Welcome to the
Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum

This is a community where people come in search of marriage related support, answers, or encouragement. Also, information about the Marriage Builders principles can be found in the books available for sale in the Marriage Builders® Bookstore.
If you would like to join our guidance forum, please read the Announcement Forum for instructions, rules, & guidelines.
The members of this community are peers and not professionals. Professional coaching is available by clicking on the link titled Coaching Center at the top of this page.
We trust that you will find the Marriage Builders® Discussion Forum to be a helpful resource for you. We look forward to your participation.
Once you have reviewed all the FAQ, tech support and announcement information, if you still have problems that are not addressed, please e-mail the administrators at mbrestored@gmail.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
Ok, I know this sounds a little paranoid, but humor me...

I was wondering if anyone has ever seen any posts authored by a member with the name of "flirtingwiththeenemy" or possibly "flirting with the enemy" or even "operation flirting with the enemy"...????? The reason I ask is that in some of my divorce paperwork, my WW mentions the MB discussion forum and quotes some stuff allegedy written by me that I NEVER wrote. She also lists my various login names as "RJP", "Want My Wife Back", and also as "Flirtingwiththeenemy". Now, I have gone by the first two names, but NOT the third.

Please let me know if you have seen anything. Thanks.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,246
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,246
My guess is your lawyer could prove this simply by requesting an IP address for all three logins.. then verify the location of the IP. Tracert.

The board isn't any sort of legal document, ot my understanding...I doubt you could really use this board in court. Mostly because I would THINK the 5th amendment would protect you from testifying against yourself...which I would think this sort of would do... but I am a long ways from any sort of legal knowledge.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
Hey Rook...

I agree, but the damage has already been done. WW made all these claims to the custody evaluator and she bought it all hook line and sinker. In the report, I am quoted as writing that I viewed the evaluation as a game and that I was thrilled that I was "pulling the wool over the evaluators eyes". I NEVER said these things!!!! But, as you can imagine... the report favored WW...

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 551
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 551
I did a quick search for you and found:

1) this post

2) another post in which you say:
I have still been doing the flirting with the enemy stuff... she was preceptive to it, then told me I was being to nice and that she didn't think we ought to be this way to one another.

http://www.marriagebuilders.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=37;t=031161

and 3) This post in which you say
Things are going well… operation “Flirting With The Enemy” is going off without a hitch.

http://www.marriagebuilders.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=37;t=029814


HTH

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
Yeah, I know... I did the same search. You see it was taken completely out of context and "flirtingwiththeenemy" was listed as one of my login names... which I have never gone by. Thanks for the insight though.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
^^bumping for feedback...^^

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
Ok, people.... Someone on the D/D board told they have seen a member going by the name of "Flirting with the enemy" in recent weeks over here ont he GQII board. So, I'll ask again if anyone here remebers seeing it as well???? ...anyone happen to remember what the topic was??? Throw me a bone here folks...!?!?

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,965
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,965
Browsing an alphabetical list of the directory shows
flipflop
flipper_alpha
flmom32937


No flirt... FWIW.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
Turtlehead...

How do you do that? Where is the directory located?

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,646
V
Member
Member
V Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,646
I'm surprised the custody evaluator didn't ask for hard copies of posts. Without written documentation it's nothing more than gossip. I'd ask to have the custody eval thrown out and another done. Did you contact the atty whose name I gave you?

C

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 630
Yes I did... phone tag insued, differant plan of attack prevailed! We have an appointment set up for mediation (my attorney's last chance!). I have a 4 page outline of things in the report that are either flat lies or taken completely out of context. And that is off the top of my head! I am going to go to my Atty's office tomorrow to review the report again and take more notes. I also have a 4 page outline on why I believ that at this point joint custody would be best for the kids. I plan to confront WW and her counsel with this at the mediation in the hopes that they will see how WW's manufactured reality simply will not hold up under cross-examination. Besides, all I want is a small variance over what was recomended anyway. The report states that in every 14 day period I get 5 days and WW gets 9. I want 7 and 7 with exchanges taking place on Sunday evenings. Fair to all and much more stable than the current situation. I would hope that WW's atty would see this as a good thing and be able to convince WW of such. If, however, mediation fails... new attorney and BIG, EXPENSIVE trial! Oh, by the way... we both had to take the MMPI-2... the results of which where not available at the time the report was issued... P*SSED me off!!!! Why write the report then???????? AGGGHHHHHH....

Oh... and not only did the evaluator obviously not read the actual transcript.... SHE NEVER EVEN ASKED ME ABOUT IT!!!!! Basically, WW was allowed to present it and spin it however she wanted with no attempt to get the "rest of the story".... again, AGGGHHHHHHHH.......

<small>[ October 28, 2004, 03:50 PM: Message edited by: Want My Wife Back??? ]</small>

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,646
V
Member
Member
V Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,646
Uhmmmm ok. So, I'm wondering if perhaps you need to either not post or re-register with an entirely new login and member # since they've read and used your posts against you in the past?

You can also come over to SYMC if you think they might not find you there. But I'd be concerned about your W or her atty continuing to read here.

Good luck! Stay in touch.

C


Moderated by  Fordude 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Search
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,531 guests, and 94 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Zion9038xe, renki, Gocroswell, Allen Inverson, Logan bauer
72,026 Registered Users
Latest Posts
Help: I Don't Like Being Around My Wife
by rossini - 07/20/25 10:36 AM
How important is it to get the whole story?
by leemc - 07/18/25 10:58 AM
Following Ex-Wifes Nursing Schedule?
by Roger Beach - 07/16/25 04:21 AM
My wife wants a separation
by Roger Beach - 07/16/25 04:20 AM
Spying husband arrested
by coooper - 06/24/25 09:19 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics133,624
Posts2,323,520
Members72,026
Most Online6,102
Jul 3rd, 2025
Building Marriages That Last A Lifetime
Copyright © 2025, Marriage Builders, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site Navigation
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0