|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,698 |
how do you install a keylogger when your antivirus software keeps catching it and stopping it from running, and you dont actually know how to stop the AVS from doing it??
Recovered marriage, recovering self, life gets better everyday
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,880 |
how do you install a keylogger when your antivirus software keeps catching it and stopping it from running, and you dont actually know how to stop the AVS from doing it?? My first thought was to uninstall the AV software, but most AV software I've dealt with could be adjusted to ignore specific programs. That, or bash the computer in with a ball-peen hammer. Either way works.
Divorced
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 166
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 166 |
My first thought was to uninstall the AV software, but most AV software I've dealt with could be adjusted to ignore specific programs.
That, or bash the computer in with a ball-peen hammer. Either way works. You have to install the keylogger then run a manual scan using your AV software. When the keylogger comes up, tell AV to ignore the software and let it run. It shouldn't detect it again.
BH - me - 29 WW - 28 Married 07/2001 D-Day #2 - 03/01/2008 03/22/2008 - NC Established 05/??/2008 - NC Broken (I think) 07/01/2008 - WW 'Unsure of what she wants to do'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,698 |
good old nortons will let me download the software but i cant install it. Am running the manual check now anyway, but really i am not all that clever 
Recovered marriage, recovering self, life gets better everyday
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 166
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 166 |
good old nortons will let me download the software but i cant install it. Am running the manual check now anyway, but really i am not all that clever  Disable Norton before you install it. wrong-click (right-click) on the little shield and select disable. Install the software. Re-enable the AV, then run a manual scan. Select ignore when it finds the software.
BH - me - 29 WW - 28 Married 07/2001 D-Day #2 - 03/01/2008 03/22/2008 - NC Established 05/??/2008 - NC Broken (I think) 07/01/2008 - WW 'Unsure of what she wants to do'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,698 |
sorry. not a sheild, just a yellow circle with a green dot on it. I forgot to mention it is called nortons go back, dont know if that makes i difference. When i right click it just wants to change notification status or open the web thing anyway, i am TJing so i'll back out now thanks for your help
Recovered marriage, recovering self, life gets better everyday
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,093
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,093 |
I see spying as one thing - watchful waiting.
Actively setting up a trap where there is NO other man, pretending to be him, sending a false email, etc., that is something else.
The law looks at it differently too. "Entrapment" is not allowed under the law.
But we sure as heck can have security cameras.
That's kind of how I see it. I know the analogy is not perfect, and that there are legal technicalities involved in the examples, and that will likely be bandied about. But it is kind of how I look at it.
I just have my own boundaries. I would check the emails my FWH sends and receives. I watch those phone calls. (I haven't installed a keylogger, but if I were that suspicious, I might have).
I just thought about the email thing, and when I thought it all the way through, didn't make sense, and didn't sound right. Just sounded unfair, and overboard. If I'm that suspicious, then I need to go back to square one and figure out what might really be happening. Do some more work that I probably need to do anyway.
SB
Lucky to be where I am, in a safe place to get marriage-related support. Recovered. Happy. Most recent D-day Fall 2005 Our new marriage began that day. Not easily, but it did happen.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,621 |
SB,
Your analysis of entrapment is outstanding. No good comes from it. Not in real life.
I am usually rather pragmatic, and I don’t mind testing students’ or associates’ knowledge. Especially if I may have to rely on that knowledge.
But testing ethics is fundamentally unethical, contradictory and ill advised. Not to mention useless and counterproductive.
Test knowledge and understanding. May even test behavior. But, not ethics or morals.
So, give FWW HNHN or BRF and discuss them together. That will be productive and will tell you much more about what you want/need to know.
With prayers,
"Never forget that your pain means nothing to a WS." ~Mulan
"An ethical man knows it is wrong to cheat on his wife. A moral man will not actually do it." ~ Ducky
WS: They are who they are.
When an eel lunges out And it bites off your snout Thats a moray ~DS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 812
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 812 |
Mr S,
I came very close to doing what you proposed.
Here's how I talked myself out of it. Many thoughts on the idea.
Let's say you create the email account and send the email.
Possible scenarios:
A. She has been in contact already via email, and this "new" email comes from out of the blue, from some strange email address and has this bizarre message in it. It is supposedly from the OM, but since she is already in contact with the OM, then WTH? She is immediately suspicious of the email, and realizes it is a trap from you. She tells you about the "attempted contact", you are reassured, FALSELY. She tells OM that you are suspicious, they take their renewed contact futher underground, and the affair is much more difficult to expose or discover. But you believe everything is okay, because she has told you about the attempted contact, AND, YOU FEEL GUILTY ABOUT YOUR STUPID AND DEVIOUS PLOT, AND ABOUT LYING TO HER ABOUT THE EMAIL. Ultimately, you would probably end up confessing about the email to her anyway.
B. She hasn't been in contact with OM. But she knows his email address. You make this one up, send the email, now she has this strange one. She's not sure what's happening, doesn't want to arouse you, not sure what to do, as she didn't start this. She doesn't even want to start it up again. It is NOT a familiar account, and she knows that she has nothing to worry about - because she has a very clean record regarding no contact. She decides it is not from the OM, couldn't be, because she knows his address and that is NOT IT. She deletes it, not even sure if it IS the OM at all, because she deletes it without even being sure that it was a renewed attempt at contact - because after all, she says to herself, it actually could have been someone fishing, it could have been spam, it could have been anything. Her reasoning is all over the place, but because she is NOT GUILTY, she believes that there is no contact in place and no reason to stir this pot. If it was just question marks, or an unclear message, there wouldn't really be anything to tell you about, and if you have her email passwords anyway, then you had every opportunity to look and see it yourself. The delete button it is, and "gone".
C. She sees it, tells you, and gives you a printout. You feel like a complete idiot. Then, out of guilt and shame, you tell her what you did. As a result, you are left trying to explain why you are acting like this, trying to trap her, lying to her, trying to set her up, lovebusting, and not even giving her the respect of recognizing the good things she is doing to try to repair the marriage (which you do admit she is doing).
D. She sees it, tells you, and gives you a printout. You feel like a complete idiot. But you don't tell her, because you think that it will cause problems. You go on in your marriage with this very disrespectful lie underlying your interactions, and that underpins many of your interactions. The shame you feel results in creating distance between the two of you, and she doesn't even know why - and she is working really hard to get closer to you. Not a real great way to build a healthy marriage, ya' think?
E. You send it, she responds, and you "catch" her "in contact" with the "OM". Now what?????? You have backed yourself into a corner! You have to expose your own lie and deceit in order to show her that you caught her. She could easily say to you:
I KNEW IT WAS YOU TRYING TO TRAP ME!
And how could you prove otherwise?
So, when I thought it through to the end, I realized that none of the outcomes was very good. There weren't any pots of gold at the end of those rainbows.
If you want to know if she is in contact, install a keylogger. Follow her. Get a voice activated recorder. Check her cell phone records. Track her emails. Hire a PI.
Don't stoop to being a liar or deceiver yourself. It will backfire.
SB Excellent post! I think Schoolbus gave you quite a thorough list of crappy possibilities. The only one I would add is the one I already mentioned, that you could tempt a recovering WW to actually contact OM again, after months of NC. The entrapment really is a lose/lose all the way around!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 64
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 64 |
So let's see, so far i believe we have the following consensus.
For (or at least Not Against): Krazy71
Against: bigkahuna Resonance hicktownmommy keepitreal MrWondering MelodyLane schoolbus Aphelion
Unknown: lildoggie NotReallyOK
So that's 8 against and 1 "not against" (with 2 unknown)
Seems pretty clear that this is a bad idea as far as most are concerned.
Thanks everyone, I really do appreciate your input.
Sincerely, ~MrStrype
Me: BH, 43 Her: FWW, 38 Married: Feb 29, 1996 Children: 2 Boys-11 & 14 EA started: sometime in 2006? PA started: 08/21/07 D-Day: 10/24/07 No Contact initiated: 10/24/07 OM: My "ex-best friend" of over 20 years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,058
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,058 |
|
|
|
Forums67
Topics133,623
Posts2,323,501
Members71,974
|
Most Online3,224 May 9th, 2025
|
|
|
|