</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by devastatedhubby:
[QB] Little background here...
My wife has had a friendship that turned EA for the past couple of years... she told me at thanksgiving time she is wanting out... because she never really loved me and that God had told her to not marry me when she did... and she did anyway...[/b]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Then SHE defrauded you of all of the years you were married. You married her with the belief that she loved you, as you loved her; thus if she really didn't love you, then she was perpetrating fraud. You cannot be held responsible for not meeting the needs of one who is a con artist.
This is all BS, most likely, but it shows how easily the pitiful rationalizations of the WS can be thrown back on them.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">
The reason controlled separation was brought up by her counselor was that my wife asked about her options... stay together, separation, divorce...
and the counselor told her about that book... because if she was to choose separation... it is probably the best way to make it work and not drag out forever because it is based on a contract that you both work out... with a counselor...</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Ummm...how is this "contract" any better than the thousands of years old contract of marriage? Why will she hold to this contract yet not the one that all families and societies are based on?
