You know, what I don't get is why someone so disdainful of Christians comes to a Christian website to post anti-Christian rhetoric. There are only about a hundred thousand other places you could go share your beliefs; why choose here?

Well, I guess when it comes right down to it, I'm more tolerant than you are.

Sure they have their beliefs and they actually have their reasons for mandatory abortions. Doesn't mean I have to agree with them, just like you don't have to agree with mine.

And these "choices" oppose my belief that the mother should have freedom of control over her own body. As it is, the gov't is treating her like a 2nd rate broodmare strain that needs culling. I don't agree with this. That is what pro-choice is about.

I'm going to ignore the next 5 or so pages (probably more since I began typing this) as you guys are just exchanging insults and the thread will get locked anyway. Again it's too bad. The topic could have been a good one but if you just want to insult people rather than exchange ideas about what all sides have in common then that's what happens. I don't agree with Krazy's approach but I do understand where he's coming from.

I do not believe that transplants are possible once the mother has conceived in the womb. As too religious objections, it would depend on the religion.

there are things more important than our constitution. I also think that we are obligated to oppose unjust rule and laws. That is why this country was formed in the first place.

Iam, check this out: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4326505.html

I don't know much about it myself, though I have heard of it used in broodmares (top quality racing mares that had problems carrying their fetuses to term, so they transplant the embryos into another mare - not sure if the jockey club actually allows it or not but probably the resulting offspring can then become breeding stock).

Enough with the personal attacks! This thread is now locked.