|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069 |
Charles and Camilla ... well, ya'll can read for yourselves. CLICK HERE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,069
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,069 |
LOL, what is the old saying? When an affair partner marries the MM, she creates a job opening (for new affair partner).
Their marriage was built on the sorrow of many other people. Sounds like they won't be part of the less than 3% that make it 5 years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
What a shame.
NOT
That pair deserve each other and whatever misery that brings.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 665
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 665 |
Nasty homewrecking heifer!!
BS(me) 40 WH 40 D-day 10/03/2007 ***Recovering and growing wiser and stronger.*** I was divorced 10/08/2008.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023 |
Not that Charles was any saint.
Married 1976 Me:BS Him:FWS MB Weekend March 2003 2 S's: '77 & '80, 1 D: '82
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069 |
LOL, what is the old saying? When an affair partner marries the MM, she creates a job opening (for new affair partner).
Their marriage was built on the sorrow of many other people. Sounds like they won't be part of the less than 3% that make it 5 years. So many on both sides were hurt by these two. Now predictably, their adultery-based marriage is failing. And I'm sure they still don't GET IT.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310 |
OMG, I can't get pass snickering over that "PURPLE OUTFIT"...GAG..
I made it happen..a joyful life..filled with peace, contentment, happiness and fabulocity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310 |
Nasty homewrecking heifer!! This is HILARIOUS!! This should win A MB PRIZE for OW descriptor!! 
I made it happen..a joyful life..filled with peace, contentment, happiness and fabulocity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,150
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,150 |
Should we create a new acronym?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774 |
I just don't freakin get it...
Diana, God rest her soul, was so beautiful. And so kind hearted. Maybe a few french fries short of a happy meal at times... but come on, Camilla? There's no comparison! Charles, wtf?!
*shaking head in disbelief*
mlhb
God first, family second, and all else will fall into place.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 335
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 335 |
It is a huge mistake to believe that anything published in the Daily Mail is the literal truth.
It's also a huge mistake to compare the lives of these people, who were manipulated into marriages that were essentially business transactions, to our own lives and our own relationships.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310 |
It is a huge mistake to believe that anything published in the Daily Mail is the literal truth.
It's also a huge mistake to compare the lives of these people, who were manipulated into marriages that were essentially business transactions, to our own lives and our own relationships. BUT IT'S FUN!! Who says WE weren't manipulated into marriages..business transactions... I COULD be a FAMOUS PERSON... Well, I actually AM a FAMOUS PERSON to MY CHILDREN, at least... Really..JUST KIDDING..don't take me SERIOUS today...
I made it happen..a joyful life..filled with peace, contentment, happiness and fabulocity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
It's also a huge mistake to compare the lives of these people, who were manipulated into marriages that were essentially business transactions, to our own lives and our own relationships. Indeed. I'm sure he lay back and thought of England. Really it's no wonder none of them have any balls when they allow themselves to be railroaded into marrying. Doesn't absolve them of responsibility for their actions though.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,069 |
I will never believe that title, fame, wealth or stature is an excuse for poor moral behavior (adultery). Nor are they exempt from the consequences, as we see here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310 |
I will never believe that title, fame, wealth or stature is an excuse for poor moral behavior (adultery). Nor are they exempt from the consequences, as we see here. AGREED!!
I made it happen..a joyful life..filled with peace, contentment, happiness and fabulocity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,316
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,316 |
It's also a huge mistake to compare the lives of these people, who were manipulated into marriages that were essentially business transactions, to our own lives and our own relationships. Makes NO difference whatsoever...Adultery is adultery...Wrong is ALWAYS wrong...There is NO gray area there...NONE... Mrs. W
FWW ~ 47 ~ MeFBH ~ 50 ~ MrWonderingDD ~ 17 Dday ~ 2005 ~ Recovered
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,310 |
And they put themselves out there in public view, for the WORLD to see, it's PART of their JOB.
They SHOULD be providing a good MORAL example rather than maintaining that sick, dysfunctional legacy...
Henry VIII is his great, great, great, great or something grandfather, correct?
I made it happen..a joyful life..filled with peace, contentment, happiness and fabulocity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,774 |
Henry the VIII is actually not a direct bloodline to the current royal family. His line ended when Elizbeth died since none of his children had children. BUT, it is well believed that he fathered Mary Boleyn's 2 children that she had at court while his mistress (you know, Anne's sister). In that case, Elizabeth the 2nd, the current queen, would be a descendant of Elizabeth the 1st. Mary's 2 children she had at court both married and had bushels of kids! There, now you all know I have a nerdy side that LOVES history. Yes, I do watch the History channel too... As far as Charles and Diana... Well, we are not in ancient times any longer. Marriages are not arranged anymore like they used to be. As long as they are not marrying a commoner, it is all good. Diana came from an acceptable family and was a virgin at marriage. They weren't arranged. Although I believe Charles did have some pressure on him to get married. He is, after all, next in line to the throne and needed some sons. Camilla, even if she had been divorced at that time, would not have fit the bill. I always liked Andrew. He was the best looking of all of them.  mlhb
God first, family second, and all else will fall into place.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,464 |
I guess that would depend on your definition of arranged.
Andrew - the playboy prince. That would have been a worse disaster than Charles.
Me: 56 (FBS) Wife: 55 (FWW) D-Day August 2005 Married 11/1982 3 Sons 27,25,23 Empty Nesters. Fully Recovered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 812
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 812 |
Hasn't it been pretty well documented that Charles and Diana both cheated?? Pretty bad all the way around!
|
|
|
0 members (),
626
guests, and
35
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,621
Posts2,323,489
Members71,946
|
Most Online3,185 Jan 27th, 2020
|
|
|
|