|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297 |
Yes, Mel, you did call my H and opened the door to more honesty in our M than had ever been. Never underestimate how grateful I am for that. I mean that. I was paralysed with fear at the time, although that is not how everyone saw it.
However, it works both ways. When I read your post on how dishonest you are about your family money, I wondered how your H would react to a similar phone call.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
Don't be an [censored] Jen.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
I presume you don't think the situations are in ANY way similar or as damaging?
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
However, it works both ways. When I read your post on how dishonest you are about your family money, I wondered how your H would react to a similar phone call. In fact I don't think I have ever read something so low in my time on this site. WOW I'm stunned.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
Adultery=Money issues. I guess that's the WW perspective.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,316
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,316 |
Seriously Kiwi...You thank ML in one breath and then threaten her in the next...over ENTIRELY different situations-How would that call go? Hello, um yes, Mr. Melody Lane? Your wife spent $110 on face cream <gasp> How would he ever recover from such a revelation? Please make sure you have the name of a counselor that they can use handy!!! Or maybe even call 911 so that he could be resussitated! lol
Interesting to see just what the perspective is from the bottom of a liquor bottle though...thanks for that! <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" />
Mrs. W
FWW ~ 47 ~ MeFBH ~ 50 ~ MrWonderingDD ~ 17 Dday ~ 2005 ~ Recovered
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297 |
LOL I am completely sober. (Cheap shot BTW Mrs W). I just recognise hypocrisy and dishonesty when I see it.
To me "family" means joint accounts, accountability on all spending etc etc. A joint account and trusting each other with money is what family is all about. "Family" is about not hiding things. When I spend $240 on a haircut and colour my H says "you spent WHAT" and then when he spends the same on some stereo equipment I say "you spent WHAT". It's companionable, it's silly, it's what makes a marriage work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,297 |
Never mind.
Of course I wouldn't make a phone call like that. It's none of my business. I was just making a point.
Last edited by KiwiJ; 01/09/07 07:07 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,150
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,150 |
The Policy of RADICAL HONESTY is all inclusive. It takes balls to own up to your spending with your hubby, especially when he sometimes disapproves. That's what Negotiating and POJA are for--helping come to a mutually satisfying, safe, and protective compromise so that both people can feel good about how the money is spent.
That's not to say or imply that Mel doesn't know this already or has not already addressed it with her hubby. I would assume she has, and only bring this up because it is the appropriate thing to know for people who are new to MB and learning MB Concepts.
This thread really went downhill.
The reason that MEDC's approach wouldn't have worked with me as the BS, is because I find it horrifically disrespectful for the FWS to decide what is or is not appropriate to my Recovery. FWSs have a track record of bad judgement (sorry!) and I would not be comfortable with mine telling me that something is not appropriate for me to know!! Excuse Me?? Why didn't you realize that it was inappropriate for you to do?
No. I will make the decisions for a while in early recovery. I'm not the one who ran the marriage into the ditch with my faulty judgement in the first place.
[color:"#39395A"]***Well, it's sort of hard to still wonder if you were consolation prize in the midst of being cherished.*** - Noodle[/color]
Devastation Day: Aug 26, 2004 [color:"#2964d8"]"I think we have come out on the other side... meaning that we love each other more than we ever did when we loved each other most." [/color] [color:"#7b9af7"] ~Archibald MacLeish[/color]
Very Happily Married Me FBS - 44 Him FWS - 51 I married him all over again, May 07
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 386
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 386 |
From Penalty Kill
This thread *has* run way downhill, and at this point I suspect the original poster is long gone.
I have to ask, why the personal attacks and alcoholic insinuations? Because of a difference of opinion? What's wrong with saying, "This was right for ME", and leaving it at that?
I don't see that MEDC is advocating dishonesty *anywhere*. Frankly, that is SO unlike MEDC, a straight-shooting poster whose 2x4s hit home to me in the early stages of recovery. I can still remember saying to my H, "Isn't this poster kind of harsh?" and his reply: "But that's how I FEEL!". Me: "Oooh".
And a small 25 watt lightbulb went on in my head.
And MEDC and 10Swords may not always agree, but I always look for their posts because I know they will have something valuable to say. One is in a recovered marriage, one not. That's just the way the cookie crumbles sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 113
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 113 |
Wow, this has really went off the deep end. I see where penaltybox is coming from and same with 10Swords. Myself as a BS, even though I have not got to the point to talking about the A, I don't need all the little details. Myself I am looking for just to close out the information and the whatifs in my head. Details for me are just going to cause me more pain and those details is something that will never be undone. I may change on this when I get to that point in discussing the A. Of course if my suspicions are of the sexual nature, I am going to ask if my WS had any sexual relations. I would have a right to know. I don't care how they did it, but where I do. Because if it was in my bed or on my couch or what ever, I want to get rid of that stuff quickly.
So what works for one person may not work for the next. The concept of honesty is what works for all of us.
I do think that we scared away the poster, but only time will tell. :-)
BS 31 (me)
FWW 31 (her)
M - 9.5 years
DD - 7
DD - 15 (step daughter)
DDay - 10/2003 EA
DDay - 10/2005 EA
DDay - 05/2006 EA, 1/10/2007 found out was PA, 1 sexual encounter
Trying to rebuild what I once had.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
However, it works both ways. When I read your post on how dishonest you are about your family money, I wondered how your H would react to a similar phone call. Oh please, Kiwi, this is just a shoddy, low attempt to change the subject. Why not have another drink? This thread has collapsed into complete, catty, vicious chaos and has sadly, become a waste of time.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
The Policy of RADICAL HONESTY is all inclusive. It takes balls to own up to your spending with your hubby, especially when he sometimes disapproves. That's what Negotiating and POJA are for--helping come to a mutually satisfying, safe, and protective compromise so that both people can feel good about how the money is spent.
That's not to say or imply that Mel doesn't know this already or has not already addressed it with her hubby. I would assume she has, and only bring this up because it is the appropriate thing to know for people who are new to MB and learning MB Concepts. 10Swords, this is being brought up in an attempt to change the subject and has nothing to do with the subject at hand. MEEEOOOWW. <img src="/ubbt/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> This will certainly teach me to never bring up any of my own marital issues here because someone with a resentment will only use it as a baseball bat in the future, not to help, but to punish. Very catty, 10Swords.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044 |
Everyone here knows I would not advocate dishonesty. Twisting Dr. Harley's appraoch around as Mel as done with Dr. Phils would go something like this. He advocates perpetuating another cruelty on the BS by allowing hurtful details that really serve no purpose to be discussed. The opposite of kindness is cruelty. That is every bit as ridiculous as what Mel has said regarding this. The fact is honesty is the cornerstone of both approaches. These personal attacks on Jen only because she stood up against Mel... (and yes... being dishonest about money when being so preachy about honesty is hypocritical) just shows the mentality of these boards. Perhaps discussing differing opinions are not welcome on your personal board Mel...but here they are. And your appraoch on this thread has not at all been reflective of the straight shooting, brash but caring person I have come to know on these boards. This is all sad indeed.
Last edited by mkeverydaycnt; 01/09/07 09:44 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044 |
10S... good morning. Just want to let you know... it is not my approach. This whole topic was brought up in an innocuous way and since then has been kept alive by those that have felt that there is but one way to do things. I have chosen to understand where others are coming from. I do believe that a BS should be able to ask certain questions. But I can understand how soemone with pure motives and honesty would not agree that is the best way to handle things. Basically that is what this entire argument comes down to for me. Dr. harley happens to be the biggest tree in the field...but his is not the only one that casts shade. And although more people can find comfort under this tree than some of the others... look closely and you will notice that there are others perched under some other trees enjoying the shade. So, my point is, knowledge is a good thing. It helps to understand where others are coming from and not always assign sinister motives to their ideas.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
MEDC, no one twisted your words, only posted your quotes from Dr. Phil where he DOES advocate dishonesty. You offered this as "another approach." It was challenged and soundly demolished, which has you reduced to making personal attacks since you can't defend the "alternative approach" that you posted.
You cannot expect to offer "alternative approaches" and not have them challenged. Sorry, not even Dr. Harley is above reproach.
Unfortunately, you have tried to turn any challenge, or even honest discussion, of your beloved Dr. Phil into a personal attack on any who questioned his wisdom. That says more about you than it does the challenger.
This thread has degenerated into malicious personal attacks because you can't just stick to the facts, MEDC; you have to turn everything into a personal atttack to divert from the issue at hand. That is a cheap debate tactic that is utilized that those that can't defend their case. THAT is what is disappointing......and obvious.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,044 |
Mel... I see a good night s sleep has done nothing for your mood. In fact it is your words that have been shown to be false and hypocritical. Your position has in fact been demolished. And Dr. Phil is not beloved to me... but I am also not a groupie for Dr. H that thinks that just because he says something that it is true... the truth stands no matter who says it... but your own words show that you do not believe it to be true. That the person speaking and not the truth is what counts most. You have become so enamoured with your bully tactics that you can't stand anyone questioning you or challenging your views. I have not in anyway challenged Dr. H here and have repeatedly said I agree with his approach. All I have said is that I understand other approaches and that does not fit into your 2 gallon hat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92,985 Likes: 1 |
I rest my case. Mel: This thread has degenerated into malicious personal attacks because you can't just stick to the facts, MEDC; you have to turn everything into a personal atttack to divert from the issue at hand. That is a cheap debate tactic that is utilized that those that can't defend their case. THAT is what is disappointing......and obvious.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.." Theodore Roosevelt Exposure 101
|
|
|
0 members (),
465
guests, and
97
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,623
Posts2,323,505
Members71,979
|
Most Online3,224 May 9th, 2025
|
|
|
|