marriage by ignoring simple basic rules put out by Dr Harley. It is in the best interest of the COM to have parents with an intact, happy, secure marriage. One does not need to pay money to have an intermediary. We have helped hundreds of couples through Plan B on the SAA and they don't pay a dime. Its not that hard to manage when someone is truly willing.

Being "civil" to a terrorist is nothing to brag about when your marriage is crumbling because the affairees are still in touch. There is nothing virtuous about being "civil" to the OM under those conditions.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
with all A's there are TWO terrorists. the OP and the spouse

and quite frankly the leader is the spouse IMHO

to recover a marriage i surely hope one can learn to be civil with their spouse

and "throwing bricks" was not meant to actually throw bricks

you don't have to remind me who's board it is. i surely know after many years and your constant reminders that it is DR. Harley's.

here's a suggestion for you. why don't you suggest to the board to go back and censor all these old posts that "you" percieve to be evil and negative. then you wouldn't have to worry about what anyone else reads

Happy Memorial Day, where we Honor all those who have gone before us and laid down there lives so we can speak freely




me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
where's a suggestion for you. why don't you suggest to the board to go back and censor all these old posts that "you" percieve to be evil and negative. then you wouldn't have to worry about what anyone else reads

Here is a suggestion to you, pops. And I mean this sincerely. Fix yourself before you commence to fix others. Fix your own marriage by actually USING Marriage Builders concepts, then you will be in a position to help others.

There are many others here who understand Marriage Builders and would help you in that regard. Rather than lashing out at posters who point out some of the dreadful, marriage wrecking advice that has passed for wisdom on this forum, and trying to shut others up, why not focus on something productive like fixing your own marriage? Wouldn't that be much more productive than dismissing good advice because you deem it too "harsh?"


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
melody let's try and stay on topic. the topic was this thread not my marriage.

i have no problem debating my marriage but start another thread and we will get to it.

of course you know that would be fruitless.

it would simply be a "mel says vs pops says" debate.

i will not be able to actually prove to you where we are and you will have no true evidence to the contrary except for your opinions


me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
melody let's try and stay on topic. the topic was this thread not my marriage.

i have no problem debating my marriage but start another thread and we will get to it.

oh no, *YOU* brought your own marriage up on this thread today when you said this: "as an example i will use our situation. for the best interest of our COM and the oc we have learned to be civil during these exchanges and not throw bricks at each other and there is civil comunication about certain issues, school, health, etc"

So it is very appropriate to point out HERE that your own tactics have not worked for YOU. You have proven with your own marriage that this advice does not work.

You posted this just last September 2010:

Originally Posted by pops On the thread "DNA test or not?" 26 September 2010
"my marriage has managed to survive 10 years since our d day. is it whole and we are still a family but it is far from perfect

yes i know the paternity of the oc. but it was pretty hard to hide the fact since i had had a vasectomy 6 years prior.

however some problems have arisen these past few months in our marriage that have led to talks of separation between the 2 of us. not A stuff but just with the many stress's that we are facing right now." here


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by calismile
I just wanted to know how many BWs get along w/ their ow and vice versa? And if you do get along w/ your OW what are some ways you have found an equilibrium? I really would like to have a better relationship w/ ow and wanted to know how others are dealing w/ it. Thanks in advance for your help.

THIS is why this old topic is relevant today.
The original poster asked a question.
The BETRAYED WIFE thinks she should get along with the OW.
"Have a better relationship with OW" .... faint
WHY is this even necessary?

Since this is a MB forum, FIRST AND FOREMOST our NUMBER ONE purpose is to serve the marriage, not the OM/OW/ or even the OC.

Making friendships/relationships with the OW/OM does NOT , in any conceivable way, serve the betterment of THE MARRIAGE.

If you, Pops, think otherwise, please enlighten me as to how building a better "relationship" with the OM/OW helps the marriage.

And, if a friendship with OM/OW is likely to HARM the marriage, and it is, then why should any betrayed spouse be told to pursue that "relationship".

The marriage comes first.
Always.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by pops
from what i have read here latey is a very "our way or the highway" attitude and that also is depressing. and i am only talking about this paticular forum

with the uncountable scenerios for people getting thru this situation i only hope that they are not chased away or discouraged by those hard lines

Quote
Welcome to the
Marriage Builders� Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Here you will find what you need as it relates to the Marriage Builders� principles that can be found in the Basic Concepts, Articles, and Q&A Columns of the Marriage Builders web site. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders� Bookstore.

You are welcome to look around and read about discussions that are similar to your situation or discussions that are just interesting. As you will find, the individual forums below are open to the public for reading.

If you would like to post a question of your own or start a discussion, click on the "Register User" link below to begin the membership process. There is no fee for joining. However, you will become a member of a community. And with that membership you will be held responsible and accountable for following the community's Rules & Guidelines and Codes of Conduct. They are very straightforward and are required in order to keep a safe and supportive community.

One of the most important requirements for becoming a member is that you read all of Dr. Harley's Ten Basic Concepts. Click the tab "Basic Concepts" above on the header to find them. The purpose of this Forum is to help couples use those Basic Concepts to overcome marital conflicts and restore romantic love.

Many of our members have been in shoes similar if not the same as yours. They begin by asking questions and, with the help of Dr. Harley's Basic Concepts, other members point them in a direction that will solve their problem. After their problem is solved, they often stay on to help new members with their own experience, perspective, and opinion.

Sometimes you may hear alternative opinions that conflict with Dr. Harley's Ten Basic Concepts. These are often raised by those who have not solved their own marital problems, but still feel they are qualified to advise others. When this happens you can expect some members to explain why their approach won't work, and why Marriage Builders� offers a better solution. There are many who are offended when that happens, but please keep in mind that the ultimate purpose of this Forum is to discuss and learn Marriage Builders� concepts.

The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Counseling Center at the top of this page.

We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders� Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.

Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail JustUss at JustUss2@aol.com

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
pops, to Pepperbands point, this thread is an example of some of the horrific, marriage wrecking advice that reigned supreme on this forum for years.

Yet instead of focusing on that aspect, your focus is on the "harshness" of some of the posters. Regardless of how "harsh" you think posters are, it does not negate the destructive advice being given.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by The WELCOME at the TOP of THIS page !!!!!
but please keep in mind that the ultimate purpose of this Forum is to discuss and learn Marriage Builders� concepts.

Try not to be offended when we bring MB concepts into the mix.
And when we do it repeatedly.
Try not to be offended when we point out what is non-MB-compatable advice/opinion.
Try listening to the MB radio broadcast which was linked by Melodylane.

NO CONTACT FOR LIFE .... because MARRIAGE BUILDING is FIRST AND FOREMOST in this and all MB forums.


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
click here

Want to make sure this is not missed. It is a must hear!

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Originally Posted by pops
melody let's try and stay on topic. the topic was this thread not my marriage.

i have no problem debating my marriage but start another thread and we will get to it.

oh no, *YOU* brought your own marriage up on this thread today when you said this: "as an example i will use our situation. for the best interest of our COM and the oc we have learned to be civil during these exchanges and not throw bricks at each other and there is civil comunication about certain issues, school, health, etc"

So it is very appropriate to point out HERE that your own tactics have not worked for YOU. You have proven with your own marriage that this advice does not work.

You posted this just last September 2010:

Originally Posted by pops On the thread "DNA test or not?" 26 September 2010
"my marriage has managed to survive 10 years since our d day. is it whole and we are still a family but it is far from perfect

yes i know the paternity of the oc. but it was pretty hard to hide the fact since i had had a vasectomy 6 years prior.

however some problems have arisen these past few months in our marriage that have led to talks of separation between the 2 of us. not A stuff but just with the many stress's that we are facing right now." here

Pops .... why not go full throttle MB Plan?
Your M is limping along because you are not really working MB.
Originally Posted by Pops Jan 18, 2009
i think fh and i are doing pretty well but also see where many times we are just "limping" along also. maybe it is complacency (?) or just being tired of the constant battle that allows us to plod on that way. maybe it's spme fear of something or lack of being able to see a different future then what our past has shown us.

it is at those times when things slip back into my mind.

i do not attribute them to my w's A tho. what i attribute them to is her lack of fulfilling/meeting my biggest en's.
here

Your W shows a callousness and a lack of empathy/caring towards you. Your wife shows you no respect.

Why is that?

Don't you think it's past time to demand a better marriage?

Call the Harleys.
Email the radio program.
You do not need to be this unhappy.

How's that for a non harsh comment?
hug

Last edited by Pepperband; 05/29/11 02:36 PM. Reason: link
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Pepperband
Originally Posted by pops
if all the back patting is over

I like "back patting" when it follows the action of inserting Harley MB concepts into the conversation......
Thank you very much. grin

I'd say the two back patting recipients here certainly deserved it. God knows they have helped hundreds of couples rebuild their marriages. Not to mention to grow up and start acting like adults. smile


If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app!

Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8.
Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010

If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
I remember reading pops justifications going after the OM for CS.

Then later on:

I remember pops later complaining about continued contact and wishing he never went after the OM for CS so there could be NC with the OM.

Many BH do this. They don't want to see the OM get off free after having their fun with their WW and leaving them with the cost and work to raise an OC. So they will spout off justifications for contact.

Yes a BH can love the OC and accept it but it's not like being able to forget that the WW had a PA for 99% of the time.

Having a OC in your home is the same as files of the PA on your hard drive and looking at them every day. For 18 years, and then some.

Having to face the OC everyday is one thing because the OC is innocent. A whole nother thing with the OM/OW.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by TheRoad
Yes a BH can love the OC and accept it but it's not like being able to forget that the WW had a PA for 99% of the time.

Having a OC in your home is the same as files of the PA on your hard drive and looking at them every day. For 18 years, and then some.

Road, I don't think you're actually qualified to say this, considering the fact that you've never had an OC.

I can guarantee you that it's not like this at all.

The term "OC" doesn't exist in our house at all. I don't use it (other than when I come here) and neither does my H. She's simply our daughter. My H considers her his own child in every way. She isn't a constant reminder of the A or the OM. She's simply his daughter. If you could see them together, then maybe you would understand what I mean. But since you can't, I guess you'll just have to take my word for it (or not).

Looking at my daughter is NOT the same as looking at pictures of the OM everyday. She isn't the OM. She is herself, an autonomous human being. I don't know, do you walk around everyday thinking of yourself as little more than a reflection of your parents? I would be very depressed if that's how I saw myself, considering my relationship with my family.

I don't care much what anonymous people on an internet forum think about me anymore, which is why I don't come here very often these days. But it does bother me when someone who has never lived an experience proclaims to know how it feels for those who have.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
The Road is allowed to render opinions about situations where he has no first hand experience.
As am I. I am allowed. grin

You, dearest Writer, are qualified to render your opinions based on your experience.
First hand experience is a nifty qualification, I'd say.

The cool thing is, we can always return to the Harley basic concepts when we squabble about how a marriage might recover from adultery.
It's so great to have a "home base" for our discussions.
kiss

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Pep, maybe it would come across a little better if The Road stated it as an opinion. Instead of saying "The OC is a constant reminder of the OM," say instead, "For me, personally, I think the OC would be a constant reminder of the OM."

The way it was stated, it sounded sort of like a blanket statement that all BS's would find the OC to be a constant reminder of the AP, which simply isn't true. Road can believe it's true, but in our case it isn't.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by writer1
Pep, maybe it would come across a little better if The Road stated it as an opinion. Instead of saying "The OC is a constant reminder of the OM," say instead, "For me, personally, I think the OC would be a constant reminder of the OM."

The way it was stated, it sounded sort of like a blanket statement that all BS's would find the OC to be a constant reminder of the AP, which simply isn't true. Road can believe it's true, but in our case it isn't.

Road can believe his own words.
But in reality, he just has opinions which are not to be confused with facts.

Try not to let him get to you.
I think it's super the way you've stood up and defended your marriage and the decisions you've made with your husband.
You are to be admired for facing the struggle and for not giving up.
I admire people who are willing to fight for their family.

That includes you, Writer.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Thanks Pep.

There are certain things I'm still sensitive to, but I'm working on it.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
Well said, pep!


Faith

me: FWW/BS 52 H: FWH/BS 49
DS 30
DD 21
DS 15
OCDS 8
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
""""""""""""""however some problems have arisen these past few months in our marriage that have led to talks of separation between the 2 of us. not A stuff but just with the many stress's that we are facing right now."""""""""'

yep i said that on 9/26/10. the problems that arose were financial where we were facing losing our house and all that we had. we considered separating with fh moving in with her parents and applying to the county for asssistance for the kids.

luckily God took control and we were able to stay in the house and together

like many when faced with a seemingly unsurmountable dilema we didn't think in the most rational way.

and yes 2 1/2 years ago i said

"""""""""""'i think fh and i are doing pretty well but also see where many times we are just "limping" along also. maybe it is complacency (?) or just being tired of the constant battle that allows us to plod on that way. maybe it's spme fear of something or lack of being able to see a different future then what our past has shown us.

it is at those times when things slip back into my mind.

i do not attribute them to my w's A tho. what i attribute them to is her lack of fulfilling/meeting my biggest en's."""""""""

i am confused as to what this was brought up for. if rying to relate to another member with similar feelings is to be thrown back at us regularly. i have no reply to that

if the answer is to say that my mariage is perfect then i will never be able to say that. is anyones marriage ever perfect? if they were then there would be no cause to put precautions in place.

remember we're talking about the "perfect"

given the opportunity to relive my marriage without a single change, would I?

Unconditionaly YES






me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
road

i agree with writer completely. oc is a term i only use here. it is never uttered in our house.

in fact if you read back in my posts you will see that i used her name (grace) instead of oc many many times.

she is my daughter and i would not change that for anything in the world


me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,449
Originally Posted by Pepperband
The cool thing is, we can always return to the Harley basic concepts when we squabble about how a marriage might recover from adultery.
It's so great to have a "home base" for our discussions.

So well said, Pep smile


Ddays 2007 and 2011
Plan B 6/21/11
Divorced July 2012
2 kids
How to Plan B Correctly
Parallel Parenting in Plan B
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
pep what do you want me to do to go "full throttle mb" ?

we already follow the priciples of poja, rad honesty, completely transparent, etc

the only thing we do not do that is recommended is have no contact with om.

for us in our situation that is not an option. and that doesn't mean that if possible in wouldn't be implamented.

what it means is that in OUR case there is no way to implament it.

soooo, while i agree that being "friends" with om/ow is not my cup of tea. i will support and encourage those who have made that choice for whatever reasons they found necessary to make there individual situation work.

and i am only talking about situations regarding this particular forum.

and i would assume that if writer is qualified to offer opinions based on her experiences then i would be afforded the same opportunity

i don't see that as spewing anti mb principles or disrespecting anyone.



me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Well, this isn't exactly on topic, but then again, this is a pretty old thread and the person who started it isn't here looking for help, so I don't suppose that matters too much.

Generally, I think it's very difficult to say what you would do in a particular situation until you actually find yourself in it. It's very easy to say what you think you would do, but you never really know until you get there.

A lot of people have come down hard on Pops because he didn't choose NC with the OM. It's easy to say that what he did was wrong and that you'd never do it that way - until you actually find yourself in the situation. The truth of the matter is, there isn't an "easy" way to deal with an OC situation. There is no win-win solution to this dilemma. No matter what choice is made, someone gets hurt, someone misses out on something. Because of this, there just isn't one right answer that works for everyone all of the time.

Sometimes the AP pushes for contact and is willing to take the matter to court, so NC becomes legally impossible. Sometimes, as in Pops', case the BS feels that (for whatever reason) they need to hold the OP responsible for their actions. As I understand it, Pops had concerns about his age and his health and he wasn't sure if he'd be physically able to provide for the OC. You can disagree with that decision all you want, but Pops took a very uncertain, messy situation and he did the best he could with it. When an A results in an OC, that's about all you can do.

Yes, NC is ideal, but it simply may not be possible in every situation.

Sometimes, I wonder if I did the right thing by choosing NC. Financially, the decision has ruined us. I didn't get to stay in my house. I'm living through foreclosure on our home and probable bankruptcy. We now live in a 2-bedroom apartment, our teenage son sleeps on a folding sofa, our older sons are living with their grandparents while they go to school because we have no room for them, and we barely make ends meet. Not all of our financial problems are a result of our OC, but having NC (and no child support from the OM) has certainly made things a lot worse than they otherwise would have been. It's hard to tell someone to ruin themselves financially for life just to ensure NC. I'm not sure if I'll ever know whether or not this was the right decision.

I too have been accused of not having a fully-recovered M, though I have no idea why. I have NC with the OM (and my H has NC with his OW), we have EP's in place, we practice RH & POJA and do our best to meet each other's EN's. LB's are still a problem, but we are constantly working on them. As Pops said, no my M isn't perfect, but I don't think many people have a "perfect" M. Just because my M isn't perfect however, doesn't mean that it isn't fully-Recovered from mine and my H's A's. The problems in my M now (other than some of the financial ones) have absolutely nothing to do with infidelity. To me, I have a completely-recovered, though still imperfect, M. I am a work in progress, as is my M.

Last edited by writer1; 05/30/11 04:38 PM.

Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
i am confused as to what this was brought up for. if rying to relate to another member with similar feelings is to be thrown back at us regularly. i have no reply to that

I will explain why it was brought up. Because you continually use your marriage as a example when you promote non-MB methods such as those promoted on this thread. As such, I will continue to point out that you are in a NON-RECOVERED marriage that is so shaky that separation is still discussed. The fact that it involved financial issues does not negate that point, it proves my point. It is clear you haven't used this program to successfully negotiate conflict and that is the point. Couples that are in love don't discuss separation and divorce. You are not a success story, you don't even USE Marriage Builders.

It is ok if you give advice on this forum, but when you persist in giving NON-MB advice, AGAINST THE RULES OF THIS BOARD, it will be pointed out. In fact, I have all your posts on my watch list so I can watch them and report them if need be. I will never forget how you gave TheRoad hell last year when he told a newcomer that absolute no contact with the OP had to be observed in order to save the marriage. [Dr Harley's own advice!] You told him he was being unrealistic. oh no, that won't happen again.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by writer1
A lot of people have come down hard on Pops because he didn't choose NC with the OM. It's easy to say that what he did was wrong and that you'd never do it that way - until you actually find yourself in the situation. The truth of the matter is, there isn't an "easy" way to deal with an OC situation. There is no win-win solution to this dilemma. No matter what choice is made, someone gets hurt, someone misses out on something. Because of this, there just isn't one right answer that works for everyone all of the time.

It doesn't matter if we ALL are in that situation and are allowing contact with the OP, it does not make it RIGHT or SMART. That position cannot be defended. I don't have to be in that position to know that. It is bullcrap to say that ending contact with the OP is "not easy;" it is staying in contact that is not easy. Divorce is not easy. Being triggered by an OP is not easy. Cutting off contact with an OP PALES in comparison. So don't tell me it is not easy.It is a walk in the park compared to a resumed affair or a divorce.

And I don't have to be in that position to know that this is Marriage Builders, not "Pops How to Cut Corners and Ruin your Marriage" board. This is Dr Harley's board, in case anyone missed the sign on the door. And he HAS saved hundreds of marriages using these principles.

So yes, there is one right answer to this. It is "NO CONTACT FOR LIFE WITH THE OP." <----that is the ONE right answer. Anyone who doesn't agree wtih that is free to go start their own board and push that agenda. But this board is DR. HARLEYS. It won't be pushed here to newcomers.

It might not be "easy" to cut off all contact, yet many do it. It can be done and it should be done if one wants to save their marriages. To say this isn't important is a tragic disservice to newcomers who come here and read this board. They need help saving their marriages, not help in destroying them.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
[
Originally Posted by writer1
Because of this, there just isn't one right answer that works for everyone all of the time.

WRONGO. Dr Bill Harley: "The WS cannot see or talk to the "lover" the rest of his/her life."

and

"While that policy seems very rigid and uncaring toward the child, the alternatives are usually disastrous. Having an old lover around, the cause of your husband's greatest sadness, has such an devastating effect on the marriage that few survive. Having heard from some of the couples who have followed this way of thinking, and others who have done the opposite, I am confident that it is the best approach to your situation." <---that is the ONE right answer.

Staying in touch with the OP<--------------ONE wrong answer


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
for us in our situation that is not an option. and that doesn't mean that if possible in wouldn't be implamented.

And this is not true. Your wife is not forced by law to see her OM. You have just taken the lazy way out because it is not important to you. In fact, isn't there contact now only because YOU sought child support? It is your "alternative" that Dr Harley mentions in his mission statement:

Sometimes you may hear alternative opinions that conflict with Dr. Harley's Ten Basic Concepts. These are often raised by those who have not solved their own marital problems, but still feel they are qualified to advise others. When this happens you can expect some members to explain why their approach won't work, and why Marriage Builders� offers a better solution. There are many who are offended when that happens, but please keep in mind that the ultimate purpose of this Forum is to discuss and learn Marriage Builders� concepts.



"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Melody, I'm curious how NC with the OM (for both the WW and OC) would be possible in a case like wanthealing's situation, where the OM is actively pursuing paternity and custody in court? If the OM wins his case, then she will be forced to allow him to be part of their OC's life. No, she doesn't have to be the one to interact with him, but he will still be part of OC's life, and it will be almost impossible for her to never talk about him or know anything about what's going on in his life, especially since her OC is very young. Some sharing of information and contact (even indirect) will almost certainly occur. It seems impossible to share custody of a very young child and know absolutely nothing about what's going on with the child while he/she is with the OM.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by writer1
Melody, I'm curious how NC with the OM (for both the WW and OC) would be possible in a case like wanthealing's situation, where the OM is actively pursuing paternity and custody in court? If the OM wins his case, then she will be forced to allow him to be part of their OC's life. No, she doesn't have to be the one to interact with him, but he will still be part of OC's life, and it will be almost impossible for her to never talk about him or know anything about what's going on in his life, especially since her OC is very young. Some sharing of information and contact (even indirect) will almost certainly occur. It seems impossible to share custody of a very young child and know absolutely nothing about what's going on with the child while he/she is with the OM.

Of course its not impossible. There is absolutely no reason to ever contact an OP. There is no pertinent information about a child that can't be passed through an intermediary. People do it every day in Plan B over on the SAA forum. All it takes is willingness.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Originally Posted by writer1
Melody, I'm curious how NC with the OM (for both the WW and OC) would be possible in a case like wanthealing's situation, where the OM is actively pursuing paternity and custody in court? If the OM wins his case, then she will be forced to allow him to be part of their OC's life. No, she doesn't have to be the one to interact with him, but he will still be part of OC's life, and it will be almost impossible for her to never talk about him or know anything about what's going on in his life, especially since her OC is very young. Some sharing of information and contact (even indirect) will almost certainly occur. It seems impossible to share custody of a very young child and know absolutely nothing about what's going on with the child while he/she is with the OM.

Of course its not impossible. There is absolutely no reason to ever contact an OP. There is no pertinent information about a child that can't be passed through an intermediary. People do it every day in Plan B over on the SAA forum. All it takes is willingness.

I know, I just don't think that I personally could send my toddler off with someone that wasn't allowed to contact me even in case of an emergency. I wouldn't send her off with anyone else that I couldn't even speak to. I just can't imagine a situation like that.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Just consider the alternative, which is a resumed affair and a broken marriage. Staying in touch with your former OM would be an untenable situation for your BS. That would be beyond cruel. That is what folks should be thinking about. Sure, its not easy, but much easier than a resumed affair or a divorce. If one only does what is easy they are likely in for a bitter, hard road. I sure don't want that for wanthealing or anyone else.



"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Just consider the alternative, which is a resumed affair and a broken marriage. Staying in touch with your former OM would be an untenable situation for your BS. That would be beyond cruel. That is what folks should be thinking about. Sure, its not easy, but much easier than a resumed affair or a divorce. If one only does what is easy they are likely in for a bitter, hard road. I sure don't want that for wanthealing or anyone else.

I wouldn't want that either, and I sincerely hope that wanthealing prevails in court and is able to keep the OM out of their lives completely.

I can't imagine anything making me want to resume my A. I would rather eat a diet of pond scum for the rest of my life than go back to that place.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by writer1
I wouldn't want that either, and I sincerely hope that wanthealing prevails in court and is able to keep the OM out of their lives completely.

I can't imagine anything making me want to resume my A. I would rather eat a diet of pond scum for the rest of my life than go back to that place.

That is why no contact is so essential after an affair. And if a WS doesn't recognize the risk, they are vulnerable to repeat affairs because they dont take appropriate steps to prevent them; they foolishly imagine they are immune.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
Wow. I wrote this thread some 6 odd years. Quite interesting to see how much conversation has been sparked from it. I wrote the thread because while I read and understood what Dr. Harley was saying I also knew instinctively that, the totality of that "mold" if you will would not fit for my family.

As the years have passed we have been both c and nc. Ow and I arent the best of friends and probably never will be. However we do have an understand and communicate when needed about my stepson. Is having contact wrong for some yes and for us it isn't. It has it's ups and downs, probably a bit more than those who chose nc all along.

For MY FAMILY however we chose to have contact with this child, which in turn meant having contact with his mother. I wanted then as I do now to basically find some middle ground or basis to communicate needed information without all the hate, anger and multitude of feelings that flooded me when this journey initiated.

I am not advocating this avenue for everyone, it's not for everyone but it IS for me and my family. I just ask that you respect my choice regardless of your personal thoughts on the matter.


While I will FOREVER be thankful for finding this place I realize I have but 1 God and Dr. Harley isn't it. His plan has worked for many people and that's wonderful! We had to do what worked for us and that meant using what worked and letting go of some ways that did not. To each his or her own. But this thread was never intent to bash or trash another's pov which seems like some people's intent.

If contact DOES NOT work for you, DON'T DO IT. Period, point blank. And if it does GO FOR IT. No one should be bashed for the choices they make for their family.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by calismile
If contact DOES NOT work for you, DON'T DO IT. Period, point blank. And if it does GO FOR IT. No one should be bashed for the choices they make for their family.

ITA. Some will argue otherwise, but when an A results in an OC, there really isn't a blanket answer that will work for everyone in every situation.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
Honestly writer1 that's my point. There is NO cookie cutter solution for everyone. While there are basic principles that can help guide people in precarious situations like ours, what works for one family may not work for another and that should be ok so long as each family is taken care of.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by calismile
Honestly writer1 that's my point. There is NO cookie cutter solution for everyone. While there are basic principles that can help guide people in precarious situations like ours, what works for one family may not work for another and that should be ok so long as each family is taken care of.

Not true. There IS a cookie cutter solution. There is NO MARRIAGE where continued contact with an OP works. That works for no family. To believe that is foolhardy and presents a risk to the marriage.

When folks come here for help, they need to be told the truth, and that is that the recovery of their marriage is HOPELESS unless all contact ends with the affair partners. That is very "cookie cutter." There are not multiple ways to recover from an affair, there is ONE WAY. And that one way is what we help newcomers achieve on this board, which is MARRIAGE BUILDERS.

The folks who advocate cutting corners almost always have terrible marriages themselves.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by calismile
If contact DOES NOT work for you, DON'T DO IT. Period, point blank. And if it does GO FOR IT. No one should be bashed for the choices they make for their family.

No one is being bashed. But saying that is a good idea for affair partners to be in contact is about like advocating drunk driving. And don't get me wrong, dear, I was a great drunk driver, but I would never advocate it for anyone. Just because I didn't get killed going drunk driving doesn't mean its smart to suggest it to others.

Anyone who continues contact with their affair partner is taking foolish risks with their own marriage. And that is fine for you to do, but it is not fine for you to come here and advocate it. I have been on this board for 10 years now and have seen a multitude of resumed affairs due to ignoring this step.

Even so, this is the Marriage Builders forum, and that is what we are all here for. Not to share reckless strategies with others.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by writer1
Originally Posted by calismile
If contact DOES NOT work for you, DON'T DO IT. Period, point blank. And if it does GO FOR IT. No one should be bashed for the choices they make for their family.

ITA. Some will argue otherwise, but when an A results in an OC, there really isn't a blanket answer that will work for everyone in every situation.

Yes, Dr Harley argues otherwise. Unless you have saved the amount of marriages he has, you are not in a position to argue with him. Like the mission statement clearly states:

Sometimes you may hear alternative opinions that conflict with Dr. Harley's Ten Basic Concepts. These are often raised by those who have not solved their own marital problems, but still feel they are qualified to advise others. When this happens you can expect some members to explain why their approach won't work, and why Marriage Builders� offers a better solution. There are many who are offended when that happens, but please keep in mind that the ultimate purpose of this Forum is to discuss and learn Marriage Builders� concepts.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,986
You're right, it is your choice. Everyone has a choice to either recover and have an MB marriage or not. Please respect Dr. Harley's board by not advocating something that clearly won't result in a fully recovered MB focused marriage.


Widowed 11/10/12 after 35 years of marriage
*********************
In a sense now, I am homeless. For the home, the place of refuge, solitude, love-where my husband lived-no longer exists. Joyce Carolyn Oates, A Widow's Story
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Not true. There IS a cookie cutter solution. There is NO MARRIAGE where continued contact with an OP works. That works for no family. To believe that is foolhardy and presents a risk to the marriage.

Actually, I know a few families who have made C in a situation where there is an OC work. Some of them actually post here still on occasion. They claim that C works for them, and since it's their lives and their family and they would know what's working for them far better than I would, I take their word for it.

Other than the financial issues it has caused, I'm glad that we chose NC. That was the right thing to do in our case for a number of reasons, and everyone involved agreed with that decision. I can see where it would have been more difficult in some respects had we chosen to have C. But there are difficulties in choosing NC when there is an OC as well. There really isn't a perfect solution. C has certain problems (foremost being the continuing presence of the AP) and NC has certain problems (in my case, on-going, severe financial difficulties). Ultimately, I do think we made the right choice, but then the OM in our case lives on the other side of the country, has very little money, and didn't attempt to pursue custody or visitation.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by calismile
As the years have passed we have been both c and nc. Ow and I arent the best of friends and probably never will be. However we do have an understand and communicate when needed about my stepson. Is having contact wrong for some yes and for us it isn't. It has it's ups and downs, probably a bit more than those who chose nc all along.

All you have done here is invite the rapist into your life. That is foolish and doesn't help your marriage or your children or your mental health. All it does is make you look unstable to invite such risk into your life. Why would you do that to yourself?


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by writer1
[
Actually, I know a few families who have made C in a situation where there is an OC work. Some of them actually post here still on occasion. They claim that C works for them, and since it's their lives and their family and they would know what's working for them far better than I would, I take their word for it.

I am sure there are some out there where it "works." However, I seriously doubt the marriage ever recovered. Just staying together is not a measure of success.

Telling people that is a good idea would be like me recommending smoking. I used to smoke 4 packs a day and never had any lasting health problems. Does that mean its smart to recommend smoking to others? What kind of person would do that except someone who wanted to harm others?

Rather, I prefer to take Dr Harley's word for it, who has treated hundreds of these cases and claims they don't work. That sure has been my experience in my 10 years here.

Would you also suggest I recommend smoking 4 packs to folks? Would that seem wise to you?



"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Sorry for my computer's inability to do the quote thingy right (very old Apple), but this was taken from Dr. Harley's letter on how to deal with infidelity that results in an OC:

"If you decide to remain married and create a mutually enjoyable future together, then the next decision you will need to make is how to treat Robin's former lover. Should he become a part of your family, with visitation rights as well as financial responsibility for raising his daughter? Or should he be out of your lives entirely?

As with the issue of divorce, this one should also be decided by enthusiastic agreement. But if you want my advice, I usually encourage a couple in your situation to keep the ex-lover away from your family. It may be difficult to engineer, but it is very important for Robin to try to avoid seeing or talking to him ever again. Granted, the affair may be over, but I am always concerned about the possibility of it becoming rekindled. If, for some reason, it is impossible to keep him away from his daughter, I suggest that you act as an intermediary, so that whenever he visits, he does not see or talk to Robin."

The hardline of absolute NC in the case of an OC doesn't seem to come directly from Dr. Harley at all. First of all, he states that whatever the couple decides (C, NC) should be decided by the couple using POJA. Yes, it is his recommendation that the couple have NC with the AP if at all possible. But he also seems to realize that sometimes, that simply isn't possible, because the AP pushes the issue and demands to be a part of the OC's life. In this case, he recommends that the WW have no direct C with the AP, in order to assure that the A does not resume. In the case where C is necessary, he suggests that the BH act as intermediary, which would require the BH to have C with his wife's AP.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by writer1
Yes, it is his recommendation that the couple have NC with the AP if at all possible. But he also seems to realize that sometimes, that simply isn't possible, because the AP pushes the issue and demands to be a part of the OC's life. In this case, he recommends that the WW have no direct C with the AP, in order to assure that the A does not resume. In the case where C is necessary, he suggests that the BH act as intermediary, which would require the BH to have C with his wife's AP.

Exactly. The hard line is between the affair partners. Did you not get that part?


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
And more recently he wrote this:

Quote
I am revising SAA and it should be in print sometime in 2011, and the problem you raise will be included in it. But it's particularly difficult to address because of our no-contact-with-the-ex-lover rule on the one hand, and the need of a child to have contact with their natural parents on the other. Our radio archives have more on this subject than anything I've written so far, because we've had several listeners call in with this problem, and I describe the approach I take.

As you probably already know by now, I tilt toward keeping the marriage healthy at the possible expense of the child not having adequate contact with the OM. I recommend that at the time of birth, the other man not be mentioned on the birth certificate unless he demands it. That makes your husband the legal parent of the child. If he does demand being on the birth certificate, I recommend that he pay child support until the child is 19. If the OM wants visitation, I recommend that it be done with transparency, so his own family knows what's going on. A mediator, paid by him, is to pick up and deliver the child so that you and your husband never have to have any contact with him.

In almost all cases that I've witnessed, the OM isn't willing to be named on the birth certificate, pay the child support, or make the situation known to his family. Under those conditions, I highly suggest that he not be able to visit his child until he or she is an adult. If an attempt is made, I suggest getting a restraining order. While that policy seems very rigid and uncaring toward the child, the alternatives are usually disastrous. Having an old lover around, the cause of your husband's greatest sadness, has such an devastating effect on the marriage that few survive.

Having heard from some of the couples who have followed this way of thinking, and others who have done the opposite, I am confident that it is the best approach to your situation.

Best wishes,
Willard F. Harley, Jr.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
4
Member
Offline
Member
4
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
Originally Posted by pops
if all the back patting is over may i ask who this more than 6 yo old thread was bumped for and why

Wow.

It looks like Pep & Mel have been bumping old threads (for WHATEVER their reasons) for some days now and you didn't respond until I decided to post, giving my props & thanks to them for their support for the NC stance & UNDERSTANDING. I'm used to you ignoring me, but now, snubbing me? Or maybe I'm being too sensitive and it had nothing to do with my comments that made you post. However...

Pops & Cali...I respect you both. But are you both SURE you're not just being sensitive (just as I MIGHT have been with Pops) because you have contact (on some level, at times) and it goes against the principles that are advocated here so you're inspired to "defend" your choices (whether they're right or wrong)? Even if you don't want to be honest on this board, I know you can look at what has happened over the course of your marriage's and SEE, this policy is absolutely on target. Having continued involvement, on any level, with the OP is NOT conducive to a recovered marriage. I know you want to stand by your choices & decisions. But to defend them and pass them off to others as if they are your success story's is just dangerous in my opinion. I have to agree with ML.

You may not want to agree with Dr. Harley's policy about NC with the OP for life simply because you feel you're living & surviving through it. But has this choice truly been conducive to your recovered marriage? I can't imagine that you having any sort of C with your OP and it NOT spark negative feelings in you related to the A! Be honest with YOURSELVES. And if this is so, I'd say Dr. Harley's policy is spot-on and you guys are just trying to defend a choice you made that goes against what he advocates...and WHY he advocates it. Just because YOU'VE made a choice that you THINK you can't back out of now, doesn't mean you should advocate like it's working, and will also work for others in this situation.

Pops, what if you decided CS wasn't necessary and made the decision back then to be NC until Grace was "of age". Do you REALLY think your M would be over by now, be in the same place, or better than it is now?

Cali...I know you probably want to defend your decisions, but...be honest WITH YOURSELF sweetie. Come on now.

I have to agree with ML here. You guys really do need to stop advocating YOUR approach to MARITAL RECOVERY if it goes against the policy of MB.

Really.

4eva



4eva

BW-47
WH-46
Married 21 yrs.
D-19
S-15
OC-14/born 9/99
NC
Dday #1 10/30/04
Dday #2 7/2/12 Skank ho #2 (40ish, childless, single & desperate; the world is becoming over-run with them...just like cheaters)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
4
Member
Offline
Member
4
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
Originally Posted by writer1
Originally Posted by MelodyLane
Not true. There IS a cookie cutter solution. There is NO MARRIAGE where continued contact with an OP works. That works for no family. To believe that is foolhardy and presents a risk to the marriage.

Actually, I know a few families who have made C in a situation where there is an OC work. Some of them actually post here still on occasion. They claim that C works for them, and since it's their lives and their family and they would know what's working for them far better than I would, I take their word for it.

And sometimes these people have just gotten used to living with their decision.

This is not the same as having a fully recovered marriage with the BS (or WS) no longer being affected by that contact either. And I think, as long as the C is affecting either spouse, the risks are still alive.


4eva

BW-47
WH-46
Married 21 yrs.
D-19
S-15
OC-14/born 9/99
NC
Dday #1 10/30/04
Dday #2 7/2/12 Skank ho #2 (40ish, childless, single & desperate; the world is becoming over-run with them...just like cheaters)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
mel

your byline says "happily recovered for 9 years"

what does the term "fully recovered marriage" mean to you

is it a marriage where there is romantic love between the couple

is it a marriage where each person trusts the other

is it a marriage where the couple works together towards a common goal

is it a marriage where there is support for each other

is it a marriage where there is complete honesty

please explain








me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 165
M
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 165
A reminder to posters that the purpose of our forum is to help posters understand the Marriage Builders program and not personal philosophies. If you can help in that respect we welcome your posts. If not, we ask that you refrain from posting.

This is a forum that we intend to watch more closely to ensure that Marriage Builders concepts are closely adhered to.

If you have any questions, please email myself or Justuss, the board administrator. I would ask that you all get back to our board's purpose, which is Marriage Builders.


mbsurvivor11@gmail.com
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
Melody I am a rape victim and find your remark "All you have done here is invite the rapist into your life." more than highly offensive. So please don't compare ow/dh affair to a rape it is FAR apart, very far a part. And by saying ow was a rapist that would mean the dh is a rapist too and that isn't the case.

I am not saying I am advocating one way or another C or NC. I know Harley's position. I was not GIVING advice for any direction. I was seeking input from BOTH side as to how I, not dh but I could find a middle ground as I KNEW I as the wife would more likely than not deal with OW more because of her son.

We, dh and I, discussed what was desired and wanted in our marriage. We discussed the MB principles and have used many of them. But NC was not a viable option for us. In our situation I have primary contact with ow not dh and it works well for all of us.

NC is a much easier option, I admit, and works very well for a lot of recovering marriages I have seen. But we ultimately didn't feel lead down that road.

You can say we let terrorist in and all the rest but if that truly be the case the terror was let in by the spouse who swung the door wide open and while having nc does help it does not negate what happened and doesn't neccesarily prevent an affair from happening again. It puts up a boundary from the op but there's a whole big world out there. We just have to pray over our marriages and build each other up instead of tear down. Good luck.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
mel

your byline says "happily recovered for 9 years"

what does the term "fully recovered marriage" mean to you

Fully recovered by Marriage Builders standards. That is what is meant.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
4eva

no i do not feel i am just defending my choices or that i have just become used to our circumstances

i do feel that i will support anyone on this forum with the decisions they make regardless if it agrees with my own choices or not.

whether some here agree or not (their choice) i do feel my marriage has recovered from the A

the answer to where i think my marriage would be had we gone nc

the answer is i truly feel we would be 9 years down the D road now

the om being responsible was such a huge issue to me at that time it would have been the deal breaker had we not gone the way we did


me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094

mel can you be more specific


me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by calismile
Melody I am a rape victim and find your remark "All you have done here is invite the rapist into your life." more than highly offensive. So please don't compare ow/dh affair to a rape it is FAR apart, very far a part. And by saying ow was a rapist that would mean the dh is a rapist too and that isn't the case.

Yes, I am comparing the OW to a rapist. Just as Dr Harley does. Adultery is WORSE than rape. If your H does not admit what he did was as bad as raping you, then I question his sincerity. Dr Harley uses that very analogy when discussing continued contact between an OP and a BS. radio clip where Dr Harley says tha...your rapist to Thanksgiving dinner"

Originally Posted by Dr Harley
"After having counseled thousands of couples with hundreds of marital conflicts, I am completely convinced that a spouse's unfaithfulness is the most painful experience that can be inflicted in marriage. Those I've counseled who have
had the tragic misfortune of having experienced rape, physical abuse, sexual abuse of their children, and infidelity have consistently reported to me that their spouse's unfaithfulness was their very worst experience
. To be convinced of the devastating impact of infidelity, you only need to go through it once.
here

Quote
IWe, dh and I, discussed what was desired and wanted in our marriage. We discussed the MB principles and have used many of them. But NC was not a viable option for us. In our situation I have primary contact with ow not dh and it works well for all of us.

Which is always a very bad idea. Like Dr Harley has stated, it is like inviting a rapist to Thanksgiving dinner. He advocates finding an intermediary to handle any communication. NC is always a viable option.

Quote
You can say we let terrorist in and all the rest but if that truly be the case the terror was let in by the spouse who swung the door wide open and while having nc does help it does not negate what happened and doesn't neccesarily prevent an affair from happening again. It puts up a boundary from the op but there's a whole big world out there. We just have to pray over our marriages and build each other up instead of tear down. Good luck.

I have no doubt that you do perceive the difference between your H and the OW, otherwise you wouldn't have ensured he is not in contact with her. If you don't understand the threat she presents to your marriage, then you are in grave danger. But I suspect you do.

Quote
while having nc does help it does not negate what happened and doesn't neccesarily prevent an affair from happening again. It puts up a boundary from the op but there's a whole big world out there

This sounds to me like your marriage is probably not affair proofed if there is still a whole big world out there that presents a threat to your marriage. You do understand that is a big part of recovery, don't you? Did your H change his lifestyle in order to prevent a repeat affair? What is your protection against that "whole big world?"


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
mel can you be more specific

That has a very specific meaning. And since you have been here for as long as me, I have no doubt you know what it means. I am recovered by Marriage Builders standards.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
i am asking you to describe in your own words what that means




me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
i am asking you to describe in your own words what that means

pops, how does Dr Harley measure a MB success? That should tell you exactly what I mean.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
4eva- girl I wasnt trying to be sensitive until the whole rapist comment came into play to be totally honest. I can read just like everyone else and I get why NC can be so benifical to a marriage and an entire families recovery.

Melody- I "invited" all this into my life I guess simply because I felt God was leading us here. And I know not being NC has caused issues in the past. However that is not the case. We often deal with just oc unless it's about scheduling visits etc.

As far as the rape comment he said "some" view it as worse than rape but I guess for me when I think of my rape and I think of this,the rape hurts much more.

I said their is a big wide world because there is, fact.

My husband has sincerely apologized and has been consistantly working on keep our marriage in a good place for some time now. We both are working to meet each others needs and fill our love banks as oppose of deplete it with lb.

And my protection from the world is believing and praying that God cover us as individuals and as a couple to help us grow where needed and to prune areas we need to work on. That and take steps to constantly work on our marriage.

What do you guys to to protect yourselves from the world?






Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by calismile
What do you guys to to protect yourselves from the world?

What we do is change the environment that led to the affair, as Marriage Builders subscribes. For example, opposite sex friendships are eliminated, transparency created, no overnight travel, passwords and bank accounts opened and shared, etc. Our WS's open up their lives so that the secret second life that led to the affair is not possible. While nothing is 100% guaranteed, it is much harder to carry on an affair when your life is an open book. And that is part and parcel of recovery. Harley covers it in this article:

Originally Posted by Dr Harley
The first step, complete separation from the lover and eliminating the conditions that made the affair possible, requires a complete understanding of the affair. All information regarding the affair must be revealed to the betrayed spouse, including the name of the lover, the conditions that made the affair possible (travel, internet, etc.), the details of what took place during the affair, all correspondence, and anything else that would shed light on the tragedy.

This information is important for two reasons: (1) it creates accountability and transparency, making it essentially impossible for the unfaithful spouse to continue the affair or begin a new one unnoticed, and (2) it creates trust for the betrayed spouse, providing evidence that the affair is over and a new one is unlikely to take its place. The nightmares you experience are likely to continue until you have the facts that will lead to your assurance that your husband can be trusted.
Requirements for Recovery

The next part is to create a romantic relationship using these concepts.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
thanks anyway mel,

i wasn't asking for dr harley's words i was asking for yours. what they meant to you

i know his words as i remember reading HN/HN back in the mid 80's and the info on this site 10 years ago

i will drop the question


me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops
thanks anyway mel,

i wasn't asking for dr harley's words i was asking for yours. what they meant to you

i know his words as i remember reading HN/HN back in the mid 80's and the info on this site 10 years ago

i will drop the question

What that means to me is what I have already told you: I am recovered according to MB standards. Those ARE my words.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,870
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,870
Originally Posted by TheRoad
..Yes a BH can love the OC and accept it but it's not like being able to forget that the WW had a PA for 99% of the time.

Having a OC in your home is the same as files of the PA on your hard drive and looking at them every day. For 18 years, and then some.

Having to face the OC everyday is one thing because the OC is innocent. A whole nother thing with the OM/OW.

I know we have moved on in this but I wanted to say something about OC because my wife from my first marriage came back pregnant when she had an affair at 20.

I knew it probably was not mine, but the fact that it was an innocent child weighed more on me and the effect it would make upon W and current DS3 we had was more of a concern. The questions and embarrassment and the obvious difference because of the race also would be something to deal with. We were very young, (me 21 and wife 20), and this was an innocent child like any other being brought into the world.

After the child was born, because of the difference in skin color, the doctor said he was going to treat him for jaundice the next day if it did not clear up. I went right to the doctors office and told him what was up and explained why my W was so embarrassed and how she wanted to believe it could be hidden from everybody but how that his color was normal. Surprised I was when the Doctor treated me coldly after that when he had been the family Doctor for years, but no skin off my nose the baby was the important one.

My wife did not bond with the boy, and I am sure that between post partum depression and everything else it overwhelmed her. I was still/allready reeling from the emotional effects of the affair but wanted to do the right thing. Adoption was suggested, we gave him up for adoption, and I have never forgave myself for allowing him to to be seperated from his mother. It did not matter that my Mom and me after work were the only ones who showed him affection and that FWW was a mess, that would have changed in time if we really cared.

Giving him up for adoption which was supposed to help keep us together had the opposite effect. It was another wedge of inability to forgive and appreciate that prescious innocent life and even our own frialty that eventually made it seem the smart thing to do to seperate. I sent her away with my son to figure things out. Justified sure she had no reason really to stray, I was a good hard working and faithful H. It took me years to figure out that running away was the mistake not staying and sticking. Thats what I figured out but had a new wife and more children and first W had moved on by that time.

Strange thing tho, all the forgiveness that I should have shown first W, and my justification for leaving her because of her affair, I gave in spades to the second W who was in way worse shape and cheated much more than the first.

But where does that leave the innocent child? I am sure that in time like I have heard from so many people in the world I would have become who would be his father to him as I got to care and know him. The sperm donor would have to rise above himself at some point to be a real father anyways. I consider giving him up for adoption a great mistake and injustice to this boy, and also backward blamed my FWW at the time for her inability to rise above and love her son reguardless of the circumstances. She left me and the son we allready had to play and create another son, and come back to a marrige and say she got raped, but yet where,,where does that leave the little baby..

It takes more than making a child to be a father, or a mother, or a parent. Thank God for those who love those innocent little lives and rise above to raise OCs, or adopt, they are truly the parents.

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,870
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,870
Oh BTW, I wasn't making the rape comment based on any posts, my WW at the time later admitted that she made that up and she had slept with some guy that she worked with after she left.

Just wanted to be clear.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
Melody -we do much of the same. Like you guys we both are very transparent. I think it helps a lot.

ConstantProcess- I am sorry you are hurting and that you were hurt in both marriage relationships. But you seemed to have learned from them. I hope if you are still married to your second wife that things are in a better place now.

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
CP

thanks so much for sharing your story

interesting you said that the adoption was another wedge in your marriage

my w and i also discussed adoption and i gave up on that path b/c i felt it would have done exactly that to us


me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,870
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,870
Originally Posted by calismile
..ConstantProcess- I am sorry you are hurting and that you were hurt in both marriage relationships. But you seemed to have learned from them. I hope if you are still married to your second wife that things are in a better place now.

Accually I am widowed now, and my W is in that better place. But I came here 6 months after her death to see how I let such an awful thing happen to this beautiful woman who at one time wanted to serve God and have a happy marriage with me and the children for the rest of her life.

One of the things I learned through my experience, through our false recovery in 1990, and from reading the basic concepts and the stories of so many good people here also, is not to put your marriage in jeopardy and run it on a tightrope. That at any time even things you thought you had conquered and were in the past could raise up thier ugly head, and that marriage, like people, was fragile.

So I agree with Mel that it should be protected. as a matter of fact that was the very words my W used in the beginning of recovery in 90-91, when I had been gone for two years and she had done the work and realized how important it was. My story is still out of my grasp of making it short but the principles here on MB were followed almost to a tee. I say almost because if I had been here and listened to my gut I would have insisted on AA for my wife as part of reconciliation. Something BTW DR H has great experience in, addictions. He wont even counsel someone for marriage if there is substance abuse or a history of it unless they have recieved treatment. He ran clinics for years, he knows about peoples brain chemistry.

So almost fully complying does not cut it, and she eventually relapsed into substance abuse and well, yeah, I thought she would NEVER fall to THAT again!

Don't fool yourself into thinking that this woman was a dummy, she knew everything except how to help herself, she helped many people see things they never understood before. She was a teacher of people and a warrior and could be tough and stubborn and a force to be reckoned with. But in this was a blindness also she would/could not deal with. Well I will go on and on.. but she died after relapse and falling into very heavy drugs from cancer which was contracted from smoking and useing respitory system depressing drugs.

The following depression I felt because I was her husband and wanted to find out what happened brought me here 6 mo after her death because I needed some answers. I did a search on google and found DR H.

So the advice about not pushing the human limits and valuing you marraige above all is good advice I completly agree with.

Thank you for your kind wishes and my three children are doing well all things considered.

Originally Posted by pops
CP

thanks so much for sharing your story

interesting you said that the adoption was another wedge in your marriage

my w and i also discussed adoption and i gave up on that path b/c i felt it would have done exactly that to us

Yes Pops I realize I was young when I made that decision, and I did not do what I really believed in either in my better nature. My Pastor had said those very words, "You know it takes more than making a child to be a father". But I had been away from the church for years and until I met my second wife at 26 I did not even start to listen to God again. Honestly I feel God is the one true Father, and all good fathers model or plagurize him as a source, whether conscious of it or not.

But you had the wisdom to understand forgivness and grace was absolutly nessesary in your marriage, and that if you couldn't give that protection to a little child, it would probably be lost on each other also.

I had allready turned down what would have been a promising career in the AF,(They wanted me because my scores were high MrRollieEyes), because my W had decided to secretly not take the pill and get pregnant against my wishes,(I wanted to wait cause we were going in the service together and I knew we needed financial stability), and i did have the wisdom to know at that age if i went in and left her home it would probably tear us apart. Maybe I was still frustrated because we were still behind the 8-ball even though I worked and did well and then she submarined me with an affair..

I don't know but by that time I was totally lost, and young and afraid. Like many things in life hindsight is 20-20, and we can understand what happened, but we still have to deal with every consequence to our actions regardless of our intentions at the time.

Counsel, cool headed and humble thinking, supportive friends and reality, and oh yeah lets not forget faith in God and his guidance when we are in doubt of what is right with dealing with his children of any age. You just can't be too careful when it comes to those things.


Me 56 Former BS
Widowed 5-17-09 --married 25 years.
4 children
DS-35 previous marriage--18-22 DGrandSons 6 and 4
Me former BS
DD-29 with DGDs 5 and 1yr
DSs 26 and 23
Teilhard de Chardin..We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience. ...Sounds about right to me.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Originally Posted by writer1
[quote=TheRoad]
I don't care much what anonymous people on an internet forum think about me anymore, which is why I don't come here very often these days. But it does bother me when someone who has never lived an experience proclaims to know how it feels for those who have.

I do not dislike you. I enjoy reading your responses and felt that it has been help to others.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,860
Originally Posted by pops
4eva

the answer to where i think my marriage would be had we gone nc

the answer is i truly feel we would be 9 years down the D road now

the om being responsible was such a huge issue to me at that time it would have been the deal breaker had we not gone the way we did

What if you would of/could of convinced yourself that NC was best and you did not want OM money/CS, that it would of been best to have NC from back then?

I'm not going to search and look for your post where you said that NC would of been better now looking back.

Was that a moment of weakness, frustration?

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,094
road yeah sure, maybe "if". i will never know that. but what i do know is that at "that" time where my head was at, right or wrong nc was a deal breaker for "me"

yes you are right i have said since that time that nc would have been better due to the rough time my w was going thru at the time. "but" like i said at "that" time it was a deal breaker for me

i agree with it now also.

"but"

i do support and will encourage those who have found themselves with some form of c due to the oc situation. as an example - cali, ff, delean, and want should her om work his way into there life.

i will not write her off

and yes if op has some form of visitation the ideal solution is to have a go between to handle all that "but" again as in my case we have no one who is willing to take on that responsibility for 18 years and the court would not appoint one.








Last edited by pops; 05/31/11 07:45 AM.

me-59 ww-55
married 1979 - together since 1974
6 kids together 15,19,21,23,29,30
my oldest son 37
d-day (confession day) memorial day 2001
oc born 12/20/01
now 8 grandchildren
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 165
M
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 165
A reminder that the purpose of this forum is to support posters in protecting and restoring their marriages using Marriage Builders concepts. It is not for the promotion of personal philosophies!

Please keep that in mind when posting. Thank you.


mbsurvivor11@gmail.com
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,539
Hi cali, nice to see you again!

Folks one of our best examples of a recovered M with C is our beloved Delean-de (Kimmy) and she came on her very recently advocating NC. Kimmy has custody of the two OC as well and she still cannot stomach the slightest bit of C with the OW.

We are in C for over two years now. My life will never be the same. My H could not walk away from the OC due to his own guilt. He often wishes he had though. Having the OP in your life is unhealthy for everyone but especially for the health of the M.

I was traumatized over and over by false recoveries because my H gave into the OW's demands of not having the evil BW in her precious OC's life. Two years into C and she realizes how wrong she was. She goes on with her life happily having it all. Her OC, free weekends to do what she pleases and CS. We get less money, more responsibility and the constant reminder of the A.

I am not saying there are not rewarding aspects of having C. I love OC and we do make a small difference in his life but it is NOT WORTH the continued C with the person who for 3 plus years did everything she could to destroy me and my family.

I am a strong advocate of Dr. H's principles and NC.


Faith

me: FWW/BS 52 H: FWH/BS 49
DS 30
DD 21
DS 15
OCDS 8
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by MBsurvivor
A reminder to posters that the purpose of our forum is to help posters understand the Marriage Builders program and not personal philosophies. If you can help in that respect we welcome your posts. If not, we ask that you refrain from posting.

This is a forum that we intend to watch more closely to ensure that Marriage Builders concepts are closely adhered to.

If you have any questions, please email myself or Justuss, the board administrator. I would ask that you all get back to our board's purpose, which is Marriage Builders.

I think it's interesting that this warning was written in response to me, when the last thing I wrote on this topic last night was a direct quote from Dr. Harley himself. Please explain why I am being singled out here for a warning for posting quotes from Dr. Harley himself?


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,357
Quote
I think it's interesting that this warning was written in response to me, when the last thing I wrote on this topic last night was a direct quote from Dr. Harley himself. Please explain why I am being singled out here for a warning for posting quotes from Dr. Harley himself?
writer, the mod's post was directly after one of pop's. I didn't take that it was intended specifically to you. Not sure how you got that idea?

Last edited by maritalbliss; 05/31/11 10:31 AM.

D-Day 2-10-2009
Fully Recovered and Better Than Ever!
Thank you Marriage Builders!

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by maritalbliss
Quote
I think it's interesting that this warning was written in response to me, when the last thing I wrote on this topic last night was a direct quote from Dr. Harley himself. Please explain why I am being singled out here for a warning for posting quotes from Dr. Harley himself?
writer, the mod's post was directly after one of pop's. I didn't take that it was intended specifically to you. Not sure how you got that idea?

At the top of the post, it said Re:writer1, even though there were several posts in between my last one and the warning. I always thought the RE at the top meant who the post was in response to, but I could be mistaken about that.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by TheRoad
Originally Posted by writer1
[quote=TheRoad]
I don't care much what anonymous people on an internet forum think about me anymore, which is why I don't come here very often these days. But it does bother me when someone who has never lived an experience proclaims to know how it feels for those who have.

I do not dislike you. I enjoy reading your responses and felt that it has been help to others.

Road, I don't dislike you either. I'm sorry if you felt that's what I was saying. I think I just get overly sensitive sometimes to certain things that are said. That's why I've been staying away from the forum for the most part. I think it actually does me more good to not be on here at this point in the process. Sometimes this place itself acts as a trigger. But there are still some stories that I am following, so I check in now and again to see how people are doing. I think it may be time to check out again and focus on my own things for awhile.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 165
M
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 165
If you have questions, concerns about moderator actions, please contact me directly.


mbsurvivor11@gmail.com
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Originally Posted by MBsurvivor
If you have questions, concerns about moderator actions, please contact me directly.

Done.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 35,996
Originally Posted by calismile
If contact DOES NOT work for you, DON'T DO IT. Period, point blank. And if it does GO FOR IT. No one should be bashed for the choices they make for their family.

I think, in the interest of clarity, when we say "contact" that we try to be precise about whom we are referring to.

If there is C or NC with the OC, that is one matter.
And if there is C with an OC, there needs to be attorneys involved and agreements placed in writing.

However, the point that Dr Harley makes, and we repeat over and over, is that NC with the affair partner is paramount to every marriage struggling to overcome adultery.

To advocate to other posters who come to this forum that seeing a former adultery partner is "OK" .... This will not be overlooked by the MBers who actually use the MB forums to discuss MB basic concepts.




Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Pepperband
To advocate to other posters who come to this forum that seeing a former adultery partner is "OK" .... This will not be overlooked by the MBers who actually use the MB forums to discuss MB basic concepts.

quoted for truth.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,818
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by calismile
But this thread was never intent to bash or trash another's pov which seems like some people's intent.

If contact DOES NOT work for you, DON'T DO IT. Period, point blank. And if it does GO FOR IT. No one should be bashed for the choices they make for their family.

I don't understand where you get that "bashing" is anybody's intent.

The entire purpose of this forum is to provide a place to discuss Dr. Harley's perspective on what will or will not work for marriage and recovery from infidelity. Not a place to discuss all points of view; there's a whole internet to do that in. Many people come here seeking to learn how to incorporate Dr. Harley's perspective into their marriage, and since Dr. Harley provides the board and sets the policies and asks that the board be used for discussion and learning of Marriage Builders concepts. So I don't see what the big deal is about asking that the board be used for that purpose and explaining Dr. Harley's perspective.

When I was an early teen my mother dragged me to a counselor, then dragged me to a second counselor, who talked with me a bit and then explained that since I was already seeing a counselor, it would be unethical of her to try to work with me since her approach and perspective might conflict with that of the first counselor.

Dr. Harley closed his practice years ago, but this board is one way in which he still counsels. It makes no sense to me for people to come in claiming that all points of view should be treated as valid; it sounds as unethical as one counselor interfering with another's work.


If you are serious about saving your marriage, you can't get it all on this forum. You've got to listen to the Marriage Builders Radio show, every day. Install the app!

Married to my radiant trophy wife, Prisca, 19 years. Father of 8.
Attended Marriage Builders weekend in May 2010

If your wife is not on board with MB, some of my posts to other men might help you.
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 266
I have to say, this thread was particularly interesting to me because in our case, we fought through the courts and now must give OM rights and visitation after a very expensive and very exhausting legal battle. We've talked about using a mediator, but in our case BH was ordered to be the one to handle all C since OC must be supervised by BH during visits with OM. We are to start that soon, so I have no idea how BH will feel after being forced to interact with OM regularly. Sometimes I really don't understand how the courts can make such irrational decisions... frown

I do know that Dr. H is dead-on about no C between me and OM. I plan to keep it 100%, though I don't know how I'll feel having to miss major events in OC's life in the future if OM is present. Dr. H went so far as to say that if OM is at OC's wedding I shouldn't be there. THAT part is what I will find hardest to accept. All other cases of NC seem doable, but big events like OC's wedding... but my M is worth it, so I'll do what I have to. I just know that I never want to see or speak to OM again, and BH is being forced to handle all communication and seems okay with that role. But what if that changes and he ends up not being able to, yet the courts are ordering it? Then what? It's certainly not easy to apply MB concepts when the courts force otherwise. frown


Me: WW
BH
DD(4)
DS(2)
DD(1)

"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." (Jeremiah 29:11)

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,803
Sorry to hear things didn't go in your favor wanthealing. That's a very difficult situation to be in. I can't even imagine how difficult it must be for your H knowing that he will have to spend considerable amounts of time around the OM. Your H seems like a very strong man.

It's amazing some of the things that courts will do. Yes, it is ideal to use a 3rd party mediator to handle all interactions, but unfortunately most judges know nothing about MB or concepts such as NC. This was the kind of thing I was actually referring to. No, you won't have to have direct C with the OM, but your BH will. Complete NC for the the WW, BH, and OC isn't always legally possible. That's all I was saying all along. I agree that it sucks, but I've been through this court thing before (not with my OC, but with my older kids) and I know all to well that things don't always go the way you want them to no matter how hard you fight.

I'll keep your family in my thoughts wanthealing. I know things look bleak now, but I'm confident that you and your H will work the issues that arise from this situation when they come up. One day at a time. That's all anyone can do.


Me: BS/FWW: 48
BS/WH: 50
DS: 30, 27, 25
DD: 28
OC: 10
BH and I are raising my OC together.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 164
Nc between the affair partners makes TONS of sense and prevents lots of potential issues from arising. What I was mainly struck by is the need for someone to literally find a post from 6 years ago that was talking not about the dh and ow having contact but the bs and ow when in that particular situation NC midstroke essentially was not a viable option for the married couple or the child involved.

I know that Harley suggest NC with OP and I get why but it was not my husband having the contact that was the point of my initial post is all.

Pep where did I say for the wayward spouse to have contact with the other person? Where at all did I advocate that was ok? To my knowledge I didn't. I spoke of contact yes, but as we can see by the title I was inquiring about a bs and ow not the two offending parties interacting. And should a poster have a question or need clarification on what I meant they could have just asked and it would have been easily answered. I refferenced my spouse only as a means of understanding that the decision or thought process to possibly have contact between ow and myself at that time, was made by poja.

Markos I could have TOTALLY taken it wrong. But since this was a thread take from 6 years ago and then bumped up all this time later what was the point of it really? Who was it helping. Did the comments help me understand anything better than I had previously? No? Did they seem to pretty much imply or question my intellect or reasoning for wanting contact is bashing to some degree. Yes. So yes I do take some offense to that personally. But initially I was refferencing the way pops was being treated and writer1 a tad too as it just didnt seem right to me.

I know the intent of MB is to build up marriages but in no way did *I* feel that the dialouge and the manner in which it was presented was meant to aid.

And had C been our family choice and contact transpired between dh and ow would the way the comments were written have really helped me feel safe to confide my true thoughts or the reality of my situation, to be possibly simply heard or uplifted or guided? It was not so much what the message of the posters were but the way the chose to convey it.


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
camismile, I have explained 3 times why I bumped this thread so I will repost my explanation, adding that I saw someone reading it in who's online:

Quote
Wow, this is an amazingly bizarre thread and I was so grateful to get to starfish's post that finally injected some sanity here. The implication that it is "adult" to friend a terrorist whose goal is the destruction of your marriage and your children's family is bizarre. You don't "get along" with a terrorist, you protect yourself from her. [lest you end up with your head cut off! nothing "adult" or virtuous about exposing yourself to foolish risks.] Having any contact with an OW will only prevent the recovery of the marriage by keeping the BS and the WS perpetually triggered. No marriage can afford that.

It is, however, an "adult" responsibility to protect your marriage and your children's family from an OW. Dr Harley advocates no contact between the married couple and the OW and, ideally, no contact with the OC.

It is scary to read some of these old threads and see how far from actual Marriage Builders concepts - and simple basic sanity - this forum once veered. It disturbs me because marriages that involve an OC need to be MORE stringent about recovery concepts, not less. For them it is a matter of survival after such a compounded trauma.

I saw someone reading it and was struck at how sad it was that you were asking how to get along with an OW and you weren't told it is a horrible idea. Rather, posters implied you should be "adult" and just accept it. crazy I saw no support here for your marriage, only for the OW and the OC. That is enabling, not supporting. It would be terrible for newcomers to believe this was Harley's stance. It is CERTAINLY NOT. Using the POJA to negotiate marriage wrecking decisions does not make a bad decision good. That is a mis-use of the POJA.

Rather, Dr Harley's advice should be followed in these circumstances:

Originally Posted by Dr Harley
A mediator, paid by him, is to pick up and deliver the child so that you and your husband never have to have any contact with him.


Having an old lover around, the cause of your husband's greatest sadness, has such an devastating effect on the marriage that few survive.

Originally Posted by Dr Harley
The path to surviving an affair begins by never seeing or talking to the other person in the affair again. Without that condition, survival is essentially impossible. So it's extremely important for Robin to avoid seeing or talking to him ever again. Granted, the affair may be over, but I am always concerned about the possibility of it becoming rekindled. If, for some reason, it is impossible to keep him away from his daughter, I suggest that you find an intermediary, so that whenever he has visitation, he does not see or talk to Robin or you.
here

calismile, I am sorry if it seems I am attacking you, I really am not. I realize you have been placed in a horrendous situation as have most people who show up here. That is why it is MORE important that they adhere to MB concepts, not less. These marriages can't afford it. I am simply heartbroken at the destructive advice that reigned supreme on this board for so long. It makes me wonder how many marriages were lost as a result of posters substituting their own personal opinions for Dr Harley's tried and true professional advice.



"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by calismile
And had C been our family choice and contact transpired between dh and ow would the way the comments were written have really helped me feel safe to confide my true thoughts or the reality of my situation, to be possibly simply heard or uplifted or guided? It was not so much what the message of the posters were but the way the chose to convey it.

If contact between your H and the OW had been your "family choice" then the greatest danger would not be our words, but a very tragic choice that would wreck your marriage. You would not be safe at all. Anyone who would support you on such a wreckless path would not be your friend.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by wanthealing
We've talked about using a mediator, but in our case BH was ordered to be the one to handle all C since OC must be supervised by BH during visits with OM. We are to start that soon, so I have no idea how BH will feel after being forced to interact with OM regularly. Sometimes I really don't understand how the courts can make such irrational decisions... frown

wanthealing, I believe this can probably be changed. I would ask your attorney if a replacement can be named and if not, what it will take to make that happen. Your H should not be put in that position or he will be perpetually triggered by the reminder of the affair. If you need it, you might even enlist Dr Harley to write a letter for the court. But there is no good reason, and lots of bad reasons why your H should be placed in this position. I would get this changed.

I am sorry the OM got any rights at all. frown

edited to add: I copied this post over to your thread so we can discuss it there.


"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt

Exposure 101


Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
2 members (Mature, 1 invisible), 1,216 guests, and 72 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bibbyryan860, Ian T, SadNewYorker, Jay Handlooms, GrenHeil
71,838 Registered Users
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 1995-2019, Marriage Builders®. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5